• Forums
  • Best Betting Sites
  • Sportsbook Promos
  • Best Sports Betting Apps
  • NFL Betting Forum
  • NBA Betting Forum
  • MLB Betting Forum
  • NHL Betting Forum
  • NCAAF Betting Forum
  • NCAAB Betting Forum
  • Soccer Betting Forum
  • Tennis Betting Forum
  • General Discussion
  • Help Forum
  • Guidelines
  • FAQ
  • Forum Updates
    Covers Logo
    Covers App
    Faster picks. Smarter bets.
    All in the NEW Covers App
    Download on the App Store Download on the Google Play Store
    • Sports
      • NFL
        • Back
        • NFL
        • NFL Home
        • Scores & Matchups
        • Prop Projections
        • NFL Picks
        • NFL Prediction Prices
        • Weather
        • Injuries
      • NCAAF
        • Back
        • NCAAF
        • NCAAF Home
        • Scores & Matchups
        • Prop Projections
        • NCAAF Picks
        • Weather
        • Injuries
      • NBA
        • Back
        • NBA
        • NBA Home
        • Scores & Matchups
        • Prop Projections
        • NBA Picks
        • Injuries
      • NCAAB
        • Back
        • NCAAB
        • NCAAB Home
        • Scores & Matchups
        • NCAAB Picks
        • Injuries
      • MLB
        • Back
        • MLB
        • MLB Home
        • Scores & Matchups
        • Prop Projections
        • MLB Picks
        • Weather
        • Injuries
      • NHL
        • Back
        • NHL
        • NHL Home
        • Scores & Matchups
        • Prop Projections
        • NHL Picks
        • Injuries
      • Soccer
      • UFC
      • WNBA
        • Back
        • WNBA
        • WNBA Home
        • Scores & Matchups
        • WNBA Picks
        • Injuries
      • CFL
        • Back
        • CFL
        • CFL Home
        • Scores & Matchups
        • CFL Picks
      • Golf
        • Back
        • Golf
        • Golf Home
        • Golf Odds
        • Masters Odds
        • PGA Championship Odds
        • US Open Odds
        • British Open Odds
        • Ryder Cup Odds
        • Golf Picks
    • Odds
      • All Odds
      • NFL
      • NCAAF
      • NBA
      • NCAAB
      • MLB
      • NHL
      • Golf
      • Soccer Odds
        • Back
        • Soccer Odds
        • MLS Odds
        • Champions League Odds
        • Premier League Odds
      • UFC
      • WNBA
      • CFL
      • Election Odds
      • Futures
        • Back
        • Futures
        • NFL
        • NBA
        • MLB
        • NHL
        • NCAAB
        • NCAAF
      • Sports Odds History
      • Politics
        • Back
        • Politics
        • Politics Home
        • Presidential Election Odds
        • Midterm Election Odds
        • House Midterm Odds
        • Senate Midterm Odds
        • Texas Midterm Odds
        • Michigan Midterm Odds
    • Picks
      • All Picks
      • NFL
      • NBA
      • NHL
      • MLB
      • NCAAF
      • NCAAB
      • Golf
      • WNBA
      • CFL
      • User Picks
      • Team User Picks
      • Consensus Picks
        • Back
        • Consensus Picks
        • All Consensus Picks
        • NFL
        • NBA
        • NHL
        • MLB
        • NCAAF
        • NCAAB
        • CFL
        • WNBA
        • Consensus FAQ
        • Public Money
    • Prop Projections
      • NFL
      • NBA
      • MLB
      • NHL
    • Betting
      • US Betting Sites
      • Canada Betting Sites
      • Sportsbook Reviews
      • States
        • Back
        • States
        • US Legal Tracker
        • Revenue Tracker
        • Arizona
        • Arkansas
        • California
        • Colorado
        • Connecticut
        • DC
        • Florida
        • Georgia
        • Illinois
        • Indiana
        • Iowa
        • Kansas
        • Kentucky
        • Louisiana
        • Maine
        • Maryland
        • Massachusetts
        • Michigan
        • Mississippi
        • Missouri
        • Nevada
        • New Hampshire
        • New Jersey
        • New York
        • North Carolina
        • Ohio
        • Oregon
        • Pennsylvania
        • Tennessee
        • Texas
        • Vermont
        • Virginia
        • West Virginia
        • Wyoming
      • Provinces
        • Back
        • Provinces
        • Alberta
        • British Columbia
        • Manitoba
        • New Brunswick
        • Newfoundland and Labrador
        • Northwest Territories
        • Nova Scotia
        • Nunavut
        • Ontario
        • Prince Edward Island
        • Quebec (English)
        • Quebec (francais)
        • Saskatchewan
        • Yukon
      • By Sport
        • Back
        • By Sport
        • Baseball
        • Basketball
        • Boxing
        • College Football
        • F1
        • Football
        • Super Bowl
        • Golf
        • Hockey
        • Horse Racing
        • March Madness
        • Soccer
        • UFC
        • World Cup
      • Betting Apps
        • Back
        • Betting Apps
        • Best Sports Betting Apps USA
        • Ontario Sports Betting Apps
      • Rest of World
        • Back
        • Rest of World
        • UK Betting Offers
          • Back
          • UK Betting Offers
          • UK Betting Sites
          • bet365 Bonus Code UK
          • 888Sport Promo Code UK
          • William Hill Sign up Offer
          • Betway Sign up Offer
          • BetVictor Bonus Code UK
      • Betting Guides
        • Back
        • Betting Guides
        • All Guides
        • Glossary
        • Betting Calculators
          • Back
          • Betting Calculators
          • Odds Converter
          • Parlay Calculator
        • Futures Betting Guide
        • Moneyline Betting Guide
        • Over/Under Betting Guide
        • Parlay Betting Guide
        • Point Spread Betting Guide
        • Prop Betting Guide
        • Sports Betting Guides
          • Back
          • Sports Betting Guides
          • How To Bet On Sports Guide
          • NFL Betting Guide
          • NHL Betting Guide
          • NBA Betting Guide
          • MLB Betting Guide
          • NCAAB Betting Guide
          • NCAAF Betting Guide
          • Golf Betting Guide
          • Tennis Betting Guide
        • Teaser Betting Guide
      • Betting News
        • Back
        • Betting News
        • All News
        • Industry News
        • Podcasts
        • Covers Videos
        • Covers Writers
        • Offers & Boosts
    • Promos
      • Sportsbook Promos
      • Canada Sportsbook Promos
      • Bonuses By Sportsbook
        • Back
        • Bonuses By Sportsbook
        • bet365 Bonus Code
        • BET99 Promo Code
        • BetMGM Bonus Code
        • BetRivers Bonus Code
        • Caesars Sportsbook Promo
        • DraftKings Promo Code
        • Fanatics Sportsbook Promo
        • FanDuel Promo Code
        • Hard Rock Bet Promo Code
        • Sports Interaction Promo
        • Stake Promo Code
        • theScore Bet Promo Code
        • TonyBet Promo Code
      • Bonuses By Region
        • Back
        • Bonuses By Region
        • Arkansas Promos
        • Arizona Promos
        • Colorado Promos
        • Connecticut Promos
        • DC Promos
        • Illinois Promos
        • Indiana Promos
        • Iowa Promos
        • Kansas Promos
        • Kentucky Promos
        • Louisiana Promos
        • Maine Promos
        • Maryland Promos
        • Massachusetts Promos
        • Michigan Promos
        • Missouri Promos
        • New Jersey Promos
        • New York Promos
        • North Carolina Promos
        • Ohio Promos
        • Pennsylvania Promos
        • Tennessee Promos
        • Vermont Promos
        • Virginia Promos
        • West Virginia Promos
        • Wyoming Promos
    • Forum & Contests
      • All Forums
      • NFL Betting Forum
      • MLB Betting Forum
      • NCAAB Betting Forum
      • NCAAF Betting Forum
      • NBA Betting Forum
      • NHL Betting Forum
      • Soccer Betting Forum
      • Contests
        • Back
        • Contests
        • Contests Home
        • Streak Survivor
        • King of Covers
        • My Contests
    • Casino
      • Sweepstakes Casino
        • Back
        • Sweepstakes Casino
        • Sweepstakes Casino
        • Sweepstakes No-Deposit Bonuses
        • Sweepstakes Promos
          • Back
          • Sweepstakes Promos
          • Card Crush
          • Casino.click
          • Chanced Casino
          • Crown Coins Casino
          • FreeSpin Casino
          • LoneStar
          • McLuck
          • Mega Bonanza Casino
          • PlayFame
          • Pulsz
          • Stake.us
      • US Casinos
        • Back
        • US Casinos
        • US Online Casinos
        • US Online Casino Bonuses
        • Casino Promos
          • Back
          • Casino Promos
          • bet365 Casino Promo Code
          • BetRivers Casino Promo
          • Borgata Casino Bonus Code
          • Caesars Casino Bonus Code
          • DraftKings Casino Promo
          • Fanatics Casino Promo
          • FanDuel Casino Promo Code
          • Golden Nugget Casino Promo
          • Hard Rock Bet Casino Promo
          • Hollywood Casino Promo Code
      • Canada Casinos
        • Back
        • Canada Casinos
        • Canada Online Casinos
        • Provinces
          • Back
          • Provinces
          • Alberta Online Casino
          • BC Online Casino
          • Ontario Online Casinos
        • Casino Promos
          • Back
          • Casino Promos
          • BC.GAME Bonus Code
          • Cloudbet Promo Code
          • RainBet Promo Code
          • Roobet Promo Code
          • Shuffle Promo Code
          • Thrill Promo Code
    • Prediction Markets
      • Prediction Markets
      • Prediction Market Apps
      • Prediction Market Promos
      • Kalshi Promo Code
      • Kalshi Referral Code
      • Polymarket Promo Code
      • Polymarket Referral Code
      • DraftKings Predictions Promo Code
      • Novig Promo Code
      • ProphetX Promo Code
      • Underdog Promo Code
      • Betr Promo Code
      • OG Promo Code
      • Fanatics Markets Promo Code
      • Plus500 Promo Code
      • Gemini Predictions Promo Code
    • NFL Week 7
      NFL Week 7
      • NFL Odds
      • NFL Picks
      • Patriots-Bears Picks
      • NFL ATS Picks
      • Survivor Picks
      • NFL Prediction Markets
      • NFL Betting Sites
    Covers Account
    Log in Create account
    Join free Log in
    All Forums | Boxing

