https://newsfeed.time.com/2012/07/17/the-average-canadian-is-now-richer-than-the-average-american/
This is apparently old news when you read the article.
Not surprising in the least. The US has allowed the banksters to run wild. Corporate influence over policy and regulation has allowed the wealth of the middle/low-class to be sacked by predatory interests. This doesn't explain disparity with respect to average.
As the article stated, the property values explains it all. The value of a typical US household fell by 100,000, while the Canadian counterpart rose by 100,000.
This is apparently old news when you read the article.
Not surprising in the least. The US has allowed the banksters to run wild. Corporate influence over policy and regulation has allowed the wealth of the middle/low-class to be sacked by predatory interests. This doesn't explain disparity with respect to average.
As the article stated, the property values explains it all. The value of a typical US household fell by 100,000, while the Canadian counterpart rose by 100,000.
Yo Stilln,
I could use some of those wing sauce recipes. I'm actually considering the purchase of a deep-fat fryer. I'm rocking the basic Franks Red Hot "Buffalo Sauce."
It ain't bad, but you've got me intrigued with these underground recipes.
Yo Stilln,
I could use some of those wing sauce recipes. I'm actually considering the purchase of a deep-fat fryer. I'm rocking the basic Franks Red Hot "Buffalo Sauce."
It ain't bad, but you've got me intrigued with these underground recipes.
Yo Stilln,
I could use some of those wing sauce recipes. I'm actually considering the purchase of a deep-fat fryer. I'm rocking the basic Franks Red Hot "Buffalo Sauce."
It ain't bad, but you've got me intrigued with these underground recipes.
Yo Stilln,
I could use some of those wing sauce recipes. I'm actually considering the purchase of a deep-fat fryer. I'm rocking the basic Franks Red Hot "Buffalo Sauce."
It ain't bad, but you've got me intrigued with these underground recipes.
Yeah ..but those rich Canadians still have to come to the US for decent Health Care...........
Canada's top politician decided to abandon his country’s socialized government health care system, to cross the border in seeking treatment for a heart condition.
Yeah ..but those rich Canadians still have to come to the US for decent Health Care...........
Canada's top politician decided to abandon his country’s socialized government health care system, to cross the border in seeking treatment for a heart condition.
Yo Stilln,
I could use some of those wing sauce recipes. I'm actually considering the purchase of a deep-fat fryer. I'm rocking the basic Franks Red Hot "Buffalo Sauce."
It ain't bad, but you've got me intrigued with these underground recipes.
Yo Stilln,
I could use some of those wing sauce recipes. I'm actually considering the purchase of a deep-fat fryer. I'm rocking the basic Franks Red Hot "Buffalo Sauce."
It ain't bad, but you've got me intrigued with these underground recipes.
Yeah ..but those rich Canadians still have to come to the US for decent Health Care...........
Canada's top politician decided to abandon his country’s socialized government health care system, to cross the border in seeking treatment for a heart condition.
Yeah ..but those rich Canadians still have to come to the US for decent Health Care...........
Canada's top politician decided to abandon his country’s socialized government health care system, to cross the border in seeking treatment for a heart condition.
Yeah ..but those rich Canadians still have to come to the US for decent Health Care...........
Canada's top politician decided to abandon his country’s socialized government health care system, to cross the border in seeking treatment for a heart condition.
Yeah ..but those rich Canadians still have to come to the US for decent Health Care...........
Canada's top politician decided to abandon his country’s socialized government health care system, to cross the border in seeking treatment for a heart condition.
QUOTE Originally Posted by gers:
Slim you felling okay no reference or spin on Barry
******
Gers, I'm still working on this angle..
QUOTE Originally Posted by gers:
Slim you felling okay no reference or spin on Barry
******
Gers, I'm still working on this angle..
Be Easy.
I still don't quite understand what you are getting at with the inverse relationship between property values and collective wealth.
Not all property values in Canada have increased. Many have decreased. The major metropolitan areas in Canada have seen a nice increase, especially Calgary. Overall, the growth seems healthy and natural. Highly desirable areas have gained in value as they should in a healthy economic climate with a growing population.
I don't see how you can characterize this as bad. There might not even be a net increase in property values. The property values in the outskirts have dwindled or stagnated and the major metropolitan areas have seen nice increases in value, especially residential.
