For those who are following
53-1 before this thread started
46-2 since being posted 99-3 overall record
4 games went into OT last night wow.
Pending Series
CLE [A], TOR [A], NY [A], WAS [A], DAL [A], ATL [A], POR [A], CHI [A]
Games for today
CHICAGO [A] / Indy - Over 210
Memphis / NY [A] - Over 210
PORTLAND [A] / Minny - Over 195.5
Yep, around 15% plus of the yield
So, rob, one question: Do you think that system applies for another sports (NHL, MLB, etc)? It's will be successful too?
Are you talking about this OT system or are you talking about the numbers u gave me using them for a system?
2 wins last night
total record now stands at 101-3
will update everything tomorrow but here are the plays for tonight
Milwaukee / ATLANTA [A] - Over 189.5
WASHINGTON [A] / New Jersey - Over 193.5
TORONTO [A] / Oklahoma - Over 206.5
New Orleans / DALLAS [A] - Over 197.5
Salsa, which are the arguments support that?
So, why not only one bet (the minor, or the major or the sum of both)?
Thanks! 
Its a A bet plus a B bet. So if you are using the numbers u gave me you will have 4 units on this game. 1 for a A and 3 for a B
Went 2-0 tonight, picked up another 3 system wins. 7-2 in the last 3 days with the plays. Be back tomorrow around noon to update everything
Rob, sorry for my bad english but I will try explain to you my points of view about your system.
I done some calcs about the optimal wager mount distribution for each step (A,B,C,D) in your system and then I found some interesting data:
1) The system's theorical yield assuming bets mount like the typical aritmetic progression (A=1, B=2, C=4, D=8) with flat success distribution (4 picks winning: one in A, one in B, one in C and one in D) and no loss is 32.3%
2) The system's real yield assuming the typical aritmetic progression and the results until last night (A=45, B=25, C=16, D=11 and 3 losses) is 25.6%
3) My discover is that if we increase the bets mount aritmetic progression to multiple 3 instead of 2 (A=1, B=3, C=9, D=27) then the yield grow up to 40.9% 
4) The handicap is that you need a more deep bankroll, since in one lose system you go down 40 bankroll units instead of 15 bankroll units of the multiple 2 system
I wait your comments...
why do that when you can just start betting the unders
FYI....take it for whats its worth....
Just by plays you've posted for basically the month of Feb and March to date when two teams have played each other both as "plays", so both teams played an overtime game within the last 4 games and neither team went over since the OT game the OVER?UNDER is 2-5
When it was the first game since the OT game for both it was 1-1
such a small sample size....but leans towards the under in the next game
Established in 1995,
Hot Forum Topics