    Sweet Science Action this week (WNF, FNF, Briggs-Iggy)

    12345 Next Last»
    Fullbrights
    bigeiii
    BOXEO
    MMACapper
    Participants:
    Search
    Views: 3243
    Posts: 104
    12345 Next Last»
     
    Fullbrights
    Fullbrights
    Veteran
    Participation Meter
    Joined: Feb, 2006
    Posts: 4377
    Posted: May. 30, 2007 - 6:25 PM ET #1

    I will be back later when I have some time, but wanted to go ahead and post a play for tonight's card.

    .5 of a unit on De Jesus (+225) vs Ramirez

    Reply
    To remove first post, remove entire topic.
    I will be back later when I have some time, but wanted to go ahead and post a play for tonight's card.

    .5 of a unit on De Jesus (+225) vs Ramirez

     
    bigeiii
    bigeiii
    Captain
    Participation Meter
    Joined: Jan, 2003
    Posts: 5870
    Posted: May. 30, 2007 - 10:04 PM ET #2

    I'm on the same side Fullbrights.
    Also threw in Calloway, the Butler, & Cally Brock, w/ the Spurs.

    Though be real clear; I'm dubious of the potential for a home-town, sympathy based Decision here; so I played that in a 2nd Parlay as well. Lopez needs to bring this one to a full Stop. & did you notice where the O/U & the ITD line opened??? I don't know if that was a typo, or maybe some1 totally crushed the UP right after it came out. But these 2 lines were in oppostion to one another when I 1st saw them early this afternoon. Pretty odd sight to see.

    GLA!
    bigeiii
    Reply
    I'm on the same side Fullbrights.
    Also threw in Calloway, the Butler, & Cally Brock, w/ the Spurs.

    Though be real clear; I'm dubious of the potential for a home-town, sympathy based Decision here; so I played that in a 2nd Parlay as well. Lopez needs to bring this one to a full Stop. & did you notice where the O/U & the ITD line opened??? I don't know if that was a typo, or maybe some1 totally crushed the UP right after it came out. But these 2 lines were in oppostion to one another when I 1st saw them early this afternoon. Pretty odd sight to see.

