zircon

**All plays are 1 unit unless otherwise posted **

165 - 110  (60.0%)  +25.67u                              

O/U: 44 - 20  [21 - 5  overs!]                                        

[*BB: 41 - 34 ] 

2025 MENS YTD: 168 - 91    64.9% ... juice from losses only -12136

 2025 posted *Best Bets:
      73 - 30   70.9% ...juice from 30 losses is -4477

                Posted *BBs  with heavy juice -200 and up:
                 25 - 5    83.3% (5 losers were: -200; -260; -250; -240; -235)

To answer your query per the list of 16 you submitted (presumed to be those members you felt met the criteria zircon listed in post#1) ....for me this search took quite a bit of doing, but objectively, without taking sides, this is what I found:

Pho-20  ---------------- did not achieve postive units;   and not 55%
oldwiseone ------------- did not consistently update YTD
eastsidebangers ------- did not consistently update YTD
Rum151 --------------- did not consistently update YTD
LB_Dirtbags ----------- did not consistently update YTD
Damon102 ---------never posted an updated YTD
Morrissey ----------chose not to post a YTD
LvTruck ---------------- did not consistently update YTD
IAdecimal5 ------------ did not achieve postive units;   and not 55%
totter ------------------- did not consistently update YTD
Bird ? (Bird4332) -------------- 20 - 19 YTD
Byrdmayne ---------chose not to post a YTD
Redline ----------- small sample size well under 100+ picks
FunkyRufus -------------- no YTD results posted
Ryoshiii -------------- failed to achieve 55%; BANNED
STLTarheels ---------------407 - 425 - 10 YTD

 It appears zircon did his homework accurately, without bias. The four listed in TOP GUN are the only ones to meet what I agree is reasonable criteria. Although, going forward, perhaps the number of picks could be lowered some from 100 minimum and still achieve a sample size with significant confidence level...