Illinois Lawmaker Proposes Repeal of Prediction Market Tax

Geoff Zochodne - Sports Betting Journalist at Covers.com
Geoff Zochodne • Senior News Analyst 15+ years betting experience
Updated: Sep 8, 2026 , 04:19 PM ET • 3 min read

The tax was only signed into law by Gov. JB Pritzker in June and came into effect at the start of July. 

Photo By - Reuters Connect.

At least one effort is already underway to repeal Illinois’ recently enacted tax on prediction market operators.

Covers Icon
Key Takeaways
  • Illinois Rep. Travis Weaver has proposed repealing the state’s new tax on prediction market trades.
  • The tax charges 1.75% per transaction, rising to 3.5% after 5 million trades.
  • The proposal comes amid regulatory clashes between Illinois, prediction markets, and the CFTC over who has authority to regulate the exchanges.

Republican Rep. Travis Weaver filed H.B. 5811 on Sept. 2, with the legislation proposing to axe Illinois’ tax on “exchange wagers.”

The proposed legislation is still a long way from becoming law, but, if passed, it would remove any references to the prediction market tax from the Illinois Sports Wagering Act. That tax was only signed into law by Gov. JB Pritzker in June and came into effect at the start of July. 

The new levy applies a 1.75% tax to the value of any “agreement, contract, transaction, or swap” offered, traded, or executed on a prediction market or exchange tied to a sporting contest or event. After 5 million “exchange wagers,” the rate increases to 3.5% of each transaction.

The Illinois Gaming Board has not yet released its revenue reports for July, so it’s unclear exactly how much revenue the state has realized thus far from the prediction market tax or who has paid it. Nevertheless, the new tax is supposed to be “in addition to all other taxes and payments owed” under the state’s Sports Wagering Act. 

While unanswered questions remain and prediction markets continue to operate in the state, Illinois sports betting regulators have indeed tried to take a harder line with the exchanges. To start, the Illinois Gaming Board sent cease-and-desist letters to Polymarket, Crypto.com, Kalshi, and Robinhood over what it alleges is unlicensed sports wagering activity.

However, another party interested in shutting down the Illinois exchange-wager fee is the U.S. Commodity Futures Trading Commission (CFTC), which has sued the state over its efforts to crack down on prediction markets. 

The CFTC maintains that prediction markets are its exclusive regulatory turf, not that of the states. The agency also amended its lawsuit against Illinois in June to include concerns about the new prediction market tax.

“Defendants’ attempt to regulate CFTC-regulated DCMs and target these DCMs by singling them out for special fees interferes with Plaintiffs’ exclusive authority to uniformly regulate and monitor this congressionally defined market,” the amended lawsuit reads.

Pages related to this topic

Geoff Zochodne, Covers Sports Betting Journalist
Senior News Analyst

Geoff has been writing about the legalization and regulation of sports betting in Canada and the United States for more than four years. His work has included coverage of launches in New York, Ohio, and Ontario, numerous court proceedings, and the decriminalization of single-game wagering by Canadian lawmakers. As an expert on the growing online gambling industry in North America, Geoff has appeared on and been cited by publications and networks such as Axios, TSN Radio, and VSiN. Prior to joining Covers, he spent 10 years as a journalist reporting on business and politics, including a stint at the Ontario legislature. More recently, Geoff’s work has focused on the pending launch of a competitive iGaming market in Alberta, the evolution of major companies within the gambling industry, and efforts by U.S. state regulators to rein in offshore activity and college player prop betting.

Popular Content

Covers is verified safe by: Evalon Logo GPWA Logo GDPR Logo GeoTrust Logo Evalon Logo