    GLA!
    bigeiii
     
    Fullbrights
    Fullbrights
    Veteran
    Participation Meter
    Joined: Feb, 2006
    Posts: 4377
    Posted: May. 30, 2007 - 10:32 PM ET #3

    Get the Red Sox game out of here and bring on the fights.


    I also played....

    .60 of a unit on De Jesus Points Handicap +17.5 (-115)
    Reply
    Get the Red Sox game out of here and bring on the fights.


    I also played....

    .60 of a unit on De Jesus Points Handicap +17.5 (-115)
     
    Fullbrights
    Fullbrights
    Veteran
    Participation Meter
    Joined: Feb, 2006
    Posts: 4377
    Posted: May. 30, 2007 - 10:33 PM ET #4

    Quote Originally Posted by Fullbrights:

    Get the Red Sox game out of here and bring on the fights.


    I also played....

    .60 of a unit on De Jesus Points Handicap +17.5 (-115)



    This was to compensate for the sympathy based decision that you mentioned.
    Reply
    Quote Originally Posted by Fullbrights:

    Get the Red Sox game out of here and bring on the fights.


    I also played....

    .60 of a unit on De Jesus Points Handicap +17.5 (-115)



    This was to compensate for the sympathy based decision that you mentioned.
     
    bigeiii
    bigeiii
    Captain
    Participation Meter
    Joined: Jan, 2003
    Posts: 5870
    Posted: May. 30, 2007 - 11:43 PM ET #5

    Lopez means De Jesus. Looking at too many open windows 2nite----->bigeiii
    My bad, I appologize.

    I took that Point Spread as well Fbs.

    Calloway was much better than I expected. Why? B/c several books had this listed as a Heavyweight fight. So I thought, (incorrectly) that was the contested Weight-Class. I'd possibly gone a little heavier if I had know this was a Cruiserweight. Cruiser is where Calloway belongs. 210 to 215 was too inflated for RC. RC is prolly not a Champion at Cruiser, but he's a lot closer at Cruiser than he is giving up 30-50lbs. at Heavy. RC worked some fairly nice old-school 1-2's upstairs 2nite. You don't see a lot of that any more. Very very simple, but effective. Pure heavy-bag stuff.

    GLA!
    bigeiii
    Reply
    Lopez means De Jesus. Looking at too many open windows 2nite----->bigeiii
    My bad, I appologize.

    I took that Point Spread as well Fbs.

    Calloway was much better than I expected. Why? B/c several books had this listed as a Heavyweight fight. So I thought, (incorrectly) that was the contested Weight-Class. I'd possibly gone a little heavier if I had know this was a Cruiserweight. Cruiser is where Calloway belongs. 210 to 215 was too inflated for RC. RC is prolly not a Champion at Cruiser, but he's a lot closer at Cruiser than he is giving up 30-50lbs. at Heavy. RC worked some fairly nice old-school 1-2's upstairs 2nite. You don't see a lot of that any more. Very very simple, but effective. Pure heavy-bag stuff.

    GLA!
    bigeiii
     
    bigeiii
    bigeiii
    Captain
    Participation Meter
    Joined: Jan, 2003
    Posts: 5870
    Posted: May. 31, 2007 - 1:35 AM ET #6

    Ramirez+237 by Decision covered my 2 other outcome units, that went the wrong way A.

    Those 7 point scorecards are really only 9-3 cards. But even that I did not quite see. I had it 6-6, a Draw, but the point deduction gives Marco the win. I really did not favor that deduction, it was just a little bit home-town'ish to me. A few warrings? "Yes." But I'd rather not take a point away in what looked like a close fight. Let the fighters decide that. Though on the official score-cards, it did not matter 1 iota. 7-5 either way, or even 8-4 seems ok by me. Witness the kla-assic argument for which side do you tend to favor? A good deal harder, though hitting less often fighter; vs. a hitting more often, but w/ less authority boxer. I don't see a sure-fire rule-of-thumb to arbitrate those 2 opposing schools of thought. So I'll listen to either one.

    Ramirez buzzed De Jesus 2 to 4 times. But ADJ had 4 to 5 cleanly out-pointed, & therefore, winning rounds as well. Tough one to call.

    I'll have more later in the week. ShoBox has me a bit riddled at the moment. But I do know that you see the Heavyweight Champ as the u.dog; how often? What......5% of the time? How about the Heavyweight Champ, who just so happens to have the Voltage edge as the u.dog;  how often do you see that? & man does the new Sho.com website pale in comparrison to the old one. The old one really had a metric ton of quality Boxing 411 to it.

    GLA!
    bigeiii
    Reply
    Ramirez+237 by Decision covered my 2 other outcome units, that went the wrong way A.

    Those 7 point scorecards are really only 9-3 cards. But even that I did not quite see. I had it 6-6, a Draw, but the point deduction gives Marco the win. I really did not favor that deduction, it was just a little bit home-town'ish to me. A few warrings? "Yes." But I'd rather not take a point away in what looked like a close fight. Let the fighters decide that. Though on the official score-cards, it did not matter 1 iota. 7-5 either way, or even 8-4 seems ok by me. Witness the kla-assic argument for which side do you tend to favor? A good deal harder, though hitting less often fighter; vs. a hitting more often, but w/ less authority boxer. I don't see a sure-fire rule-of-thumb to arbitrate those 2 opposing schools of thought. So I'll listen to either one.

    Ramirez buzzed De Jesus 2 to 4 times. But ADJ had 4 to 5 cleanly out-pointed, & therefore, winning rounds as well. Tough one to call.

    I'll have more later in the week. ShoBox has me a bit riddled at the moment. But I do know that you see the Heavyweight Champ as the u.dog; how often? What......5% of the time? How about the Heavyweight Champ, who just so happens to have the Voltage edge as the u.dog;  how often do you see that? & man does the new Sho.com website pale in comparrison to the old one. The old one really had a metric ton of quality Boxing 411 to it.

    GLA!
    bigeiii
     
    Fullbrights
    Fullbrights
    Veteran
    Participation Meter
    Joined: Feb, 2006
    Posts: 4377
    Posted: May. 31, 2007 - 1:53 AM ET #7

    .5 of a unit on De Jesus (+225) vs Ramirez 
    .60 of a unit on De Jesus Points Handicap +17.5 (-115)


    I must say I knew that we were about to see a far too wide decision before it was even announced.  I called up one of my buddies who was watching this fight and said, "watch this crap, 117-110 across the board."  I had De Jesus winning 114-113 and I wouldn't have complained if Ramirez got a close split nod, but those scores were Midwestern hometown judging at it's finest.  The midwest has not been kind to me in 2007, two mooses in Oklahoma and now this in Missouri.

