Los Angeles Angels Picks
5th in American League West
(52 - 85)
Next Game
Mon, Aug 31
21:38 ET
NYY @ LAA Picks
MLB PicksEV Model Rating
Star rating: 3 out of 5
EV Model Rating
Star rating: 4 out of 5
Mike Trout projects as the 6th-best hitter in Major League Baseball, according to the leading projection system (THE BAT X).. Mike Trout is projected to hit 2nd in the lineup in this game.. Angel Stadium has the lowest average fence height in the majors.. Batters such as Mike Trout with extreme flyball tendencies are usually more effective when facing pitchers like Elmer Rodriguez-Cruz who skew towards the groundball end of the spectrum.. The New York Yankees outfield defense grades out as the 3rd-weakest among all the teams on the slate today.
EV Model Rating
Star rating: 3 out of 5
Spencer Jones is projected to bat 6th in the batting order in this matchup.. The leading projection system (THE BAT) ranks Angel Stadium as the 3rd-worst field in Major League Baseball for run-scoring.. Today, Spencer Jones is at a disadvantage facing the league's 11th-deepest LF fences given that he hits his flyballs to the opposite field at a 34.3% rate (83rd percentile).. Spencer Jones will be at a disadvantage playing away from home in today's matchup.
Total Bases
MB
Moises Ballesteros u1.5 Total Bases (-240)
Projection 0.72
EV Model Rating
Star rating: 3 out of 5
The leading projection system (THE BAT) ranks Angel Stadium as the 3rd-worst field in Major League Baseball for run-scoring.. Moises Ballesteros has an 80th percentile opposite-field rate on his flyballs (33.9%) and has the misfortune of hitting them towards MLB's 11th-deepest LF fences today.. The New York Yankees infield defense profiles as the strongest among all the teams on the slate today.
EV Model Rating
Star rating: 4 out of 5
Mike Trout projects as the 6th-best hitter in Major League Baseball, according to the leading projection system (THE BAT X).. Mike Trout is projected to hit 2nd in the lineup in this game.. Angel Stadium has the lowest average fence height in the majors.. Batters such as Mike Trout with extreme flyball tendencies are usually more effective when facing pitchers like Elmer Rodriguez-Cruz who skew towards the groundball end of the spectrum.. The New York Yankees outfield defense grades out as the 3rd-weakest among all the teams on the slate today.
EV Model Rating
Star rating: 4 out of 5
When it comes to his home run talent, Zach Neto ranks in the 89th percentile according to the leading projection system (THE BAT X).. Zach Neto is penciled in 1st in the batting order today.. Angel Stadium has the lowest average fence height in the majors.. The New York Yankees outfield defense grades out as the 3rd-weakest among all the teams on the slate today.. Home field advantage typically bolsters batter metrics in all categories, and Zach Neto will hold that advantage in today's matchup.
EV Model Rating
Star rating: 3 out of 5
The leading projection system (THE BAT X) projects Vaughn Grissom in the 80th percentile when it comes to his batting average ability.. Vaughn Grissom is projected to hit 4th on the lineup card in today's game.. Angel Stadium has the lowest average fence height in the majors.. The New York Yankees outfield defense grades out as the 3rd-weakest among all the teams on the slate today.. Vaughn Grissom will hold the home field advantage today, which figures to boost all of his stats.
EV Model Rating
Star rating: 3 out of 5
Josh Lowe's BABIP skill is projected in the 78th percentile by the leading projection system (THE BAT X).. Angel Stadium has the lowest average fence height in the majors.. Hitting from the opposite that Elmer Rodriguez-Cruz throws from, Josh Lowe will have an edge today.. The New York Yankees outfield defense grades out as the 3rd-weakest among all the teams on the slate today.. Josh Lowe will hold the home field advantage today, which ought to boost all of his stats.
EV Model Rating
Star rating: 4 out of 5
Mike Trout projects as the 6th-best hitter in Major League Baseball, according to the leading projection system (THE BAT X).. Mike Trout is projected to hit 2nd in the lineup in this game.. Angel Stadium has the lowest average fence height in the majors.. Batters such as Mike Trout with extreme flyball tendencies are usually more effective when facing pitchers like Elmer Rodriguez-Cruz who skew towards the groundball end of the spectrum.. The New York Yankees outfield defense grades out as the 3rd-weakest among all the teams on the slate today.
