unplucked_gem

"None of this is consequential."

Football can't get here fast enough.  

Also very important to note that most on a given "side" are perfectly fine ignoring him (and his 4,000 characters) until he inserts himself into conversations for reasons other than advancement and subsequently people end up with accommodations such as mine.

"You are discussing with the guy you have a problem with"

 Misread of the situation. 

No one has a problem with the guy but rather his inability to separate personal politics that run counter-current to his own from his official duties representing covers.

His partisan bias disproportionately manifests towards those he views (labels) a certain way deteriorating their experience on covers.

What your referring to would be his poor attempts to justify his actions with means other than stated guidelines while dismissing (routinely) behavior warranting time served.  Means that when called out, and proven false, perpetuate his bias as "history" or "angst"

The end game, not much.  Eventually people will tire, move on, and they'll win at the detriment of covers usership.  They have a forum and platform to self counsel eachother through their TDS and continued failed policies (with lightsbulbs and thumbs up) and thought while watching their party continually get wholly rejected by the American people.

And then eventually piss off for good, cause I know and age discrepancy when I see one.

@THEMUGG

To not come in, argue, and get the last word is secretly killing buddy, there's solace in that.

Interesting to me the tone and script has changed since the last overstep that got aired in the help forum.

@THEMUGG

Unable to show one lib sent to the box post inauguration.

@wallstreetcappers

Piss off.

You even stalk me into the box.  You're unable to separate your official duties with you personal political positions that also crumble under their own weight.

It's both transparent and sad.

Proving our point well done.  Tough standard moving forward.

@wallstreetcappers

#deflection 

#stalker

#TDS

#BIAS

2nd thread in two days you enter to address my post with nothing substantive.  My angst would like to know if this is within your official capacity or a personal matter.

As to the rest of your content, I fundamentally disagree.  I have maintained that a logically sound and well reasoned argument could alter my malleable positions.  Sadly, the left never seems to offer this.  Especially perplexing, given my long public statement of being a registered independent from the closed state of Pennsylvania.  A well rationed party polling at 60 year lows would seemingly try to advance their strengths rather than condemn for my choice of president.

I mean all I have really said is that Democrats stole the nomination from Bernie (we now see why), Covid / Vaccines / Lockdowns were a joke...sorry mismanaged, and Joe had a bit more than a stutter.

So, ill end on this.  I'll go back and pull links to my civil asking and answering questions from the left and you go back and pull where you gave literally one inch on a position to someone on the right and we'll revisit your post above.

Until then.....piss off and stop stalking me.

"If you ask a question, put on your big boy pants and be prepared for an answer"

From the left?  He'd be waiting a while, they don't, or can't, answer very often.

Without the 2nd, football may have been futbol so.

@StumpTownStu

 #95 is very well said.  Absent a definition (or evidence) of "Epstein stuff" I maintain my level of Trump suppport based on things like the economy, trade deals, peace, etc is warranted.

Also a leading study published by peers of people suggests that people may choke on popcorn and should use an abundance of caution when stuffing their faces.

Definitely remains easier to throw blanket assertions over a group of voters and upon pushback claim twisting of words than it would be to explain oneself.

@StumpTownStu

Other than the same old reliable "trust me, I've seen it.....oh and it's bad....but you can't see it".

@THEMUGG

"BTW.....whatever happened to Schiff's evidence that will prove Trump colluded with the Russians to fix the 2016 election? an_popcorn"

Don't you know, Trump made up a mortgage fraud case to keep him quiet so he wont supply the evidence.

Adam is rather quiet at the moment though.

@StumpTownStu

I ask myself from Trump was it more about minors or money?  Unless of course Epstein was a pauper.

#88

Say it ain't so Bill.  So if wrong about this......what else?

https://www.foxnews.com/media/bill-maher-admits-he-wrong-about-trump-tariffs-doesnt-see-country-depression-all

https://ca.news.yahoo.com/bill-maher-says-wrong-trump-142800410.html

@joe pockets

Point of discussion.  Do you know why on wind farms, some of the turbines dont spin?

I thought surely theyre broken and looked it up.  As it turns out, it's called "parked".  Some of the reasons for parking them somewhat baffle me.  Love to chat on it, if there's interest.

@soup-can

Thanks for the info.

Absent evidence if you're asking me who im more inclined to believe engaged with minors it'd be Clinton over Trump....and definitely Spacey.

#stormy

@slamspurs

Well reasoned.

Trump will ask for a 100 to settle at 50 which seems like a win over the present 25.  But since not 100, viewed as loss.

@Calde13

 Very true

So Russia Collusion is the Republicans distraction of DJT's connection to Epstein which appears to be the distraction of Democrats continued pitiful polling.  

 Maybe the WSJ should do their polling here.

https://www.foxnews.com/media/democratic-senator-laments-partys-messaging-problem-ratings-plummet-30-year-low

So how do they turn it around, especially with continued derangement syndrome over a guy who is gone im 41ish months.