    Rest of the week.....

    1.25 units on over 8.5 rounds (-125) in Camarena-Bradley
    .50 of a unit on under 9.5 rounds (+110) in Perez-Ortiz
    .50 of a unit on Marquez (+325) vs Hernandez

    Parlay: .25 of a unit to win 1.06
    Over 9.5 in Tackie-Hernandez (-340)
    Over 9.5 in Marquez-Hernandez (-270)
    Over 9.5 in Kono-Saegusa (-320)
    Perez (+125) vs Ortiz


    I will probably also look at betting Bradley by decision and Alvarez by decision.

    Reply
    .5 of a unit on De Jesus (+225) vs Ramirez 
    .60 of a unit on De Jesus Points Handicap +17.5 (-115)


    I must say I knew that we were about to see a far too wide decision before it was even announced.  I called up one of my buddies who was watching this fight and said, "watch this crap, 117-110 across the board."  I had De Jesus winning 114-113 and I wouldn't have complained if Ramirez got a close split nod, but those scores were Midwestern hometown judging at it's finest.  The midwest has not been kind to me in 2007, two mooses in Oklahoma and now this in Missouri.

    Rest of the week.....

    1.25 units on over 8.5 rounds (-125) in Camarena-Bradley
    .50 of a unit on under 9.5 rounds (+110) in Perez-Ortiz
    .50 of a unit on Marquez (+325) vs Hernandez

    Parlay: .25 of a unit to win 1.06
    Over 9.5 in Tackie-Hernandez (-340)
    Over 9.5 in Marquez-Hernandez (-270)
    Over 9.5 in Kono-Saegusa (-320)
    Perez (+125) vs Ortiz


    I will probably also look at betting Bradley by decision and Alvarez by decision.

     
    Fullbrights
    Fullbrights
    Veteran
    Participation Meter
    Joined: Feb, 2006
    Posts: 4377
    Posted: May. 31, 2007 - 1:59 AM ET #8

    Plus, I will be hedging the final leg of the parlay (Ibragimov) with Briggs ITD, gotta wait for 5dimes to drop the line on that one.


    This has been 2 months in the making for a very nice payoff and none have been real close calls (I guess you could say the one judge that gave the fight to DLH made it close).

    1 unit to win 5.57:

    Froch -610
    Kessler -425
    Pacquiao -600

    Sturm -260

    Mayweather -220
    Taylor -350
    Ibragimov -195

    Reply
    Plus, I will be hedging the final leg of the parlay (Ibragimov) with Briggs ITD, gotta wait for 5dimes to drop the line on that one.


    This has been 2 months in the making for a very nice payoff and none have been real close calls (I guess you could say the one judge that gave the fight to DLH made it close).

    1 unit to win 5.57:

    Froch -610
    Kessler -425
    Pacquiao -600

    Sturm -260

    Mayweather -220
    Taylor -350
    Ibragimov -195

     
    Fullbrights
    Fullbrights
    Veteran
    Participation Meter
    Joined: Feb, 2006
    Posts: 4377
    Posted: May. 31, 2007 - 10:40 PM ET #9

    Briggs looks his same muscular self, but was even heavier then he was for the White Wolf at 273.  Sultan actually surprised me at the shape he looked to be in, I didn't expect him to be 221 after viewing photos of him earlier in the week.

    Nothing changes for me, still just going to hedge the Iggy closing parlay above with Briggs inside the distance when the odds are offered at 5dimes for it.
    Reply
    Briggs looks his same muscular self, but was even heavier then he was for the White Wolf at 273.  Sultan actually surprised me at the shape he looked to be in, I didn't expect him to be 221 after viewing photos of him earlier in the week.

    Nothing changes for me, still just going to hedge the Iggy closing parlay above with Briggs inside the distance when the odds are offered at 5dimes for it.
     
    bigeiii
    bigeiii
    Captain
    Participation Meter
    Joined: Jan, 2003
    Posts: 5870
    Posted: Jun. 1, 2007 - 1:50 AM ET #10

    I kan't call SB "muscular". Looks obvious to me;....that....SB has enjoyed his Belt. Being up 5 lbs., & that is a Career high for SB.

    This is like the other side finding a couple of bombs early on in Stratego as a kid. It was game over early on as the other side just so happened to connect in just the right way, despite your early bombs;...... or......you duped the other side, & they chased, & chased & chased, then they ran outta petrol to eventually get beat. I like SB, he is good for Boxing. Nice persona'. Lottsa raw Voltage. But he can be beaten, esp' at a Career high in Weight, i.e. running on "E" later on re: petrol

    Sultan has some Pop himself. Sultan is a Lefty. IF I'm Boris Grinberg; I'd just have Sultan give away the first 3-4 Rounds; then beat an outta shape, & very libel to be tiring SB late.

    GLA!
    bigeiii
    Reply
    I kan't call SB "muscular". Looks obvious to me;....that....SB has enjoyed his Belt. Being up 5 lbs., & that is a Career high for SB.

    This is like the other side finding a couple of bombs early on in Stratego as a kid. It was game over early on as the other side just so happened to connect in just the right way, despite your early bombs;...... or......you duped the other side, & they chased, & chased & chased, then they ran outta petrol to eventually get beat. I like SB, he is good for Boxing. Nice persona'. Lottsa raw Voltage. But he can be beaten, esp' at a Career high in Weight, i.e. running on "E" later on re: petrol

    Sultan has some Pop himself. Sultan is a Lefty. IF I'm Boris Grinberg; I'd just have Sultan give away the first 3-4 Rounds; then beat an outta shape, & very libel to be tiring SB late.

    GLA!
    bigeiii
     
    Fullbrights
    Fullbrights
    Veteran
    Participation Meter
    Joined: Feb, 2006
    Posts: 4377
    Posted: Jun. 1, 2007 - 8:41 AM ET #11

    Quote Originally Posted by bigeiii:

    I kan't call SB "muscular". Looks obvious to me;....that....SB has enjoyed his Belt. Being up 5 lbs., & that is a Career high for SB.

