Quote Originally Posted by I_Need_A_Detox:
Midnight, why did Obama have his future Russian ambassador stationed in Russia during the 2008 election? Do you have the ability to answer this question?
OK, let’s review this one before someone starts to think it is a valid, intelligent point.
Detox: Logic and reason have never penetrated your skull; and now what little rationale you ever possessed also seems to be disappearing. After reading this you may consider not only a detox, but 1) a complete brain flush, and 2) re-entry into Kindergarten for a second go at it. If accepted, forget everything your parents taught you up to the age of 5. Total reprogramming is the only possible answer.
If I, you, or anyone else were running for POTUS he/she would want and need all possible input about the political culture, economy and direction of events in all possible countries, but especially those that are in the top ten industrial/military establishments and are potential rivals or enemies. The voters want such candidates to be as knowledgeable as possible about just such things. “Boots on the ground” is a high political advantage in politics just as it is armed warfare. That is why sitting (remember that word, important later) governments maintain embassies and consulates all over the world, with a few covert agents involved for more sensitive intelligence gathering. We want, and expect, candidates to be well informed when discussing and debating the probable future ambitions of our potential rivals and enemies. With me so far?
Mere presence on site does not constitute anything illegal, immoral, unethical, or unpatriotic. Is there anything illegal, immoral, unethical, or unpatriotic about Obama’s representative’s actions while gathering and assessing information or are you merely grasping at straws again? Can you make an accusation with evidence or is it just “he was there, must have been doing something dirty or suspicious going on.”
Flynn had been a highly consultant for the Russian government.
Flynn had highly placed connections and contacts within the Russian government.
Flynn was discussing sanctions and deals only a sitting government has a right to discuss.
After the election, but before the inauguration, Flynn was then negotiating sanctions and conditions that only a sitting government has any legal right to do.
During all the aforementioned actions Flynn had knowledge of the Swede’s investment in and/or connected to Russia.
Flynn and/or the Swede, got caught up in a Chess game, which the Russians have long been masters at. It would appear these guys have not moved beyond Checkers yet.
Sadly, there are only two things I can do regarding you man. 1) Continue to refute you so other vulnerable minds will not be infected, and 2) pray for you at church, where I make it a habit to pray for all the unfortunate I cannot help.
Have a nice day. Peace.
Hot Forum Topics
