
Last report before the election, how convienent


If labor force participation had held even since January (when it was 8.3 percent), the jobless rate would be 8.4 percent. If the job participation rate were the same as when Barack Obama took office, the rate would be 10.7 percent. The broader U-6 rate (unemployed plus total employed part time for economic reasons) held steady at 14.7 percent.
1.1 million people have disappeared from the labor force during the past year.
In 2012, employment growth has averaged 146K per month, compared with an average monthly gain of 153K in 2011.
PS: the upward revision for August consists of government hiring.
If labor force participation had held even since January (when it was 8.3 percent), the jobless rate would be 8.4 percent. If the job participation rate were the same as when Barack Obama took office, the rate would be 10.7 percent. The broader U-6 rate (unemployed plus total employed part time for economic reasons) held steady at 14.7 percent.
1.1 million people have disappeared from the labor force during the past year.
In 2012, employment growth has averaged 146K per month, compared with an average monthly gain of 153K in 2011.
PS: the upward revision for August consists of government hiring.
Crusher, was that the so called " MAINSTREAM MEDIA " that carried the debate? Was it the questions from the left wing PBS that didn't give Robney a fair chance ?
You guys on the right are such hypocrites.
Crusher, was that the so called " MAINSTREAM MEDIA " that carried the debate? Was it the questions from the left wing PBS that didn't give Robney a fair chance ?
You guys on the right are such hypocrites.
If labor force participation had held even since January (when it was 8.3 percent), the jobless rate would be 8.4 percent. If the job participation rate were the same as when Barack Obama took office, the rate would be 10.7 percent. The broader U-6 rate (unemployed plus total employed part time for economic reasons) held steady at 14.7 percent.
1.1 million people have disappeared from the labor force during the past year.
In 2012, employment growth has averaged 146K per month, compared with an average monthly gain of 153K in 2011.
PS: the upward revision for August consists of government hiring.
If labor force participation had held even since January (when it was 8.3 percent), the jobless rate would be 8.4 percent. If the job participation rate were the same as when Barack Obama took office, the rate would be 10.7 percent. The broader U-6 rate (unemployed plus total employed part time for economic reasons) held steady at 14.7 percent.
1.1 million people have disappeared from the labor force during the past year.
In 2012, employment growth has averaged 146K per month, compared with an average monthly gain of 153K in 2011.
PS: the upward revision for August consists of government hiring.
I believe the numbers are off - as they always are. These numbers are used as a political football for both sides.
Doesn't matter. Voters will decide based on many factors, and if someone changes their mind based off of these numbers then they suck at voting.
Watch for the report on Monday detailing illegal donations from overseas to Obama. That will be the story all next week.
I believe the numbers are off - as they always are. These numbers are used as a political football for both sides.
Doesn't matter. Voters will decide based on many factors, and if someone changes their mind based off of these numbers then they suck at voting.
Watch for the report on Monday detailing illegal donations from overseas to Obama. That will be the story all next week.
This is obvious: If the "Direction of the Country" polls are moving up, that favors the incumbent, if going down, that favors the challengers. People vote on emotion, and if undeciced independents decide this thing, I'd say that unemployment numbers might be the biggest indicator and factor on deciding whom to vote for.
This number is big.
Although I can't prove it, I still don't believe it.
This is obvious: If the "Direction of the Country" polls are moving up, that favors the incumbent, if going down, that favors the challengers. People vote on emotion, and if undeciced independents decide this thing, I'd say that unemployment numbers might be the biggest indicator and factor on deciding whom to vote for.
This number is big.
Although I can't prove it, I still don't believe it.
What hogwash! Canada's numbers come out and we create more jobs per captia than the Americans, our jobless figures go up while their figures drop to a four year low. More Americans than ever are dependant on food stamps and yet somehow the jobless figures are better? Talk about cooking the books! The United States would need to have created at least 500,000 jobs to see a decline in unemployment figues.
If you believe in the honest validity of these "mysteriously adjusted numbers", then you also believe in Santa Claus, and the Tooth Fairy.
What hogwash! Canada's numbers come out and we create more jobs per captia than the Americans, our jobless figures go up while their figures drop to a four year low. More Americans than ever are dependant on food stamps and yet somehow the jobless figures are better? Talk about cooking the books! The United States would need to have created at least 500,000 jobs to see a decline in unemployment figues.
If you believe in the honest validity of these "mysteriously adjusted numbers", then you also believe in Santa Claus, and the Tooth Fairy.
If you choose to make use of any information on this website including online sports betting services from any websites that may be featured on this website, we strongly recommend that you carefully check your local laws before doing so.It is your sole responsibility to understand your local laws and observe them strictly.Covers does not provide any advice or guidance as to the legality of online sports betting or other online gambling activities within your jurisdiction and you are responsible for complying with laws that are applicable to you in your relevant locality.Covers disclaims all liability associated with your use of this website and use of any information contained on it.As a condition of using this website, you agree to hold the owner of this website harmless from any claims arising from your use of any services on any third party website that may be featured by Covers.