- Stats
- Picks
- Odds
Cal Poly @ USC Game Overview
CP vs USCRecords
Head-To-HeadLast 10
CP vs USC Preview
Last Meeting ( Dec 17, 2015 ) Cal Poly SLO 82, USC 101
Change is in the air at Southern California, which will have plenty of new names in the lineup for its season opener against visiting Cal Poly on Nov. 3.
Trojans coach Eric Musselman shook up his roster after an underwhelming first season in the Big Ten. USC finished 17-18 overall and 7-13 in conference play.
Musselman has 13 newcomers -- 10 transfers and three freshmen. Graduate forward Chad Baker-Mazara figures to play a prominent role after helping Auburn reach the Final Four last season.
The Trojans will face a veteran Cal Poly team that reached the Big West Championship semifinals last season and finished 16-19 overall and 8-12 in conference play.
Second-year Mustangs coach Mike DeGeorge's squad includes sophomore guard Peter Bandelj, who returns as the Mustangs' leading scorer after averaging 10.4 points a game last season.
Picked to finish seventh in the Big West preseason poll, Cal Poly features one of the nation's most diverse lineups, with this season's roster representing nine different countries.
The Mustangs averaged 82.1 points per game last season, but their up-tempo offense will be tested by the defensive-minded Trojans.
USC beat Loyola Marymount 60-51 in an exhibition game on Oct. 18 after holding the Lions to 28% shooting from the field.
"Defensively, we were really, really good, especially in the first half," Musselman said. "Offensively, we have a lot of areas for growth."
Baker-Mazara led the Trojans with 14 points, guard Jordan Marsh added 12, and center Gabe Dynes had six blocks. A 7-foot-5 transfer from Youngstown State, Dynes also contributed nine points and eight rebounds.
Musselman's lone returning starter is forward Terrance Williams II, who was limited to seven games last season due to injury. He was encouraged by what he saw in the win over Loyola Marymount.
"We've got some things to work on, of course, but the biggest thing I think of is the defense," Williams said. "Gabe was shot blocking in the middle, and the guards were guarding. The offense is going to clean itself up, but we take pride in the defense. We are a physical team, and we play hard."
--Field Level Media
CP vs USCInjury report
Cal Poly's Injuries
| Player | POS | Status | Date | Note |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| No injuries to report. | ||||
USC's Injuries
| Player | POS | Status | Date | Note |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| A. Dickerson | G-F | Out - Hip( Dec 05, '25) | Dec 05, '25 | |
| Dickerson is dealing with a hip injury and will not take the court for the Trojans. He will miss three months. | ||||
| R. Rice | G | Out - Shoulder( Nov 24, '25) | Nov 24, '25 | |
| Rice suffered a shoulder injury and will not take the court for the Trojans. He will miss the remainder of the 2025-26 season. | ||||
CP vs USCStats
Offense vs Defense
Key Stats League ranks in parenthesis
| OFFENSE |
Off. Rank | Stat | Def. Rank | DEFENSE |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| -- | (323) | FG% | (84) | -- |
| -- | (202) | FGM | (156) | -- |
| -- | (60) | FGA | (240) | -- |
| -- | (193) | 3P% | (77) | -- |
| -- | (9) | 3PM | (203) | -- |
| -- | (8) | 3PA | (284) | -- |
| -- | (41) | FT% | (328) | -- |
| -- | (27) | FTM | (277) | -- |
| -- | (38) | FTA | (246) | -- |
| League Avg. |
|---|
| 43.9 |
| 27.0 |
| 61.6 |
| 31.8 |
| 7.8 |
| 24.6 |
| 70.3 |
| 15.4 |
| 21.9 |
More Stats
| OFFENSE |
Off. Rank | Stat | Def. Rank | DEFENSE |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| -- | (54) | REB | (112) | -- |
| -- | (180) | OREB | (248) | -- |
| -- | (334) | DREB | (176) | -- |
| -- | (275) | AST | (162) | -- |
| -- | (361) | TO | (115) | -- |
| -- | (351) | AST/TO | (125) | -- |
| -- | (220) | STL | (233) | -- |
| -- | (162) | BLK | (10) | -- |
| League Avg. |
|---|
| 34.0 |
| 10.0 |
| 24.0 |
| 14.5 |
| 13.6 |
| 1.1 |
| 7.8 |
| 3.6 |
Points
| OFFENSE |
Off. Rank | Stat | Def. Rank | DEFENSE |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| -- | (64) | Points | (196) | -- |
| -- | (231) | 1st Half | (229) | -- |
| -- | (231) | 2nd Half | (229) | -- |
| League Avg. |
|---|
| 77.2 |
| 36.4 |
| 40.3 |