• Forums
  • Best Betting Sites
  • Sportsbook Promos
  • Best Sports Betting Apps
  • NFL Betting Forum
  • NBA Betting Forum
  • MLB Betting Forum
  • NHL Betting Forum
  • NCAAF Betting Forum
  • NCAAB Betting Forum
  • Soccer Betting Forum
  • Tennis Betting Forum
  • General Discussion
  • Help Forum
  • Guidelines
  • FAQ
  • Forum Updates
    Covers Logo
    Covers App
    Faster picks. Smarter bets.
    All in the NEW Covers App
    Download on the App Store Download on the Google Play Store
    • Sports
      • NFL
        • Back
        • NFL
        • NFL Home
        • Scores & Matchups
        • Prop Projections
        • NFL Picks
        • NFL Prediction Prices
        • Weather
        • Injuries
      • NCAAF
        • Back
        • NCAAF
        • NCAAF Home
        • Scores & Matchups
        • Prop Projections
        • NCAAF Picks
        • Weather
        • Injuries
      • NBA
        • Back
        • NBA
        • NBA Home
        • Scores & Matchups
        • Prop Projections
        • NBA Picks
        • Injuries
      • NCAAB
        • Back
        • NCAAB
        • NCAAB Home
        • Scores & Matchups
        • NCAAB Picks
        • Injuries
      • MLB
        • Back
        • MLB
        • MLB Home
        • Scores & Matchups
        • Prop Projections
        • MLB Picks
        • Weather
        • Injuries
      • NHL
        • Back
        • NHL
        • NHL Home
        • Scores & Matchups
        • Prop Projections
        • NHL Picks
        • Injuries
      • Soccer
      • UFC
      • WNBA
        • Back
        • WNBA
        • WNBA Home
        • Scores & Matchups
        • WNBA Picks
        • Injuries
      • CFL
        • Back
        • CFL
        • CFL Home
        • Scores & Matchups
        • CFL Picks
      • Golf
        • Back
        • Golf
        • Golf Home
        • Golf Odds
        • Masters Odds
        • PGA Championship Odds
        • US Open Odds
        • British Open Odds
        • Ryder Cup Odds
        • Golf Picks
    • Odds
      • All Odds
      • NFL
      • NCAAF
      • NBA
      • NCAAB
      • MLB
      • NHL
      • Golf
      • Soccer Odds
        • Back
        • Soccer Odds
        • MLS Odds
        • Champions League Odds
        • Premier League Odds
      • UFC
      • WNBA
      • CFL
      • Election Odds
      • Futures
        • Back
        • Futures
        • NFL
        • NBA
        • MLB
        • NHL
        • NCAAB
        • NCAAF
      • Sports Odds History
      • Politics
        • Back
        • Politics
        • Politics Home
        • Presidential Election Odds
        • Midterm Election Odds
        • House Midterm Odds
        • Senate Midterm Odds
        • Texas Midterm Odds
        • Michigan Midterm Odds
    • Picks
      • All Picks
      • NFL
      • NBA
      • NHL
      • MLB
      • NCAAF
      • NCAAB
      • Golf
      • WNBA
      • CFL
      • User Picks
      • Team User Picks
      • Consensus Picks
        • Back
        • Consensus Picks
        • All Consensus Picks
        • NFL
        • NBA
        • NHL
        • MLB
        • NCAAF
        • NCAAB
        • CFL
        • WNBA
        • Consensus FAQ
        • Public Money
    • Prop Projections
      • NFL
      • NBA
      • MLB
      • NHL
    • Betting
      • US Betting Sites
      • Canada Betting Sites
      • Sportsbook Reviews
      • States
        • Back
        • States
        • US Legal Tracker
        • Revenue Tracker
        • Arizona
        • Arkansas
        • California
        • Colorado
        • Connecticut
        • DC
        • Florida
        • Georgia
        • Illinois
        • Indiana
        • Iowa
        • Kansas
        • Kentucky
        • Louisiana
        • Maine
        • Maryland
        • Massachusetts
        • Michigan
        • Mississippi
        • Missouri
        • Nevada
        • New Hampshire
        • New Jersey
        • New York
        • North Carolina
        • Ohio
        • Oregon
        • Pennsylvania
        • Tennessee
        • Texas
        • Vermont
        • Virginia
        • West Virginia
        • Wyoming
      • Provinces
        • Back
        • Provinces
        • Alberta
        • British Columbia
        • Manitoba
        • New Brunswick
        • Newfoundland and Labrador
        • Northwest Territories
        • Nova Scotia
        • Nunavut
        • Ontario
        • Prince Edward Island
        • Quebec (English)
        • Quebec (francais)
        • Saskatchewan
        • Yukon
      • By Sport
        • Back
        • By Sport
        • Baseball
        • Basketball
        • Boxing
        • College Football
        • F1
        • Football
        • Super Bowl
        • Golf
        • Hockey
        • Horse Racing
        • March Madness
        • Soccer
        • UFC
        • World Cup
      • Betting Apps
        • Back
        • Betting Apps
        • Best Sports Betting Apps USA
        • Ontario Sports Betting Apps
      • Rest of World
        • Back
        • Rest of World
        • UK Betting Offers
          • Back
          • UK Betting Offers
          • UK Betting Sites
          • bet365 Bonus Code UK
          • 888Sport Promo Code UK
          • William Hill Sign up Offer
          • Betway Sign up Offer
          • BetVictor Bonus Code UK
      • Betting Guides
        • Back
        • Betting Guides
        • All Guides
        • Glossary
        • Betting Calculators
          • Back
          • Betting Calculators
          • Odds Converter
          • Parlay Calculator
        • Futures Betting Guide
        • Moneyline Betting Guide
        • Over/Under Betting Guide
        • Parlay Betting Guide
        • Point Spread Betting Guide
        • Prop Betting Guide
        • Sports Betting Guides
          • Back
          • Sports Betting Guides
          • How To Bet On Sports Guide
          • NFL Betting Guide
          • NHL Betting Guide
          • NBA Betting Guide
          • MLB Betting Guide
          • NCAAB Betting Guide
          • NCAAF Betting Guide
          • Golf Betting Guide
          • Tennis Betting Guide
        • Teaser Betting Guide
      • Betting News
        • Back
        • Betting News
        • All News
        • Industry News
        • Podcasts
        • Covers Videos
        • Covers Writers
        • Offers & Boosts
    • Promos
      • Sportsbook Promos
      • Canada Sportsbook Promos
      • Bonuses By Sportsbook
        • Back
        • Bonuses By Sportsbook
        • bet365 Bonus Code
        • BET99 Promo Code
        • BetMGM Bonus Code
        • BetRivers Bonus Code
        • Caesars Sportsbook Promo
        • DraftKings Promo Code
        • Fanatics Sportsbook Promo
        • FanDuel Promo Code
        • Hard Rock Bet Promo Code
        • Sports Interaction Promo
        • Stake Promo Code
        • theScore Bet Promo Code
        • TonyBet Promo Code
      • Bonuses By Region
        • Back
        • Bonuses By Region
        • Arkansas Promos
        • Arizona Promos
        • Colorado Promos
        • Connecticut Promos
        • DC Promos
        • Illinois Promos
        • Indiana Promos
        • Iowa Promos
        • Kansas Promos
        • Kentucky Promos
        • Louisiana Promos
        • Maine Promos
        • Maryland Promos
        • Massachusetts Promos
        • Michigan Promos
        • Missouri Promos
        • New Jersey Promos
        • New York Promos
        • North Carolina Promos
        • Ohio Promos
        • Pennsylvania Promos
        • Tennessee Promos
        • Vermont Promos
        • Virginia Promos
        • West Virginia Promos
        • Wyoming Promos
    • Forum & Contests
      • All Forums
      • NFL Betting Forum
      • MLB Betting Forum
      • NCAAB Betting Forum
      • NCAAF Betting Forum
      • NBA Betting Forum
      • NHL Betting Forum
      • Soccer Betting Forum
      • Contests
        • Back
        • Contests
        • Contests Home
        • Streak Survivor
        • King of Covers
        • My Contests
    • Casino
      • Sweepstakes Casino
        • Back
        • Sweepstakes Casino
        • Sweepstakes Casino
        • Sweepstakes No-Deposit Bonuses
        • Sweepstakes Promos
          • Back
          • Sweepstakes Promos
          • Card Crush
          • Casino.click
          • Chanced Casino
          • Crown Coins Casino
          • FreeSpin Casino
          • LoneStar
          • McLuck
          • Mega Bonanza Casino
          • PlayFame
          • Pulsz
          • Stake.us
      • US Casinos
        • Back
        • US Casinos
        • US Online Casinos
        • US Online Casino Bonuses
        • Casino Promos
          • Back
          • Casino Promos
          • bet365 Casino Promo Code
          • BetRivers Casino Promo
          • Borgata Casino Bonus Code
          • Caesars Casino Bonus Code
          • DraftKings Casino Promo
          • Fanatics Casino Promo
          • FanDuel Casino Promo Code
          • Golden Nugget Casino Promo
          • Hard Rock Bet Casino Promo
          • Hollywood Casino Promo Code
      • Canada Casinos
        • Back
        • Canada Casinos
        • Canada Online Casinos
        • Provinces
          • Back
          • Provinces
          • Alberta Online Casino
          • BC Online Casino
          • Ontario Online Casinos
        • Casino Promos
          • Back
          • Casino Promos
          • BC.GAME Bonus Code
          • Cloudbet Promo Code
          • RainBet Promo Code
          • Roobet Promo Code
          • Shuffle Promo Code
          • Thrill Promo Code
    • Prediction Markets
      • Prediction Markets
      • Prediction Market Apps
      • Prediction Market Promos
      • Kalshi Promo Code
      • Kalshi Referral Code
      • Polymarket Promo Code
      • Polymarket Referral Code
      • DraftKings Predictions Promo Code
      • Novig Promo Code
      • ProphetX Promo Code
      • Underdog Promo Code
      • Betr Promo Code
      • OG Promo Code
      • Fanatics Markets Promo Code
      • Plus500 Promo Code
      • Gemini Predictions Promo Code
    • NBA Opening Night
      NBA Opening Night
      • NBA Odds
      • NBA Picks
      • Thunder-Spurs Picks
      • NBA Prediction Markets
      • NBA Betting Sites
    Covers Account
    Log in Create account
    Join free Log in
    All Forums | Boxing

