Philadelphia vs Miami Picks & Props
PHI vs MIA Picks
MLB PicksEV Model Rating
Star rating: 3 out of 5
The weather forecast predicts the 5th-most suitable pitching conditions of all games on the slate, as it relates to temperature and humidity.. Kyle Stowers pulls a lot of his flyballs (34.1% — 78th percentile) but may find it hard to clear the league's 4th-deepest RF fences today.
EV Model Rating
Star rating: 3 out of 5
The leading projection system (THE BAT X) projects Alec Bohm in the 96th percentile as it relates to his batting average ability.. Alec Bohm hits many of his flyballs to center field (40% — 98th percentile) and is a great match for the park considering he'll be hitting towards MLB's 6th-shallowest CF fences today.
EV Model Rating
Star rating: 4 out of 5
Batting from the opposite that Aaron Nola throws from, Graham Pauley will have an advantage in today's game.. Home field advantage generally boosts hitter metrics across the board, and Graham Pauley will hold that advantage in today's matchup.
EV Model Rating
Star rating: 4 out of 5
When it comes to his home run ability, Kyle Stowers ranks in the 92nd percentile according to the leading projection system (THE BAT X).. Kyle Stowers is projected to bat 2nd in the batting order today.. Kyle Stowers will hold the platoon advantage over Aaron Nola today.. Home field advantage generally bolsters hitter stats in all categories, and Kyle Stowers will hold that advantage in today's matchup.
EV Model Rating
Star rating: 4 out of 5
EV Model Rating
Star rating: 4 out of 5
As it relates to his batting average talent, Otto Lopez is projected as the 18th-best batter in the league by the leading projection system (THE BAT X).. Otto Lopez is projected to hit 3rd in the lineup in today's game.. Otto Lopez hits many of his flyballs to center field (38.9% — 92nd percentile) and is a great match for the park considering he'll be hitting towards the game's 6th-shallowest CF fences in today's game.. Otto Lopez will possess the home field advantage in today's matchup, which ought to bolster all of his stats.
EV Model Rating
Star rating: 3 out of 5
Kyle Schwarber projects as the 3rd-best home run batter in the majors, via the leading projection system (THE BAT X).. Kyle Schwarber is penciled in 2nd in the lineup in this game.. Batting from the opposite that Janson Junk throws from, Kyle Schwarber will have an advantage in today's game.. Kyle Schwarber has big-time power (100th percentile) if he makes contact, but that's always far from assured (28.1% K%). Today, however, opposing pitcher Janson Junk has a pitch-to-contact profile (18th percentile K%) — great news for Schwarber.
EV Model Rating
Star rating: 3 out of 5
When it comes to his home run ability, Kyle Stowers ranks in the 92nd percentile according to the leading projection system (THE BAT X).. Kyle Stowers is projected to bat 2nd in the batting order today.. Kyle Stowers will hold the platoon advantage over Aaron Nola today.. Home field advantage generally bolsters hitter stats in all categories, and Kyle Stowers will hold that advantage in today's matchup.
EV Model Rating
Star rating: 3 out of 5
Kyle Schwarber projects as the 3rd-best home run batter in the majors, via the leading projection system (THE BAT X).. Kyle Schwarber is penciled in 2nd in the lineup in this game.. Batting from the opposite that Janson Junk throws from, Kyle Schwarber will have an advantage in today's game.. Kyle Schwarber has big-time power (100th percentile) if he makes contact, but that's always far from assured (28.1% K%). Today, however, opposing pitcher Janson Junk has a pitch-to-contact profile (18th percentile K%) — great news for Schwarber.
