I agree with all of this.
Agree with what you said here. Guilty or not, high school/college whatever the guy is an obviously biased hack. His rant reminded me of a sloppy Zerohedge thread where the partisan throw up is so obviously amature it is laughable. Is he interested in making a positive, unbiased impact for the country or crying about Trump backlash and that evil Clinton?
Stand above this twitter, media quagmire and act like you belong in the position. The more I read about his past and his alliances the more I want this guy the hell out of the picture. I dont care if you are a Repub or Dem, you cannot be so biased that you are actually poisoning this position and abusing this critical opportunity.
Those two questions were: “Is any part of your statement false?” and “Did you make up any part of your statement?”
commonly here it refers to SAD ALIAS FU*K...someone who had their original usename banned because they couldn't act like a normal person, so they create multiple aliases under new usernames because they all have mental issues and desperately need professional help.
Then can we overturn the convictions that were based on polygraph results.?
Well...the boyfriend also claimed she has no fear of flying whatsoever and is not uncomfortable in rooms with only one exit. The second door story as told by her is a sham, was on the house years before she claimed. She says she is a psychologist but her name is not in CA database. Stanford removed that designation from her faculty page before her testimony.
Oh....and she wasnt raped.
a lot like Our Failure in chiefs ex wife’s claims of he raped her.
Life goes on...move on with it...i can assure you every single judge before Kav has bias, and every single judge that will follow him will too...these people are only humans, not saints...if Ruth Ginsberg or anyone else was appointed in this modern era, they would have all their buried skeletons exposed too
Asked what if Trump won the presidency, Ginsburg said: "I don't want to think about that possibility, but if it should be, then everything is up for grabs."
Interview July 8, 2016 with New York Times
"I can’t imagine what this place would be — I can’t imagine what the country would be — with Donald Trump as our president. For the country, it could be four years. For the court, it could be — I don’t even want to contemplate that.
Asked what if Trump won the presidency, Ginsburg said: "I don't want to think about that possibility, but if it should be, then everything is up for grabs."
Interview July 11, 2016 with CNN
"He is a faker. He has no consistency about him. He says whatever comes into his head at the moment. He really has an ego. ...
On July 14, 2016, Ginsburg apologized for her remarks...isn't she precious the little wino...
Established in 1995,
wally thinking he could have an actual debate or conversation with this tool...even Hochuli wouldnt have overturned that Browns 1st down no matter how much Goodell told him to as a Chuckys favor
Hot Forum Topics