    Diaz/JMM, Juarez/John Picks

    123 Next Last»
    walktheline
    G8RB8
    Kidcole35
    HakAttack1
    DannoDanger
    ...
    Participants:
    Search
    Views: 2193
    Posts: 64
    123 Next Last»
     
    walktheline
    walktheline
    Banned
    Participation Meter
    Joined: Dec, 2007
    Posts: 4526
    Posted: Feb. 23, 2009 - 8:07 AM ET #1

    My early lean is JMM... however, I'm starting to like the under. Diaz isn't hard to find and I'm not sure he has tasted any true power yet. JMM isn't a huge puncher, but better than most. I'm not sure how many clean counters Diaz will be able to eat. I'm pretty sure this will be a war. The under also covers a cut or a Diaz TKO if he wears JMM out with his volume.
    I don't know what they'll put JMM ITD at, but I can't picture it being better than +285, the current price of the under 10.5 at 5dimes. However....
    I'm going to parlay it with Juarez at +260. I can't pass this up at 300 to win 3858.
    Reply
    To remove first post, remove entire topic.
    My early lean is JMM... however, I'm starting to like the under. Diaz isn't hard to find and I'm not sure he has tasted any true power yet. JMM isn't a huge puncher, but better than most. I'm not sure how many clean counters Diaz will be able to eat. I'm pretty sure this will be a war. The under also covers a cut or a Diaz TKO if he wears JMM out with his volume.
    I don't know what they'll put JMM ITD at, but I can't picture it being better than +285, the current price of the under 10.5 at 5dimes. However....
    I'm going to parlay it with Juarez at +260. I can't pass this up at 300 to win 3858.
     
    G8RB8
    G8RB8
    Legend
    Participation Meter
    Joined: Oct, 2005
    Posts: 30086
    Posted: Feb. 23, 2009 - 1:07 PM ET #2

    Quote Originally Posted by walktheline:

     I'm pretty sure this will be a war.
    God I hope so. . .  I always liked Marquez's heart, and Diaz should be willing to trade shots as well.  Looking forward to seeing lots of brutal exchanges. 
     
    Bagel Sandwiches Suck
    Reply
    Quote Originally Posted by walktheline:

     I'm pretty sure this will be a war.
    God I hope so. . .  I always liked Marquez's heart, and Diaz should be willing to trade shots as well.  Looking forward to seeing lots of brutal exchanges. 
     
     
    Kidcole35
    Kidcole35
    Rookie
    Participation Meter
    Joined: Nov, 2007
    Posts: 552
    Posted: Feb. 23, 2009 - 4:07 PM ET #3

    JMM and John should get decision victories. I hope we don't get shitty judging being that it's in Diaz and Rocky's backyards.
    Reply
    JMM and John should get decision victories. I hope we don't get shitty judging being that it's in Diaz and Rocky's backyards.
     
    HakAttack1
    HakAttack1
    Prospect
    Participation Meter
    Joined: Feb, 2007
    Posts: 387
    Posted: Feb. 23, 2009 - 6:56 PM ET #4

    Quote Originally Posted by walktheline:

    My early lean is JMM... however, I'm starting to like the under. Diaz isn't hard to find and I'm not sure he has tasted any true power yet. JMM isn't a huge puncher, but better than most. I'm not sure how many clean counters Diaz will be able to eat. I'm pretty sure this will be a war. The under also covers a cut or a Diaz TKO if he wears JMM out with his volume.
    I don't know what they'll put JMM ITD at, but I can't picture it being better than +285, the current price of the under 10.5 at 5dimes. However....
    I'm going to parlay it with Juarez at +260. I can't pass this up at 300 to win 3858.



    Diaz is there to be hit but he is also pretty tough. I think JMM rolls to a UD.

    Any play on Juarez seems to me to be a throwaway.
    Reply
    Quote Originally Posted by walktheline:

    My early lean is JMM... however, I'm starting to like the under. Diaz isn't hard to find and I'm not sure he has tasted any true power yet. JMM isn't a huge puncher, but better than most. I'm not sure how many clean counters Diaz will be able to eat. I'm pretty sure this will be a war. The under also covers a cut or a Diaz TKO if he wears JMM out with his volume.
    I don't know what they'll put JMM ITD at, but I can't picture it being better than +285, the current price of the under 10.5 at 5dimes. However....
    I'm going to parlay it with Juarez at +260. I can't pass this up at 300 to win 3858.