PHI vs MIA Consensus Picks
PHI vs MIA Props
| GAME & PLAYER PROPS | PROJECTIONS | ANALYSIS | BEST ODDS | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
MONEYLINE
|
|||||||
|
TOTAL
|
|||||||
|
SPREAD
|
|||||||
|
TOTAL HITS
K. Stowers
(LF)
0.5 Total Hits
0.90
PROJECTION
+0.4
DIFFERENCE
9.45%
EV
|
|||||||
|
TOTAL HITS
X. Edwards
(2B)
0.5 Total Hits
1.02
PROJECTION
+0.5
DIFFERENCE
3.33%
EV
|
|||||||
|
TOTAL HITS
L. Hicks
(C)
0.5 Total Hits
0.90
PROJECTION
+0.4
DIFFERENCE
3%
EV
|
|||||||
|
TOTAL HITS
A. Garcia
(RF)
0.5 Total Hits
0.96
PROJECTION
+0.5
DIFFERENCE
1.98%
EV
|
|||||||
|
TOTAL HITS
A. Bohm
(3B)
0.5 Total Hits
1.04
PROJECTION
+0.5
DIFFERENCE
0.21%
EV
|
|||||||
|
TOTAL HITS
O. Lopez
(SS)
0.5 Total Hits
1.12
PROJECTION
+0.6
DIFFERENCE
-2.56%
EV
|
|||||||
|
TOTAL HITS
J. Realmuto
(C)
0.5 Total Hits
0.97
PROJECTION
+0.5
DIFFERENCE
-3.13%
EV
|
|||||||
|
TOTAL HITS
G. Pauley
(3B)
0.5 Total Hits
0.67
PROJECTION
+0.2
DIFFERENCE
-5.36%
EV
|
|||||||
|
TOTAL BASES
A. Bohm
(3B)
1.5 Total Bases
1.49
PROJECTION
0.0
DIFFERENCE
10.81%
EV
|
|||||||
|
TOTAL BASES
J. Realmuto
(C)
1.5 Total Bases
1.51
PROJECTION
0.0
DIFFERENCE
7.03%
EV
|
|||||||
|
TOTAL BASES
K. Schwarber
(LF)
1.5 Total Bases
1.77
PROJECTION
+0.3
DIFFERENCE
7%
EV
|
|||||||
|
TOTAL BASES
A. Garcia
(RF)
1.5 Total Bases
1.62
PROJECTION
+0.1
DIFFERENCE
5.83%
EV
|
|||||||
|
TOTAL BASES
K. Stowers
(LF)
1.5 Total Bases
1.68
PROJECTION
+0.2
DIFFERENCE
4.74%
EV
|
|||||||
|
TOTAL BASES
G. Pauley
(3B)
1.5 Total Bases
1.16
PROJECTION
-0.3
DIFFERENCE
4.5%
EV
|
|||||||
|
TOTAL BASES
O. Lopez
(SS)
1.5 Total Bases
1.67
PROJECTION
+0.2
DIFFERENCE
2.76%
EV
|
|||||||
|
TOTAL BASES
L. Hicks
(C)
1.5 Total Bases
1.37
PROJECTION
-0.1
DIFFERENCE
-0.58%
EV
|
|||||||
|
TOTAL HOME RUNS
K. Schwarber
(LF)
0.5 Total Home Runs
0.24
PROJECTION
-0.3
DIFFERENCE
0.69%
EV
|
|||||||
|
TOTAL HOME RUNS
A. Garcia
(RF)
0.5 Total Home Runs
0.15
PROJECTION
-0.3
DIFFERENCE
0.37%
EV
|
|||||||
|
TOTAL HOME RUNS
K. Stowers
(LF)
0.5 Total Home Runs
0.19
PROJECTION
-0.3
DIFFERENCE
-4.12%
EV
|
|||||||
|
TOTAL HOME RUNS
A. Bohm
(3B)
0.5 Total Home Runs
0.07
PROJECTION
-0.4
DIFFERENCE
-4.22%
EV
|
|||||||
|
TOTAL HOME RUNS
O. Lopez
(SS)
0.5 Total Home Runs
0.09
PROJECTION
-0.4
DIFFERENCE
-4.77%
EV
|
|||||||
|
TOTAL HOME RUNS
J. Realmuto
(C)
0.5 Total Home Runs
0.10
PROJECTION
-0.4
DIFFERENCE
-5.55%
EV
|
|||||||
|
TOTAL RBIS
G. Pauley
(3B)
0.5 Total RBIs
0.40
PROJECTION
-0.1
DIFFERENCE
12.79%
EV
|
|||||||
|
TOTAL RBIS
K. Stowers
