• Forums
  • Best Betting Sites
  • Sportsbook Promos
  • Best Sports Betting Apps
  • NFL Betting Forum
  • NBA Betting Forum
  • MLB Betting Forum
  • NHL Betting Forum
  • NCAAF Betting Forum
  • NCAAB Betting Forum
  • Soccer Betting Forum
  • Tennis Betting Forum
  • General Discussion
  • Help Forum
  • Guidelines
  • FAQ
  • Forum Updates
    Covers Logo
    Covers App
    Faster picks. Smarter bets.
    All in the NEW Covers App
    Download on the App Store Download on the Google Play Store
    • Sports
      • NFL
        • Back
        • NFL
        • NFL Home
        • Scores & Matchups
        • Prop Projections
        • NFL Picks
        • NFL Prediction Prices
        • Weather
        • Injuries
      • NCAAF
        • Back
        • NCAAF
        • NCAAF Home
        • Scores & Matchups
        • Prop Projections
        • NCAAF Picks
        • Weather
        • Injuries
      • NBA
        • Back
        • NBA
        • NBA Home
        • Scores & Matchups
        • Prop Projections
        • NBA Picks
        • Injuries
      • NCAAB
        • Back
        • NCAAB
        • NCAAB Home
        • Scores & Matchups
        • NCAAB Picks
        • Injuries
      • MLB
        • Back
        • MLB
        • MLB Home
        • Scores & Matchups
        • Prop Projections
        • MLB Picks
        • Weather
        • Injuries
      • NHL
        • Back
        • NHL
        • NHL Home
        • Scores & Matchups
        • Prop Projections
        • NHL Picks
        • Injuries
      • Soccer
      • UFC
      • WNBA
        • Back
        • WNBA
        • WNBA Home
        • Scores & Matchups
        • WNBA Picks
        • Injuries
      • CFL
        • Back
        • CFL
        • CFL Home
        • Scores & Matchups
        • CFL Picks
      • Golf
        • Back
        • Golf
        • Golf Home
        • Golf Odds
        • Masters Odds
        • PGA Championship Odds
        • US Open Odds
        • British Open Odds
        • Ryder Cup Odds
        • Golf Picks
    • Odds
      • All Odds
      • NFL
      • NCAAF
      • NBA
      • NCAAB
      • MLB
      • NHL
      • Golf
      • Soccer Odds
        • Back
        • Soccer Odds
        • MLS Odds
        • Champions League Odds
        • Premier League Odds
      • UFC
      • WNBA
      • CFL
      • Election Odds
      • Futures
        • Back
        • Futures
        • NFL
        • NBA
        • MLB
        • NHL
        • NCAAB
        • NCAAF
      • Sports Odds History
      • Politics
        • Back
        • Politics
        • Politics Home
        • Presidential Election Odds
        • Midterm Election Odds
        • House Midterm Odds
        • Senate Midterm Odds
        • Texas Midterm Odds
        • Michigan Midterm Odds
    • Picks
      • All Picks
      • NFL
      • NBA
      • NHL
      • MLB
      • NCAAF
      • NCAAB
      • Golf
      • WNBA
      • CFL
      • User Picks
      • Team User Picks
      • Consensus Picks
        • Back
        • Consensus Picks
        • All Consensus Picks
        • NFL
        • NBA
        • NHL
        • MLB
        • NCAAF
        • NCAAB
        • CFL
        • WNBA
        • Consensus FAQ
        • Public Money
    • Prop Projections
      • NFL
      • NBA
      • MLB
      • NHL
    • Betting
      • US Betting Sites
      • Canada Betting Sites
      • Sportsbook Reviews
      • States
        • Back
        • States
        • US Legal Tracker
        • Revenue Tracker
        • Arizona
        • Arkansas
        • California
        • Colorado
        • Connecticut
        • DC
        • Florida
        • Georgia
        • Illinois
        • Indiana
        • Iowa
        • Kansas
        • Kentucky
        • Louisiana
        • Maine
        • Maryland
        • Massachusetts
        • Michigan
        • Mississippi
        • Missouri
        • Nevada
        • New Hampshire
        • New Jersey
        • New York
        • North Carolina
        • Ohio
        • Oregon
        • Pennsylvania
        • Tennessee
        • Texas
        • Vermont
        • Virginia
        • West Virginia
        • Wyoming
      • Provinces
        • Back
        • Provinces
        • Alberta
        • British Columbia
        • Manitoba
        • New Brunswick
        • Newfoundland and Labrador
        • Northwest Territories
        • Nova Scotia
        • Nunavut
        • Ontario
        • Prince Edward Island
        • Quebec (English)
        • Quebec (francais)
        • Saskatchewan
        • Yukon
      • By Sport
        • Back
        • By Sport
        • Baseball
        • Basketball
        • Boxing
        • College Football
        • F1
        • Football
        • Super Bowl
        • Golf
        • Hockey
        • Horse Racing
        • March Madness
        • Soccer
        • UFC
        • World Cup
      • Betting Apps
        • Back
        • Betting Apps
        • Best Sports Betting Apps USA
        • Ontario Sports Betting Apps
      • Rest of World
        • Back
        • Rest of World
        • UK Betting Offers
          • Back
          • UK Betting Offers
          • UK Betting Sites
          • bet365 Bonus Code UK
          • 888Sport Promo Code UK
          • William Hill Sign up Offer
          • Betway Sign up Offer
          • BetVictor Bonus Code UK
      • Betting Guides
        • Back
        • Betting Guides
        • All Guides
        • Glossary
        • Betting Calculators
          • Back
          • Betting Calculators
          • Odds Converter
          • Parlay Calculator
        • Futures Betting Guide
        • Moneyline Betting Guide
        • Over/Under Betting Guide
        • Parlay Betting Guide
        • Point Spread Betting Guide
        • Prop Betting Guide
        • Sports Betting Guides
          • Back
          • Sports Betting Guides
          • How To Bet On Sports Guide
          • NFL Betting Guide
          • NHL Betting Guide
          • NBA Betting Guide
          • MLB Betting Guide
          • NCAAB Betting Guide
          • NCAAF Betting Guide
          • Golf Betting Guide
          • Tennis Betting Guide
        • Teaser Betting Guide
      • Betting News
        • Back
        • Betting News
        • All News
        • Industry News
        • Podcasts
        • Covers Videos
        • Covers Writers
        • Offers & Boosts
    • Promos
      • Sportsbook Promos
      • Canada Sportsbook Promos
      • Bonuses By Sportsbook
        • Back
        • Bonuses By Sportsbook
        • bet365 Bonus Code
        • BET99 Promo Code
        • BetMGM Bonus Code
        • BetRivers Bonus Code
        • Caesars Sportsbook Promo
        • DraftKings Promo Code
        • Fanatics Sportsbook Promo
        • FanDuel Promo Code
        • Hard Rock Bet Promo Code
        • Sports Interaction Promo
        • Stake Promo Code
        • theScore Bet Promo Code
        • TonyBet Promo Code
      • Bonuses By Region
        • Back
        • Bonuses By Region
        • Arkansas Promos
        • Arizona Promos
        • Colorado Promos
        • Connecticut Promos
        • DC Promos
        • Illinois Promos
        • Indiana Promos
        • Iowa Promos
        • Kansas Promos
        • Kentucky Promos
        • Louisiana Promos
        • Maine Promos
        • Maryland Promos
        • Massachusetts Promos
        • Michigan Promos
        • Missouri Promos
        • New Jersey Promos
        • New York Promos
        • North Carolina Promos
        • Ohio Promos
        • Pennsylvania Promos
        • Tennessee Promos
        • Vermont Promos
        • Virginia Promos
        • West Virginia Promos
        • Wyoming Promos
    • Forum & Contests
      • All Forums
      • NFL Betting Forum
      • MLB Betting Forum
      • NCAAB Betting Forum
      • NCAAF Betting Forum
      • NBA Betting Forum
      • NHL Betting Forum
      • Soccer Betting Forum
      • Contests
        • Back
        • Contests
        • Contests Home
        • Streak Survivor
        • King of Covers
        • My Contests
    • Casino
      • Sweepstakes Casino
        • Back
        • Sweepstakes Casino
        • Sweepstakes Casino
        • Sweepstakes No-Deposit Bonuses
        • Sweepstakes Promos
          • Back
          • Sweepstakes Promos
          • Card Crush
          • Casino.click
          • Chanced Casino
          • Crown Coins Casino
          • FreeSpin Casino
          • LoneStar
          • McLuck
          • Mega Bonanza Casino
          • PlayFame
          • Pulsz
          • Stake.us
      • US Casinos
        • Back
        • US Casinos
        • US Online Casinos
        • US Online Casino Bonuses
        • Casino Promos
          • Back
          • Casino Promos
          • bet365 Casino Promo Code
          • BetRivers Casino Promo
          • Borgata Casino Bonus Code
          • Caesars Casino Bonus Code
          • DraftKings Casino Promo
          • Fanatics Casino Promo
          • FanDuel Casino Promo Code
          • Golden Nugget Casino Promo
          • Hard Rock Bet Casino Promo
          • Hollywood Casino Promo Code
      • Canada Casinos
        • Back
        • Canada Casinos
        • Canada Online Casinos
        • Provinces
          • Back
          • Provinces
          • Alberta Online Casino
          • BC Online Casino
          • Ontario Online Casinos
        • Casino Promos
          • Back
          • Casino Promos
          • BC.GAME Bonus Code
          • Cloudbet Promo Code
          • RainBet Promo Code
          • Roobet Promo Code
          • Shuffle Promo Code
          • Thrill Promo Code
    • Prediction Markets
      • Prediction Markets
      • Prediction Market Apps
      • Prediction Market Promos
      • Kalshi Promo Code
      • Kalshi Referral Code
      • Polymarket Promo Code
      • Polymarket Referral Code
      • DraftKings Predictions Promo Code
      • Novig Promo Code
      • ProphetX Promo Code
      • Underdog Promo Code
      • Betr Promo Code
      • OG Promo Code
      • Fanatics Markets Promo Code
      • Plus500 Promo Code
      • Gemini Predictions Promo Code
    • NBA Opening Night
      NBA Opening Night
      • NBA Odds
      • NBA Picks
      • NBA Moneyline Picks
      • Celtics-Pistons Picks
      • 76ers-Knicks Picks
      • Thunder-Spurs Picks
      • NBA Prediction Markets
      • NBA Betting Sites
    Covers Account
    Log in Create account
    Join free Log in
    All Forums | Boxing