EV Model Rating
Star rating: 3 out of 5
When it comes to his home run talent, Zach Neto ranks in the 89th percentile according to the leading projection system (THE BAT X).. Zach Neto is penciled in 1st in the batting order today.. Angel Stadium has the lowest average fence height in the majors.. The New York Yankees outfield defense grades out as the 3rd-weakest among all the teams on the slate today.. Home field advantage typically bolsters batter metrics in all categories, and Zach Neto will hold that advantage in today's matchup.
Consensus Picks
More ConsensusNYY @ LAA · Props
| GAME & PLAYER PROPS | PROJECTIONS | ANALYSIS | BEST ODDS | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
MONEYLINE
|
|||||||
|
TOTAL
|
|||||||
|
SPREAD
LAA
+1.5 spread
0.28
PROJECTION
-1.2
DIFFERENCE
7.74%
EV
|
|||||||
|
TOTAL HITS
L. Garcia Jr.
(1B)
0.5 Total Hits
0.91
PROJECTION
+0.4
DIFFERENCE
11.22%
EV
|
|||||||
|
TOTAL HITS
S. Jones
(RF)
0.5 Total Hits
0.68
PROJECTION
+0.2
DIFFERENCE
7.26%
EV
|
|||||||
|
TOTAL HITS
B. Rice
(DH)
0.5 Total Hits
0.88
PROJECTION
+0.4
DIFFERENCE
5.74%
EV
|
|||||||
|
TOTAL HITS
W. Meckler
(LF)
0.5 Total Hits
0.83
PROJECTION
+0.3
DIFFERENCE
5.48%
EV
|
|||||||
|
TOTAL HITS
MB
M. Ballesteros
(DH)
0.5 Total Hits
0.73
PROJECTION
+0.2
DIFFERENCE
5.24%
EV
|
|||||||
|
TOTAL HITS
A. Wells
(C)
0.5 Total Hits
0.60
PROJECTION
+0.1
DIFFERENCE
4.88%
EV
|
|||||||
|
TOTAL HITS
T. Grisham
(CF)
0.5 Total Hits
0.82
PROJECTION
+0.3
DIFFERENCE
4.74%
EV
|
|||||||
|
TOTAL HITS
T. Heineman
(C)
0.5 Total Hits
0.59
PROJECTION
+0.1
DIFFERENCE
3.37%
EV
|
|||||||
|
TOTAL HITS
C. Bellinger
(LF)
0.5 Total Hits
0.93
PROJECTION
+0.4
DIFFERENCE
2.36%
EV
|
|||||||
|
TOTAL HITS
G. Lombard Jr.
(SS)
0.5 Total Hits
0.94
PROJECTION
+0.4
DIFFERENCE
-3.18%
EV
|
|||||||
|
TOTAL HITS
C. Moore
(2B)
0.5 Total Hits
0.81
PROJECTION
+0.3
DIFFERENCE
-4.94%
EV
|
|||||||
|
TOTAL HITS
J. Caballero
(SS)
0.5 Total Hits
0.81
PROJECTION
+0.3
DIFFERENCE
-4.95%
EV
|
|||||||
|
TOTAL HITS
M. Trout
(CF)
0.5 Total Hits
0.97
PROJECTION
+0.5
DIFFERENCE
-4.96%
EV
|
|||||||
|
TOTAL HITS
Z. Neto
(SS)
0.5 Total Hits
0.98
PROJECTION
+0.5
DIFFERENCE
-5.76%
EV
|
|||||||
|
TOTAL BASES
M. Trout
(CF)
1.5 Total Bases
1.72
PROJECTION
+0.2
DIFFERENCE
13.52%
EV
|
|||||||
|
TOTAL BASES
S. Jones
(RF)
1.5 Total Bases
0.66
PROJECTION
-0.8
DIFFERENCE
10.87%
EV
|
|||||||
|
TOTAL BASES
MB
M. Ballesteros
(DH)
1.5 Total Bases
0.72
PROJECTION
-0.8
DIFFERENCE
9.44%
EV
|
|||||||
|
TOTAL BASES
Z. Neto
(SS)
1.5 Total Bases
1.58
PROJECTION
+0.1
DIFFERENCE
7.75%
EV
|
|||||||
|
TOTAL BASES
A. Wells
(C)
1.5 Total Bases
0.60
PROJECTION
-0.9
DIFFERENCE
7.04%
EV
|
|||||||
|
TOTAL BASES
T. Grisham
(CF)