(LF)
0.5 Total RBIs
0.63
PROJECTION
+0.1
DIFFERENCE
12.78%
EV
|
|||||||
|
TOTAL RBIS
A. Garcia
(RF)
0.5 Total RBIs
0.62
PROJECTION
+0.1
DIFFERENCE
12.58%
EV
|
|||||||
|
TOTAL RBIS
O. Lopez
(SS)
0.5 Total RBIs
0.57
PROJECTION
+0.1
DIFFERENCE
12.38%
EV
|
|||||||
|
TOTAL RBIS
K. Schwarber
(LF)
0.5 Total RBIs
0.68
PROJECTION
+0.2
DIFFERENCE
8.4%
EV
|
|||||||
|
TOTAL RBIS
J. Realmuto
(C)
0.5 Total RBIs
0.45
PROJECTION
-0.1
DIFFERENCE
7.57%
EV
|
|||||||
|
TOTAL RBIS
A. Bohm
(3B)
0.5 Total RBIs
0.42
PROJECTION
-0.1
DIFFERENCE
1.32%
EV
|
|||||||
|
TOTAL RBIS
L. Hicks
(C)
0.5 Total RBIs
0.46
PROJECTION
0.0
DIFFERENCE
-3.27%
EV
|
|||||||
|
HITS+RUNS+RBIS
K. Stowers
(LF)
1.5 Hits+Runs+RBIs
2.22
PROJECTION
+0.7
DIFFERENCE
8.79%
EV
|
|||||||
|
HITS+RUNS+RBIS
K. Schwarber
(LF)
1.5 Hits+Runs+RBIs
2.32
PROJECTION
+0.8
DIFFERENCE
8.73%
EV
|
|||||||
|
HITS+RUNS+RBIS
G. Pauley
(3B)
1.5 Hits+Runs+RBIs
1.49
PROJECTION
0.0
DIFFERENCE
7.33%
EV
|
|||||||
|
HITS+RUNS+RBIS
A. Garcia
(RF)
1.5 Hits+Runs+RBIs
2.11
PROJECTION
+0.6
DIFFERENCE
7.12%
EV
|
|||||||
|
HITS+RUNS+RBIS
O. Lopez
(SS)
1.5 Hits+Runs+RBIs
2.19
PROJECTION
+0.7
DIFFERENCE
6.68%
EV
|
|||||||
|
HITS+RUNS+RBIS
A. Bohm
(3B)
1.5 Hits+Runs+RBIs
1.88
PROJECTION
+0.4
DIFFERENCE
6.09%
EV
|
|||||||
|
HITS+RUNS+RBIS
J. Realmuto
(C)
1.5 Hits+Runs+RBIs
1.87
PROJECTION
+0.4
DIFFERENCE
4.6%
EV
|
|||||||
|
HITS+RUNS+RBIS
L. Hicks
(C)
1.5 Hits+Runs+RBIs
1.84
PROJECTION
+0.3
DIFFERENCE
-1.27%
EV
|
|||||||
- Proj. Diff: Low to High
- Proj. Diff: High to Low
- Proj. Rating: Low to High
- Proj. Rating: High to Low
- +EV: Low to High
- +EV: High to Low
MONEYLINE
TOTAL
SPREAD
TOTAL HITS
K. Stowers
(LF)
0.5 Total Hits
0.90
PROJECTION
+0.4
DIFFERENCE
9.45%
EV
TOTAL HITS
X. Edwards
(2B)
0.5 Total Hits
1.02
PROJECTION
+0.5
DIFFERENCE
3.33%
EV
TOTAL HITS
L. Hicks
(C)
0.5 Total Hits
0.90
PROJECTION
+0.4
DIFFERENCE
3%
EV
TOTAL HITS
A. Garcia
(RF)
0.5 Total Hits
0.96
PROJECTION
+0.5
DIFFERENCE
1.98%
EV
TOTAL HITS
A. Bohm
(3B)
0.5 Total Hits
1.04
PROJECTION
+0.5
DIFFERENCE
0.21%
EV
TOTAL HITS
O. Lopez
(SS)
0.5 Total Hits
1.12
PROJECTION
+0.6
DIFFERENCE
-2.56%
EV
TOTAL HITS
J. Realmuto
(C)
0.5 Total Hits
0.97
PROJECTION
+0.5
DIFFERENCE
-3.13%
EV
TOTAL HITS
G. Pauley
(3B)
0.5 Total Hits
0.67
PROJECTION
+0.2
DIFFERENCE
-5.36%
EV
TOTAL BASES
A. Bohm
(3B)
1.5 Total Bases
1.49
PROJECTION
0.0
DIFFERENCE
10.81%
EV
TOTAL BASES
J. Realmuto
(C)
1.5 Total Bases
1.51
PROJECTION
0.0
DIFFERENCE
7.03%
EV
TOTAL BASES
K. Schwarber
(LF)