    Pac-Man-Bradley... MHO

    12 Next Last»
    Redlad
    nuttyrich
    walktheline
    CoverLane
    DaBestEver24
    ...
    Participants:
    Search
    Views: 3990
    Posts: 35
    12 Next Last»
     
    Redlad
    Redlad
    Captain
    Participation Meter
    Joined: Aug, 2001
    Posts: 6822
    Posted: Jun. 9, 2012 - 12:52 AM ET #1

    If Bradley fights a smart fight I look for him to preform very comptitively tonight.I think his camp realizes that they can't get overly aggressive (especially in the early rds). His boxing skills & speed should have a telling effect on what Manny will be able to accomplish in this bout. I just can't envision the overly energized monster that Manny has had the reputation for in his hay-day. His body seems to have  lost some of the old muscle tone & it does not take a Sherlock Holmes to imagine why. Bradley may not be a big puncher but he can display some crafty footwork & ring smarts to avoid walking into a big shot from the veteran. He also has the ability to use angles to move in & out while scoring points with quick combinations. So I look for this fight to be very close. The problem with betting Bradley to win is summed up in 2 sets of 2 words. Bob Arum & Top Rank. Some of us who have been around the boxing game know how intimidating it can be for a judge to vote against a house fighter. It is a little known fact that promoters have a say in who will judge upcoming fights in which they promote. You can imagine how much pressure this puts on judges who want steady work (esspecially in high profile fights; where they get paid the most money). A very wise boxing expert once told me that to bet against an undefeated fighter, is a losing proposition, in the long run. I'll follow that advice in tonight's match-up. but because I don't trust the judges I'll take the 16.5 point handicap instead of betting Bradley to win straight-up. The main thing I'm worried about (as was pointed out by another poster) is Bradley head-butting his way into trouble. Certainly not out of the equation.

    So it's  Bradley + 16.5 handicap as my final Wager for 5 Units.


    P.S.

