US Open 2009
[/Quote>
Deja Vu Tennis Capper!?? How many times do I need to keep doing this??There is a new Sheriff in town ![]()
[/Quote>
Deja Vu Tennis Capper!?? How many times do I need to keep doing this??There is a new Sheriff in town ![]()
Hate away my friend. Hate away ![]()
What are you talking about? I'm being serious.....I just can't win with you eh?
Hate away my friend. Hate away ![]()
What are you talking about? I'm being serious.....I just can't win with you eh?
I just hit a Berdych/Nadal to meet in Wimbledon 2010 final +8000 prop that i posted before the tournament started - my only prop of the tournament. So am I better than you? I mean, you hit a Federer not to win bet which was probably -150ish, and I just picked up 32 units on an 80-1 prop. No, it doesn't mean that at all.
Chill out and enjoy your winnings, my man.
I just hit a Berdych/Nadal to meet in Wimbledon 2010 final +8000 prop that i posted before the tournament started - my only prop of the tournament. So am I better than you? I mean, you hit a Federer not to win bet which was probably -150ish, and I just picked up 32 units on an 80-1 prop. No, it doesn't mean that at all.
Chill out and enjoy your winnings, my man.
What are you talking about? I'm being serious.....I just can't win with you eh?
You hated on me all day and now I get "one right" as you called it you now like me. Go Back to hating please..![]()
What are you talking about? I'm being serious.....I just can't win with you eh?
You hated on me all day and now I get "one right" as you called it you now like me. Go Back to hating please..![]()
Why do you gain so much satisfaction in one upping others, Mack? You're clearly a better than decent capper, so why waste time going back and forth, which you know very well will end predictably (it won't end).
I just hit a Berdych/Nadal to meet in Wimbledon 2010 final +8000 prop that i posted before the tournament started - my only prop of the tournament. So am I better than you? I mean, you hit a Federer not to win bet which was probably -150ish, and I just picked up 32 units on an 80-1 prop. No, it doesn't mean that at all.
Chill out and enjoy your winnings, my man.
Yeah your right GSP. Never post drunk. Just alot of hate all day towards me, but and in truth just enormous relief the bet hit. I think Gambling brings the worst out in people, I really do. I had half my roll on today yet for some reason elation hasn't hit me...
Going to take a break for a few months...
Why do you gain so much satisfaction in one upping others, Mack? You're clearly a better than decent capper, so why waste time going back and forth, which you know very well will end predictably (it won't end).
I just hit a Berdych/Nadal to meet in Wimbledon 2010 final +8000 prop that i posted before the tournament started - my only prop of the tournament. So am I better than you? I mean, you hit a Federer not to win bet which was probably -150ish, and I just picked up 32 units on an 80-1 prop. No, it doesn't mean that at all.
Chill out and enjoy your winnings, my man.
Yeah your right GSP. Never post drunk. Just alot of hate all day towards me, but and in truth just enormous relief the bet hit. I think Gambling brings the worst out in people, I really do. I had half my roll on today yet for some reason elation hasn't hit me...
Going to take a break for a few months...
Yeah your right GSP. Never post drunk. Just alot of hate all day towards me, but and in truth just enormous relief the bet hit. I think Gambling brings the worst out in people, I really do. I had half my roll on today yet for some reason elation hasn't hit me...
Going to take a break for a few months...
Hope to see your picks in the future. I'd be lying if I said I didn't take an interest in seeing what your bigger plays are.
Yeah your right GSP. Never post drunk. Just alot of hate all day towards me, but and in truth just enormous relief the bet hit. I think Gambling brings the worst out in people, I really do. I had half my roll on today yet for some reason elation hasn't hit me...
Going to take a break for a few months...
Hope to see your picks in the future. I'd be lying if I said I didn't take an interest in seeing what your bigger plays are.
Hope to see your picks in the future. I'd be lying if I said I didn't take an interest in seeing what your bigger plays are.