1.5 Total Bases
1.77
PROJECTION
+0.3
DIFFERENCE
7%
EV
TOTAL BASES
A. Garcia
(RF)
1.5 Total Bases
1.62
PROJECTION
+0.1
DIFFERENCE
5.83%
EV
TOTAL BASES
K. Stowers
(LF)
1.5 Total Bases
1.68
PROJECTION
+0.2
DIFFERENCE
4.74%
EV
TOTAL BASES
G. Pauley
(3B)
1.5 Total Bases
1.16
PROJECTION
-0.3
DIFFERENCE
4.5%
EV
TOTAL BASES
O. Lopez
(SS)
1.5 Total Bases
1.67
PROJECTION
+0.2
DIFFERENCE
2.76%
EV
TOTAL BASES
L. Hicks
(C)
1.5 Total Bases
1.37
PROJECTION
-0.1
DIFFERENCE
-0.58%
EV
TOTAL HOME RUNS
K. Schwarber
(LF)
0.5 Total Home Runs
0.24
PROJECTION
-0.3
DIFFERENCE
0.69%
EV
TOTAL HOME RUNS
A. Garcia
(RF)
0.5 Total Home Runs
0.15
PROJECTION
-0.3
DIFFERENCE
0.37%
EV
TOTAL HOME RUNS
K. Stowers
(LF)
0.5 Total Home Runs
0.19
PROJECTION
-0.3
DIFFERENCE
-4.12%
EV
TOTAL HOME RUNS
A. Bohm
(3B)
0.5 Total Home Runs
0.07
PROJECTION
-0.4
DIFFERENCE
-4.22%
EV
TOTAL HOME RUNS
O. Lopez
(SS)
0.5 Total Home Runs
0.09
PROJECTION
-0.4
DIFFERENCE
-4.77%
EV
TOTAL HOME RUNS
J. Realmuto
(C)
0.5 Total Home Runs
0.10
PROJECTION
-0.4
DIFFERENCE
-5.55%
EV
TOTAL RBIS
G. Pauley
(3B)
0.5 Total RBIs
0.40
PROJECTION
-0.1
DIFFERENCE
12.79%
EV
TOTAL RBIS
K. Stowers
(LF)
0.5 Total RBIs
0.63
PROJECTION
+0.1
DIFFERENCE
12.78%
EV
TOTAL RBIS
A. Garcia
(RF)
0.5 Total RBIs
0.62
PROJECTION
+0.1
DIFFERENCE
12.58%
EV
TOTAL RBIS
O. Lopez
(SS)
0.5 Total RBIs
0.57
PROJECTION
+0.1
DIFFERENCE
12.38%
EV
TOTAL RBIS
K. Schwarber
(LF)
0.5 Total RBIs
0.68
PROJECTION
+0.2
DIFFERENCE
8.4%
EV
TOTAL RBIS
J. Realmuto
(C)
0.5 Total RBIs
0.45
PROJECTION
-0.1
DIFFERENCE
7.57%
EV
TOTAL RBIS
A. Bohm
(3B)
0.5 Total RBIs
0.42
PROJECTION
-0.1
DIFFERENCE
1.32%
EV
TOTAL RBIS
L. Hicks
(C)
0.5 Total RBIs
0.46
PROJECTION
0.0
DIFFERENCE
-3.27%
EV
HITS+RUNS+RBIS
K. Stowers
(LF)
1.5 Hits+Runs+RBIs
2.22
PROJECTION
+0.7
DIFFERENCE
8.79%
EV
HITS+RUNS+RBIS
K. Schwarber
(LF)
1.5 Hits+Runs+RBIs
2.32
PROJECTION
+0.8
DIFFERENCE
8.73%
EV
HITS+RUNS+RBIS
G. Pauley
(3B)
1.5 Hits+Runs+RBIs
1.49
PROJECTION
0.0
DIFFERENCE
7.33%
EV
HITS+RUNS+RBIS
A. Garcia
(RF)
1.5 Hits+Runs+RBIs
2.11
PROJECTION
+0.6
DIFFERENCE
7.12%
EV
HITS+RUNS+RBIS
O. Lopez
(SS)
1.5 Hits+Runs+RBIs
2.19
PROJECTION
+0.7
DIFFERENCE
6.68%
EV
HITS+RUNS+RBIS
A. Bohm
(3B)
1.5 Hits+Runs+RBIs
1.88
PROJECTION
+0.4
DIFFERENCE
6.09%
EV
HITS+RUNS+RBIS
J. Realmuto
(C)
1.5 Hits+Runs+RBIs
1.87
PROJECTION
+0.4
DIFFERENCE
4.6%
EV
HITS+RUNS+RBIS
L. Hicks
(C)
1.5 Hits+Runs+RBIs
1.84
PROJECTION
+0.3
DIFFERENCE
-1.27%
EV
PHI vs MIA Trends
Check back shortly to see trends for this matchup