Profile | Entries | Thread Author | Posts | Activity |
---|---|---|---|---|
![]() |
14-11, not 13-12. |
Flynt | 100 |
|
![]() |
13-10, not 12-11. |
Flynt | 100 |
|
![]() |
I'm gonna be like Hal from Malcolm in the middle when he was obsessive compulsive over bowling an 300 game, doing the same routine before every throw. I'm gonna be obsessive compulsive over building this winning streak. Especially if the win I was cheated out of interferes with potentially winning monthly wins. The pick I made Thursday July 10 was Cleveland and that game was rained out, came back next day to make an different pick thinking Cleveland at Chicago game would of been voided since game was rained out. And said pending I was locked into over 8.5 in Chicago Cleveland game an pick I never made. If anything I should of been locked into Cleveland pick in make up game which would of been an win. If I had to pick I would rather have an W17, 21 and or 25 over monthly wins. The winning streak would be better in long run especially the W21 and W25 but the winning streak might lead to an monthly wins also. Sometimes its hard to be calm and patient and wait multiple days to make an pick. Most days it seems like there is at least one good game to pick from. |
Flynt | 100 |
|
![]() |
12-10, not 11-11. |
Flynt | 100 |
|
![]() |
11-10, not 10-11. |
Flynt | 100 |
|
![]() |
10-10, not 9-11. Gonna comment until they correct it. I never picked over 8.5 in Cleveland CHW game, I picked Cleveland over at white Sox on Thursday Jul 10, that game was rained out then I come back Fri Jul 11, I didn't make an pick but it said pending. I should of been locked into Cleveland from an day earlier if I was gonna be locked into an pick. But an glitch or hacker or something randomly somehow switched pick to over 8.5 in Cleveland CHW game on Fri Jul 11 even though I didn't pick that. Cost me an loss that shouldn't of happened since I didn't pick that instead of win since I picked Cleveland an day earlier and they won the first game of the doubleheader. |
Flynt | 100 |
|
![]() |
9-10 now, not 8-11. |
Flynt | 100 |
|
![]() |
Should be 7-10 right now, not 6-11. Tammy or one of the Covers employees should fix this mistake or glitch and all of them that are happening on other people accounts too. Should be 8 and an half games back of the leader, not 9 and an half. Picked Cleveland over at the White Sox on Thursday Jul 10, and that game was rained out, and instead of pick being void, or keeping Cleveland pick for next day when rained out game was being made up, it just randomly switched to over 8.5 runs in Cleveland white Sox game even though I never picked that. |
Flynt | 100 |
|
![]() |
I should be 5-8 or 4-8-1, not 3-9. Fix your mistakes Covers. BC Edmonton game went final and BC Covered -3 so that is an win. Has me still locked into pick when I checked my picks profile but doesn't have pending by my entry. And how did the Cleveland pick from the rained out game Thursday Jul 10 get switched over into an O 8.5 pick Fri Jul 11 in Cleveland CHW game an pick I didn't make at all. |
Flynt | 100 |
|
![]() |
I didn't even pick the over 8.5 in Cleveland White Sox game. I picked Cleveland yesterday and an glitch or something switched and transferred over 8.5 an pick I didn't even make in that game to today. I should either be 3-6-1 cause of yesterday rainout or 4-6 since I picked Cleveland yesterday and if that transfers over to today with there win. Not 3-7, I never picked the over in Cleveland White Sox game. Now I picked Cleveland tonight. I should be 4-6 or 3-6-1 going into that game, Not 3-7. Whoever causes records and picks to be wrong should be fired. |
Flynt | 100 |
|
![]() |
I didn't pick the over 8.5 in today makeup game either of Cleveland CHW. If anything the pick I actually made yesterday of Cleveland should of transferred over to today, not the pick I didn't make of over 8.5 in CLE CHW game. |
Flynt | 100 |
|
![]() |
Tonight Streak Survivor prop I picked Cleveland. I didn't pick over 8.5 in Cleveland White Sox game. Either result will be an push, but still get the picks made right. |
Flynt | 100 |
|
![]() |
Cavs even though they been terrible this series after an great regular season, and they mostly been terrible vs pacers cause of injury but there no way they could of been getting +6.5 at home vs pacers in game 5. Must of been an glitch, good it was caught on to. If anything it would of been Pacers +6.5, if it was Cavs +6.5 even with the injuries everyone would of been on the Cavs pick. |
Flynt | 100 |
|
![]() |
Wanted to pick over 5 in game 7 of Winnipeg ST Louis, that was my first instinct would of been right. But was off the board so couldn't pick that game, only had tomorrow NHL game. Would of been wrong with Reds or Cubs. Wish I would of picked the Athletics would of been right with that pick. Ended up picking over in GS Hou game, total went down an couple points from last game, over 207.5 to over 206. Figured the pace would continue of over from the last 3 games. Gonna need an miracle for the over to win. Hopefully the game goes to overtime. |
Flynt | 100 |
|
![]() |
Just switched to 3-0. |
Flynt | 100 |
|
![]() |
Marked the win for the over in Denver LA Clippers game in picks profile but didn't give me credit for win. The 2-0 didn't go to 3-0. Stayed at 2-0. |
Flynt | 100 |
|
![]() |
replied to
Survey: What type of Community events would you like to see? (Chance to win Covers swag!)
in Streak Survivor @KRU ESPN streak for the cash, that type of format. They could have two different contests at one time, they could have the Covers streak survivor the way it is, and have an Covers streak survivor that is similar to the SFTC format. And they should also add an forfeit button option. |
tammy296 | 40 |
|
![]() |
Since losing streaks are just as hard to accomplish as winning streaks. Covers should give out the same prizes. Since there 1000 for most monthly wins, there should be an 1000 winner for most monthly losses. 1K for W17, 25K for W21 and 100K for W25, there should be equal or some sort of cash prizes for losing streaks. Even if the losing streaks have to accumulate more losses than the winning streaks accumulate wins. But right now unless Covers would raise the standards for losing streaks should be 1k prize for L17, 25k for L21, and,100K for L25. Losing at sport picks on purpose and picking losers would be harder and more of an skill and accomplishment, than picking losing sport picks on accident or at random. And would be just as much an accomplishment as the winning streaks. More people would probably compete in the competitions and Covers streak survivor if Covers was giving out double prizes. |
Flynt | 100 |
|
![]() |
Terrible month so far on Covers streak survivor, three game losing streak, then three game winning streak, now another three game losing streak. Dallas why couldn't you make one more basket or give up one basket less to phoenix to cover? At Dallas +8, one more make or one more miss by phoenix, would of lost by 7 or 6 instead of losing by 9. Hopefully this month turns around, an W21 or W22 to end the month. |
majesty | 25 |
|
![]() |
Why does the Covers support team in the emails operate and or say there operating under summer hours all year long? It is winter, almost spring, not summer. |
Flynt | 100 |
|
If you choose to make use of any information on this website including online sports betting services from any websites that may be featured on this website, we strongly recommend that you carefully check your local laws before doing so.It is your sole responsibility to understand your local laws and observe them strictly.Covers does not provide any advice or guidance as to the legality of online sports betting or other online gambling activities within your jurisdiction and you are responsible for complying with laws that are applicable to you in your relevant locality.Covers disclaims all liability associated with your use of this website and use of any information contained on it.As a condition of using this website, you agree to hold the owner of this website harmless from any claims arising from your use of any services on any third party website that may be featured by Covers.