Imagine you own a house in Calgary and some property a hundred-or-so miles away. Your house may have increased in value by 100-200,000, but the value of your distant property most likely fell by 100-200,000, maybe more.
I guess this article is more an issue of the US residential real estate FALLING OFF THE MAP. Anyhow, I don't think you could characterize the property values of Canadian households as artificially high to the detriment of the the collective wealth/well being of the nation. You should bump a thread on the topic of that inverse relationship.
Be Easy.
I still don't quite understand what you are getting at with the inverse relationship between property values and collective wealth.
Not all property values in Canada have increased. Many have decreased. The major metropolitan areas in Canada have seen a nice increase, especially Calgary. Overall, the growth seems healthy and natural. Highly desirable areas have gained in value as they should in a healthy economic climate with a growing population.
I don't see how you can characterize this as bad. There might not even be a net increase in property values. The property values in the outskirts have dwindled or stagnated and the major metropolitan areas have seen nice increases in value, especially residential.
Imagine you own a house in Calgary and some property a hundred-or-so miles away. Your house may have increased in value by 100-200,000, but the value of your distant property most likely fell by 100-200,000, maybe more.
I guess this article is more an issue of the US residential real estate FALLING OFF THE MAP. Anyhow, I don't think you could characterize the property values of Canadian households as artificially high to the detriment of the the collective wealth/well being of the nation. You should bump a thread on the topic of that inverse relationship.
Yeah ..but those rich Canadians still have to come to the US for decent Health Care...........
Canada's top politician decided to abandon his country’s socialized government health care system, to cross the border in seeking treatment for a heart condition.
Yeah ..but those rich Canadians still have to come to the US for decent Health Care...........
Canada's top politician decided to abandon his country’s socialized government health care system, to cross the border in seeking treatment for a heart condition.
Be Easy.
I still don't quite understand what you are getting at with the inverse relationship between property values and collective wealth.
Not all property values in Canada have increased. Many have decreased. The major metropolitan areas in Canada have seen a nice increase, especially Calgary. Overall, the growth seems healthy and natural. Highly desirable areas have gained in value as they should in a healthy economic climate with a growing population.
I don't see how you can characterize this as bad. There might not even be a net increase in property values. The property values in the outskirts have dwindled or stagnated and the major metropolitan areas have seen nice increases in value, especially residential.
Imagine you own a house in Calgary and some property a hundred-or-so miles away. Your house may have increased in value by 100-200,000, but the value of your distant property most likely fell by 100-200,000, maybe more.
I guess this article is more an issue of the US residential real estate FALLING OFF THE MAP. Anyhow, I don't think you could characterize the property values of Canadian households as artificially high to the detriment of the the collective wealth/well being of the nation. You should bump a thread on the topic of that inverse relationship.
Be Easy.
I still don't quite understand what you are getting at with the inverse relationship between property values and collective wealth.
Not all property values in Canada have increased. Many have decreased. The major metropolitan areas in Canada have seen a nice increase, especially Calgary. Overall, the growth seems healthy and natural. Highly desirable areas have gained in value as they should in a healthy economic climate with a growing population.
I don't see how you can characterize this as bad. There might not even be a net increase in property values. The property values in the outskirts have dwindled or stagnated and the major metropolitan areas have seen nice increases in value, especially residential.
Imagine you own a house in Calgary and some property a hundred-or-so miles away. Your house may have increased in value by 100-200,000, but the value of your distant property most likely fell by 100-200,000, maybe more.
I guess this article is more an issue of the US residential real estate FALLING OFF THE MAP. Anyhow, I don't think you could characterize the property values of Canadian households as artificially high to the detriment of the the collective wealth/well being of the nation. You should bump a thread on the topic of that inverse relationship.
If you choose to make use of any information on this website including online sports betting services from any websites that may be featured on this website, we strongly recommend that you carefully check your local laws before doing so. It is your sole responsibility to understand your local laws and observe them strictly. Covers does not provide any advice or guidance as to the legality of online sports betting or other online gambling activities within your jurisdiction and you are responsible for complying with laws that are applicable to you in your relevant locality. Covers disclaims all liability associated with your use of this website and use of any information contained on it. As a condition of using this website, you agree to hold the owner of this website harmless from any claims arising from your use of any services on any third party website that may be featured by Covers.