    If you don't  agree with any or all of my opinions, it does not mean that

    1. You know nothing about boxing or

    2. You know nothing about gambling on boxing.


    It  merely means we disagree on the analysis of the outcome, where luck & the boxers strategy play a major role, at the end of the day. GLTU!
    Reply
    To remove first post, remove entire topic.
    If Bradley fights a smart fight I look for him to preform very comptitively tonight.I think his camp realizes that they can't get overly aggressive (especially in the early rds). His boxing skills & speed should have a telling effect on what Manny will be able to accomplish in this bout. I just can't envision the overly energized monster that Manny has had the reputation for in his hay-day. His body seems to have  lost some of the old muscle tone & it does not take a Sherlock Holmes to imagine why. Bradley may not be a big puncher but he can display some crafty footwork & ring smarts to avoid walking into a big shot from the veteran. He also has the ability to use angles to move in & out while scoring points with quick combinations. So I look for this fight to be very close. The problem with betting Bradley to win is summed up in 2 sets of 2 words. Bob Arum & Top Rank. Some of us who have been around the boxing game know how intimidating it can be for a judge to vote against a house fighter. It is a little known fact that promoters have a say in who will judge upcoming fights in which they promote. You can imagine how much pressure this puts on judges who want steady work (esspecially in high profile fights; where they get paid the most money). A very wise boxing expert once told me that to bet against an undefeated fighter, is a losing proposition, in the long run. I'll follow that advice in tonight's match-up. but because I don't trust the judges I'll take the 16.5 point handicap instead of betting Bradley to win straight-up. The main thing I'm worried about (as was pointed out by another poster) is Bradley head-butting his way into trouble. Certainly not out of the equation.

    So it's  Bradley + 16.5 handicap as my final Wager for 5 Units.


    P.S.

    If you don't  agree with any or all of my opinions, it does not mean that

    1. You know nothing about boxing or

    2. You know nothing about gambling on boxing.


    It  merely means we disagree on the analysis of the outcome, where luck & the boxers strategy play a major role, at the end of the day. GLTU!
     
    nuttyrich
    nuttyrich
    Veteran
    Participation Meter
    Joined: Jul, 2004
    Posts: 1709
    Posted: Jun. 9, 2012 - 1:31 AM ET #2

    Good luck red!

         
    Reply
    Good luck red!

         
     
    walktheline
    walktheline
    Banned
    Participation Meter
    Joined: Dec, 2007
    Posts: 4526
    Posted: Jun. 9, 2012 - 1:49 AM ET #3

    That's absolutely 100% the best way to bet this fight. I have zero doubt that Bradley will be more than competitive. Is there really any doubt that he won't lose by a margin greater than 8-4 on the cards? I don't think so. 

    I don't like this play, I love this play. Red, your thinking is on point, imho.
    Reply
    That's absolutely 100% the best way to bet this fight. I have zero doubt that Bradley will be more than competitive. Is there really any doubt that he won't lose by a margin greater than 8-4 on the cards? I don't think so. 

    I don't like this play, I love this play. Red, your thinking is on point, imho.
     
    CoverLane
    CoverLane
    Banned
    Participation Meter
    Joined: Mar, 2011
    Posts: 6903
    Posted: Jun. 9, 2012 - 2:27 AM ET #4

    You guys think Bradley has a shot at winning some rounds?

    Book is offering Winner of round 1...2...3......

    Bradley is sitting around +10000 through 3, +6600 round 4, +8000 5 through 12...

    Need 2 wins to turn some profit
    Reply
    You guys think Bradley has a shot at winning some rounds?

    Book is offering Winner of round 1...2...3......

    Bradley is sitting around +10000 through 3, +6600 round 4, +8000 5 through 12...

    Need 2 wins to turn some profit
     
    walktheline
    walktheline
    Banned
    Participation Meter
    Joined: Dec, 2007
    Posts: 4526
    Posted: Jun. 9, 2012 - 2:42 AM ET #5

    Quote Originally Posted by CoverLane:

    You guys think Bradley has a shot at winning some rounds?

    Book is offering Winner of round 1...2...3......

    Bradley is sitting around +10000 through 3, +6600 round 4, +8000 5 through 12...

    Need 2 wins to turn some profit

    I believe you're reading the prop incorrectly. Bradley has to win IN those rounds to win the prop, as in knockout Pacquiao. He's 100/1 to knock him out in rounds 1-3, 66/1 in rounds 4-6 and so on. To answer your question, I would be shocked if he got dominated.
    Reply
    Quote Originally Posted by CoverLane:

    You guys think Bradley has a shot at winning some rounds?

    Book is offering Winner of round 1...2...3......

    Bradley is sitting around +10000 through 3, +6600 round 4, +8000 5 through 12...

    Need 2 wins to turn some profit

    I believe you're reading the prop incorrectly. Bradley has to win IN those rounds to win the prop, as in knockout Pacquiao. He's 100/1 to knock him out in rounds 1-3, 66/1 in rounds 4-6 and so on. To answer your question, I would be shocked if he got dominated.
     
    DaBestEver24
    DaBestEver24
    Banned
    Participation Meter
    Joined: Jan, 2012
    Posts: 2486
    Posted: Jun. 9, 2012 - 9:05 AM ET #6

    Quote Originally Posted by Redlad:

    If Bradley fights a smart fight I look for him to preform very comptitively tonight.I think his camp realizes that they can't get overly aggressive (especially in the early rds). His boxing skills & speed should have a telling effect on what Manny will be able to accomplish in this bout. I just can't envision the overly energized monster that Manny has had the reputation for in his hay-day. His body seems to have  lost some of the old muscle tone & it does not take a Sherlock Holmes to imagine why. Bradley may not be a big puncher but he can display some crafty footwork & ring smarts to avoid walking into a big shot from the veteran. He also has the ability to use angles to move in & out while scoring points with quick combinations. So I look for this fight to be very close. The problem with betting Bradley to win is summed up in 2 sets of 2 words. Bob Arum & Top Rank. Some of us who have been around the boxing game know how intimidating it can be for a judge to vote against a house fighter. It is a little known fact that promoters have a say in who will judge upcoming fights in which they promote. You can imagine how much pressure this puts on judges who want steady work (esspecially in high profile fights; where they get paid the most money). A very wise boxing expert once told me that to bet against an undefeated fighter, is a losing proposition, in the long run. I'll follow that advice in tonight's match-up. but because I don't trust the judges I'll take the 16.5 point handicap instead of betting Bradley to win straight-up. The main thing I'm worried about (as was pointed out by another poster) is Bradley head-butting his way into trouble. Certainly not out of the equation.

    So it's  Bradley + 16.5 handicap as my final Wager for 5 Units.
    P


    P.S.

    If you don't  agree with any or all of my opinions, it does not mean that

    1. You know nothing about boxing or

    2. You know nothing about gambling on boxing.


    It  merely means we disagree on the analysis of the outcome, where luck & the boxers strategy play a major role, at the end of the day. GLTU!

