invocing an article of the iranian deal and not releasing the 100 billion seized by the us has asked for independent investigation by iac(international atomic committeee) under this clause it can realistically take up to 9 months to a year before findings are disclosed
0
To remove first post, remove entire topic.
invocing an article of the iranian deal and not releasing the 100 billion seized by the us has asked for independent investigation by iac(international atomic committeee) under this clause it can realistically take up to 9 months to a year before findings are disclosed
You make the comparisons of today's news, based on the original horrible deal made. I only lost $5K last week... I usually lose $30K per week. I am a great gambler
There is nothing good about releasing billions of funds to Iran, not now, not ever. They have a track record of state sponsored terror, human rights violations and suppressing freedoms of their own people. Just this past week, they have done half a dozen bad deeds on the international stage.
Kerry did not grow a spine, he and Obama figured out how to spin this horrible deal as a good thing to the low information voter. That is the only success if you choose to see it that way.
0
I disagree
You make the comparisons of today's news, based on the original horrible deal made. I only lost $5K last week... I usually lose $30K per week. I am a great gambler
There is nothing good about releasing billions of funds to Iran, not now, not ever. They have a track record of state sponsored terror, human rights violations and suppressing freedoms of their own people. Just this past week, they have done half a dozen bad deeds on the international stage.
Kerry did not grow a spine, he and Obama figured out how to spin this horrible deal as a good thing to the low information voter. That is the only success if you choose to see it that way.
You make the comparisons of today's news, based on the original horrible deal made. I only lost $5K last week... I usually lose $30K per week. I am a great gambler
There is nothing good about releasing billions of funds to Iran, not now, not ever. They have a track record of state sponsored terror, human rights violations and suppressing freedoms of their own people. Just this past week, they have done half a dozen bad deeds on the international stage.
Kerry did not grow a spine, he and Obama figured out how to spin this horrible deal as a good thing to the low information voter. That is the only success if you choose to see it that way.
look we need both Saudi and Irans support to stabilize this region, both have terrible human rights records and both sponsor terrorist activities and it will take both participants to indeed achieve peace in the middle east.
they say the region has been at war for milinias fair enough but They stated this when the republicans didn't want to reconstruct Europe.
Europe at the time was also involved in wars that went back millinias.
If we truly want this region to remotely look peaceful we must engage with both Iran and Saudi Arabia as well as Egypt and Israeli use our Nato influence and begin engaging with Russia to set up an architecture to lasting peace and structured civilization
we need all the players in the region to win this war.
0
Quote Originally Posted by SportsFan9698:
I disagree
You make the comparisons of today's news, based on the original horrible deal made. I only lost $5K last week... I usually lose $30K per week. I am a great gambler
There is nothing good about releasing billions of funds to Iran, not now, not ever. They have a track record of state sponsored terror, human rights violations and suppressing freedoms of their own people. Just this past week, they have done half a dozen bad deeds on the international stage.
Kerry did not grow a spine, he and Obama figured out how to spin this horrible deal as a good thing to the low information voter. That is the only success if you choose to see it that way.
look we need both Saudi and Irans support to stabilize this region, both have terrible human rights records and both sponsor terrorist activities and it will take both participants to indeed achieve peace in the middle east.
they say the region has been at war for milinias fair enough but They stated this when the republicans didn't want to reconstruct Europe.
Europe at the time was also involved in wars that went back millinias.
If we truly want this region to remotely look peaceful we must engage with both Iran and Saudi Arabia as well as Egypt and Israeli use our Nato influence and begin engaging with Russia to set up an architecture to lasting peace and structured civilization
we need all the players in the region to win this war.
look we need both Saudi and Irans support to stabilize this region, both have terrible human rights records and both sponsor terrorist activities and it will take both participants to indeed achieve peace in the middle east.
they say the region has been at war for milinias fair enough but They stated this when the republicans didn't want to reconstruct Europe.
Europe at the time was also involved in wars that went back millinias.
If we truly want this region to remotely look peaceful we must engage with both Iran and Saudi Arabia as well as Egypt and Israeli use our Nato influence and begin engaging with Russia to set up an architecture to lasting peace and structured civilization
we need all the players in the region to win this war.
I just think this stupid deal puts Iran closer to getting a nuke... I don't think they will be able to use it in the western hemosphere so I guess I really don't give a fvck. They will use it, or more likely attempt and fail. Then the wolves can rip the carcass apart for all I care.
0
Quote Originally Posted by nature1970:
look we need both Saudi and Irans support to stabilize this region, both have terrible human rights records and both sponsor terrorist activities and it will take both participants to indeed achieve peace in the middle east.
they say the region has been at war for milinias fair enough but They stated this when the republicans didn't want to reconstruct Europe.
Europe at the time was also involved in wars that went back millinias.
If we truly want this region to remotely look peaceful we must engage with both Iran and Saudi Arabia as well as Egypt and Israeli use our Nato influence and begin engaging with Russia to set up an architecture to lasting peace and structured civilization
we need all the players in the region to win this war.
I just think this stupid deal puts Iran closer to getting a nuke... I don't think they will be able to use it in the western hemosphere so I guess I really don't give a fvck. They will use it, or more likely attempt and fail. Then the wolves can rip the carcass apart for all I care.
really hate to break this to you but iran already has a nuclear weapon
I am not sure if they classify it as an a bomb or a dirty bomb but sanctions have done nothing to prevent it hiroshima could currently be classified as a dirty bomb...
countries develope nuclear capabilies Pakistan India in the 90's
sanctioned them.....
look at pudgy and the skeleton crew (N. Korea) we have been sanctioning them since 1950's they have a weapon able to create a 5.5 earth quake. now whether its an a bomb grade or h bomb sanctions do not work.
0
really hate to break this to you but iran already has a nuclear weapon
I am not sure if they classify it as an a bomb or a dirty bomb but sanctions have done nothing to prevent it hiroshima could currently be classified as a dirty bomb...
countries develope nuclear capabilies Pakistan India in the 90's
sanctioned them.....
look at pudgy and the skeleton crew (N. Korea) we have been sanctioning them since 1950's they have a weapon able to create a 5.5 earth quake. now whether its an a bomb grade or h bomb sanctions do not work.
If you choose to make use of any information on this website including online sports betting services from any websites that may be featured on
this website, we strongly recommend that you carefully check your local laws before doing so.It is your sole responsibility to understand your local laws and observe them strictly.Covers does not provide
any advice or guidance as to the legality of online sports betting or other online gambling activities within your jurisdiction and you are responsible for complying with laws that are applicable to you in
your relevant locality.Covers disclaims all liability associated with your use of this website and use of any information contained on it.As a condition of using this website, you agree to hold the owner
of this website harmless from any claims arising from your use of any services on any third party website that may be featured by Covers.
Hot Forum Topics