    Diaz is there to be hit but he is also pretty tough. I think JMM rolls to a UD.

    Any play on Juarez seems to me to be a throwaway.
     
    walktheline
    walktheline
    Banned
    Participation Meter
    Joined: Dec, 2007
    Posts: 4526
    Posted: Feb. 24, 2009 - 9:03 AM ET #5

    Quote Originally Posted by HakAttack1:




    Diaz is there to be hit but he is also pretty tough. I think JMM rolls to a UD.

    Any play on Juarez seems to me to be a throwaway.


    You probably are correct. Also, I can't pull the trigger on JMM. The more I think about this fight, the less I like him. That cut really bothered Diaz against Campbell. He would have won that fight running away without that issue. I don't think he had any idea how to respond. I have this gut feeling that Diaz makes JMM look very old very fast. I've tried to look at it 1,000 ways, but I keep seeing Diaz outworking him over 12 rounds. Maybe less.

     I also underestimated Diaz's body punching.  Unless he gets rocked early on, I think he'll take the fight over at some point in the middle rounds. Throw in some home cooking on the cards and we could have another mild upset in the boxing world.

    I think the torch will get passed this weekend. Before I talk myself out of it, I'll probably bet Diaz for around a nickel.
    Reply
    Quote Originally Posted by HakAttack1:




    Diaz is there to be hit but he is also pretty tough. I think JMM rolls to a UD.

    Any play on Juarez seems to me to be a throwaway.


    You probably are correct. Also, I can't pull the trigger on JMM. The more I think about this fight, the less I like him. That cut really bothered Diaz against Campbell. He would have won that fight running away without that issue. I don't think he had any idea how to respond. I have this gut feeling that Diaz makes JMM look very old very fast. I've tried to look at it 1,000 ways, but I keep seeing Diaz outworking him over 12 rounds. Maybe less.

     I also underestimated Diaz's body punching.  Unless he gets rocked early on, I think he'll take the fight over at some point in the middle rounds. Throw in some home cooking on the cards and we could have another mild upset in the boxing world.

    I think the torch will get passed this weekend. Before I talk myself out of it, I'll probably bet Diaz for around a nickel.
     
    DannoDanger
    DannoDanger
    Veteran
    Participation Meter
    Joined: Jul, 2008
    Posts: 3554
    Posted: Feb. 24, 2009 - 10:26 AM ET #6

    Quote Originally Posted by walktheline:



    You probably are correct. Also, I can't pull the trigger on JMM. The more I think about this fight, the less I like him. That cut really bothered Diaz against Campbell. He would have won that fight running away without that issue. I don't think he had any idea how to respond. I have this gut feeling that Diaz makes JMM look very old very fast. I've tried to look at it 1,000 ways, but I keep seeing Diaz outworking him over 12 rounds. Maybe less.

     I also underestimated Diaz's body punching.  Unless he gets rocked early on, I think he'll take the fight over at some point in the middle rounds. Throw in some home cooking on the cards and we could have another mild upset in the boxing world.

    I think the torch will get passed this weekend. Before I talk myself out of it, I'll probably bet Diaz for around a nickel.

     

    Totally agree.  I think Diaz will be able to take JMM's best shot, and keep coming.  Diaz is a big, strong lightweight.  I don't think JMM will be able to discourage him.  People are letting the KO of Casamayor fool them into thinking JMM has fight-changing power.  I see this fight going the way of Diaz's fights with Julio Diaz and Freitas.  I think he'll take JMM's punches and just keep coming.  He'll pound JMM to the body, and I can see him eventually stopping him late in the fight.   

    Reply

    Quote Originally Posted by walktheline:



    You probably are correct. Also, I can't pull the trigger on JMM. The more I think about this fight, the less I like him. That cut really bothered Diaz against Campbell. He would have won that fight running away without that issue. I don't think he had any idea how to respond. I have this gut feeling that Diaz makes JMM look very old very fast. I've tried to look at it 1,000 ways, but I keep seeing Diaz outworking him over 12 rounds. Maybe less.

     I also underestimated Diaz's body punching.  Unless he gets rocked early on, I think he'll take the fight over at some point in the middle rounds. Throw in some home cooking on the cards and we could have another mild upset in the boxing world.

    I think the torch will get passed this weekend. Before I talk myself out of it, I'll probably bet Diaz for around a nickel.

     

    Totally agree.  I think Diaz will be able to take JMM's best shot, and keep coming.  Diaz is a big, strong lightweight.  I don't think JMM will be able to discourage him.  People are letting the KO of Casamayor fool them into thinking JMM has fight-changing power.  I see this fight going the way of Diaz's fights with Julio Diaz and Freitas.  I think he'll take JMM's punches and just keep coming.  He'll pound JMM to the body, and I can see him eventually stopping him late in the fight.   

     
    nuttyrich
    nuttyrich
    Veteran
    Participation Meter
    Joined: Jul, 2004
    Posts: 1709
    Posted: Feb. 25, 2009 - 12:36 AM ET #7

    Quote Originally Posted by walktheline:



    You probably are correct. Also, I can't pull the trigger on JMM. The more I think about this fight, the less I like him. That cut really bothered Diaz against Campbell. He would have won that fight running away without that issue. I don't think he had any idea how to respond. I have this gut feeling that Diaz makes JMM look very old very fast. I've tried to look at it 1,000 ways, but I keep seeing Diaz outworking him over 12 rounds. Maybe less.

     I also underestimated Diaz's body punching.  Unless he gets rocked early on, I think he'll take the fight over at some point in the middle rounds. Throw in some home cooking on the cards and we could have another mild upset in the boxing world.

    I think the torch will get passed this weekend. Before I talk myself out of it, I'll probably bet Diaz for around a nickel.


    Diaz has NO POP, he was getting rocked on the inside by Nate! Marquez can fight inside, outside, this is a one sided fight. Marquez wins easily, but close on the score cards as the fight is in HOUSTON. Diaz was exposed in the Campbell fight, he's not a bad fighter he does throw a ton of punches but has no thunder in them. His defense is his offense (throwing a ton of punches), Marquez will tear him apart. If anyone thinks a weak puncher with a  high volume of punching like Diaz can beat Marquez is insane.Marquez  will pepper him with his long Jab all night,  uppercuts on the inside,and straight right hand  as Diaz walks straight in . If you know boxing you know a TRUE boxer will always beat a slugger who only goes forward and no PUNCH to hurt his man. Why Diaz is taking this fight  I have no idea worst possible matchup for him style wise.

    Take JMM by decision.
    Reply
    Quote Originally Posted by walktheline:



    You probably are correct. Also, I can't pull the trigger on JMM. The more I think about this fight, the less I like him. That cut really bothered Diaz against Campbell. He would have won that fight running away without that issue. I don't think he had any idea how to respond. I have this gut feeling that Diaz makes JMM look very old very fast. I've tried to look at it 1,000 ways, but I keep seeing Diaz outworking him over 12 rounds. Maybe less.

     I also underestimated Diaz's body punching.  Unless he gets rocked early on, I think he'll take the fight over at some point in the middle rounds. Throw in some home cooking on the cards and we could have another mild upset in the boxing world.

    I think the torch will get passed this weekend. Before I talk myself out of it, I'll probably bet Diaz for around a nickel.