    This is like the other side finding a couple of bombs early on in Stratego as a kid. It was game over early on as the other side just so happened to connect in just the right way, despite your early bombs;...... or......you duped the other side, & they chased, & chased & chased, then they ran outta petrol to eventually get beat. I like SB, he is good for Boxing. Nice persona'. Lottsa raw Voltage. But he can be beaten, esp' at a Career high in Weight, i.e. running on "E" later on re: petrol

    Sultan has some Pop himself. Sultan is a Lefty. IF I'm Boris Grinberg; I'd just have Sultan give away the first 3-4 Rounds; then beat an outta shape, & very libel to be tiring SB late.

    GLA!
    bigeiii



    Looked pretty jacked to me when I watched the weigh-in yesterday, a tad more girth around the belt line then before, but not much. 

    Of course that is the formula for beating Briggs.  I think the only way that Briggs wins is inside the 1st 3 rounds.  The only reason that he was still in the fight with Sergei come the 12th was due to the White Wolf doing absolutely nothing in the form of activity and therefore allowing Briggs to conserve what little energy he had left.  Though Timur has flaws, he is one thing and that is active for a heavyweight, so that same scenario will not play out.  He just has to avoid the bombs for a few rounds and then put a leather shampoo on Briggs while he reaches for his inhaler.
    Reply
    Quote Originally Posted by bigeiii:

    I kan't call SB "muscular". Looks obvious to me;....that....SB has enjoyed his Belt. Being up 5 lbs., & that is a Career high for SB.

    This is like the other side finding a couple of bombs early on in Stratego as a kid. It was game over early on as the other side just so happened to connect in just the right way, despite your early bombs;...... or......you duped the other side, & they chased, & chased & chased, then they ran outta petrol to eventually get beat. I like SB, he is good for Boxing. Nice persona'. Lottsa raw Voltage. But he can be beaten, esp' at a Career high in Weight, i.e. running on "E" later on re: petrol

    Sultan has some Pop himself. Sultan is a Lefty. IF I'm Boris Grinberg; I'd just have Sultan give away the first 3-4 Rounds; then beat an outta shape, & very libel to be tiring SB late.

    GLA!
    bigeiii



    Looked pretty jacked to me when I watched the weigh-in yesterday, a tad more girth around the belt line then before, but not much. 

    Of course that is the formula for beating Briggs.  I think the only way that Briggs wins is inside the 1st 3 rounds.  The only reason that he was still in the fight with Sergei come the 12th was due to the White Wolf doing absolutely nothing in the form of activity and therefore allowing Briggs to conserve what little energy he had left.  Though Timur has flaws, he is one thing and that is active for a heavyweight, so that same scenario will not play out.  He just has to avoid the bombs for a few rounds and then put a leather shampoo on Briggs while he reaches for his inhaler.
     
    BOXEO
    BOXEO
    Prospect
    Participation Meter
    Joined: Oct, 2005
    Posts: 385
    Posted: Jun. 1, 2007 - 9:15 AM ET #12

    Quote Originally Posted by Fullbrights:




    Looked pretty jacked to me when I watched the weigh-in yesterday, a tad more girth around the belt line then before, but not much. 

    Of course that is the formula for beating Briggs.  I think the only way that Briggs wins is inside the 1st 3 rounds.  The only reason that he was still in the fight with Sergei come the 12th was due to the White Wolf doing absolutely nothing in the form of activity and therefore allowing Briggs to conserve what little energy he had left.  Though Timur has flaws, he is one thing and that is active for a heavyweight, so that same scenario will not play out.  He just has to avoid the bombs for a few rounds and then put a leather shampoo on Briggs while he reaches for his inhaler.
     
    Timo? I think you got the two confused  Anyway, normally I wait until the day of the fight to post my pick, but all I needed to see was Briggs come in higher in weight then his last fight and all bets were off on him! He still can very well knock SI right out of the ring, but he will need to do it very early (I say two rounds!) He was huffin' and puffin' against the "White Wolf" after one single round. 
     
    SI needs to box for three rounds (not even worry about winning the rounds) and then take it to Briggs (In and out) and possibly score a late round stoppage or decision win. If he tries to trade with Briggs he will lose that battle, but fight smart.... and he wins this easy! 
     
    Boxeo Bets: Sultan -180
                      
    Reply
    Quote Originally Posted by Fullbrights:




    Looked pretty jacked to me when I watched the weigh-in yesterday, a tad more girth around the belt line then before, but not much. 

    Of course that is the formula for beating Briggs.  I think the only way that Briggs wins is inside the 1st 3 rounds.  The only reason that he was still in the fight with Sergei come the 12th was due to the White Wolf doing absolutely nothing in the form of activity and therefore allowing Briggs to conserve what little energy he had left.  Though Timur has flaws, he is one thing and that is active for a heavyweight, so that same scenario will not play out.  He just has to avoid the bombs for a few rounds and then put a leather shampoo on Briggs while he reaches for his inhaler.
     
    Timo? I think you got the two confused  Anyway, normally I wait until the day of the fight to post my pick, but all I needed to see was Briggs come in higher in weight then his last fight and all bets were off on him! He still can very well knock SI right out of the ring, but he will need to do it very early (I say two rounds!) He was huffin' and puffin' against the "White Wolf" after one single round. 
     
    SI needs to box for three rounds (not even worry about winning the rounds) and then take it to Briggs (In and out) and possibly score a late round stoppage or decision win. If he tries to trade with Briggs he will lose that battle, but fight smart.... and he wins this easy! 
     
    Boxeo Bets: Sultan -180
                      
     
    Fullbrights
    Fullbrights
    Veteran
    Participation Meter
    Joined: Feb, 2006
    Posts: 4377
    Posted: Jun. 1, 2007 - 10:43 AM ET #13

    Quote Originally Posted by BOXEO:

     
    Timo? I think you got the two confused  Anyway, normally I wait until the day of the fight to post my pick, but all I needed to see was Briggs come in higher in weight then his last fight and all bets were off on him! He still can very well knock SI right out of the ring, but he will need to do it very early (I say two rounds!) He was huffin' and puffin' against the "White Wolf" after one single round. 
     
    SI needs to box for three rounds (not even worry about winning the rounds) and then take it to Briggs (In and out) and possibly score a late round stoppage or decision win. If he tries to trade with Briggs he will lose that battle, but fight smart.... and he wins this easy! 
     
