Profile | Entries | Thread Author | Posts | Activity |
---|---|---|---|---|
![]() |
His point is, if you're 16-6 betting -300 favorites you are down money. The goal of gambling is to win money, not have a winning record.
That said, I don't think you only play -300 favorites and you're likely up money on the year. If so, keep it up. |
CashCowPlays | 12 |
|
![]() |
Great call |
newmarket | 7 |
|
![]() |
Quote Originally Posted by HuskyNation1:
This looks like a LOCKED up winner Why would you even say something like that? |
HuskyNation1 | 8 |
|
![]() |
Quote Originally Posted by KingScorpio:
@Kaufee All,i'm saying is that cheap line is inviting heavy S.D. action.IMO
I think books sometimes make it a cheap line to confuse bettors. If SD is -140 I think it would induce more action on SD, confirming our belief SD has a better chance to win. The public loves betting favorites. But at a pick'em? Now we stop and wonder why tf is the line so cheap? And we start over thinking it and maybe pass on it altogether. And certainly don't bet the farm on it. One of the psychological tools sportsbooks employ imo. But since none of us really know what sets and moves lines, I could be way off. Just my theory. |
Kaufee | 38 |
|
![]() |
Quote Originally Posted by Miracling2: Quote Originally Posted by Brooklyncapper: you do know the weather here right? in new york? heard it was choky since yesterday ![]() |
Miracling2 | 14 |
|
![]() |
replied to
I got great news for all you. If you found this thread you just found a literal gold mine.
in MLB Betting You have the wrong SP for Cleveland. |
JimmyGape | 455 |
|
![]() |
TB Rays. I no longer bet with or against them. I never know what version of them shows up.
I'm going with the Reds and Blue Jays today. Lord help me |
Sidehatch | 8 |
|
![]() |
Never a doubt |
Aussiejesse | 26 |
|
![]() |
Wind is blowing out at around 20mph. Doesn't mean the over is a lock but it's why everyone is betting it. |
Mrgohard3 | 19 |
|
![]() |
I was just looking at this one. Detroit is 1-7 this season when Flaherty starts |
KC_4_LIFE | 52 |
|
![]() |
Texas came through! And I needed it. Lost some of my other coin flip games. I might go right back to Milwaukee tomorrow |
cbbanalysts | 25 |
|
![]() |
GL 007 |
OO7CRUSHER | 19 |
|
![]() |
GL Weeble
I'm on MIL FG but your F5 reminds me how bad their BP is |
weeble5672 | 8 |
|
![]() |
I took the Cubs F5. GL! |
Kenrock333 | 5 |
|
![]() |
Go 'Stros! |
finsterbaby | 370 |
|
![]() |
GL cbb. I like the card. I almost played SEA but had 5 plays already lol
With you on TEX +1.5 though |
cbbanalysts | 25 |
|
![]() |
YTD 17-12 +8.4 units
Sides 13-10 Totals 4-2
It's been a few weeks since posting. Hope everyone is making
Today I like:
TEX +1.5 +105 (1/1.05) Six players on Texas bat .300 or better vs. Skubal and both Skubal starts vs. Texas last year were one run games.
SF ML -110 (1.1/1) The Twins being a "good" home team is fake news. Sure they're 8-1 at home vs. teams with a losing record, but against teams that are .500 or better? They're 4-5.
MIL ML -115 (1.15/1) Better pitcher and better team for a cheap price? I'm in. The line makes me wonder if I'm taking the bait but win or lose, I'm biting.
CHC F5 +0.5 -125 (1.25/1) I think the Cubs have a slight edge in this one, but I want nothing to do with the Cubbies bullpen late in the game.
HOU -1.5 +115 (1/1.15) When Brown starts, Houston either loses or wins on the RL. Over the last 19 games Houston has won with Brown starting, 16 of them were by 2+ runs. So if I like Houston to win, I'm taking a shot at the RL.
I also lean Seattle but I have a big enough card already. BOL on your plays |
FirefIy | 4 |
|
![]() |
People forget the Twins are 17-20 on the year. Everyone acting like this is the Dodgers vs. the Rockies. Taking a shot on the dog after the Twins already won the series isn't the worst idea.
GL ungmu |
umgmu | 65 |
|
![]() |
What a game bro |
Aussiejesse | 8 |
|
![]() |
I think now is the time to try it. The Marlins offense isn't awful and the Dodgers have 2 new guys in the lineup tonight |
GMAN2100 | 4 |
|
If you choose to make use of any information on this website including online sports betting services from any websites that may be featured on this website, we strongly recommend that you carefully check your local laws before doing so.It is your sole responsibility to understand your local laws and observe them strictly.Covers does not provide any advice or guidance as to the legality of online sports betting or other online gambling activities within your jurisdiction and you are responsible for complying with laws that are applicable to you in your relevant locality.Covers disclaims all liability associated with your use of this website and use of any information contained on it.As a condition of using this website, you agree to hold the owner of this website harmless from any claims arising from your use of any services on any third party website that may be featured by Covers.