I jiust finished it about 1n hour ago. None of the picks I have posted up until now qualified. I don't want to get too much into how I did it or what I used but it took me about 2 full days and this is based off the last 20 years of MLB Data.
Starting tomorrow, I will post them here, for free of course, daily. LETS CRUSH
3
I jiust finished it about 1n hour ago. None of the picks I have posted up until now qualified. I don't want to get too much into how I did it or what I used but it took me about 2 full days and this is based off the last 20 years of MLB Data.
Starting tomorrow, I will post them here, for free of course, daily. LETS CRUSH
Without the idea behind it means nothing. Just a claim. Worthless. Honestly annoying trash. Post the system/model or honestly go away. Sick of seeing this trash.
4
Without the idea behind it means nothing. Just a claim. Worthless. Honestly annoying trash. Post the system/model or honestly go away. Sick of seeing this trash.
Without the idea behind it means nothing. Just a claim. Worthless. Honestly annoying trash. Post the system/model or honestly go away. Sick of seeing this trash.
Go fuck yourself. Only trash here is you.
3
Quote Originally Posted by smellybunty:
Without the idea behind it means nothing. Just a claim. Worthless. Honestly annoying trash. Post the system/model or honestly go away. Sick of seeing this trash.
Quote Originally Posted by smellybunty: Without the idea behind it means nothing. Just a claim. Worthless. Honestly annoying trash. Post the system/model or honestly go away. Sick of seeing this trash. Go fuck yourself. Only trash here is you.
Theres no point in mentioning you have a model if you aren't going to allow people to see if it makes sense. Just post your plays. Why even mention your "model"? Its all about getting attention. I stand by my original comment. BOL to anyone following based on this "model"
3
Quote Originally Posted by JimmyGape:
Quote Originally Posted by smellybunty: Without the idea behind it means nothing. Just a claim. Worthless. Honestly annoying trash. Post the system/model or honestly go away. Sick of seeing this trash. Go fuck yourself. Only trash here is you.
Theres no point in mentioning you have a model if you aren't going to allow people to see if it makes sense. Just post your plays. Why even mention your "model"? Its all about getting attention. I stand by my original comment. BOL to anyone following based on this "model"
Is that a mathematical model you're basing your research 20 years back on?
If 20.14$ ROI equals to $52,000 profits - you had to invest $258,192.65 over the period of 20 years. Cause
If you had deposited $258,192.65 in a U.S. bank 20 years ago (in 2005) and earned an average annual interest rate of 2%, compounded annually, your account balance today (in 2025) would be approximately $383,660.70.
?? Inflation-Adjusted Value However, due to inflation, the purchasing power of money decreases over time. According to the U.S. Inflation Calculator, $1 in 2005 is equivalent to about $1.64 in 2025, reflecting a cumulative inflation rate of 63.75% over 20 years . In2013Dollars
To maintain the same purchasing power as $258,192.65 in 2005, you would need approximately $423,433.95 in 2025.
?? Summary Final bank balance (2% interest): ~$383,660.70
Inflation-adjusted equivalent: ~$423,433.95
Shortfall due to inflation: ~$39,773.25
This illustrates that a 2% annual return would not have kept pace with inflation over the past two decades. To preserve and grow the real value of your savings, investments with higher returns—such as stocks, real estate, or inflation-protected securities—might have been more effective.
2
Congratulations and thanks for posting!
I am curious about the following:
Is that a mathematical model you're basing your research 20 years back on?
If 20.14$ ROI equals to $52,000 profits - you had to invest $258,192.65 over the period of 20 years. Cause
If you had deposited $258,192.65 in a U.S. bank 20 years ago (in 2005) and earned an average annual interest rate of 2%, compounded annually, your account balance today (in 2025) would be approximately $383,660.70.
?? Inflation-Adjusted Value However, due to inflation, the purchasing power of money decreases over time. According to the U.S. Inflation Calculator, $1 in 2005 is equivalent to about $1.64 in 2025, reflecting a cumulative inflation rate of 63.75% over 20 years . In2013Dollars
To maintain the same purchasing power as $258,192.65 in 2005, you would need approximately $423,433.95 in 2025.
?? Summary Final bank balance (2% interest): ~$383,660.70
Inflation-adjusted equivalent: ~$423,433.95
Shortfall due to inflation: ~$39,773.25
This illustrates that a 2% annual return would not have kept pace with inflation over the past two decades. To preserve and grow the real value of your savings, investments with higher returns—such as stocks, real estate, or inflation-protected securities—might have been more effective.
I can also run a mathematical model based on gradual investment of a quarter a million dollars we're talking about over the period of 20 years. I just don't think it would get any better in favor of an offered model.
0
I can also run a mathematical model based on gradual investment of a quarter a million dollars we're talking about over the period of 20 years. I just don't think it would get any better in favor of an offered model.
Chase Rate: 32.8% (above league avg, limits walks/hard contact)
Home Splits: Much better command & weaker opponent SLG at Comerica
Flaherty has regained form similar to his 2019 All-Star level. In May, he’s allowed only 1 HR over 3 starts and increased his whiff rate substantially, which our model weights heavily.