    This guy is killing me.  After your whole analysis u came up wit a bradley +16.5 medium? Youre basically saying pacman will win but it will b close. Cmon. Just bet pacman large on the ml! Its simple. Pacman cant lose! Theres a good chance bradley goes to sleep
    Reply
    Quote Originally Posted by Redlad:

    If Bradley fights a smart fight I look for him to preform very comptitively tonight.I think his camp realizes that they can't get overly aggressive (especially in the early rds). His boxing skills & speed should have a telling effect on what Manny will be able to accomplish in this bout. I just can't envision the overly energized monster that Manny has had the reputation for in his hay-day. His body seems to have  lost some of the old muscle tone & it does not take a Sherlock Holmes to imagine why. Bradley may not be a big puncher but he can display some crafty footwork & ring smarts to avoid walking into a big shot from the veteran. He also has the ability to use angles to move in & out while scoring points with quick combinations. So I look for this fight to be very close. The problem with betting Bradley to win is summed up in 2 sets of 2 words. Bob Arum & Top Rank. Some of us who have been around the boxing game know how intimidating it can be for a judge to vote against a house fighter. It is a little known fact that promoters have a say in who will judge upcoming fights in which they promote. You can imagine how much pressure this puts on judges who want steady work (esspecially in high profile fights; where they get paid the most money). A very wise boxing expert once told me that to bet against an undefeated fighter, is a losing proposition, in the long run. I'll follow that advice in tonight's match-up. but because I don't trust the judges I'll take the 16.5 point handicap instead of betting Bradley to win straight-up. The main thing I'm worried about (as was pointed out by another poster) is Bradley head-butting his way into trouble. Certainly not out of the equation.

    So it's  Bradley + 16.5 handicap as my final Wager for 5 Units.
    P


    P.S.

    If you don't  agree with any or all of my opinions, it does not mean that

    1. You know nothing about boxing or

    2. You know nothing about gambling on boxing.


    It  merely means we disagree on the analysis of the outcome, where luck & the boxers strategy play a major role, at the end of the day. GLTU!

    This guy is killing me.  After your whole analysis u came up wit a bradley +16.5 medium? Youre basically saying pacman will win but it will b close. Cmon. Just bet pacman large on the ml! Its simple. Pacman cant lose! Theres a good chance bradley goes to sleep
     
    Jerseyboy89
    Jerseyboy89
    Veteran
    Participation Meter
    Joined: Sep, 2010
    Posts: 2608
    Posted: Jun. 9, 2012 - 9:27 AM ET #7

    +360 is a gift, a GIFT, Pacquiao is not winning this fight, I can promise you this,
    Reply
    +360 is a gift, a GIFT, Pacquiao is not winning this fight, I can promise you this,
     
    london2k
    london2k
    Prospect
    Participation Meter
    Joined: Aug, 2010
    Posts: 24
    Posted: Jun. 9, 2012 - 9:40 AM ET #8

    Quote Originally Posted by Redlad:

    If Bradley fights a smart fight I look for him to preform very comptitively tonight.I think his camp realizes that they can't get overly aggressive (especially in the early rds). His boxing skills & speed should have a telling effect on what Manny will be able to accomplish in this bout. I just can't envision the overly energized monster that Manny has had the reputation for in his hay-day. His body seems to have  lost some of the old muscle tone & it does not take a Sherlock Holmes to imagine why. Bradley may not be a big puncher but he can display some crafty footwork & ring smarts to avoid walking into a big shot from the veteran. He also has the ability to use angles to move in & out while scoring points with quick combinations. So I look for this fight to be very close. The problem with betting Bradley to win is summed up in 2 sets of 2 words. Bob Arum & Top Rank. Some of us who have been around the boxing game know how intimidating it can be for a judge to vote against a house fighter. It is a little known fact that promoters have a say in who will judge upcoming fights in which they promote. You can imagine how much pressure this puts on judges who want steady work (esspecially in high profile fights; where they get paid the most money). A very wise boxing expert once told me that to bet against an undefeated fighter, is a losing proposition, in the long run. I'll follow that advice in tonight's match-up. but because I don't trust the judges I'll take the 16.5 point handicap instead of betting Bradley to win straight-up. The main thing I'm worried about (as was pointed out by another poster) is Bradley head-butting his way into trouble. Certainly not out of the equation.

    So it's  Bradley + 16.5 handicap as my final Wager for 5 Units.


    P.S.

    If you don't  agree with any or all of my opinions, it does not mean that

    1. You know nothing about boxing or

    2. You know nothing about gambling on boxing.


    It  merely means we disagree on the analysis of the outcome, where luck & the boxers strategy play a major role, at the end of the day. GLTU!


    Sorry....I'm not getting this?  What bet is out there at "+16.5" on Bradley? It can't be round betting, as even a whitewash would only be 120-108...or 12 points........so what exactly does the +16.5 refer to?

    Thanks,

    Reply
    Quote Originally Posted by Redlad:

    If Bradley fights a smart fight I look for him to preform very comptitively tonight.I think his camp realizes that they can't get overly aggressive (especially in the early rds). His boxing skills & speed should have a telling effect on what Manny will be able to accomplish in this bout. I just can't envision the overly energized monster that Manny has had the reputation for in his hay-day. His body seems to have  lost some of the old muscle tone & it does not take a Sherlock Holmes to imagine why. Bradley may not be a big puncher but he can display some crafty footwork & ring smarts to avoid walking into a big shot from the veteran. He also has the ability to use angles to move in & out while scoring points with quick combinations. So I look for this fight to be very close. The problem with betting Bradley to win is summed up in 2 sets of 2 words. Bob Arum & Top Rank. Some of us who have been around the boxing game know how intimidating it can be for a judge to vote against a house fighter. It is a little known fact that promoters have a say in who will judge upcoming fights in which they promote. You can imagine how much pressure this puts on judges who want steady work (esspecially in high profile fights; where they get paid the most money). A very wise boxing expert once told me that to bet against an undefeated fighter, is a losing proposition, in the long run. I'll follow that advice in tonight's match-up. but because I don't trust the judges I'll take the 16.5 point handicap instead of betting Bradley to win straight-up. The main thing I'm worried about (as was pointed out by another poster) is Bradley head-butting his way into trouble. Certainly not out of the equation.

    So it's  Bradley + 16.5 handicap as my final Wager for 5 Units.


    P.S.

    If you don't  agree with any or all of my opinions, it does not mean that

    1. You know nothing about boxing or

    2. You know nothing about gambling on boxing.


    It  merely means we disagree on the analysis of the outcome, where luck & the boxers strategy play a major role, at the end of the day. GLTU!


    Sorry....I'm not getting this?  What bet is out there at "+16.5" on Bradley? It can't be round betting, as even a whitewash would only be 120-108...or 12 points........so what exactly does the +16.5 refer to?