    Diaz has NO POP, he was getting rocked on the inside by Nate! Marquez can fight inside, outside, this is a one sided fight. Marquez wins easily, but close on the score cards as the fight is in HOUSTON. Diaz was exposed in the Campbell fight, he's not a bad fighter he does throw a ton of punches but has no thunder in them. His defense is his offense (throwing a ton of punches), Marquez will tear him apart. If anyone thinks a weak puncher with a  high volume of punching like Diaz can beat Marquez is insane.Marquez  will pepper him with his long Jab all night,  uppercuts on the inside,and straight right hand  as Diaz walks straight in . If you know boxing you know a TRUE boxer will always beat a slugger who only goes forward and no PUNCH to hurt his man. Why Diaz is taking this fight  I have no idea worst possible matchup for him style wise.

    Take JMM by decision.
     
    nuttyrich
    nuttyrich
    Veteran
    Participation Meter
    Joined: Jul, 2004
    Posts: 1709
    Posted: Feb. 25, 2009 - 12:44 AM ET #8

    Quote Originally Posted by DannoDanger:

     

    Totally agree.  I think Diaz will be able to take JMM's best shot, and keep coming.  Diaz is a big, strong lightweight.  I don't think JMM will be able to discourage him.  People are letting the KO of Casamayor fool them into thinking JMM has fight-changing power.  I see this fight going the way of Diaz's fights with Julio Diaz and Freitas.  I think he'll take JMM's punches and just keep coming.  He'll pound JMM to the body, and I can see him eventually stopping him late in the fight.   



    Julio Diaz is average at best! And Freitas's career was over when he QUIT against Diego years ago. Comparing Marquez to those two fighters is an insult! Classic example of clash of styles, a one dimensonal fighter like Diaz who walks in with his head down just throwing punches. Marquez, Great jabber, great inside fighter, great counter puncher, and great upper cut and straight right. Diaz needs certain fighter's to make him look good, and Marquez is the WRONG fighter to do so with.
    Reply
    Quote Originally Posted by DannoDanger:

     

    Totally agree.  I think Diaz will be able to take JMM's best shot, and keep coming.  Diaz is a big, strong lightweight.  I don't think JMM will be able to discourage him.  People are letting the KO of Casamayor fool them into thinking JMM has fight-changing power.  I see this fight going the way of Diaz's fights with Julio Diaz and Freitas.  I think he'll take JMM's punches and just keep coming.  He'll pound JMM to the body, and I can see him eventually stopping him late in the fight.   



    Julio Diaz is average at best! And Freitas's career was over when he QUIT against Diego years ago. Comparing Marquez to those two fighters is an insult! Classic example of clash of styles, a one dimensonal fighter like Diaz who walks in with his head down just throwing punches. Marquez, Great jabber, great inside fighter, great counter puncher, and great upper cut and straight right. Diaz needs certain fighter's to make him look good, and Marquez is the WRONG fighter to do so with.
     
    walktheline
    walktheline
    Banned
    Participation Meter
    Joined: Dec, 2007
    Posts: 4526
    Posted: Feb. 25, 2009 - 2:18 AM ET #9

    Quote Originally Posted by nuttyrich:



    Diaz has NO POP, he was getting rocked on the inside by Nate! Marquez can fight inside, outside, this is a one sided fight. Marquez wins easily, but close on the score cards as the fight is in HOUSTON. Diaz was exposed in the Campbell fight, he's not a bad fighter he does throw a ton of punches but has no thunder in them. His defense is his offense (throwing a ton of punches), Marquez will tear him apart. If anyone thinks a weak puncher with a  high volume of punching like Diaz can beat Marquez is insane.Marquez  will pepper him with his long Jab all night,  uppercuts on the inside,and straight right hand  as Diaz walks straight in . If you know boxing you know a TRUE boxer will always beat a slugger who only goes forward and no PUNCH to hurt his man. Why Diaz is taking this fight  I have no idea worst possible matchup for him style wise.

    Take JMM by decision.


    If you really think that JMM will go into Houston and make beat Diaz with ease, you are a naive fool. Open your eyes up.

    Is JMM still hungry? I know Diaz is. Campbell didn't give him an ass beating. Watch that one again. You think the old horse is going to ride in there and outwork a younger, faster, hungrier fighter with a boxing 101 lesson at this point in their careers you are insane.

    I'm not going to argue about this all week long. Maybe JMM's pure talent will get him a win. However, Diaz's will and youth will overcome his disadvantage in "every" category like you've stated.

    This matchup is bad for Marquez, not Diaz. This won't be much of a boxing match. Marquez won't get the chance to sit back and jab/counter in the center of the ring.

    I guess we'll find out Saturday night.


    Reply
    Quote Originally Posted by nuttyrich:



    Diaz has NO POP, he was getting rocked on the inside by Nate! Marquez can fight inside, outside, this is a one sided fight. Marquez wins easily, but close on the score cards as the fight is in HOUSTON. Diaz was exposed in the Campbell fight, he's not a bad fighter he does throw a ton of punches but has no thunder in them. His defense is his offense (throwing a ton of punches), Marquez will tear him apart. If anyone thinks a weak puncher with a  high volume of punching like Diaz can beat Marquez is insane.Marquez  will pepper him with his long Jab all night,  uppercuts on the inside,and straight right hand  as Diaz walks straight in . If you know boxing you know a TRUE boxer will always beat a slugger who only goes forward and no PUNCH to hurt his man. Why Diaz is taking this fight  I have no idea worst possible matchup for him style wise.

    Take JMM by decision.


    If you really think that JMM will go into Houston and make beat Diaz with ease, you are a naive fool. Open your eyes up.

    Is JMM still hungry? I know Diaz is. Campbell didn't give him an ass beating. Watch that one again. You think the old horse is going to ride in there and outwork a younger, faster, hungrier fighter with a boxing 101 lesson at this point in their careers you are insane.

    I'm not going to argue about this all week long. Maybe JMM's pure talent will get him a win. However, Diaz's will and youth will overcome his disadvantage in "every" category like you've stated.

    This matchup is bad for Marquez, not Diaz. This won't be much of a boxing match. Marquez won't get the chance to sit back and jab/counter in the center of the ring.

    I guess we'll find out Saturday night.


     
    ROY29
    ROY29
    Veteran
    Participation Meter
    Joined: Nov, 2007
    Posts: 1174
    Posted: Feb. 25, 2009 - 12:02 PM ET #10

    Reply
     
    walktheline
    walktheline
    Banned
    Participation Meter
    Joined: Dec, 2007
    Posts: 4526
    Posted: Feb. 25, 2009 - 12:25 PM ET #11

    Props are up on 5dimes.....
    Reply
    Props are up on 5dimes.....
     
    nuttyrich
    nuttyrich
    Veteran
    Participation Meter
    Joined: Jul, 2004
    Posts: 1709
    Posted: Feb. 25, 2009 - 9:33 PM ET #12

    Quote Originally Posted by walktheline:



    If you really think that JMM will go into Houston and make beat Diaz with ease, you are a naive fool. Open your eyes up.

    Is JMM still hungry? I know Diaz is. Campbell didn't give him an ass beating. Watch that one again. You think the old horse is going to ride in there and outwork a younger, faster, hungrier fighter with a boxing 101 lesson at this point in their careers you are insane.

    I'm not going to argue about this all week long. Maybe JMM's pure talent will get him a win. However, Diaz's will and youth will overcome his disadvantage in "every" category like you've stated.

    This matchup is bad for Marquez, not Diaz. This won't be much of a boxing match. Marquez won't get the chance to sit back and jab/counter in the center of the ring.

    I guess we'll find out Saturday night.