1.5 Total Bases
1.51
PROJECTION
0.0
DIFFERENCE
7.03%
EV
|
|||||||
|
TOTAL BASES
J. Chisholm Jr.
(2B)
1.5 Total Bases
0.74
PROJECTION
-0.8
DIFFERENCE
6.44%
EV
|
|||||||
|
TOTAL BASES
G. Lombard Jr.
(SS)
1.5 Total Bases
1.38
PROJECTION
-0.1
DIFFERENCE
6.24%
EV
|
|||||||
|
TOTAL BASES
C. Bellinger
(LF)
1.5 Total Bases
1.51
PROJECTION
0.0
DIFFERENCE
4.05%
EV
|
|||||||
|
TOTAL BASES
V. Grissom
(2B)
1.5 Total Bases
0.98
PROJECTION
-0.5
DIFFERENCE
2.66%
EV
|
|||||||
|
TOTAL BASES
C. Moore
(2B)
1.5 Total Bases
0.81
PROJECTION
-0.7
DIFFERENCE
2.05%
EV
|
|||||||
|
TOTAL BASES
D. Guzman
(3B)
1.5 Total Bases
0.83
PROJECTION
-0.7
DIFFERENCE
1.92%
EV
|
|||||||
|
TOTAL BASES
B. Rice
(DH)
1.5 Total Bases
1.57
PROJECTION
+0.1
DIFFERENCE
-1.52%
EV
|
|||||||
|
TOTAL BASES
W. Meckler
(LF)
1.5 Total Bases
1.08
PROJECTION
-0.4
DIFFERENCE
-2.91%
EV
|
|||||||
|
TOTAL BASES
J. Caballero
(SS)
1.5 Total Bases
0.85
PROJECTION
-0.7
DIFFERENCE
-3.16%
EV
|
|||||||
|
TOTAL BASES
L. Garcia Jr.
(1B)
1.5 Total Bases
1.47
PROJECTION
0.0
DIFFERENCE
-3.31%
EV
|
|||||||
|
TOTAL HOME RUNS
L. Garcia Jr.
(1B)
0.5 Total Home Runs
0.12
PROJECTION
-0.4
DIFFERENCE
0.67%
EV
|
|||||||
|
TOTAL HOME RUNS
S. Jones
(RF)
0.5 Total Home Runs
0.10
PROJECTION
-0.4
DIFFERENCE
-0.58%
EV
|
|||||||
|
TOTAL HOME RUNS
M. Trout
(CF)
0.5 Total Home Runs
0.18
PROJECTION
-0.3
DIFFERENCE
-1.01%
EV
|
|||||||
|
TOTAL HOME RUNS
Z. Neto
(SS)
0.5 Total Home Runs
0.13
PROJECTION
-0.4
DIFFERENCE
-2.41%
EV
|
|||||||
|
TOTAL HOME RUNS
T. Heineman
(C)
0.5 Total Home Runs
0.02
PROJECTION
-0.5
DIFFERENCE
-2.8%
EV
|
|||||||
|
TOTAL HOME RUNS
A. Wells
(C)
0.5 Total Home Runs
0.11
PROJECTION
-0.4
DIFFERENCE
-3.38%
EV
|
|||||||
|
TOTAL HOME RUNS
G. Lombard Jr.
(SS)
0.5 Total Home Runs
0.07
PROJECTION
-0.4
DIFFERENCE
-4.22%
EV
|
|||||||
|
TOTAL RBIS
M. Trout
(CF)
0.5 Total RBIs
0.61
PROJECTION
+0.1
DIFFERENCE
18.93%
EV
|
|||||||
|
TOTAL RBIS
Z. Neto
(SS)
0.5 Total RBIs
0.47
PROJECTION
0.0
DIFFERENCE
12.77%
EV
|
|||||||
|
TOTAL RBIS
V. Grissom
(2B)
0.5 Total RBIs
0.48
PROJECTION
0.0
DIFFERENCE
11.24%
EV
|
|||||||
|
TOTAL RBIS
J. Lowe
(LF)
0.5 Total RBIs
0.39
PROJECTION
-0.1
DIFFERENCE
9.76%
EV
|
|||||||
|
TOTAL RBIS
C. Bellinger
(LF)