    Thanks,

     
    Qncyk1
    Qncyk1
    Veteran
    Participation Meter
    Joined: Aug, 2011
    Posts: 1239
    Posted: Jun. 9, 2012 - 12:32 PM ET #9

    Quote Originally Posted by Redlad:

    If Bradley fights a smart fight I look for him to preform very comptitively tonight.I think his camp realizes that they can't get overly aggressive (especially in the early rds). His boxing skills & speed should have a telling effect on what Manny will be able to accomplish in this bout. I just can't envision the overly energized monster that Manny has had the reputation for in his hay-day. His body seems to have  lost some of the old muscle tone & it does not take a Sherlock Holmes to imagine why. Bradley may not be a big puncher but he can display some crafty footwork & ring smarts to avoid walking into a big shot from the veteran. He also has the ability to use angles to move in & out while scoring points with quick combinations. So I look for this fight to be very close. The problem with betting Bradley to win is summed up in 2 sets of 2 words. Bob Arum & Top Rank. Some of us who have been around the boxing game know how intimidating it can be for a judge to vote against a house fighter. It is a little known fact that promoters have a say in who will judge upcoming fights in which they promote. You can imagine how much pressure this puts on judges who want steady work (esspecially in high profile fights; where they get paid the most money). A very wise boxing expert once told me that to bet against an undefeated fighter, is a losing proposition, in the long run. I'll follow that advice in tonight's match-up. but because I don't trust the judges I'll take the 16.5 point handicap instead of betting Bradley to win straight-up. The main thing I'm worried about (as was pointed out by another poster) is Bradley head-butting his way into trouble. Certainly not out of the equation.

    So it's  Bradley + 16.5 handicap as my final Wager for 5 Units.


    P.S.

    If you don't  agree with any or all of my opinions, it does not mean that

    1. You know nothing about boxing or

    2. You know nothing about gambling on boxing.


    It  merely means we disagree on the analysis of the outcome, where luck & the boxers strategy play a major role, at the end of the day. GLTU!

    wow. a non-ego voice of reasoning on the boxing forum that is actually making a play.

    as we say here in mexico...mucho gusto, Redland.

    I dont believe that corrupt judging will be a factor in this fight. I posted my picks here of paq/jmm3(win),devon/madaina(win),kirkland/molina(win),garcia/morales(win),hopkins/dawson(loss) specifically because of the hometown promoters influence but i dont see that happening tonight. arum recently came out and publically stated that if paq performs the same way he did against jmm he could lose to bradley. i believe that arum has given the green light to his preferred judge(s) to not give the benefit of the doubt to paq in all the close rounds as he is also the promoter of bradley and may think that bradley is his future star. i believe that arum has given up on paq/pbf because he knows that paq will never agree to the test and pbf will not fight without it.

    regardless, i like paq tonight to win and think that the line will eventually get down to as low as -300. +16.5 is a good bet because in bradleys last ten, two have been determined early because of headbuts and i think that this fight will not be a blowout and will be fairly judged. reasoning behind paq is bradleys fights against abregu/alexander(pro-rated) he averaged around 540 total punches and paq averaged 650 against mosely/jmm( 578). also, the lesser punch output of bradley are against guys that dont hit nearly as hard as paq and didnt have power in both their hands to keep him honest.

    thanks for your non-"im the smartest guy in the boxing forum" post and i hope i see a chavez jr/lee play from you next week.

    Reply

    Quote Originally Posted by Redlad:

    If Bradley fights a smart fight I look for him to preform very comptitively tonight.I think his camp realizes that they can't get overly aggressive (especially in the early rds). His boxing skills & speed should have a telling effect on what Manny will be able to accomplish in this bout. I just can't envision the overly energized monster that Manny has had the reputation for in his hay-day. His body seems to have  lost some of the old muscle tone & it does not take a Sherlock Holmes to imagine why. Bradley may not be a big puncher but he can display some crafty footwork & ring smarts to avoid walking into a big shot from the veteran. He also has the ability to use angles to move in & out while scoring points with quick combinations. So I look for this fight to be very close. The problem with betting Bradley to win is summed up in 2 sets of 2 words. Bob Arum & Top Rank. Some of us who have been around the boxing game know how intimidating it can be for a judge to vote against a house fighter. It is a little known fact that promoters have a say in who will judge upcoming fights in which they promote. You can imagine how much pressure this puts on judges who want steady work (esspecially in high profile fights; where they get paid the most money). A very wise boxing expert once told me that to bet against an undefeated fighter, is a losing proposition, in the long run. I'll follow that advice in tonight's match-up. but because I don't trust the judges I'll take the 16.5 point handicap instead of betting Bradley to win straight-up. The main thing I'm worried about (as was pointed out by another poster) is Bradley head-butting his way into trouble. Certainly not out of the equation.

    So it's  Bradley + 16.5 handicap as my final Wager for 5 Units.


    P.S.

    If you don't  agree with any or all of my opinions, it does not mean that

    1. You know nothing about boxing or

    2. You know nothing about gambling on boxing.


    It  merely means we disagree on the analysis of the outcome, where luck & the boxers strategy play a major role, at the end of the day. GLTU!

    wow. a non-ego voice of reasoning on the boxing forum that is actually making a play.

    as we say here in mexico...mucho gusto, Redland.

    I dont believe that corrupt judging will be a factor in this fight. I posted my picks here of paq/jmm3(win),devon/madaina(win),kirkland/molina(win),garcia/morales(win),hopkins/dawson(loss) specifically because of the hometown promoters influence but i dont see that happening tonight. arum recently came out and publically stated that if paq performs the same way he did against jmm he could lose to bradley. i believe that arum has given the green light to his preferred judge(s) to not give the benefit of the doubt to paq in all the close rounds as he is also the promoter of bradley and may think that bradley is his future star. i believe that arum has given up on paq/pbf because he knows that paq will never agree to the test and pbf will not fight without it.

    regardless, i like paq tonight to win and think that the line will eventually get down to as low as -300. +16.5 is a good bet because in bradleys last ten, two have been determined early because of headbuts and i think that this fight will not be a blowout and will be fairly judged. reasoning behind paq is bradleys fights against abregu/alexander(pro-rated) he averaged around 540 total punches and paq averaged 650 against mosely/jmm( 578). also, the lesser punch output of bradley are against guys that dont hit nearly as hard as paq and didnt have power in both their hands to keep him honest.

    thanks for your non-"im the smartest guy in the boxing forum" post and i hope i see a chavez jr/lee play from you next week.

     
    esplanade
    esplanade
    Captain
    Participation Meter
    Joined: Feb, 2008
    Posts: 9021
    Posted: Jun. 9, 2012 - 12:51 PM ET #10

    Quote Originally Posted by london2k:



    Sorry....I'm not getting this?  What bet is out there at "+16.5" on Bradley? It can't be round betting, as even a whitewash would only be 120-108...or 12 points........so what exactly does the +16.5 refer to?