Cheers mate. Will send a friend request and let you know when/if they happen. Its VERY rare I bet so much. Only 4 times before this since 1996 actually, that I have bet such a large amount. Sometimes its a dream job, other times its a curse..
Hope to see your picks in the future. I'd be lying if I said I didn't take an interest in seeing what your bigger plays are.
Cheers mate. Will send a friend request and let you know when/if they happen. Its VERY rare I bet so much. Only 4 times before this since 1996 actually, that I have bet such a large amount. Sometimes its a dream job, other times its a curse..
At 7/3/2010 12:35:38 AM he posts:
Tennis capper, I dont like the guy, never will. Is he good. I dont know, don't care. I hope we never cross paths again.
So, clearly what's the best way to never cross paths again?
Bump a thread of a year ago and write post #29 at 7/3/2010 1:53:04 AM
Mack, at that US Open I had Del Potro to win the Open before the tournament started (much, much better odds that the play you bumped), also in that tournament I posted what I called the Best Value of the year until then telling people to bet Acasuso vs Ferrer large at +275 odds. Guess who won the match. How about earlier this year when I posted Soderling at +170 against Davydenko in Rotterdam or when I posted a large play on Becker against Davydenko in Halle a couple of weeks ago again as a +170 underdog. Koellerer against Golubev at +280 is my largest play up to date this year, go back and check that score if you really want to.
In this Wimbledon I posted 4 plays, 3 won and yesterday Murray lost.
Funny that.
I am sorry I don't have a collection of links like you, I prefer to (at least attempt to, sometimes I fail miserably though
The reason why people respect me and talk nicely about me is because in my 2 years on Covers I didn't do anything apart from posting plays with reasoning, I had a bunch of haters on here and a few of them were banned because they were constantly harassing me so I am used to that, but I am not begging for attention, like you. Once you will stop the attention whoring, once you will try to regularly avoid your drunken outbursts and once you will only keep posting your plays with reasoning I am sure that people will start to like you and follow you more. Until then, you pretty much represent whatever is wrong with Covers.
Now I am really going to ignore you from now on so if you want to talk to me it's like if you will talk to yourself because the forum doesn't need this useless crap, so I hope you keep hitting all your 50% of the bankroll plays because I would really feel sad if a fellow poster loses half of his roll on a single event. Bye
At 7/3/2010 12:35:38 AM he posts:
Tennis capper, I dont like the guy, never will. Is he good. I dont know, don't care. I hope we never cross paths again.
So, clearly what's the best way to never cross paths again?
Bump a thread of a year ago and write post #29 at 7/3/2010 1:53:04 AM
Mack, at that US Open I had Del Potro to win the Open before the tournament started (much, much better odds that the play you bumped), also in that tournament I posted what I called the Best Value of the year until then telling people to bet Acasuso vs Ferrer large at +275 odds. Guess who won the match. How about earlier this year when I posted Soderling at +170 against Davydenko in Rotterdam or when I posted a large play on Becker against Davydenko in Halle a couple of weeks ago again as a +170 underdog. Koellerer against Golubev at +280 is my largest play up to date this year, go back and check that score if you really want to.
In this Wimbledon I posted 4 plays, 3 won and yesterday Murray lost.
Funny that.
I am sorry I don't have a collection of links like you, I prefer to (at least attempt to, sometimes I fail miserably though
The reason why people respect me and talk nicely about me is because in my 2 years on Covers I didn't do anything apart from posting plays with reasoning, I had a bunch of haters on here and a few of them were banned because they were constantly harassing me so I am used to that, but I am not begging for attention, like you. Once you will stop the attention whoring, once you will try to regularly avoid your drunken outbursts and once you will only keep posting your plays with reasoning I am sure that people will start to like you and follow you more. Until then, you pretty much represent whatever is wrong with Covers.