    When has Will and Youth WON a fight? You need SKILLS to WIN, this is boxing. I find it odd you're so confident Diaz will beat him in every way yet you say Marquez can win. You cannot take both sides, pick one and stand by it. I see you originally wanted Marquez now seems like you're leaning to Diaz. This is an OPINION forum so berating each other because you don't like my pick is useless. When the bell rings the fighters decide what's going to happen .. and the texas judges. I say and stand by it Marquez wins easily BUT with the scoring in Houston he STILL wins.

    So I will make my last (and consistent pick) Marquez - even after almost being robbed by Houston Judges.

    Oh if you want to bring age into it, Mosley at 37 was almost a 5-1 dog against a BUM named Margarito.


    Reply
    Quote Originally Posted by walktheline:



    If you really think that JMM will go into Houston and make beat Diaz with ease, you are a naive fool. Open your eyes up.

    Is JMM still hungry? I know Diaz is. Campbell didn't give him an ass beating. Watch that one again. You think the old horse is going to ride in there and outwork a younger, faster, hungrier fighter with a boxing 101 lesson at this point in their careers you are insane.

    I'm not going to argue about this all week long. Maybe JMM's pure talent will get him a win. However, Diaz's will and youth will overcome his disadvantage in "every" category like you've stated.

    This matchup is bad for Marquez, not Diaz. This won't be much of a boxing match. Marquez won't get the chance to sit back and jab/counter in the center of the ring.

    I guess we'll find out Saturday night.




    When has Will and Youth WON a fight? You need SKILLS to WIN, this is boxing. I find it odd you're so confident Diaz will beat him in every way yet you say Marquez can win. You cannot take both sides, pick one and stand by it. I see you originally wanted Marquez now seems like you're leaning to Diaz. This is an OPINION forum so berating each other because you don't like my pick is useless. When the bell rings the fighters decide what's going to happen .. and the texas judges. I say and stand by it Marquez wins easily BUT with the scoring in Houston he STILL wins.

    So I will make my last (and consistent pick) Marquez - even after almost being robbed by Houston Judges.

    Oh if you want to bring age into it, Mosley at 37 was almost a 5-1 dog against a BUM named Margarito.


     
    Cee_MoNeY
    Cee_MoNeY
    Veteran
    Participation Meter
    Joined: Oct, 2008
    Posts: 1465
    Posted: Feb. 25, 2009 - 9:49 PM ET #13

    JMM and Manny Pac are the worse 1 and 2 pound for pound boxers in my lifetime. Too much credit is given to Manny pac and JMM. Jmm beat a very faded and lucky ring tiltlist in Casamoyer, after his lucky beating of Mike K and his robbery of Santa Cruz. ****Also the judge cards were very very close still and i had it close as well******** Out of all the titlest at the time Campbell, Diaz, Casamoyer, and  D. Diaz, both chose to fight the route of facing the weaker two for a reason. Give them both a challenging title fight that both would be favored to win. Diaz throws many punches and his agressive style will be conflicting with Marquez.

     

    The truth in all of this is that Nate Campbell turned his carrer into a high note. His power is underated as well as his grit, defense and determination. Top that with the fact I thought the Baby bull looked pudgy, led to his loss. Campbells body punching abililty is underrated as well.

    JMM has not one A graded win in my opinion even though I thought he beat PAC-Man both times which would have gave him 2 A grade wins. Barrera was faded at best. He lost to a overprotected Chris John and Juarez will never be an elite talent.

    Diaz by decsion......

    I like Juarez but small. Worth the odds

     

    Reply

    JMM and Manny Pac are the worse 1 and 2 pound for pound boxers in my lifetime. Too much credit is given to Manny pac and JMM. Jmm beat a very faded and lucky ring tiltlist in Casamoyer, after his lucky beating of Mike K and his robbery of Santa Cruz. ****Also the judge cards were very very close still and i had it close as well******** Out of all the titlest at the time Campbell, Diaz, Casamoyer, and  D. Diaz, both chose to fight the route of facing the weaker two for a reason. Give them both a challenging title fight that both would be favored to win. Diaz throws many punches and his agressive style will be conflicting with Marquez.

     

    The truth in all of this is that Nate Campbell turned his carrer into a high note. His power is underated as well as his grit, defense and determination. Top that with the fact I thought the Baby bull looked pudgy, led to his loss. Campbells body punching abililty is underrated as well.

    JMM has not one A graded win in my opinion even though I thought he beat PAC-Man both times which would have gave him 2 A grade wins. Barrera was faded at best. He lost to a overprotected Chris John and Juarez will never be an elite talent.

    Diaz by decsion......

    I like Juarez but small. Worth the odds

     

     
    Cee_MoNeY
    Cee_MoNeY
    Veteran
    Participation Meter
    Joined: Oct, 2008
    Posts: 1465
    Posted: Feb. 25, 2009 - 9:52 PM ET #14

    Quote Originally Posted by nuttyrich:



    When has Will and Youth WON a fight? You need SKILLS to WIN, this is boxing. I find it odd you're so confident Diaz will beat him in every way yet you say Marquez can win. You cannot take both sides, pick one and stand by it. I see you originally wanted Marquez now seems like you're leaning to Diaz. This is an OPINION forum so berating each other because you don't like my pick is useless. When the bell rings the fighters decide what's going to happen .. and the texas judges. I say and stand by it Marquez wins easily BUT with the scoring in Houston he STILL wins.

    So I will make my last (and consistent pick) Marquez - even after almost being robbed by Houston Judges.

    Oh if you want to bring age into it, Mosley at 37 was almost a 5-1 dog against a BUM named Margarito.


    I think your way of presenting your opinion is pushy......That could bother some. Either way we are all allowed to have an opinion.

    Reply

    Quote Originally Posted by nuttyrich:



    When has Will and Youth WON a fight? You need SKILLS to WIN, this is boxing. I find it odd you're so confident Diaz will beat him in every way yet you say Marquez can win. You cannot take both sides, pick one and stand by it. I see you originally wanted Marquez now seems like you're leaning to Diaz. This is an OPINION forum so berating each other because you don't like my pick is useless. When the bell rings the fighters decide what's going to happen .. and the texas judges. I say and stand by it Marquez wins easily BUT with the scoring in Houston he STILL wins.

    So I will make my last (and consistent pick) Marquez - even after almost being robbed by Houston Judges.

    Oh if you want to bring age into it, Mosley at 37 was almost a 5-1 dog against a BUM named Margarito.


    I think your way of presenting your opinion is pushy......That could bother some. Either way we are all allowed to have an opinion.

     
    A2C
    A2C
    Captain
    Participation Meter
    Joined: Aug, 2007
    Posts: 5053
    Posted: Feb. 25, 2009 - 9:55 PM ET #15

    Agree with pretty much everything you're saying Cee.  Will be back later with picks for the weekend.
    Reply
    Agree with pretty much everything you're saying Cee.  Will be back later with picks for the weekend.
     
    walktheline
    walktheline
    Banned
    Participation Meter
    Joined: Dec, 2007
    Posts: 4526
    Posted: Feb. 26, 2009 - 2:37 AM ET #16

    Quote Originally Posted by nuttyrich:



    When has Will and Youth WON a fight? You need SKILLS to WIN, this is boxing. I find it odd you're so confident Diaz will beat him in every way yet you say Marquez can win. You cannot take both sides, pick one and stand by it. I see you originally wanted Marquez now seems like you're leaning to Diaz. This is an OPINION forum so berating each other because you don't like my pick is useless. When the bell rings the fighters decide what's going to happen .. and the texas judges. I say and stand by it Marquez wins easily BUT with the scoring in Houston he STILL wins.