    Thanks,



    How many judges are there, my friend? Add up the 3 scorecards and there you go. In addition, a Bradley bet loses to the ko.
    Reply
    Quote Originally Posted by london2k:



    Sorry....I'm not getting this?  What bet is out there at "+16.5" on Bradley? It can't be round betting, as even a whitewash would only be 120-108...or 12 points........so what exactly does the +16.5 refer to?

    Thanks,



    How many judges are there, my friend? Add up the 3 scorecards and there you go. In addition, a Bradley bet loses to the ko.
     
    rzagza
    rzagza
    All-Star
    Participation Meter
    Joined: Sep, 2009
    Posts: 10857
    Posted: Jun. 9, 2012 - 1:09 PM ET #11

    +16.5 seems about right, I suppose.  117-111, 117-111, 116-112 is 16.  So basically you are hoping there's either 1 close card or no blowout cards.  I dont see the point in doing this prop though.  Bradley is not going to KO Pac.  He's just not so you're only path to victory is a loss on the cards thats not a wipeout.  Why wouldnt you just bet the fight to go the distance then at -130 or take Pac to win a decision at +125.  You cant seriously Bradley is gonna get a stoppage here.  There are better ways to bet on this fight than this.
    Reply
    +16.5 seems about right, I suppose.  117-111, 117-111, 116-112 is 16.  So basically you are hoping there's either 1 close card or no blowout cards.  I dont see the point in doing this prop though.  Bradley is not going to KO Pac.  He's just not so you're only path to victory is a loss on the cards thats not a wipeout.  Why wouldnt you just bet the fight to go the distance then at -130 or take Pac to win a decision at +125.  You cant seriously Bradley is gonna get a stoppage here.  There are better ways to bet on this fight than this.
     
    Qncyk1
    Qncyk1
    Veteran
    Participation Meter
    Joined: Aug, 2011
    Posts: 1239
    Posted: Jun. 9, 2012 - 1:17 PM ET #12

    it might not go the distance. 2 of bradleys last 10 have been under because of his noggin and paq has been know to cut.

    also, paq may stop bradley.

    agree that bradley stopping ko is very slim.

    Reply

    it might not go the distance. 2 of bradleys last 10 have been under because of his noggin and paq has been know to cut.

    also, paq may stop bradley.

    agree that bradley stopping ko is very slim.

     
    walktheline
    walktheline
    Banned
    Participation Meter
    Joined: Dec, 2007
    Posts: 4526
    Posted: Jun. 9, 2012 - 1:33 PM ET #13

    Quote Originally Posted by rzagza:

    +16.5 seems about right, I suppose.  117-111, 117-111, 116-112 is 16.  So basically you are hoping there's either 1 close card or no blowout cards.  I dont see the point in doing this prop though.  Bradley is not going to KO Pac.  He's just not so you're only path to victory is a loss on the cards thats not a wipeout.  Why wouldnt you just bet the fight to go the distance then at -130 or take Pac to win a decision at +125.  You cant seriously Bradley is gonna get a stoppage here.  There are better ways to bet on this fight than this.

    Fight goes the distance is up to -145, and the prop is -130. Pac might not win a decision. Bradley could get a stoppage, although unlikely. It covers more surface area of your ass relatively cheaply. 

    What particular angle is better? On another note, this fight is giving me a headache... 
    Reply
    Quote Originally Posted by rzagza:

    +16.5 seems about right, I suppose.  117-111, 117-111, 116-112 is 16.  So basically you are hoping there's either 1 close card or no blowout cards.  I dont see the point in doing this prop though.  Bradley is not going to KO Pac.  He's just not so you're only path to victory is a loss on the cards thats not a wipeout.  Why wouldnt you just bet the fight to go the distance then at -130 or take Pac to win a decision at +125.  You cant seriously Bradley is gonna get a stoppage here.  There are better ways to bet on this fight than this.

    Fight goes the distance is up to -145, and the prop is -130. Pac might not win a decision. Bradley could get a stoppage, although unlikely. It covers more surface area of your ass relatively cheaply. 

    What particular angle is better? On another note, this fight is giving me a headache... 
     
    walktheline
    walktheline
    Banned
    Participation Meter
    Joined: Dec, 2007
    Posts: 4526
    Posted: Jun. 9, 2012 - 1:36 PM ET #14

    Personally, the only thing I'm playing is "Not Pacquiao inside the distance" at -170.
    Reply
    Personally, the only thing I'm playing is "Not Pacquiao inside the distance" at -170.
     
    rzagza
    rzagza
    All-Star
    Participation Meter
    Joined: Sep, 2009
    Posts: 10857
    Posted: Jun. 9, 2012 - 1:53 PM ET #15

    Quote Originally Posted by walktheline:

    Personally, the only thing I'm playing is "Not Pacquiao inside the distance" at -170.

    You think Bradley is more likely to score a stoppage than Pac?  I just dont see that, at all.  I ultimately think it goes to the cards but I give Bradley little to no chance of a stoppage and Pac a decent chance at a late stoppage.  You also think Bradley is going to win a decision against boxing's cash cow?  How did that work out for Marquez?  Marquez won 7 rounds and still lost.  You think Bradley can do better than that? I dont.
    Reply
    Quote Originally Posted by walktheline:

    Personally, the only thing I'm playing is "Not Pacquiao inside the distance" at -170.

    You think Bradley is more likely to score a stoppage than Pac?  I just dont see that, at all.  I ultimately think it goes to the cards but I give Bradley little to no chance of a stoppage and Pac a decent chance at a late stoppage.  You also think Bradley is going to win a decision against boxing's cash cow?  How did that work out for Marquez?  Marquez won 7 rounds and still lost.  You think Bradley can do better than that? I dont.
     
    walktheline
    walktheline
    Banned
    Participation Meter
    Joined: Dec, 2007
    Posts: 4526
    Posted: Jun. 9, 2012 - 2:00 PM ET #16

    Quote Originally Posted by rzagza:


    You think Bradley is more likely to score a stoppage than Pac?  I just dont see that, at all.  I ultimately think it goes to the cards but I give Bradley little to no chance of a stoppage and Pac a decent chance at a late stoppage.  You also think Bradley is going to win a decision against boxing's cash cow?  How did that work out for Marquez?  Marquez won 7 rounds and still lost.  You think Bradley can do better than that? I dont.

