Have Republicans Ever Hated a President More Than Barack Obama?

Before they were elected, I thougt Clinton was a typical sociopathic politician, who would deceive others, exploit political payoffs to himself, and manipulate voter sentiment for his own gain while making empty promises. However, Clinton surprised me in his later presidency by compromising with Gingrich for the good of the nation.

Before Obama was elected I thought he was a great speaker and made great empty promises that either where unrealistic or lies to manipulate voter sentiment, or both, but he was a vacuous personality who lied and manipulated in a totally self-serving manner. I also recognized his strong Marxist leanings.

Obama has expanded government to throttle the economy based on his Marxist income-redistribution agenda, and has proved totally inept in conducting foreign affairs as well as the domestic economy. He is ruining the nation and building a Nanny state filled with parasites who think the nation owes them a living (where' my Obama phone, or welfare check, or food stamps, or free health care?).

The stupid and ignorant voters in the USA are getting the government they deserve with elections stolen by Obama through voter fraud practices that favor Democrats and through his IRS intimidation of conservative groups and conservative campaign contributors.  

What is there to hate? More to pity.  

Every Republican and Every southerner is racist. 

Gotcha.

It is no wonder that there is racial division with generalized bigoted statements like that.

The Republicans despised Clinton much, much more than Obama.

Obama is politically weak, not that bright, and has cost his party dearly.

Clinton was a much more effective politican.

I think it says a lot more about the pathetic state of our country that Obama was elected back to back as opposed to the republican base.  The first election, Obama would not have been beaten by anyone.  McCain didn't stand a chance.  The nation's first black president, a liberal at that, was just too much for anyone to overcome.  He ran on two words: "Hope and Change."  The country had had enough of Bush...Obama was a lock.

The real discouraging part is the fact that he was re-elected after radically altering the direction of this country.  The "white guilt" along with mindless democratic voters blindly voting for him again regardless of his performance will prove to cost this nation dearly.  $18 trillion in debt?  Spending more than every president combined before him?  We will not recover from this racist, anti-colonial terrorist supporting person.  The fact that some can continue to support him is literally mind boggling. 

He does not have our best interest at heart, and never has.  He aligns his cabinet members with political radicals who will carry out his views and insulates himself from thier decisions.  How unthinkable is it for an AG of the US to use the phrase "my people" and come right out and state the DOJ will not prosecute unless the victim is a minority??  Unthinkable.  Silence on so many racially biased issues it disgusts me. 

You make a lot of allegations. Unfortunately, you can't back up most of them with actual facts.

the idea that Obama is intelligent because he won an election is silly.

Maxine Waters and Sheila Jackson Lee have won several elections, so has Barbara Boxer.

They're all idiots.

Actually Obama's policies are much more Corporatist than Marxist.

"The hatred for Bush has been loud and proud. It's time for Obama to show that he can do better, Hopefully his foibles will be as scrutinized and magnified. I doubt it though. He seems to have gotten a pass to this point. Here are a couple benchmarks for the first day of his presidency. Please add your own.

DOW 8281
Oil 33.60"

https://www.covers.com/postingforum/post01/showmessage.aspx?spt=87&sub=100353412

It would not matter what the person accomplished to you as long as they had a -D next to their name. Its unfortunate that you cannot enagage in political discussions without the R/D paradigm.

Bush was a terrible president. Too liberal - not a true fiscal conservative. Like Obama he increased spending and expanded government, though not as badly as Obama. Obama tripled the national debt left by Bush. 

Both parties are competing for the parasite votes - those looking for government hand-outs. We have been becoming more of a nanny state since FDR.

Thus, Tea Party fiscal conservatives remain a minority at a time when they are needed to reverse the course of a degraded nation.

The future of the country is found today in Chicago and Detroit. As it exists today, the best that Republicans could do would be to slow the decline somewhat compared to Democrats.

Things will get worse, and someday the Tea Party will be called on to revive the nation. 

[Quote: Originally Posted by BAMA62] WE DON'T HAVE ANYONE. WE JUST WANT THE MAN TO TELL THE TRUTH AND START WORKING ON THE ECONOMY INSTEAD OF TAKING A VACATION EVERY MONTH OF HIS LIFE.
[/Quote

Obama needs to make more speeches.

]

QUOTE Originally Posted by Tinklebell:

Before they were elected, I thought Clinton was a typical sociopathic politician, who would deceive others, exploit political payoffs to himself, and manipulate voter sentiment for his own gain while making empty promises. However, Clinton surprised me in his later presidency by compromising with Gingrich for the good of the nation.

Before Obama was elected I thought he was a great speaker and made great empty promises that either where unrealistic or lies to manipulate voter sentiment, or both, but he was a vacuous personality who lied and manipulated in a totally self-serving manner. I also recognized his strong Marxist leanings.

Obama has expanded government to throttle the economy based on his Marxist income-redistribution agenda, and has proved totally inept in conducting foreign affairs as well as the domestic economy. He is ruining the nation and building a Nanny state filled with parasites who think the nation owes them a living (where' my Obama phone, or welfare check, or food stamps, or free health care?).

The stupid and ignorant voters in the USA are getting the government they deserve with elections stolen by Obama through voter fraud practices that favor Democrats and through his IRS intimidation of conservative groups and conservative campaign contributors.  

What is there to hate? More to pity.  

What is a corporatist policy? Obama only supports corporations that donate heavily to him and other Democrats, like alternate energy companies going bankrupt. These companies give to Obama and Obama pays them off with bailouts, subsidies, contracts, and tax breaks.

Obama is the biggest income re-distributor the country has ever seen, and any income redistribution (including awarding government unions big salaries and benefits) is a Marxist policy. Only when rewards are earned through work and profit, without an intervening source of entitlement, is this capitalism with no Marxism.

He is a glib con man, a great speaker, but not really intelligent. As long as he has his teleprompter he can read his speeches and sound intelligent. Like any good con men, he tells you what you want to hear and you mistake that for intelligence.

He became a devout Marxist at Occidental College, and anyone who adopts Marxism is not intelligent - they are unrealistically idealistic. All liberals believe in income redistribution and thus all liberals are Marxist to some degree.

The only thing phonier than the numerous, hard to count scandals is the President himself. How anybody can have any respect for this guy is beyond me. Remember when he had the audacity during the closing days of the 2012 election  to say "vote with revenge". Just plain nutty. Let's have Bernanke print another 85 billion "phony' dollars this month.