ponson vs batista today. don't let the aruban's era fool you, he allowed 4 unearned runs in his first start of the season. batista bounced back nicely in his last start after leaving his previous start early after facing just 10 batters. batista went 7 solid ininngs, allowing just 4 hits and a run last week in cleveland.
looking at batista last season
after may 17: 26 games, 13-8 rec, 16-10 team rec, 3.62 era, .263 opp avg
before may 17: 7 starts, 3-3 rec, 4-3 team rec, 6.98 era, .323 opp avg
batista's last gs and his performance in 07 after the first month give me pause in jumping on the rangers at +140 today. however, while the final score indicates the mariners bats woke up yesterday, a closer look reveals they scored 7 runs on 9 hits in the first 3 innings, then could only manage a single hit in 5 innings vs the texas bullpen. 4 of the runs came on hr's by sexson and balentien. i think yesterday's game falls intto the category of "every team wins 54, and every team loses 54" and not the "other 54 category". incidently, jarrod washburn almost always wins that type of game, it's the other 54 that he usually comes up just short in.
m's face another righty today, and i'm not ready to pronounce the offense cured just yet. thus, i will not be considering the mariners ML or RL at all. the rangers pen has now put together 5 straight solid games. that may help motivate me to back the dog, not sure yet. the problem i'm having is . . . .can you back ponson off two starts against a professional pitcher on the road at +140. are you getting decent value there ? i'm leaning towards taking a wait and see approach with ponson.
rangers get hamilton back in the lineup tonight, while the mariners will likely keep the starting nine the same.
0
To remove first post, remove entire topic.
'08 Season Record 11-10-2
Units +2.21
Average Pric e +114
Monday no play
ponson vs batista today. don't let the aruban's era fool you, he allowed 4 unearned runs in his first start of the season. batista bounced back nicely in his last start after leaving his previous start early after facing just 10 batters. batista went 7 solid ininngs, allowing just 4 hits and a run last week in cleveland.
looking at batista last season
after may 17: 26 games, 13-8 rec, 16-10 team rec, 3.62 era, .263 opp avg
before may 17: 7 starts, 3-3 rec, 4-3 team rec, 6.98 era, .323 opp avg
batista's last gs and his performance in 07 after the first month give me pause in jumping on the rangers at +140 today. however, while the final score indicates the mariners bats woke up yesterday, a closer look reveals they scored 7 runs on 9 hits in the first 3 innings, then could only manage a single hit in 5 innings vs the texas bullpen. 4 of the runs came on hr's by sexson and balentien. i think yesterday's game falls intto the category of "every team wins 54, and every team loses 54" and not the "other 54 category". incidently, jarrod washburn almost always wins that type of game, it's the other 54 that he usually comes up just short in.
m's face another righty today, and i'm not ready to pronounce the offense cured just yet. thus, i will not be considering the mariners ML or RL at all. the rangers pen has now put together 5 straight solid games. that may help motivate me to back the dog, not sure yet. the problem i'm having is . . . .can you back ponson off two starts against a professional pitcher on the road at +140. are you getting decent value there ? i'm leaning towards taking a wait and see approach with ponson.
rangers get hamilton back in the lineup tonight, while the mariners will likely keep the starting nine the same.
some extra reasons to think the m's offensemight slump a bit longer
last night: rangers bullpen pitchers needed only 50 pitches to get through 5.0 innings, in addition, over those 5 innings, rangers pitchers only threw 13 balls. keep in mind, this is the texas bullpen that's throwing up koufax like numbers.
and to further indight the rangers offense, washburn was easily on track to get through 7 or more ip on less than 100 pitches, until he was sidelined by a minor calf injury. sean green needed just 19 pitches to retire 6 batters, and half of those guys struck out. JJ putz was successful in the 9th, but not sharp.
so we have two weaker hitting teams (lately) along with one bullpen who over achieving and another that's underachieving. the total feels like a complete tossup, while the game also seems pretty close to a toss up, albeit an edge to mariners. the texas ML price keeps getting better, anything at +150 or better demands a play in my opinion. kind of like the mariners-indians series last week. two evenly matched teams, yet one rewards you with an nice price.
0
some extra reasons to think the m's offensemight slump a bit longer
last night: rangers bullpen pitchers needed only 50 pitches to get through 5.0 innings, in addition, over those 5 innings, rangers pitchers only threw 13 balls. keep in mind, this is the texas bullpen that's throwing up koufax like numbers.
and to further indight the rangers offense, washburn was easily on track to get through 7 or more ip on less than 100 pitches, until he was sidelined by a minor calf injury. sean green needed just 19 pitches to retire 6 batters, and half of those guys struck out. JJ putz was successful in the 9th, but not sharp.
so we have two weaker hitting teams (lately) along with one bullpen who over achieving and another that's underachieving. the total feels like a complete tossup, while the game also seems pretty close to a toss up, albeit an edge to mariners. the texas ML price keeps getting better, anything at +150 or better demands a play in my opinion. kind of like the mariners-indians series last week. two evenly matched teams, yet one rewards you with an nice price.
it crept up to +147 earlier before i completed my research, i've been consistently on the wrong side of the moves all season until the past few days. so i figured the price would move in my favor. not today.
looks like i'm out of luck on +150, i would settle for high 140's, but it appears i won't get that either.
oh well, i stuck my guns on the price last night, and watch the game go off the board with making an investment, and quickly saw how wrong i was as the mariners torched millwood early.
0
it crept up to +147 earlier before i completed my research, i've been consistently on the wrong side of the moves all season until the past few days. so i figured the price would move in my favor. not today.
looks like i'm out of luck on +150, i would settle for high 140's, but it appears i won't get that either.
oh well, i stuck my guns on the price last night, and watch the game go off the board with making an investment, and quickly saw how wrong i was as the mariners torched millwood early.
If you choose to make use of any information on this website including online sports betting services from any websites that may be featured on
this website, we strongly recommend that you carefully check your local laws before doing so.It is your sole responsibility to understand your local laws and observe them strictly.Covers does not provide
any advice or guidance as to the legality of online sports betting or other online gambling activities within your jurisdiction and you are responsible for complying with laws that are applicable to you in
your relevant locality.Covers disclaims all liability associated with your use of this website and use of any information contained on it.As a condition of using this website, you agree to hold the owner
of this website harmless from any claims arising from your use of any services on any third party website that may be featured by Covers.