    He's a Top Rank fighter. Marquez wasn't. Insta rematch clause, huge money there. I don't think Bradley is more likely to stop Pacquiao at all. Why do you think that?
    Reply
    Quote Originally Posted by rzagza:


    You think Bradley is more likely to score a stoppage than Pac?  I just dont see that, at all.  I ultimately think it goes to the cards but I give Bradley little to no chance of a stoppage and Pac a decent chance at a late stoppage.  You also think Bradley is going to win a decision against boxing's cash cow?  How did that work out for Marquez?  Marquez won 7 rounds and still lost.  You think Bradley can do better than that? I dont.

    He's a Top Rank fighter. Marquez wasn't. Insta rematch clause, huge money there. I don't think Bradley is more likely to stop Pacquiao at all. Why do you think that?
     
    rzagza
    rzagza
    All-Star
    Participation Meter
    Joined: Sep, 2009
    Posts: 10857
    Posted: Jun. 9, 2012 - 2:13 PM ET #17

    You said you're only playing Pacquaio to not score a KO.  

    As far as Bradley being a Top Rank fighter - that means nothing.  Pac is making 30 million for this fight, Bradley is making 5.  Who do you think stands to lose more in future wages if Pacquaio loses?  Top Rank.  They cannot have Manny lose.  Once he loses the mystique is gone and the massive paydays for everyone in Top Rank go away.  They wont have that.
    Reply
    You said you're only playing Pacquaio to not score a KO.  

    As far as Bradley being a Top Rank fighter - that means nothing.  Pac is making 30 million for this fight, Bradley is making 5.  Who do you think stands to lose more in future wages if Pacquaio loses?  Top Rank.  They cannot have Manny lose.  Once he loses the mystique is gone and the massive paydays for everyone in Top Rank go away.  They wont have that.
     
    rzagza
    rzagza
    All-Star
    Participation Meter
    Joined: Sep, 2009
    Posts: 10857
    Posted: Jun. 9, 2012 - 2:14 PM ET #18

    Once he's done with Manny, Bradley will move on to good but not great paydays with guys like Khan, Ortiz, Berto etc.  He'll be making roughly the same $ in those fights even if he loses to Manny.  
    Reply
    Once he's done with Manny, Bradley will move on to good but not great paydays with guys like Khan, Ortiz, Berto etc.  He'll be making roughly the same $ in those fights even if he loses to Manny.  
     
    walktheline
    walktheline
    Banned
    Participation Meter
    Joined: Dec, 2007
    Posts: 4526
    Posted: Jun. 9, 2012 - 2:19 PM ET #19

    Bradley being a Top Rank fighter COULD mean that he won't automatically be raped by the three blind mice. If the Mayweather fight is off the table, where does Pacquiao go after Bradley? A rematch would be huge. The more and more I think about this, I feel Bradley will get a fair shake on the cards.

    Is Pacquiao even going to continue fighting after Bradley anyways?
    Reply
    Bradley being a Top Rank fighter COULD mean that he won't automatically be raped by the three blind mice. If the Mayweather fight is off the table, where does Pacquiao go after Bradley? A rematch would be huge. The more and more I think about this, I feel Bradley will get a fair shake on the cards.

    Is Pacquiao even going to continue fighting after Bradley anyways?
     
    rzagza
    rzagza
    All-Star
    Participation Meter
    Joined: Sep, 2009
    Posts: 10857
    Posted: Jun. 9, 2012 - 2:21 PM ET #20

    It doesnt matter who Manny fights.  He gets 30 million dollars to fight whoever.  Cotto again - another 30 million.  Amir Khan - 30 million. Doesnt matter who it is.  You think he's going to walk away from that $?
    Reply
    It doesnt matter who Manny fights.  He gets 30 million dollars to fight whoever.  Cotto again - another 30 million.  Amir Khan - 30 million. Doesnt matter who it is.  You think he's going to walk away from that $?
     
    walktheline
    walktheline
    Banned
    Participation Meter
    Joined: Dec, 2007
    Posts: 4526
    Posted: Jun. 9, 2012 - 2:28 PM ET #21

    He's never going to fight Khan. Cotto again? Who the hell wants to see that? I not sure if he CAN walk away, because there are rumblings that he has financial trouble. Seems absurd, but it's been said by more than a few people.

    Honestly, I have a feeling Pacquiao wants to finally take a breather. He's probably too proud to wilt in the middle of a fight but I can absolutely see a point where he simply doesn't want to fight anymore. We've been teetering on that point for a while now and another tough fight could seal the deal. Don't you agree?
    Reply
    He's never going to fight Khan. Cotto again? Who the hell wants to see that? I not sure if he CAN walk away, because there are rumblings that he has financial trouble. Seems absurd, but it's been said by more than a few people.

    Honestly, I have a feeling Pacquiao wants to finally take a breather. He's probably too proud to wilt in the middle of a fight but I can absolutely see a point where he simply doesn't want to fight anymore. We've been teetering on that point for a while now and another tough fight could seal the deal. Don't you agree?
     
    london2k
    london2k
    Prospect
    Participation Meter
    Joined: Aug, 2010
    Posts: 24
    Posted: Jun. 9, 2012 - 2:54 PM ET #22

    I think it's easy to over-analyse this fight.

    To me it comes down to this....

    Pac can almost certainly take Bradley's best punch, and keep on coming.

    Bradley can almost certainly NOT take Pac's best punch, and would likely be KO'd by it.

    If the above theory is indeed correct....Pac has no reason to avoid Bradley, he can wade in firing with both barrels. If Bradley slips up ONE time...his great footwork notwithstanding, the fight will be over.

    You can get +150 on Pac by KO. So the linesmaker is saying that Bradley, on average, would only get caught once every 18 rounds.
    I think that is WAY out of line. Bradley won't, I'm almost sure, be in the survival mode....just backpeddling to avoid exchanges. And if he gets into repeated exchanges, Pac is likely to land the big one.

    This is like the Superbowl.....very often the line and matchup is one that you wouldn't even bother betting if the game were a regular season game.....but you bet it because everyone has to have a bet on the Superbowl. I don't see this as a great betting opportunity.......but because it's a "Superbowl-type" fight, I want some action on it. The Pac by KO at +150 seems the most logical way forward to me.
    Reply
    I think it's easy to over-analyse this fight.

    To me it comes down to this....