Now I am really going to ignore you from now on so if you want to talk to me it's like if you will talk to yourself because the forum doesn't need this useless crap, so I hope you keep hitting all your 50% of the bankroll plays because I would really feel sad if a fellow poster loses half of his roll on a single event. Bye
Mack and his drunken outbursts at his best:
At 7/3/2010 12:35:38 AM he posts:
Tennis capper, I dont like the guy, never will. Is he good. I dont know, don't care. I hope we never cross paths again.
So, clearly what's the best way to never cross paths again?
Bump a thread of a year ago and write post #29 at 7/3/2010 1:53:04 AM
Mack, at that US Open I had Del Potro to win the Open before the tournament started (much, much better odds that the play you bumped), also in that tournament I posted what I called the Best Value of the year until then telling people to bet Acasuso vs Ferrer large at +275 odds. Guess who won the match. How about earlier this year when I posted Soderling at +170 against Davydenko in Rotterdam or when I posted a large play on Becker against Davydenko in Halle a couple of weeks ago again as a +170 underdog. Koellerer against Golubev at +280 is my largest play up to date this year, go back and check that score if you really want to.
In this Wimbledon I posted 4 plays, 3 won and yesterday Murray lost.
Funny that.
I am sorry I don't have a collection of links like you, I prefer to (at least attempt to, sometimes I fail miserably though
The reason why people respect me and talk nicely about me is because in my 2 years on Covers I didn't do anything apart from posting plays with reasoning, I had a bunch of haters on here and a few of them were banned because they were constantly harassing me so I am used to that, but I am not begging for attention, like you. Once you will stop the attention whoring, once you will try to regularly avoid your drunken outbursts and once you will only keep posting your plays with reasoning I am sure that people will start to like you and follow you more. Until then, you pretty much represent whatever is wrong with Covers.
Now I am really going to ignore you from now on so if you want to talk to me it's like if you will talk to yourself because the forum doesn't need this useless crap, so I hope you keep hitting all your 50% of the bankroll plays because I would really feel sad if a fellow poster loses half of his roll on a single event. Bye
I made two plays, one on Fed and another on Del Potro +1100, split between the two the value is still greater than what he posted. I also think my post in this thread telling him to just wait until the semis to start fading turned out to be great advice... also warned him Del Potro was his only real shot.... I guess it was nice to read that golden oldie... But I have to wonder how he felt when that line came down to Roger having to fail as a -450 or whatever he was. This type of bet would have looked ten times better if done at this Wimbledon where he struggled throughout.
and honestly having watched that USO final I think Mack got pretty lucky. I had stakes in both he and Del Potro so no rooting interest but it was pretty obvious to me that Fed was in full control of the match until he got heated about the challenge system being used late (successfully as well, on a game point of his on serve) and faded after that.
I had a run last year where I cashed Date Krumm (ever heard of her?) 5 straight matches in a little tournament as a huge dog every single rounds, like +250, +450 +500, +275, +175 all in a row. Best thing I ever did. I would bump that thread but I am not a psycho attention seeker! Lots of people have posts and threads like this but no one else has ever necro posted them for props a year later!
This bet was not even great value relative to how things went down, as I explained in my post on the first page. It is the people who bet Del Potro +1100 who should be making bumps IMO. It was a correct pick and congrats but there were way better ways to extract value out of this belief.
At one point in live betting Del Potro was +1250, those are the odds this winner had to overcome. Fed got blasted in the 5th set but it took a mental lapse the likes of which I have not seen from him in a slam before or since to let it get that far, and it was a lapse triggered by a completely arbitrary and unpredictable event, that challenge.
I have never seen someone do self promotion like this. What does it accomplish? What do you care what others think of you if you are banking?
This is fast becoming the Mack Publicly Masturbates to his Accomplishments Forum.
Mack and his drunken outbursts at his best:
At 7/3/2010 12:35:38 AM he posts:
Tennis capper, I dont like the guy, never will. Is he good. I dont know, don't care. I hope we never cross paths again.
So, clearly what's the best way to never cross paths again?