    So I will make my last (and consistent pick) Marquez - even after almost being robbed by Houston Judges.

    Oh if you want to bring age into it, Mosley at 37 was almost a 5-1 dog against a BUM named Margarito.




    Now I don't take a clear side? Really? C'mon man, you can find every side I've taken for the last year or so on here.

    Mosley was 37? Really? I must have missed that one too....

    You started "berating" in this thread the second you posted an aggressive response. I guess we've all been guilty of that at times, but it seemed clear you had some sort of axe to grind or just wanted to be a dick. If you just wanted to throw out a counterpoint, try to do so in a mild manner. Give respect to get respect.

    Also, this is only JMM's second fight at 135. In closing, JMM is a great fighter. However, when he stepped up in competition how did he do? He couldn't get over the hump. Putting him ANYWHERE in the top 10 P4P doesn't make sense. He is there based on what? What amazing wins does he have anytime  in the past 4 years? Ummm... zero.

    Cee - good shit as usual. A2C - waiting with bated breath.

    I still can't believe you said I don't pick a side or take strong stands. Are you crazy? Other than losing, I'm pretty sure the thing that stands out the most in my posts is taking strong stands on the sides I've selected. I usually back those up with every reason I made the choice. If this doesn't meet your criteria, too bad. You can post that shit in your thread.

    I'm all ears 99% of the time and enjoy going around and around with the fine members of this forum. You are just rubbing me the wrong way... if I'm taking it the wrong way, I apologize.


    Reply
    Quote Originally Posted by nuttyrich:



    When has Will and Youth WON a fight? You need SKILLS to WIN, this is boxing. I find it odd you're so confident Diaz will beat him in every way yet you say Marquez can win. You cannot take both sides, pick one and stand by it. I see you originally wanted Marquez now seems like you're leaning to Diaz. This is an OPINION forum so berating each other because you don't like my pick is useless. When the bell rings the fighters decide what's going to happen .. and the texas judges. I say and stand by it Marquez wins easily BUT with the scoring in Houston he STILL wins.

    So I will make my last (and consistent pick) Marquez - even after almost being robbed by Houston Judges.

    Oh if you want to bring age into it, Mosley at 37 was almost a 5-1 dog against a BUM named Margarito.




    Now I don't take a clear side? Really? C'mon man, you can find every side I've taken for the last year or so on here.

    Mosley was 37? Really? I must have missed that one too....

    You started "berating" in this thread the second you posted an aggressive response. I guess we've all been guilty of that at times, but it seemed clear you had some sort of axe to grind or just wanted to be a dick. If you just wanted to throw out a counterpoint, try to do so in a mild manner. Give respect to get respect.

    Also, this is only JMM's second fight at 135. In closing, JMM is a great fighter. However, when he stepped up in competition how did he do? He couldn't get over the hump. Putting him ANYWHERE in the top 10 P4P doesn't make sense. He is there based on what? What amazing wins does he have anytime  in the past 4 years? Ummm... zero.

    Cee - good shit as usual. A2C - waiting with bated breath.

    I still can't believe you said I don't pick a side or take strong stands. Are you crazy? Other than losing, I'm pretty sure the thing that stands out the most in my posts is taking strong stands on the sides I've selected. I usually back those up with every reason I made the choice. If this doesn't meet your criteria, too bad. You can post that shit in your thread.

    I'm all ears 99% of the time and enjoy going around and around with the fine members of this forum. You are just rubbing me the wrong way... if I'm taking it the wrong way, I apologize.


     
    Redlad
    Redlad
    Captain
    Participation Meter
    Joined: Aug, 2001
    Posts: 6822
    Posted: Feb. 27, 2009 - 5:38 AM ET #17

    My take on Diaz-JMM
     
    The winner of this fight will be the one who is able to control the distance. An inside fight favors Diaz=== outside it's JMM. If Diaz can use his jab and pressure JMM to fight against the ropes he has a clear edge. If, on the hand JMM can avoid the pressure using his own jab to control the distance== It's a whole other fight. Diaz is more of a one dimensional fighter who relies on volume punching and pressure, pressure & more pressure. He tries to break his opponent down by being the much busier man inside the ring. The veteran Marquez has been in with some of the best pressure boxers in his career (MAB, Pacman) so it will not be something he hasn't seen before. I think the slight mental edge belongs to Diaz because he has much more to prove in this bout. After being totally outclassed by Campbell he will be balls out to win this fight. The home crowd will also be a big plus for him. Still, I have to admit that Marquez throws the much shorter, straighter combination punches, which usually brings victory against the style that Diaz brings to the table. The counter-punching skills also favor Marquez. The odds of 7-5 JMM seem just about right. So, I really think this one could go either way because Diaz should fight for his life in this one. I know a cop-out, but the way I feel. I will watch it and hope for the exciting fight that I suspect we will all see. Ok... $50 on a DRAW taking huge odds. GLTU! & lets keep it civil as we have some excellent boxing handicappers in this forum.
    Reply
    My take on Diaz-JMM
     
    The winner of this fight will be the one who is able to control the distance. An inside fight favors Diaz=== outside it's JMM. If Diaz can use his jab and pressure JMM to fight against the ropes he has a clear edge. If, on the hand JMM can avoid the pressure using his own jab to control the distance== It's a whole other fight. Diaz is more of a one dimensional fighter who relies on volume punching and pressure, pressure & more pressure. He tries to break his opponent down by being the much busier man inside the ring. The veteran Marquez has been in with some of the best pressure boxers in his career (MAB, Pacman) so it will not be something he hasn't seen before. I think the slight mental edge belongs to Diaz because he has much more to prove in this bout. After being totally outclassed by Campbell he will be balls out to win this fight. The home crowd will also be a big plus for him. Still, I have to admit that Marquez throws the much shorter, straighter combination punches, which usually brings victory against the style that Diaz brings to the table. The counter-punching skills also favor Marquez. The odds of 7-5 JMM seem just about right. So, I really think this one could go either way because Diaz should fight for his life in this one. I know a cop-out, but the way I feel. I will watch it and hope for the exciting fight that I suspect we will all see. Ok... $50 on a DRAW taking huge odds. GLTU! & lets keep it civil as we have some excellent boxing handicappers in this forum.
     
