Here you go.

GREAT STUFF THANKS !!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

Thanks SRTZEE!! 

So let me see if I understand this v1, v2, v3 JM system.

1)  We wait for a sweep by one team over another
2)  When the two teams play against each other again AND the RPI stipulation is met (i.e. the teams power rankings are almost even), we have an "official play" then:
      a)  The v1 system kicks in, and we bet on the team that was swept previously for a three-game series chase.
      b)  If the bet-on team, the team that was swept previously is at home then,
            i)  if they lose the [A] game by more than 3 runs, then v2 kicks in and you should the swept team for a much higher stake for [B] bet because historically the home team in this case will "blow out" the visitors in the second game.  Repeat [C] bet if the home team loses, but bet more if the home team loases again by more than 3.  Here, I would be concerned if the first two teams of my chase lost big at home.
            ii)  otherwise make the normal [B] on the home team
      c)  If the bet-on team is on the road, regardless of the score in the [A] game, if it loses, just bet normal for the [B] game, and the [C] game if necessary.
3)  If when the two teams play each other, the RPI filter is NOT met, this becomes an "unofficial" play.  So you have the option of betting on the team that was swept for an [A] bet or not and chasing for three games. 
      a)  If the team that was swept previously wins the [A] game, but has an RPI of at least 0.025 less than their opponent, then you have won this bet.  However, v3 kicks in and you can chase the team with the higher RPI for an additional two or three game chase (depending on that 4th game in the series).
      b)  If the team that was swept previously wins the [A] game, but has an RPI of at least 0.025 higher than the opponent, then again we win the bet, but no further systems kick in.
      c)  If the team that was swept previously loses the [A] game, chase with [B] and [C].


For those who choose to play the "unofficial" series, why would we want to play for another win if situation 3a) arises?  This is saying that if the lesser ranked team happens to get lucky and beats the much better team on the first game of a series after being swept earlier, then the likelihood of them doing it again is slim - so bet the other team (version 3). 

However, if the teams are very close in RPI (between 0.01 and 0.025 difference), then version 3 will not kick in and you can decide how to place your bets.  Do you play the unofficial plays through to the completion of the series or do you skip the first game of the series to see if version 3 kicks in??  Hmmmm. 

Did I get this right????

Yes, the RPI is greater than 0.025 between the teams, and it WAS a fluke that Washington won the game (6 in their last at bat).  But if you had bet the Washington team to win the [A] bet as an unofficial play, you won.  So he will mark that down as a win.  Which brings me to another interesting thought....  How will Mr. Morrison track his victories with all these systems he has released?  We know he will take the unofficial win, but what will happen if his new and improved system v3.0 flaws because Florida loses the next two??   Hmmmmm. 

so did he claim he won the florida game or lost the very first bet of this amazing new system?