<
0
Ok Im gonna show the haters and doubters what this thing is all about and the blood sweat and tears I put in to build something absolutely legendary.
Chase Rate: 32.8% (above league avg, limits walks/hard contact)
Home Splits: Much better command & weaker opponent SLG at Comerica
Flaherty has regained form similar to his 2019 All-Star level. In May, he’s allowed only 1 HR over 3 starts and increased his whiff rate substantially, which our model weights heavily.
This is a weak contact lineup lacking extra-base power, especially against higher-velocity and breaking-ball heavy righties — exactly Flaherty’s pitch mix.
Detroit Bullpen WAR: 2.1 (Top 10 in MLB)
Cleveland Bullpen WAR: 0.6 (Bottom third)
The model gives significant credit to bullpens in tightly lined games. Detroit’s late-inning arms have held opponents under a .205 average in the past two weeks.
Tigers Defensive Runs Saved (DRS): +15 (6th in MLB)
Comerica Park’s spacious outfield rewards rangy outfield defense — and Detroit has elite OF coverage in Parker Meadows and Riley Greene.
This helps limit 2Bs and 3Bs — key for neutralizing Cleveland's speed/small ball game.
Cleveland has a bigger national profile due to recent playoff appearances, but this specific version of the Guardians is overvalued.
Detroit is quietly 9-3 in Flaherty starts and undervalued due to preseason projections.
Model Line: Tigers -156 (true odds)
Market Line: Tigers -130 to -135 range (implied ~54%)
Edge: +7% — one of the strongest plays on the slate
Recommended Unit Size: 3 units (based on our unit scale for 6%+ edge)
<
0
2. Guardians’ Offense vs RHP is Bottom Tier
wRC+ vs RHP: 82 (4th-worst in MLB)
ISO vs RHP: .118 (29th out of 30 teams)
This is a weak contact lineup lacking extra-base power, especially against higher-velocity and breaking-ball heavy righties — exactly Flaherty’s pitch mix.
Detroit Bullpen WAR: 2.1 (Top 10 in MLB)
Cleveland Bullpen WAR: 0.6 (Bottom third)
The model gives significant credit to bullpens in tightly lined games. Detroit’s late-inning arms have held opponents under a .205 average in the past two weeks.
Tigers Defensive Runs Saved (DRS): +15 (6th in MLB)
Comerica Park’s spacious outfield rewards rangy outfield defense — and Detroit has elite OF coverage in Parker Meadows and Riley Greene.
This helps limit 2Bs and 3Bs — key for neutralizing Cleveland's speed/small ball game.
Cleveland has a bigger national profile due to recent playoff appearances, but this specific version of the Guardians is overvalued.
Detroit is quietly 9-3 in Flaherty starts and undervalued due to preseason projections.
Model Line: Tigers -156 (true odds)
Market Line: Tigers -130 to -135 range (implied ~54%)
Edge: +7% — one of the strongest plays on the slate
Recommended Unit Size: 3 units (based on our unit scale for 6%+ edge)
Im in California, and its past 5 am and I havent slept. I been working on this thing for days straight and have barely slept. We're gonna end the books.
0
Im in California, and its past 5 am and I havent slept. I been working on this thing for days straight and have barely slept. We're gonna end the books.
You're - or We - can't to end the books. Nor it is our intention. But, we can mimic them. Don't forget that the books are using AI since 2021. And, once they will feel AI used by the betters is harmful - they will do one of the two or both: "enhance" historical data with irrelevant data that will drive AI crazy. And in hour of need - go opposite expected AI outcome prediction.
0
You're - or We - can't to end the books. Nor it is our intention. But, we can mimic them. Don't forget that the books are using AI since 2021. And, once they will feel AI used by the betters is harmful - they will do one of the two or both: "enhance" historical data with irrelevant data that will drive AI crazy. And in hour of need - go opposite expected AI outcome prediction.
This seems like something copied from a sports service that has been compiling this info for many, many years. Thats okay but I find hard to believe you recently went over all this info for every team and found the lines to compile a model. The time it would take and the way it is written out says it came from somewhere else
Either way no matter where it came from I hope you and the forum find success.
1
This seems like something copied from a sports service that has been compiling this info for many, many years. Thats okay but I find hard to believe you recently went over all this info for every team and found the lines to compile a model. The time it would take and the way it is written out says it came from somewhere else
Either way no matter where it came from I hope you and the forum find success.
If you choose to make use of any information on this website including online sports betting services from any websites that may be featured on
this website, we strongly recommend that you carefully check your local laws before doing so.It is your sole responsibility to understand your local laws and observe them strictly.Covers does not provide
any advice or guidance as to the legality of online sports betting or other online gambling activities within your jurisdiction and you are responsible for complying with laws that are applicable to you in
your relevant locality.Covers disclaims all liability associated with your use of this website and use of any information contained on it.As a condition of using this website, you agree to hold the owner
of this website harmless from any claims arising from your use of any services on any third party website that may be featured by Covers.