    Redlad
    Redlad
    Captain
    Participation Meter
    Joined: Aug, 2001
    Posts: 6822
    Posted: Feb. 27, 2009 - 5:50 AM ET #18

    One thing I forgot to mention. You might ask ===== If I thought Campbell completely outclassed Diaz, Why would I give Diaz any shot against a world class fighter like Marquez? My answer would be=== Styles make fights. Campbell style was a complete nightmare against Diaz's pressure style. Marquez (in his later fights) has shown more of a tendency to want to mix it up & break from his pure boxing mode. This would favor Diaz & give him more of a chance to win. At least a 5-7 chance to be more accurate.
    Reply
    One thing I forgot to mention. You might ask ===== If I thought Campbell completely outclassed Diaz, Why would I give Diaz any shot against a world class fighter like Marquez? My answer would be=== Styles make fights. Campbell style was a complete nightmare against Diaz's pressure style. Marquez (in his later fights) has shown more of a tendency to want to mix it up & break from his pure boxing mode. This would favor Diaz & give him more of a chance to win. At least a 5-7 chance to be more accurate.
     
    walktheline
    walktheline
    Banned
    Participation Meter
    Joined: Dec, 2007
    Posts: 4526
    Posted: Feb. 27, 2009 - 6:11 AM ET #19

    Quote Originally Posted by Redlad:

    My take on Diaz-JMM
     
    The winner of this fight will be the one who is able to control the distance. An inside fight favors Diaz=== outside it's JMM. If Diaz can use his jab and pressure JMM to fight against the ropes he has a clear edge. If, on the hand JMM can avoid the pressure using his own jab to control the distance== It's a whole other fight. Diaz is more of a one dimensional fighter who relies on volume punching and pressure, pressure & more pressure. He tries to break his opponent down by being the much busier man inside the ring. The veteran Marquez has been in with some of the best pressure boxers in his career (MAB, Pacman) so it will not be something he hasn't seen before. I think the slight mental edge belongs to Diaz because he has much more to prove in this bout. After being totally outclassed by Campbell he will be balls out to win this fight. The home crowd will also be a big plus for him. Still, I have to admit that Marquez throws the much shorter, straighter combination punches, which usually brings victory against the style that Diaz brings to the table. The counter-punching skills also favor Marquez. The odds of 7-5 JMM seem just about right. So, I really think this one could go either way because Diaz should fight for his life in this one. I know a cop-out, but the way I feel. I will watch it and hope for the exciting fight that I suspect we will all see. Ok... $50 on a DRAW taking huge odds. GLTU! & lets keep it civil as we have some excellent boxing handicappers in this forum.


    Both post are gold, so I quoted this one. Top notch shit in your response. Superb analysis on this one. I can't disagree on anything you've stated. Awesome post, and  best of luck. Did you get it the draw at 25/1? FB is notorious for playing the .10 unit draws... you have more of a shot in this fight than any other in recent memory.


    Reply
    Quote Originally Posted by Redlad:

    My take on Diaz-JMM
     
    The winner of this fight will be the one who is able to control the distance. An inside fight favors Diaz=== outside it's JMM. If Diaz can use his jab and pressure JMM to fight against the ropes he has a clear edge. If, on the hand JMM can avoid the pressure using his own jab to control the distance== It's a whole other fight. Diaz is more of a one dimensional fighter who relies on volume punching and pressure, pressure & more pressure. He tries to break his opponent down by being the much busier man inside the ring. The veteran Marquez has been in with some of the best pressure boxers in his career (MAB, Pacman) so it will not be something he hasn't seen before. I think the slight mental edge belongs to Diaz because he has much more to prove in this bout. After being totally outclassed by Campbell he will be balls out to win this fight. The home crowd will also be a big plus for him. Still, I have to admit that Marquez throws the much shorter, straighter combination punches, which usually brings victory against the style that Diaz brings to the table. The counter-punching skills also favor Marquez. The odds of 7-5 JMM seem just about right. So, I really think this one could go either way because Diaz should fight for his life in this one. I know a cop-out, but the way I feel. I will watch it and hope for the exciting fight that I suspect we will all see. Ok... $50 on a DRAW taking huge odds. GLTU! & lets keep it civil as we have some excellent boxing handicappers in this forum.


    Both post are gold, so I quoted this one. Top notch shit in your response. Superb analysis on this one. I can't disagree on anything you've stated. Awesome post, and  best of luck. Did you get it the draw at 25/1? FB is notorious for playing the .10 unit draws... you have more of a shot in this fight than any other in recent memory.


     
    nc1capper
    nc1capper
    MVP
    Participation Meter
    Joined: Aug, 2007
    Posts: 16348
    Posted: Feb. 27, 2009 - 9:11 AM ET #20

    looks like this is going to be a good one,,you guys are razor sharp over here,,anything else to sway me either way on juarez early?
    Reply
    looks like this is going to be a good one,,you guys are razor sharp over here,,anything else to sway me either way on juarez early?
     
    Fullbrights
    Fullbrights
    Veteran
    Participation Meter
    Joined: Feb, 2006
    Posts: 4377
    Posted: Feb. 27, 2009 - 12:49 PM ET #21

    Agree, the draw isn't a bad option here.  I am really having a tough time grasping Baby-Bull/JMM, I don't know if I will be on either side or total.
    Reply
    Agree, the draw isn't a bad option here.  I am really having a tough time grasping Baby-Bull/JMM, I don't know if I will be on either side or total.
     
    Zumbize
    Zumbize
    Rookie
    Participation Meter
    Joined: Oct, 2007
    Posts: 668
    Posted: Feb. 27, 2009 - 1:01 PM ET #22

    This is going to sound like insanity, but I've got to spit it out. In some ways, I will be just as impressed with JMM if we wins this fight clearly than I would be by a win in a Manny rematch.

    Diaz is a young, strong, and HUGE career lightweight. No he's not the same caliber of pure athlete as Manny, and he doesn't have even remotely similar one shot power, but he is absolutely relentless, and where Manny can be made to take a backward step, Diaz's pressure doesn't stop for a second. And the fight is in Diaz's backyard.

    I'm not saying JMM can't get any respect with his shots from Diaz, but the under here is a play on cuts only. Nate landed everything but the kitchen sink on him and he basically took it in stride. Marquez is a sharp puncher but not heavy handed. Don't let the Casa fight fool you.

    This is just an excellent, excellent fight. Gun to my head I'd take the value with Diaz by decision.
    Reply
    This is going to sound like insanity, but I've got to spit it out. In some ways, I will be just as impressed with JMM if we wins this fight clearly than I would be by a win in a Manny rematch.

    Diaz is a young, strong, and HUGE career lightweight. No he's not the same caliber of pure athlete as Manny, and he doesn't have even remotely similar one shot power, but he is absolutely relentless, and where Manny can be made to take a backward step, Diaz's pressure doesn't stop for a second. And the fight is in Diaz's backyard.

    I'm not saying JMM can't get any respect with his shots from Diaz, but the under here is a play on cuts only. Nate landed everything but the kitchen sink on him and he basically took it in stride. Marquez is a sharp puncher but not heavy handed. Don't let the Casa fight fool you.

    This is just an excellent, excellent fight. Gun to my head I'd take the value with Diaz by decision.
     
    Redlad
    Redlad
    Captain
    Participation Meter
    Joined: Aug, 2001
    Posts: 6822
    Posted: Feb. 27, 2009 - 3:17 PM ET #23

    walktheline asked,
     
     Did you get it the draw at 25/1? FB is notorious for playing the .10 unit draws... you have more of a shot in this fight than any other in recent memory
     
     
    The best I could find was 20-1 but still a long-shot.
    Reply
    walktheline asked,
     
     Did you get it the draw at 25/1? FB is notorious for playing the .10 unit draws... you have more of a shot in this fight than any other in recent memory
     
     
    The best I could find was 20-1 but still a long-shot.
     
    Buzzcat
    Buzzcat
    Banned
    Participation Meter
    Joined: Jul, 2008
    Posts: 1858
    Posted: Feb. 27, 2009 - 8:14 PM ET #24

    If  I gotta pay $50 to watch it, I'm betting that Diaz takes an ass whuppin and gets a bizarre decision.
    Reply
    If  I gotta pay $50 to watch it, I'm betting that Diaz takes an ass whuppin and gets a bizarre decision.
     
     
    nuttyrich
    nuttyrich
    Veteran
    Participation Meter
    Joined: Jul, 2004
    Posts: 1709
    Posted: Feb. 28, 2009 - 5:53 AM ET #25

    Quote Originally Posted by walktheline:



    Now I don't take a clear side? Really? C'mon man, you can find every side I've taken for the last year or so on here.