0.5 Total RBIs
0.55
PROJECTION
+0.1
DIFFERENCE
7.65%
EV
|
|||||||
|
TOTAL RBIS
L. Garcia Jr.
(1B)
0.5 Total RBIs
0.53
PROJECTION
0.0
DIFFERENCE
6.74%
EV
|
|||||||
|
TOTAL RBIS
D. Guzman
(3B)
0.5 Total RBIs
0.37
PROJECTION
-0.1
DIFFERENCE
5.37%
EV
|
|||||||
|
TOTAL RBIS
J. Caballero
(SS)
0.5 Total RBIs
0.33
PROJECTION
-0.2
DIFFERENCE
5.37%
EV
|
|||||||
|
TOTAL RBIS
B. Rice
(DH)
0.5 Total RBIs
0.52
PROJECTION
0.0
DIFFERENCE
3.4%
EV
|
|||||||
|
TOTAL RBIS
J. Chisholm Jr.
(2B)
0.5 Total RBIs
0.44
PROJECTION
-0.1
DIFFERENCE
3.36%
EV
|
|||||||
|
TOTAL RBIS
T. Grisham
(CF)
0.5 Total RBIs
0.47
PROJECTION
0.0
DIFFERENCE
3.2%
EV
|
|||||||
|
TOTAL RBIS
MB
M. Ballesteros
(DH)
0.5 Total RBIs
0.40
PROJECTION
-0.1
DIFFERENCE
2.02%
EV
|
|||||||
|
TOTAL RBIS
W. Meckler
(LF)
0.5 Total RBIs
0.36
PROJECTION
-0.1
DIFFERENCE
1.96%
EV
|
|||||||
|
TOTAL RBIS
C. Moore
(2B)
0.5 Total RBIs
0.37
PROJECTION
-0.1
DIFFERENCE
0.68%
EV
|
|||||||
|
TOTAL RBIS
G. Lombard Jr.
(SS)
0.5 Total RBIs
0.39
PROJECTION
-0.1
DIFFERENCE
-5.48%
EV
|
|||||||
|
TOTAL RBIS
S. Jones
(RF)
0.5 Total RBIs
0.37
PROJECTION
-0.1
DIFFERENCE
-6.78%
EV
|
|||||||
|
HITS+RUNS+RBIS
M. Trout
(CF)
1.5 Hits+Runs+RBIs
2.30
PROJECTION
+0.8
DIFFERENCE
16.86%
EV
|
|||||||
|
HITS+RUNS+RBIS
Z. Neto
(SS)
1.5 Hits+Runs+RBIs
2.08
PROJECTION
+0.6
DIFFERENCE
10.81%
EV
|
|||||||
|
HITS+RUNS+RBIS
V. Grissom
(2B)
1.5 Hits+Runs+RBIs
1.88
PROJECTION
+0.4
DIFFERENCE
8.75%
EV
|
|||||||
|
HITS+RUNS+RBIS
D. Guzman
(3B)
1.5 Hits+Runs+RBIs
1.58
PROJECTION
+0.1
DIFFERENCE
7.75%
EV
|
|||||||
|
HITS+RUNS+RBIS
J. Lowe
(LF)
1.5 Hits+Runs+RBIs
1.48
PROJECTION
0.0
DIFFERENCE
3.84%
EV
|
|||||||
|
HITS+RUNS+RBIS
C. Moore
(2B)
1.5 Hits+Runs+RBIs
1.56
PROJECTION
+0.1
DIFFERENCE
2.21%
EV
|
|||||||
|
HITS+RUNS+RBIS
A. Wells
(C)
1.5 Hits+Runs+RBIs
1.34
PROJECTION
-0.2
DIFFERENCE
2.03%
EV
|
|||||||
|
HITS+RUNS+RBIS
J. Chisholm Jr.
(2B)
1.5 Hits+Runs+RBIs
1.61
PROJECTION
+0.1
DIFFERENCE
0.99%
EV
|
|||||||
|
HITS+RUNS+RBIS
L. Garcia Jr.
(1B)