    Pac can almost certainly take Bradley's best punch, and keep on coming.

    Bradley can almost certainly NOT take Pac's best punch, and would likely be KO'd by it.

    If the above theory is indeed correct....Pac has no reason to avoid Bradley, he can wade in firing with both barrels. If Bradley slips up ONE time...his great footwork notwithstanding, the fight will be over.

    You can get +150 on Pac by KO. So the linesmaker is saying that Bradley, on average, would only get caught once every 18 rounds.
    I think that is WAY out of line. Bradley won't, I'm almost sure, be in the survival mode....just backpeddling to avoid exchanges. And if he gets into repeated exchanges, Pac is likely to land the big one.

    This is like the Superbowl.....very often the line and matchup is one that you wouldn't even bother betting if the game were a regular season game.....but you bet it because everyone has to have a bet on the Superbowl. I don't see this as a great betting opportunity.......but because it's a "Superbowl-type" fight, I want some action on it. The Pac by KO at +150 seems the most logical way forward to me.
     
    rzagza
    rzagza
    All-Star
    Participation Meter
    Joined: Sep, 2009
    Posts: 10857
    Posted: Jun. 9, 2012 - 3:06 PM ET #23

    Cotto again? Dont be surprised.  It's all about money and it will do huge numbers.
    Reply
    Cotto again? Dont be surprised.  It's all about money and it will do huge numbers.
     
    gridironguy
    gridironguy
    Banned
    Participation Meter
    Joined: Apr, 2007
    Posts: 5296
    Posted: Jun. 9, 2012 - 4:22 PM ET #24

    Quote Originally Posted by rzagza:

    Cotto again? Dont be surprised.  It's all about money and it will do huge numbers.



    Reply
    Quote Originally Posted by rzagza:

    Cotto again? Dont be surprised.  It's all about money and it will do huge numbers.



     
     
    Redlad
    Redlad
    Captain
    Participation Meter
    Joined: Aug, 2001
    Posts: 6822
    Posted: Jun. 9, 2012 - 7:03 PM ET #25

    Quote Originally Posted by rzagza:

    +16.5 seems about right, I suppose.  117-111, 117-111, 116-112 is 16.  So basically you are hoping there's either 1 close card or no blowout cards.  I dont see the point in doing this prop though.  Bradley is not going to KO Pac.  He's just not so you're only path to victory is a loss on the cards thats not a wipeout.  Why wouldnt you just bet the fight to go the distance then at -130 or take Pac to win a decision at +125.  You cant seriously Bradley is gonna get a stoppage here.  There are better ways to bet on this fight than this.



    Well; although I agree that it is highly unlikely that Bradley stops Pac-Man. I can surely see him winning on points. That's why I wouldn't bet  Pac-Man to win a decision. As far as the over bet.is concerned , on paper it looks like an over play, but Bradley's tendency to fight like a billy goat could cause the fight to be stopped due to a cuts. That's why I think I made the most logical play taking the points handicap. I hope that clarifies my reasoning. GLTU!
    Reply
    Quote Originally Posted by rzagza:

    +16.5 seems about right, I suppose.  117-111, 117-111, 116-112 is 16.  So basically you are hoping there's either 1 close card or no blowout cards.  I dont see the point in doing this prop though.  Bradley is not going to KO Pac.  He's just not so you're only path to victory is a loss on the cards thats not a wipeout.  Why wouldnt you just bet the fight to go the distance then at -130 or take Pac to win a decision at +125.  You cant seriously Bradley is gonna get a stoppage here.  There are better ways to bet on this fight than this.



    Well; although I agree that it is highly unlikely that Bradley stops Pac-Man. I can surely see him winning on points. That's why I wouldn't bet  Pac-Man to win a decision. As far as the over bet.is concerned , on paper it looks like an over play, but Bradley's tendency to fight like a billy goat could cause the fight to be stopped due to a cuts. That's why I think I made the most logical play taking the points handicap. I hope that clarifies my reasoning. GLTU!
    All Forums | Boxing
    12 Next Last»

    Hot Forums IconHot Forum Topics

    • Claiming Prizes 57,784
    • Serious Streak Survivor Strategies 1,918,493
    • Commanders vs Niners in-game live MNF 2,746
    • Monday 10/19/2026 608
    • NFL THREAD * 151 * 26,041
    • PART DEUX 157
    • the whole problem is knowingly spreading false info to vulnerable people 22,987
    • Monday Night Covers Bloodbath Brewing 2,451
    • 49er under 52 all in do 1,511
    • 10/18 3,565

    Warning - External Link

    Report User

    Thank you for reporting
    This content is abusive or harmful
    This post is spam
    An error has occurred
    This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.

    Delete Post

    Are you sure you would like to remove this post?

    Remove Thread

    Are you sure you would like to remove this thread?

    Scan Results

    Login/Register

    Happy to have you join the conversation. To do so, please login or create an account.
    Accounts are free and easy to create.

    Search


    Loading…

    Loading…

    About Us
    Contact Us
    Careers
    Our Team
    Brand
    Testimonials
    Betting Guides
    Sportsbook Reviews
    Betting News
    Podcasts
    Responsible Gambling
    Betting Sites
    US Betting Sites
    Canada Betting Sites
    Canada Casinos
    Best Betting Apps
    Contests
    Streak Survivor
    King of Covers
    Ultimate Race
    Office Pools
    The Covers community has
    810,221
    lifetime members worldwide
    Join our community today
    Covers 30 Years Logo Established in 1995,
    Covers is the world
    leader in sports
    betting information.
    21+
    Gambling problem? Call 1-800-GAMBLER
    Help Privacy Privacy Choices Terms of Service Cookies Sitemap Forum
    YouTube logo
    Facebook logo
    Twitter logo
    Instagram logo
    LinkedIn logo
    Google News logo
    Covers is verified safe by:
    Evalon Logo Logo GPWA Logo GDPR logo Logo GeoTrust logo Logo
    Covers Logo
    Copyright © 1995 - 2026 Genius Sports. All Rights Reserved.
    If you choose to make use of any information on this website including online sports betting services from any websites that may be featured on this website, we strongly recommend that you carefully check your local laws before doing so.It is your sole responsibility to understand your local laws and observe them strictly.Covers does not provide any advice or guidance as to the legality of online sports betting or other online gambling activities within your jurisdiction and you are responsible for complying with laws that are applicable to you in your relevant locality.Covers disclaims all liability associated with your use of this website and use of any information contained on it.As a condition of using this website, you agree to hold the owner of this website harmless from any claims arising from your use of any services on any third party website that may be featured by Covers.