    Mosley was 37? Really? I must have missed that one too....

    You started "berating" in this thread the second you posted an aggressive response. I guess we've all been guilty of that at times, but it seemed clear you had some sort of axe to grind or just wanted to be a dick. If you just wanted to throw out a counterpoint, try to do so in a mild manner. Give respect to get respect.

    Also, this is only JMM's second fight at 135. In closing, JMM is a great fighter. However, when he stepped up in competition how did he do? He couldn't get over the hump. Putting him ANYWHERE in the top 10 P4P doesn't make sense. He is there based on what? What amazing wins does he have anytime  in the past 4 years? Ummm... zero.

    Cee - good shit as usual. A2C - waiting with bated breath.

    I still can't believe you said I don't pick a side or take strong stands. Are you crazy? Other than losing, I'm pretty sure the thing that stands out the most in my posts is taking strong stands on the sides I've selected. I usually back those up with every reason I made the choice. If this doesn't meet your criteria, too bad. You can post that shit in your thread.

    I'm all ears 99% of the time and enjoy going around and around with the fine members of this forum. You are just rubbing me the wrong way... if I'm taking it the wrong way, I apologize.




    I don't think either of us are being "dicks" or saying anything wrong. This is truly OUR opinion on two fighters. I only said with this fight you started out leaning toward JMM then to Diaz. I personally made my statement of what I think of Diaz and Marquez. When I post it's NOT to crap on someone's pick, it's my HONEST feeling on a fighter. I don't wager anymore, so maybe the people who DO it may rub them the wrong way. I have no axe to grind, some fights I feel very intense on, this is one of them. It has NO bearing on your pick or why you picked it. I think we are both smart enough to know with sports and betting, when that bell rings everything goes out the window and boxing is no different. This is my true feeling of the fight, is JMM the best no, I just believe his style beats Diaz's very easily. Some guys aren't made for one another. Styles  make fights. If my posts rubbed you the wrong way I apologize. I never had the intention to piss someone off or rub them the wrong way. This is just an opinion forum, and when two people's opinions don't match it can LOOK nasty, but I assure you I have nothing to gain by disagreeing with anyone.

    I hope it's a great fight either way.
    Reply
    Quote Originally Posted by walktheline:



    Now I don't take a clear side? Really? C'mon man, you can find every side I've taken for the last year or so on here.

    Mosley was 37? Really? I must have missed that one too....

    You started "berating" in this thread the second you posted an aggressive response. I guess we've all been guilty of that at times, but it seemed clear you had some sort of axe to grind or just wanted to be a dick. If you just wanted to throw out a counterpoint, try to do so in a mild manner. Give respect to get respect.

    Also, this is only JMM's second fight at 135. In closing, JMM is a great fighter. However, when he stepped up in competition how did he do? He couldn't get over the hump. Putting him ANYWHERE in the top 10 P4P doesn't make sense. He is there based on what? What amazing wins does he have anytime  in the past 4 years? Ummm... zero.

    Cee - good shit as usual. A2C - waiting with bated breath.

    I still can't believe you said I don't pick a side or take strong stands. Are you crazy? Other than losing, I'm pretty sure the thing that stands out the most in my posts is taking strong stands on the sides I've selected. I usually back those up with every reason I made the choice. If this doesn't meet your criteria, too bad. You can post that shit in your thread.

    I'm all ears 99% of the time and enjoy going around and around with the fine members of this forum. You are just rubbing me the wrong way... if I'm taking it the wrong way, I apologize.




    I don't think either of us are being "dicks" or saying anything wrong. This is truly OUR opinion on two fighters. I only said with this fight you started out leaning toward JMM then to Diaz. I personally made my statement of what I think of Diaz and Marquez. When I post it's NOT to crap on someone's pick, it's my HONEST feeling on a fighter. I don't wager anymore, so maybe the people who DO it may rub them the wrong way. I have no axe to grind, some fights I feel very intense on, this is one of them. It has NO bearing on your pick or why you picked it. I think we are both smart enough to know with sports and betting, when that bell rings everything goes out the window and boxing is no different. This is my true feeling of the fight, is JMM the best no, I just believe his style beats Diaz's very easily. Some guys aren't made for one another. Styles  make fights. If my posts rubbed you the wrong way I apologize. I never had the intention to piss someone off or rub them the wrong way. This is just an opinion forum, and when two people's opinions don't match it can LOOK nasty, but I assure you I have nothing to gain by disagreeing with anyone.

    I hope it's a great fight either way.
    All Forums | Boxing
    123 Next Last»

    Hot Forums IconHot Forum Topics

    • Claiming Prizes 57,789
    • Tuesday 10/20/2026 861
    • 🏈🏈🏈 Fubah2's risky CFB bets 279,226
    • I'm embarrassed for Trump supporters 61,591
    • PART DEUX 150
    • Congrats to ltdsks - 20 wins in a row! 5,073
    • Public Indicator Calculations 2026 23,283
    • Lies, Inaccuracies & Stupidity 33,163
    • NFL THREAD * 151 * 26,087
    • NCAA WEEK 8. (( 151 )) 2,475

    Warning - External Link

    Report User

    Thank you for reporting
    This content is abusive or harmful
    This post is spam
    An error has occurred
    This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.

    Delete Post

    Are you sure you would like to remove this post?

    Remove Thread

    Are you sure you would like to remove this thread?

    Scan Results

    Login/Register

    Happy to have you join the conversation. To do so, please login or create an account.
    Accounts are free and easy to create.

    Search


    Loading…

    Loading…

    About Us
    Contact Us
    Careers
    Our Team
    Brand
    Testimonials
    Betting Guides
    Sportsbook Reviews
    Betting News
    Podcasts
    Responsible Gambling
    Betting Sites
    US Betting Sites
    Canada Betting Sites
    Canada Casinos
    Best Betting Apps
    Contests
    Streak Survivor
    King of Covers
    Ultimate Race
    Office Pools
    The Covers community has
    810,221
    lifetime members worldwide
    Join our community today
    Covers 30 Years Logo Established in 1995,
    Covers is the world
    leader in sports
    betting information.
    21+
    Gambling problem? Call 1-800-GAMBLER
    Help Privacy Privacy Choices Terms of Service Cookies Sitemap Forum
    YouTube logo
    Facebook logo
    Twitter logo
    Instagram logo
    LinkedIn logo
    Google News logo
    Covers is verified safe by:
    Evalon Logo Logo GPWA Logo GDPR logo Logo GeoTrust logo Logo
    Covers Logo
    Copyright © 1995 - 2026 Genius Sports. All Rights Reserved.
    If you choose to make use of any information on this website including online sports betting services from any websites that may be featured on this website, we strongly recommend that you carefully check your local laws before doing so.It is your sole responsibility to understand your local laws and observe them strictly.Covers does not provide any advice or guidance as to the legality of online sports betting or other online gambling activities within your jurisdiction and you are responsible for complying with laws that are applicable to you in your relevant locality.Covers disclaims all liability associated with your use of this website and use of any information contained on it.As a condition of using this website, you agree to hold the owner of this website harmless from any claims arising from your use of any services on any third party website that may be featured by Covers.