    Boxeo Bets: Sultan -180
                      


    Yep, I guess Timur's last few borefests are still in my mind somewhere.  Meant to say the Sultan of Swat.
    Reply
    Quote Originally Posted by BOXEO:

     
    Timo? I think you got the two confused  Anyway, normally I wait until the day of the fight to post my pick, but all I needed to see was Briggs come in higher in weight then his last fight and all bets were off on him! He still can very well knock SI right out of the ring, but he will need to do it very early (I say two rounds!) He was huffin' and puffin' against the "White Wolf" after one single round. 
     
    SI needs to box for three rounds (not even worry about winning the rounds) and then take it to Briggs (In and out) and possibly score a late round stoppage or decision win. If he tries to trade with Briggs he will lose that battle, but fight smart.... and he wins this easy! 
     
    Boxeo Bets: Sultan -180
                      


    Yep, I guess Timur's last few borefests are still in my mind somewhere.  Meant to say the Sultan of Swat.
     
    bigeiii
    bigeiii
    Captain
    Participation Meter
    Joined: Jan, 2003
    Posts: 5870
    Posted: Jun. 1, 2007 - 1:25 PM ET #14

    Interesting comments & Weigh-In results for 2nites ShoBox. Is Kirkland ready? Or is Duran a very live-dog?

    I do like T.Brad' on the under-card. Good looking, strong kinda fighter. I like Jimenez as well. Eagle & Cally Brock.

    But I'm still trying to fig' out the ShoBox Main-Event. That was a helluva a smoke screen by Kirk' or Kirk' is in some real trouble & not motivated to fight at all.

    GLA!
    bigeiii

    Reply
    Interesting comments & Weigh-In results for 2nites ShoBox. Is Kirkland ready? Or is Duran a very live-dog?

    I do like T.Brad' on the under-card. Good looking, strong kinda fighter. I like Jimenez as well. Eagle & Cally Brock.

    But I'm still trying to fig' out the ShoBox Main-Event. That was a helluva a smoke screen by Kirk' or Kirk' is in some real trouble & not motivated to fight at all.

    GLA!
    bigeiii

     
    Fullbrights
    Fullbrights
    Veteran
    Participation Meter
    Joined: Feb, 2006
    Posts: 4377
    Posted: Jun. 1, 2007 - 2:08 PM ET #15

    Quote Originally Posted by bigeiii:

    Interesting comments & Weigh-In results for 2nites ShoBox. Is Kirkland ready? Or is Duran a very live-dog?

    I do like T.Brad' on the under-card. Good looking, strong kinda fighter. I like Jimenez as well. Eagle & Cally Brock.

    But I'm still trying to fig' out the ShoBox Main-Event. That was a helluva a smoke screen by Kirk' or Kirk' is in some real trouble & not motivated to fight at all.

    GLA!
    bigeiii




    Your kidding me Bigeiii? You like Brock, Kyowa, and Jimenez?  No way, I can't believe your going out on that limb with those picks.  Just joking.

    Just a factoid on Kirkland, Steve Farhood talked about his troubles leading up to this fight in his article this week.  From what he wrote, Kirkland has basically been homeless and living out of his car leading up to this fight.  Kirkland was quoted as saying, "I basically been struggling.  I had to move out of my apartment.  Waking up out of my car and training, ain't had no training expense money, stuff like that.  I am basically just on a string right now."

    That is very disturbing to me.  There may be more behind the story then meets the eye, but what is an undefeated fighter promoted my a major promoter (Gary Shaw) living like this leading up to a Shobox main event.  If I was Gary Shaw I would at least want to protect my investment by having him in the right mindset heading into the fight.  I have heard bad things about Gary in the past from people in the industry, but this is a joke.  I am not playing the fight, but I am going to be pulling for Kirkland.
    Reply
    Quote Originally Posted by bigeiii:

    Interesting comments & Weigh-In results for 2nites ShoBox. Is Kirkland ready? Or is Duran a very live-dog?

    I do like T.Brad' on the under-card. Good looking, strong kinda fighter. I like Jimenez as well. Eagle & Cally Brock.

    But I'm still trying to fig' out the ShoBox Main-Event. That was a helluva a smoke screen by Kirk' or Kirk' is in some real trouble & not motivated to fight at all.

    GLA!
    bigeiii




    Your kidding me Bigeiii? You like Brock, Kyowa, and Jimenez?  No way, I can't believe your going out on that limb with those picks.  Just joking.

    Just a factoid on Kirkland, Steve Farhood talked about his troubles leading up to this fight in his article this week.  From what he wrote, Kirkland has basically been homeless and living out of his car leading up to this fight.  Kirkland was quoted as saying, "I basically been struggling.  I had to move out of my apartment.  Waking up out of my car and training, ain't had no training expense money, stuff like that.  I am basically just on a string right now."

    That is very disturbing to me.  There may be more behind the story then meets the eye, but what is an undefeated fighter promoted my a major promoter (Gary Shaw) living like this leading up to a Shobox main event.  If I was Gary Shaw I would at least want to protect my investment by having him in the right mindset heading into the fight.  I have heard bad things about Gary in the past from people in the industry, but this is a joke.  I am not playing the fight, but I am going to be pulling for Kirkland.
     
    bigeiii
    bigeiii
    Captain
    Participation Meter
    Joined: Jan, 2003
    Posts: 5870
    Posted: Jun. 1, 2007 - 2:20 PM ET #16

    LOL! I have a hack-saw in hand out on my chalky limb; which hovers above the thin ice. ; )

    I may try a 1/10th of a unit against Kirk'. None of what I'm getting suggests he is right, though I would make him the legit fav' under normal circumstances. Still waiting for some Props.

    GLA!
    bigeiii
    Reply
    LOL! I have a hack-saw in hand out on my chalky limb; which hovers above the thin ice. ; )

    I may try a 1/10th of a unit against Kirk'. None of what I'm getting suggests he is right, though I would make him the legit fav' under normal circumstances. Still waiting for some Props.

    GLA!
    bigeiii
     
    bigeiii
    bigeiii
    Captain
    Participation Meter
    Joined: Jan, 2003
    Posts: 5870
    Posted: Jun. 1, 2007 - 2:24 PM ET #17

    Soon as I peck that out; they open right up. I put 1/10th of a unit on both outcome Props against Kirk'. Decision & Stoppage for Duran; w/ the above Boxing chalk & French Open chalk.

    GLA!
    bigeiii
    Reply
    Soon as I peck that out; they open right up. I put 1/10th of a unit on both outcome Props against Kirk'. Decision & Stoppage for Duran; w/ the above Boxing chalk & French Open chalk.