1.5 Hits+Runs+RBIs
1.89
PROJECTION
+0.4
DIFFERENCE
-0.33%
EV
|
|||||||
|
HITS+RUNS+RBIS
G. Lombard Jr.
(SS)
1.5 Hits+Runs+RBIs
1.75
PROJECTION
+0.3
DIFFERENCE
-1.91%
EV
|
|||||||
|
HITS+RUNS+RBIS
MB
M. Ballesteros
(DH)
1.5 Hits+Runs+RBIs
1.52
PROJECTION
0.0
DIFFERENCE
-3.79%
EV
|
|||||||
|
HITS+RUNS+RBIS
W. Meckler
(LF)
1.5 Hits+Runs+RBIs
1.49
PROJECTION
0.0
DIFFERENCE
-5.35%
EV
|
|||||||
|
HITS+RUNS+RBIS
S. Jones
(RF)
1.5 Hits+Runs+RBIs
1.39
PROJECTION
-0.1
DIFFERENCE
-6.11%
EV
|
|||||||
|
HITS+RUNS+RBIS
T. Heineman
(C)
1.5 Hits+Runs+RBIs
1.08
PROJECTION
-0.4
DIFFERENCE
-17%
EV
|
|||||||
- Proj. Diff: Low to High
- Proj. Diff: High to Low
- Proj. Rating: Low to High
- Proj. Rating: High to Low
- +EV: Low to High
- +EV: High to Low
MONEYLINE
TOTAL
SPREAD
LAA
+1.5 spread
0.28
PROJECTION
-1.2
DIFFERENCE
7.74%
EV
TOTAL HITS
L. Garcia Jr.
(1B)
0.5 Total Hits
0.91
PROJECTION
+0.4
DIFFERENCE
11.22%
EV
TOTAL HITS
S. Jones
(RF)
0.5 Total Hits
0.68
PROJECTION
+0.2
DIFFERENCE
7.26%
EV
TOTAL HITS
B. Rice
(DH)
0.5 Total Hits
0.88
PROJECTION
+0.4
DIFFERENCE
5.74%
EV
TOTAL HITS
W. Meckler
(LF)
0.5 Total Hits
0.83
PROJECTION
+0.3
DIFFERENCE
5.48%
EV
TOTAL HITS
MB
M. Ballesteros
(DH)
0.5 Total Hits
0.73
PROJECTION
+0.2
DIFFERENCE
5.24%
EV
TOTAL HITS
A. Wells
(C)
0.5 Total Hits
0.60
PROJECTION
+0.1
DIFFERENCE
4.88%
EV
TOTAL HITS
T. Grisham
(CF)
0.5 Total Hits
0.82
PROJECTION
+0.3
DIFFERENCE
4.74%
EV
TOTAL HITS
T. Heineman
(C)
0.5 Total Hits
0.59
PROJECTION
+0.1
DIFFERENCE
3.37%
EV
TOTAL HITS
C. Bellinger
(LF)
0.5 Total Hits
0.93
PROJECTION
+0.4
DIFFERENCE
2.36%
EV
TOTAL HITS
G. Lombard Jr.
(SS)
0.5 Total Hits
0.94
PROJECTION
+0.4
DIFFERENCE
-3.18%
EV
TOTAL HITS
C. Moore
(2B)
0.5 Total Hits
0.81
PROJECTION
+0.3
DIFFERENCE
-4.94%
EV
TOTAL HITS
J. Caballero
(SS)
0.5 Total Hits
0.81
PROJECTION
+0.3
DIFFERENCE
-4.95%
EV
TOTAL HITS
M. Trout
(CF)
0.5 Total Hits
0.97
PROJECTION
+0.5
DIFFERENCE
-4.96%
EV
TOTAL HITS
Z. Neto
(SS)
0.5 Total Hits
0.98
PROJECTION
+0.5
DIFFERENCE
-5.76%
EV
TOTAL BASES
M. Trout
(CF)
1.5 Total Bases
1.72
PROJECTION
+0.2
DIFFERENCE
13.52%
EV
TOTAL BASES
S. Jones
(RF)
1.5 Total Bases
0.66
PROJECTION
-0.8
DIFFERENCE
10.87%
EV
TOTAL BASES
MB
M. Ballesteros
(DH)
1.5 Total Bases
0.72
PROJECTION
-0.8
DIFFERENCE
9.44%
EV
TOTAL BASES
Z. Neto
(SS)
1.5 Total Bases
1.58
PROJECTION
+0.1
DIFFERENCE
7.75%
EV
TOTAL BASES
A. Wells
(C)
1.5 Total Bases
0.60
PROJECTION
-0.9
DIFFERENCE
7.04%
EV
TOTAL BASES
T. Grisham
(CF)
