Djoker to Win Roland Garros
I think you're right about Wimbly though. The year is ripe for a young gun. Wimbledon is a young mans Trophy.
I think you're right about Wimbly though. The year is ripe for a young gun. Wimbledon is a young mans Trophy.
daytradernation:
Joker will win this easily. I watched his last few games and is head and shoulders above everyone. Murray has no shot. Like the swiss character to beat tsonga as well.Serena looks like an animal and should win it all.....
Murray forces set 5
daytradernation:
Joker will win this easily. I watched his last few games and is head and shoulders above everyone. Murray has no shot. Like the swiss character to beat tsonga as well.Serena looks like an animal and should win it all.....
Murray forces set 5
Buh bam.Cash it. All a formality from here.
incorrect ,. + 600 was way to high ,. & remember Stan being + 820 when he won the Aussie title
Buh bam.Cash it. All a formality from here.
incorrect ,. + 600 was way to high ,. & remember Stan being + 820 when he won the Aussie title
Multiple posters in this thread straight up owned. No other words necessary
The only person that got owned is Novak
"owned" is a saying in poker when you put all of your money in bad
In this case, I had novak to win at -130 (pre tourney).
I think I put it in pretty good pre flop as the odds were now -700 to -900 on novak to win
feels more like a gross 1 outer on the river
lol
Multiple posters in this thread straight up owned. No other words necessary
The only person that got owned is Novak
"owned" is a saying in poker when you put all of your money in bad
In this case, I had novak to win at -130 (pre tourney).
I think I put it in pretty good pre flop as the odds were now -700 to -900 on novak to win
feels more like a gross 1 outer on the river
lol
Even money? Seriously. Yes I'll have some of that, thank you berry berry much.
Even money? Seriously. Yes I'll have some of that, thank you berry berry much.
Does anyone know what Wawrinka future to win French Open was ?
According to a link I just googled Wawrinka was actually 3rd behind Novak and Nadal to win the French Open. He was 16-1 according to this article.
I remember seeing Federer at 27-1 on 5 dimes, and was like wowww he's got no shot then. 5 dimes gives a little better odds than most books, you figure Stan couldn't have been more than 18-1 or so.
The funny thing is that guy who picked Wawrinka to win like 4 days ago at +500? Wawrinka was paying more than that today alone. One of those reminders to that taking futures usually isn't a good value than betting individual matches, but I guess you never know. If Murray had beaten Novak, he probably would have been 2-1 or less over Stan.
Novak didn't have his best today, maybe that delay yesterday with Murray hurt him.
I didn't really see anything out of the ordinary for Novak. Stan just played a hell of a match. I've never seen someone use a backhand with such power and accuracy before, not even Fed in his prime.
Stan's defense was impeccable today as well. Many of those balls he chased down only a few men in the sport can get to.
He would run from one end of the court to the other, one hand it over the net, and keep it in play somehow. Simply a great match by him, great for the sport.
Does anyone know what Wawrinka future to win French Open was ?
According to a link I just googled Wawrinka was actually 3rd behind Novak and Nadal to win the French Open. He was 16-1 according to this article.
I remember seeing Federer at 27-1 on 5 dimes, and was like wowww he's got no shot then. 5 dimes gives a little better odds than most books, you figure Stan couldn't have been more than 18-1 or so.
The funny thing is that guy who picked Wawrinka to win like 4 days ago at +500? Wawrinka was paying more than that today alone. One of those reminders to that taking futures usually isn't a good value than betting individual matches, but I guess you never know. If Murray had beaten Novak, he probably would have been 2-1 or less over Stan.
Novak didn't have his best today, maybe that delay yesterday with Murray hurt him.
I didn't really see anything out of the ordinary for Novak. Stan just played a hell of a match. I've never seen someone use a backhand with such power and accuracy before, not even Fed in his prime.
Stan's defense was impeccable today as well. Many of those balls he chased down only a few men in the sport can get to.
He would run from one end of the court to the other, one hand it over the net, and keep it in play somehow. Simply a great match by him, great for the sport.
Novak didn't have his best today, maybe that delay
yesterday with Murray hurt him.
Another excuse. Stan beat him in aussie 2014 and lost 5 setter to him in aussie 2015. The credit goes to stan. He kicked his azz. Period
Novak didn't have his best today, maybe that delay
yesterday with Murray hurt him.
Another excuse. Stan beat him in aussie 2014 and lost 5 setter to him in aussie 2015. The credit goes to stan. He kicked his azz. Period
Hot Forum Topics
-
🤢🥴💩_ Fubah's risky baseball bets _🥶😲🥵
448,308
-
🏈🏈🏈 “To BEt, or not to BEt, that is the question” ...Fubah2's risky bets
302,092
-
PART DEUX
273
-
🏈🏈🏈 Fubah2's risky CFB bets
257,511
-
Wednesday 09/16/2026
710
-
Couple Beers
4,383
-
Trump lies so much.
20,717
-
NCAA FOOTBALL. 151
19,727
-
pg mlb 2026 season thread
6,555
-
Public Indicator Calculations 2026
11,745
Warning - External Link
Report User
This post is spam
Delete Post
Remove Thread
Scan Results
Login/Register
Accounts are free and easy to create.
Search