    GLA!
    bigeiii
     
    Fullbrights
    Fullbrights
    Veteran
    Participation Meter
    Joined: Feb, 2006
    Posts: 4377
    Posted: Jun. 1, 2007 - 2:51 PM ET #18

    4 more plays here.....

    .25 of a unit on Hernandez by 10rd decision (+101) vs Tackie

    Taking a long-shot with this jackpot hope:
    .20 of a unit on the draw (+1500) in Hernandez-Tackie

    .70 of a unit on Bradley by 10rd Decision (-138)

    1.15 units on Marquez +19.5 points handicap (-115) vs Hernandez

    Reply
    4 more plays here.....

    .25 of a unit on Hernandez by 10rd decision (+101) vs Tackie

    Taking a long-shot with this jackpot hope:
    .20 of a unit on the draw (+1500) in Hernandez-Tackie

    .70 of a unit on Bradley by 10rd Decision (-138)

    1.15 units on Marquez +19.5 points handicap (-115) vs Hernandez

     
    MMACapper
    MMACapper
    Captain
    Participation Meter
    Joined: Nov, 2003
    Posts: 5683
    Posted: Jun. 2, 2007 - 12:33 AM ET #19

    Bradley decision
    Reply
    Bradley decision
     
    MMACapper
    MMACapper
    Captain
    Participation Meter
    Joined: Nov, 2003
    Posts: 5683
    Posted: Jun. 2, 2007 - 12:34 AM ET #20

    Nice work tonight Fullbrights
    Reply
    Nice work tonight Fullbrights
     
    Fullbrights
    Fullbrights
    Veteran
    Participation Meter
    Joined: Feb, 2006
    Posts: 4377
    Posted: Jun. 2, 2007 - 12:41 AM ET #21

    .25 of a unit on Hernandez by 10rd decision (+101) vs Tackie
    .20 of a unit on the draw (+1500) in Hernandez-Tackie
    .70 of a unit on Bradley by 10rd Decision (-138)
    1.25 units on over 8.5 rounds (-125) in Camarena-Bradley
    .50 of a unit on Marquez (+325) vs Hernandez
    1.15 units on Marquez +19.5 points handicap (-115) vs Hernandez 

    Parlay: .25 of a unit to win 1.06
    Over 9.5 in Tackie-Hernandez (-340)
    Over 9.5 in Marquez-Hernandez (-270)
    Over 9.5 in Kono-Saegusa (-320)
    Perez (+125) vs Ortiz



    Good night so far, up almost 2 units.

    Reply
    .25 of a unit on Hernandez by 10rd decision (+101) vs Tackie
    .20 of a unit on the draw (+1500) in Hernandez-Tackie
    .70 of a unit on Bradley by 10rd Decision (-138)
    1.25 units on over 8.5 rounds (-125) in Camarena-Bradley
    .50 of a unit on Marquez (+325) vs Hernandez
    1.15 units on Marquez +19.5 points handicap (-115) vs Hernandez 

    Parlay: .25 of a unit to win 1.06
    Over 9.5 in Tackie-Hernandez (-340)
    Over 9.5 in Marquez-Hernandez (-270)
    Over 9.5 in Kono-Saegusa (-320)
    Perez (+125) vs Ortiz



    Good night so far, up almost 2 units.

     
    Fullbrights
    Fullbrights
    Veteran
    Participation Meter
    Joined: Feb, 2006
    Posts: 4377
    Posted: Jun. 2, 2007 - 1:18 AM ET #22

    Forgot my other loss...
    .50 of a unit on under 9.5 rounds (+110) in Perez-Ortiz


    The night started off great, but I limped in.  Won 1.31 units on the night.

    Tomorrow night is guaranteed to be a winning one also, I have Iggy closing the 1 unit (+557) parlay that's been going for a couple of months. 

    Hedged the Sultan closer with.....
    1.5 units on Briggs Inside the Distance (+199)


    My only other possible play could be Alvarez by decision if it is offered.
    Reply
    Forgot my other loss...
    .50 of a unit on under 9.5 rounds (+110) in Perez-Ortiz


    The night started off great, but I limped in.  Won 1.31 units on the night.

    Tomorrow night is guaranteed to be a winning one also, I have Iggy closing the 1 unit (+557) parlay that's been going for a couple of months. 

    Hedged the Sultan closer with.....
    1.5 units on Briggs Inside the Distance (+199)


    My only other possible play could be Alvarez by decision if it is offered.
     
    bigeiii
    bigeiii
    Captain
    Participation Meter
    Joined: Jan, 2003
    Posts: 5870
    Posted: Jun. 2, 2007 - 12:33 PM ET #23

    Well; a 1 unit Parlay made it thur, but I did drop -1/5th of a unit for the nite.

    Bradley cruised; advancing my 1 unit Parlay to Cally & Eagle. Bradly is kinda a bit short'ish, but he is fairly compact & therefore Strong for it. Came forward all nite. Not what I'd call cut of Championship Jr.Middle timber; but no easy out for any Champ either. Nice smack run by Bradley post-fight.

    I had the Krik' fight even, 5 to 5. But the 10-8 KD Round does make Kirk' the winner. Duran scored nicely w/ his Lead-Jab, enough to get at least 3 or 4 Rounds. Then it came down to how the couple of closer rounds were scored. Kirk' may or may not be Title legit? I don't know either way yet. Maybe Shaw was trying to teach Kirk some kinda tough-love lesson; & Kirk' persevered & made it thru? Time will tale.

    Jimenez dropped 1 round, on cruise-control to a UD win.

    GLA!
    bigeiii
    Reply
    Well; a 1 unit Parlay made it thur, but I did drop -1/5th of a unit for the nite.

    Bradley cruised; advancing my 1 unit Parlay to Cally & Eagle. Bradly is kinda a bit short'ish, but he is fairly compact & therefore Strong for it. Came forward all nite. Not what I'd call cut of Championship Jr.Middle timber; but no easy out for any Champ either. Nice smack run by Bradley post-fight.

    I had the Krik' fight even, 5 to 5. But the 10-8 KD Round does make Kirk' the winner. Duran scored nicely w/ his Lead-Jab, enough to get at least 3 or 4 Rounds. Then it came down to how the couple of closer rounds were scored. Kirk' may or may not be Title legit? I don't know either way yet. Maybe Shaw was trying to teach Kirk some kinda tough-love lesson; & Kirk' persevered & made it thru? Time will tale.