Bump a thread of a year ago and write post #29 at 7/3/2010 1:53:04 AM
Mack, at that US Open I had Del Potro to win the Open before the tournament started (much, much better odds that the play you bumped), also in that tournament I posted what I called the Best Value of the year until then telling people to bet Acasuso vs Ferrer large at +275 odds. Guess who won the match. How about earlier this year when I posted Soderling at +170 against Davydenko in Rotterdam or when I posted a large play on Becker against Davydenko in Halle a couple of weeks ago again as a +170 underdog. Koellerer against Golubev at +280 is my largest play up to date this year, go back and check that score if you really want to.
In this Wimbledon I posted 4 plays, 3 won and yesterday Murray lost.
Funny that.
I am sorry I don't have a collection of links like you, I prefer to (at least attempt to, sometimes I fail miserably though
The reason why people respect me and talk nicely about me is because in my 2 years on Covers I didn't do anything apart from posting plays with reasoning, I had a bunch of haters on here and a few of them were banned because they were constantly harassing me so I am used to that, but I am not begging for attention, like you. Once you will stop the attention whoring, once you will try to regularly avoid your drunken outbursts and once you will only keep posting your plays with reasoning I am sure that people will start to like you and follow you more. Until then, you pretty much represent whatever is wrong with Covers.
Now I am really going to ignore you from now on so if you want to talk to me it's like if you will talk to yourself because the forum doesn't need this useless crap, so I hope you keep hitting all your 50% of the bankroll plays because I would really feel sad if a fellow poster loses half of his roll on a single event. Bye
I made two plays, one on Fed and another on Del Potro +1100, split between the two the value is still greater than what he posted. I also think my post in this thread telling him to just wait until the semis to start fading turned out to be great advice... also warned him Del Potro was his only real shot.... I guess it was nice to read that golden oldie... But I have to wonder how he felt when that line came down to Roger having to fail as a -450 or whatever he was. This type of bet would have looked ten times better if done at this Wimbledon where he struggled throughout.
and honestly having watched that USO final I think Mack got pretty lucky. I had stakes in both he and Del Potro so no rooting interest but it was pretty obvious to me that Fed was in full control of the match until he got heated about the challenge system being used late (successfully as well, on a game point of his on serve) and faded after that.
I had a run last year where I cashed Date Krumm (ever heard of her?) 5 straight matches in a little tournament as a huge dog every single rounds, like +250, +450 +500, +275, +175 all in a row. Best thing I ever did. I would bump that thread but I am not a psycho attention seeker! Lots of people have posts and threads like this but no one else has ever necro posted them for props a year later!
This bet was not even great value relative to how things went down, as I explained in my post on the first page. It is the people who bet Del Potro +1100 who should be making bumps IMO. It was a correct pick and congrats but there were way better ways to extract value out of this belief.
At one point in live betting Del Potro was +1250, those are the odds this winner had to overcome. Fed got blasted in the 5th set but it took a mental lapse the likes of which I have not seen from him in a slam before or since to let it get that far, and it was a lapse triggered by a completely arbitrary and unpredictable event, that challenge.
I have never seen someone do self promotion like this. What does it accomplish? What do you care what others think of you if you are banking?
This is fast becoming the Mack Publicly Masturbates to his Accomplishments Forum.
![]()
![]()
Hot Forum Topics
- Claiming Prizes 57,789
- Tuesday 10/20/2026 861
- 🏈🏈🏈 Fubah2's risky CFB bets 279,217
- I'm embarrassed for Trump supporters 61,590
- PART DEUX 144
- Congrats to ltdsks - 20 wins in a row! 5,071
- Public Indicator Calculations 2026 23,278
- Lies, Inaccuracies & Stupidity 33,163
- NFL THREAD * 151 * 26,079
- NCAA WEEK 8. (( 151 )) 2,464
Warning - External Link
Report User
This post is spam
Delete Post
Remove Thread
Scan Results
Login/Register
Accounts are free and easy to create.
Search
