I see this going the distance with Bradley winning 7 maybe 8 rounds and then a long delay before the dec. is given then Pac hears he won a split dec. by the pressured fixed up judges.
I could not pass up Bradley +611 by dec. a week ago but for a very small amount only because of the WWE type judges at ringside.
Your bet looks solid RED
GL
I see this going the distance with Bradley winning 7 maybe 8 rounds and then a long delay before the dec. is given then Pac hears he won a split dec. by the pressured fixed up judges.
I could not pass up Bradley +611 by dec. a week ago but for a very small amount only because of the WWE type judges at ringside.
I see this going the distance with Bradley winning 7 maybe 8 rounds and then a long delay before the dec. is given then Pac hears he won a split dec. by the pressured fixed up judges.
I could not pass up Bradley +611 by dec. a week ago but for a very small amount only because of the WWE type judges at ringside.
Your bet looks solid RED
GL
you are absolutely insane if you think bradley will outpoint manny in this fight.
Quote Originally Posted by keven vanlith:
I see this going the distance with Bradley winning 7 maybe 8 rounds and then a long delay before the dec. is given then Pac hears he won a split dec. by the pressured fixed up judges.
I could not pass up Bradley +611 by dec. a week ago but for a very small amount only because of the WWE type judges at ringside.
Your bet looks solid RED
GL
you are absolutely insane if you think bradley will outpoint manny in this fight.
you are absolutely insane if you think bradley will outpoint manny in this fight.
I admit it...I'm INSANE!
HBO announcers have to be the worst, most bias boxing analysis in the sport. 119-109 Lederman has it for Pac-Man? See they all think their sucking Bob Arum's D--K! They assume (as I did) that Arum wants Pac-Man to get the decision. Manny lost all the late rds IMO, Compubox stats are mostly full of crap, in plenty of respected boxing experts opinion. By the way I still had Manny winning the fight 115-113 on my scorecard. So why did Bradley get a controversial call. Here's my take..
Arum HATES Floyd Mayweather so much ( since Mayweather escaped his clutches) that he'll do anything to prevent a Pac-Man-Mayweather mega fight. Even throwing a bone to Bradley in a fight that normally would have went Manny's way. Now Bradley is forced to give Pac-Man a re-match where Arum controls both fighters & Floyd is left out in the cold. Promoters have no conscience, their all about the power & $$$!
Congratulations to all Bradley bettors, whether you took the points handicap or bet him straight-up. To the Pac-man money-line bettors, you got a raw deal as even I thought Manny won the fight & I bet on Bradley.
Quote Originally Posted by gridironguy:
you are absolutely insane if you think bradley will outpoint manny in this fight.
I admit it...I'm INSANE!
HBO announcers have to be the worst, most bias boxing analysis in the sport. 119-109 Lederman has it for Pac-Man? See they all think their sucking Bob Arum's D--K! They assume (as I did) that Arum wants Pac-Man to get the decision. Manny lost all the late rds IMO, Compubox stats are mostly full of crap, in plenty of respected boxing experts opinion. By the way I still had Manny winning the fight 115-113 on my scorecard. So why did Bradley get a controversial call. Here's my take..
Arum HATES Floyd Mayweather so much ( since Mayweather escaped his clutches) that he'll do anything to prevent a Pac-Man-Mayweather mega fight. Even throwing a bone to Bradley in a fight that normally would have went Manny's way. Now Bradley is forced to give Pac-Man a re-match where Arum controls both fighters & Floyd is left out in the cold. Promoters have no conscience, their all about the power & $$$!
Congratulations to all Bradley bettors, whether you took the points handicap or bet him straight-up. To the Pac-man money-line bettors, you got a raw deal as even I thought Manny won the fight & I bet on Bradley.
Well that Quote was directed at me and i have no smart cracks to come back with for gridironguy.
I handicapped that fight wrong and was gifted, even though my 7 round to 5 prediction for Bradley on these Judges cards, if you want to call them that, came true.
I had it 9-3 Pac.
I have had WAAAAY more insane Bad Beats happen to me, than Lucky Wins in sports betting in the last 30 odd years, mostly in the NFL, so i am not giving this insanity back anytime soon.
Lets enjoy it while we can RED the next 5 may go ag. us---me for sure knowing my history.
Well that Quote was directed at me and i have no smart cracks to come back with for gridironguy.
I handicapped that fight wrong and was gifted, even though my 7 round to 5 prediction for Bradley on these Judges cards, if you want to call them that, came true.
I had it 9-3 Pac.
I have had WAAAAY more insane Bad Beats happen to me, than Lucky Wins in sports betting in the last 30 odd years, mostly in the NFL, so i am not giving this insanity back anytime soon.
Lets enjoy it while we can RED the next 5 may go ag. us---me for sure knowing my history.
Lets enjoy it while we can RED the next 5 may go ag. us---me for sure knowing my history.
Amen to that Kevin, but watch the replay of the fight with the sound off next week & I can almost guarantee you you'll see the fight closer then 9-3 Pac. The commentators tend to have a huge influence on how one sees a fight on TV.
Lets enjoy it while we can RED the next 5 may go ag. us---me for sure knowing my history.
Amen to that Kevin, but watch the replay of the fight with the sound off next week & I can almost guarantee you you'll see the fight closer then 9-3 Pac. The commentators tend to have a huge influence on how one sees a fight on TV.
Lets enjoy it while we can RED the next 5 may go ag. us---me for sure knowing my history.
Amen to that Kevin, but watch the replay of the fight with the sound off next week & I can almost guarantee you you'll see the fight closer then 9-3 Pac. The commentators tend to have a huge influence on how one sees a fight on TV.
also aside from the volume, you might want to look away when the commentators show the punch numbers cause seeing the facts might sway you also
After I got into the ring after the fight, I went over to Bradley and said 'You did very well.' He said, 'I tried hard, but I couldn't beat the guy.
Lets enjoy it while we can RED the next 5 may go ag. us---me for sure knowing my history.
Amen to that Kevin, but watch the replay of the fight with the sound off next week & I can almost guarantee you you'll see the fight closer then 9-3 Pac. The commentators tend to have a huge influence on how one sees a fight on TV.
also aside from the volume, you might want to look away when the commentators show the punch numbers cause seeing the facts might sway you also
After I got into the ring after the fight, I went over to Bradley and said 'You did very well.' He said, 'I tried hard, but I couldn't beat the guy.
Lets enjoy it while we can RED the next 5 may go ag. us---me for sure knowing my history.
Amen to that Kevin, but watch the replay of the fight with the sound off next week & I can almost guarantee you you'll see the fight closer then 9-3 Pac. The commentators tend to have a huge influence on how one sees a fight on TV.
Pacquiao landed 253 of 751 punches, a connect rate of 34 percent. Bradley landed 159 of 839, a connect rate of just 19 percent. On top of that, Pacquiao seemed to land the more powerful shots.
Lets enjoy it while we can RED the next 5 may go ag. us---me for sure knowing my history.
Amen to that Kevin, but watch the replay of the fight with the sound off next week & I can almost guarantee you you'll see the fight closer then 9-3 Pac. The commentators tend to have a huge influence on how one sees a fight on TV.
Pacquiao landed 253 of 751 punches, a connect rate of 34 percent. Bradley landed 159 of 839, a connect rate of just 19 percent. On top of that, Pacquiao seemed to land the more powerful shots.
Hot Forum Topics