1.5 Total Bases
1.51
PROJECTION
0.0
DIFFERENCE
7.03%
EV
TOTAL BASES
J. Chisholm Jr.
(2B)
1.5 Total Bases
0.74
PROJECTION
-0.8
DIFFERENCE
6.44%
EV
TOTAL BASES
G. Lombard Jr.
(SS)
1.5 Total Bases
1.38
PROJECTION
-0.1
DIFFERENCE
6.24%
EV
TOTAL BASES
C. Bellinger
(LF)
1.5 Total Bases
1.51
PROJECTION
0.0
DIFFERENCE
4.05%
EV
TOTAL BASES
V. Grissom
(2B)
1.5 Total Bases
0.98
PROJECTION
-0.5
DIFFERENCE
2.66%
EV
TOTAL BASES
C. Moore
(2B)
1.5 Total Bases
0.81
PROJECTION
-0.7
DIFFERENCE
2.05%
EV
TOTAL BASES
D. Guzman
(3B)
1.5 Total Bases
0.83
PROJECTION
-0.7
DIFFERENCE
1.92%
EV
TOTAL BASES
B. Rice
(DH)
1.5 Total Bases
1.57
PROJECTION
+0.1
DIFFERENCE
-1.52%
EV
TOTAL BASES
W. Meckler
(LF)
1.5 Total Bases
1.08
PROJECTION
-0.4
DIFFERENCE
-2.91%
EV
TOTAL BASES
J. Caballero
(SS)
1.5 Total Bases
0.85
PROJECTION
-0.7
DIFFERENCE
-3.16%
EV
TOTAL BASES
L. Garcia Jr.
(1B)
1.5 Total Bases
1.47
PROJECTION
0.0
DIFFERENCE
-3.31%
EV
TOTAL HOME RUNS
L. Garcia Jr.
(1B)
0.5 Total Home Runs
0.12
PROJECTION
-0.4
DIFFERENCE
0.67%
EV
TOTAL HOME RUNS
S. Jones
(RF)
0.5 Total Home Runs
0.10
PROJECTION
-0.4
DIFFERENCE
-0.58%
EV
TOTAL HOME RUNS
M. Trout
(CF)
0.5 Total Home Runs
0.18
PROJECTION
-0.3
DIFFERENCE
-1.01%
EV
TOTAL HOME RUNS
Z. Neto
(SS)
0.5 Total Home Runs
0.13
PROJECTION
-0.4
DIFFERENCE
-2.41%
EV
TOTAL HOME RUNS
T. Heineman
(C)
0.5 Total Home Runs
0.02
PROJECTION
-0.5
DIFFERENCE
-2.8%
EV
TOTAL HOME RUNS
A. Wells
(C)
0.5 Total Home Runs
0.11
PROJECTION
-0.4
DIFFERENCE
-3.38%
EV
TOTAL HOME RUNS
G. Lombard Jr.
(SS)
0.5 Total Home Runs
0.07
PROJECTION
-0.4
DIFFERENCE
-4.22%
EV
TOTAL RBIS
M. Trout
(CF)
0.5 Total RBIs
0.61
PROJECTION
+0.1
DIFFERENCE
18.93%
EV
TOTAL RBIS
Z. Neto
(SS)
0.5 Total RBIs
0.47
PROJECTION
0.0
DIFFERENCE
12.77%
EV
TOTAL RBIS
V. Grissom
(2B)
0.5 Total RBIs
0.48
PROJECTION
0.0
DIFFERENCE
11.24%
EV
TOTAL RBIS
J. Lowe
(LF)
0.5 Total RBIs
0.39
PROJECTION
-0.1
DIFFERENCE
9.76%
EV
TOTAL RBIS
C. Bellinger
(LF)
0.5 Total RBIs
0.55
PROJECTION
+0.1
DIFFERENCE
7.65%
EV
TOTAL RBIS
L. Garcia Jr.
(1B)
0.5 Total RBIs
0.53
PROJECTION
0.0
DIFFERENCE
6.74%
EV
TOTAL RBIS
D. Guzman
(3B)
0.5 Total RBIs
0.37
PROJECTION
-0.1
DIFFERENCE
5.37%
EV
TOTAL RBIS
J. Caballero
(SS)
0.5 Total RBIs
0.33
PROJECTION
-0.2
DIFFERENCE
5.37%
EV
TOTAL RBIS
B. Rice
(DH)