    Jimenez dropped 1 round, on cruise-control to a UD win.

    GLA!
    bigeiii
     
    BOXEO
    BOXEO
    Prospect
    Participation Meter
    Joined: Oct, 2005
    Posts: 385
    Posted: Jun. 2, 2007 - 12:37 PM ET #24

    Quote Originally Posted by Fullbrights:

    Forgot my other loss...
    .50 of a unit on under 9.5 rounds (+110) in Perez-Ortiz


    The night started off great, but I limped in.  Won 1.31 units on the night.

    Tomorrow night is guaranteed to be a winning one also, I have Iggy closing the 1 unit (+557) parlay that's been going for a couple of months. 

    Hedged the Sultan closer with.....
    1.5 units on Briggs Inside the Distance (+199)


    My only other possible play could be Alvarez by decision if it is offered.
     

    FB,

     

    The Briggs KO is a VERY smart move. Not only because you are covering you’re bet, but also because the more I look at this fight, it really depends on which SI shows up. We all know what Briggs will do, but SI can box when he wants to and this will be his best chance to win this fight. If he uses his jab like he did when he fought LW he should easily beat Briggs and maybe score a late TKO. If he thinks he can trade with Briggs like he did with Austin, it will be lights out for SI.

     

    I just don't see SI taking those huge shots from Briggs. SI can be a bit sloppy at times, and he better hope that he is much tighter in the defense department or Briggs will come away with the win.... by KO!

    Reply
    Quote Originally Posted by Fullbrights:

    Forgot my other loss...
    .50 of a unit on under 9.5 rounds (+110) in Perez-Ortiz


    The night started off great, but I limped in.  Won 1.31 units on the night.

    Tomorrow night is guaranteed to be a winning one also, I have Iggy closing the 1 unit (+557) parlay that's been going for a couple of months. 

    Hedged the Sultan closer with.....
    1.5 units on Briggs Inside the Distance (+199)


    My only other possible play could be Alvarez by decision if it is offered.
     

    FB,

     

    The Briggs KO is a VERY smart move. Not only because you are covering you’re bet, but also because the more I look at this fight, it really depends on which SI shows up. We all know what Briggs will do, but SI can box when he wants to and this will be his best chance to win this fight. If he uses his jab like he did when he fought LW he should easily beat Briggs and maybe score a late TKO. If he thinks he can trade with Briggs like he did with Austin, it will be lights out for SI.

     

    I just don't see SI taking those huge shots from Briggs. SI can be a bit sloppy at times, and he better hope that he is much tighter in the defense department or Briggs will come away with the win.... by KO!

     
     
    bigeiii
    bigeiii
    Captain
    Participation Meter
    Joined: Jan, 2003
    Posts: 5870
    Posted: Jun. 2, 2007 - 12:58 PM ET #25

    Interesting to see Cally Brock & A.Gon' so heavy. Cally is at a 2nd Career highest Wight, A.Gon has added about 30 lbs in his last couple of fights, he is at his highest Weight. Love to get a Total for that. & Cally Brock has dropped by -1000 accordingly. However; it looks like pretty good weight (heavier in the Arms/Shoulders) to me.

    GLA!
    bigeiii


    Reply
    Interesting to see Cally Brock & A.Gon' so heavy. Cally is at a 2nd Career highest Wight, A.Gon has added about 30 lbs in his last couple of fights, he is at his highest Weight. Love to get a Total for that. & Cally Brock has dropped by -1000 accordingly. However; it looks like pretty good weight (heavier in the Arms/Shoulders) to me.

    GLA!
    bigeiii


    All Forums | Boxing
    12345 Next Last»

    Hot Forums IconHot Forum Topics

    • Claiming Prizes 57,802
    • 🏈🏈🏈 Fubah2's risky CFB bets 279,299
    • Tuesday 10/20/2026 865
    • I'm embarrassed for Trump supporters 61,603
    • PART DEUX 161
    • Congrats to ltdsks - 20 wins in a row! 5,083
    • Public Indicator Calculations 2026 23,289
    • Lies, Inaccuracies & Stupidity 33,169
    • NFL THREAD * 151 * 26,101
    • How low can Trump go ? 29,775

    Warning - External Link

    Report User

    Thank you for reporting
    This content is abusive or harmful
    This post is spam
    An error has occurred
    This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.

    Delete Post

    Are you sure you would like to remove this post?

    Remove Thread

    Are you sure you would like to remove this thread?

    Scan Results

    Login/Register

    Happy to have you join the conversation. To do so, please login or create an account.
    Accounts are free and easy to create.

    Search


    Loading…

    Loading…

    About Us
    Contact Us
    Careers
    Our Team
    Brand
    Testimonials
    Betting Guides
    Sportsbook Reviews
    Betting News
    Podcasts
    Responsible Gambling
    Betting Sites
    US Betting Sites
    Canada Betting Sites
    Canada Casinos
    Best Betting Apps
    Contests
    Streak Survivor
    King of Covers
    Ultimate Race
    Office Pools
    The Covers community has
    810,221
    lifetime members worldwide
    Join our community today
    Covers 30 Years Logo Established in 1995,
    Covers is the world
    leader in sports
    betting information.
    21+
    Gambling problem? Call 1-800-GAMBLER
    Help Privacy Privacy Choices Terms of Service Cookies Sitemap Forum
    YouTube logo
    Facebook logo
    Twitter logo
    Instagram logo
    LinkedIn logo
    Google News logo
    Covers is verified safe by:
    Evalon Logo Logo GPWA Logo GDPR logo Logo GeoTrust logo Logo
    Covers Logo
    Copyright © 1995 - 2026 Genius Sports. All Rights Reserved.
    If you choose to make use of any information on this website including online sports betting services from any websites that may be featured on this website, we strongly recommend that you carefully check your local laws before doing so.It is your sole responsibility to understand your local laws and observe them strictly.Covers does not provide any advice or guidance as to the legality of online sports betting or other online gambling activities within your jurisdiction and you are responsible for complying with laws that are applicable to you in your relevant locality.Covers disclaims all liability associated with your use of this website and use of any information contained on it.As a condition of using this website, you agree to hold the owner of this website harmless from any claims arising from your use of any services on any third party website that may be featured by Covers.