0.5 Total RBIs
0.52
PROJECTION
0.0
DIFFERENCE
3.4%
EV
TOTAL RBIS
J. Chisholm Jr.
(2B)
0.5 Total RBIs
0.44
PROJECTION
-0.1
DIFFERENCE
3.36%
EV
TOTAL RBIS
T. Grisham
(CF)
0.5 Total RBIs
0.47
PROJECTION
0.0
DIFFERENCE
3.2%
EV
TOTAL RBIS
MB
M. Ballesteros
(DH)
0.5 Total RBIs
0.40
PROJECTION
-0.1
DIFFERENCE
2.02%
EV
TOTAL RBIS
W. Meckler
(LF)
0.5 Total RBIs
0.36
PROJECTION
-0.1
DIFFERENCE
1.96%
EV
TOTAL RBIS
C. Moore
(2B)
0.5 Total RBIs
0.37
PROJECTION
-0.1
DIFFERENCE
0.68%
EV
TOTAL RBIS
G. Lombard Jr.
(SS)
0.5 Total RBIs
0.39
PROJECTION
-0.1
DIFFERENCE
-5.48%
EV
TOTAL RBIS
S. Jones
(RF)
0.5 Total RBIs
0.37
PROJECTION
-0.1
DIFFERENCE
-6.78%
EV
HITS+RUNS+RBIS
M. Trout
(CF)
1.5 Hits+Runs+RBIs
2.30
PROJECTION
+0.8
DIFFERENCE
16.86%
EV
HITS+RUNS+RBIS
Z. Neto
(SS)
1.5 Hits+Runs+RBIs
2.08
PROJECTION
+0.6
DIFFERENCE
10.81%
EV
HITS+RUNS+RBIS
V. Grissom
(2B)
1.5 Hits+Runs+RBIs
1.88
PROJECTION
+0.4
DIFFERENCE
8.75%
EV
HITS+RUNS+RBIS
D. Guzman
(3B)
1.5 Hits+Runs+RBIs
1.58
PROJECTION
+0.1
DIFFERENCE
7.75%
EV
HITS+RUNS+RBIS
J. Lowe
(LF)
1.5 Hits+Runs+RBIs
1.48
PROJECTION
0.0
DIFFERENCE
3.84%
EV
HITS+RUNS+RBIS
C. Moore
(2B)
1.5 Hits+Runs+RBIs
1.56
PROJECTION
+0.1
DIFFERENCE
2.21%
EV
HITS+RUNS+RBIS
A. Wells
(C)
1.5 Hits+Runs+RBIs
1.34
PROJECTION
-0.2
DIFFERENCE
2.03%
EV
HITS+RUNS+RBIS
J. Chisholm Jr.
(2B)
1.5 Hits+Runs+RBIs
1.61
PROJECTION
+0.1
DIFFERENCE
0.99%
EV
HITS+RUNS+RBIS
L. Garcia Jr.
(1B)
1.5 Hits+Runs+RBIs
1.89
PROJECTION
+0.4
DIFFERENCE
-0.33%
EV
HITS+RUNS+RBIS
G. Lombard Jr.
(SS)
1.5 Hits+Runs+RBIs
1.75
PROJECTION
+0.3
DIFFERENCE
-1.91%
EV
HITS+RUNS+RBIS
MB
M. Ballesteros
(DH)
1.5 Hits+Runs+RBIs
1.52
PROJECTION
0.0
DIFFERENCE
-3.79%
EV
HITS+RUNS+RBIS
W. Meckler
(LF)
1.5 Hits+Runs+RBIs
1.49
PROJECTION
0.0
DIFFERENCE
-5.35%
EV
HITS+RUNS+RBIS
S. Jones
(RF)
1.5 Hits+Runs+RBIs
1.39
PROJECTION
-0.1
DIFFERENCE
-6.11%
EV
HITS+RUNS+RBIS
T. Heineman
(C)
1.5 Hits+Runs+RBIs
1.08
PROJECTION
-0.4
DIFFERENCE
-17%
EV
NYY @ LAA · Trends
NYY
LAA
Over
Under
NYY
LAA
Over
Under
Over
Under
Over
Under
NYY
LAA
NYY
LAA