I am not intolerant of bigotry... In fact I think it is good that foxnews exposes what the GOP and right party is all about... better that than people be fooled...
bigots are so easily fooled because they are lead by their fear, hatred, emotion, defensiveness and inability to take personal responsibility in their lives...
foxnews knows this and is able to cash in on it...
0
who are you calling "you people"?
I am not intolerant of bigotry... In fact I think it is good that foxnews exposes what the GOP and right party is all about... better that than people be fooled...
bigots are so easily fooled because they are lead by their fear, hatred, emotion, defensiveness and inability to take personal responsibility in their lives...
foxnews knows this and is able to cash in on it...
they appeal to the lowest common denominator. Unfortunately the majority of our population applies.
if you consider an IQ in the 70's is borderline mentally retarded, where do you have your average foxnews viewer? you probably couldn't put it lower because that gets into requiring hygiene assistance and hype negotiating the TV and things like that and it would be malpractice for an in home caretaker to put foxnews on for someone. so, probably mid 70's?
0
Quote Originally Posted by mattbrot:
they appeal to the lowest common denominator. Unfortunately the majority of our population applies.
if you consider an IQ in the 70's is borderline mentally retarded, where do you have your average foxnews viewer? you probably couldn't put it lower because that gets into requiring hygiene assistance and hype negotiating the TV and things like that and it would be malpractice for an in home caretaker to put foxnews on for someone. so, probably mid 70's?
if you consider an IQ in the 70's is borderline mentally retarded, where do you have your average foxnews viewer? you probably couldn't put it lower because that gets into requiring hygiene assistance and hype negotiating the TV and things like that and it would be malpractice for an in home caretaker to put foxnews on for someone. so, probably mid 70's?
I would say high 60's to low 70's on avg is about right.
0
Quote Originally Posted by ClubDirt:
if you consider an IQ in the 70's is borderline mentally retarded, where do you have your average foxnews viewer? you probably couldn't put it lower because that gets into requiring hygiene assistance and hype negotiating the TV and things like that and it would be malpractice for an in home caretaker to put foxnews on for someone. so, probably mid 70's?
I would say high 60's to low 70's on avg is about right.
I dont watch foxnews... not sure why people that hate them would...
Foxnews has such high ratings because they herd the lemmings like no other and give them the news they want to hear... not reality... but fantasyland...
and as seen on this site people that live in fantasy land completely fall apart when taken out of their dream world...
I think the dependence of foxnews to avoid the cruel reality of reality is part of the foxnews disease/addiction...
must be hard for someone caught up in the disease to see...
at least it looks that way...
nice job illustrating the topic of the thread
can always count on your kind
0
Quote Originally Posted by canovsp:
Now I know why FOX News ratings are so good.
Even people that hate them are watching.
I dont watch foxnews... not sure why people that hate them would...
Foxnews has such high ratings because they herd the lemmings like no other and give them the news they want to hear... not reality... but fantasyland...
and as seen on this site people that live in fantasy land completely fall apart when taken out of their dream world...
I think the dependence of foxnews to avoid the cruel reality of reality is part of the foxnews disease/addiction...
must be hard for someone caught up in the disease to see...
if you consider an IQ in the 70's is borderline mentally retarded, where do you have your average foxnews viewer? you probably couldn't put it lower because that gets into requiring hygiene assistance and hype negotiating the TV and things like that and it would be malpractice for an in home caretaker to put foxnews on for someone. so, probably mid 70's?
Club, I am calling you out here... as a non-partisan independent I call out all sides and all posters....
I think the there are two type of foxnews viewers and both higher than mid 70s IQ....
Im thinking 80s-high 90s for the people that believe what is given to them as truth...
because they would start losing people at about 100 and higher... but viewers 100 and higher know it is BS but need the lower IQ people to believe in it so they agree with it...
Like if you look at canos or some of the other smarter guys like sara, they even make light or the absurdity with humorous stances knowing its foxnews rhetoric... because they know how integral it is to have the lower IQ guys to believe it as truth...
while guys like bowslit.... well...... god bless him
0
Quote Originally Posted by ClubDirt:
if you consider an IQ in the 70's is borderline mentally retarded, where do you have your average foxnews viewer? you probably couldn't put it lower because that gets into requiring hygiene assistance and hype negotiating the TV and things like that and it would be malpractice for an in home caretaker to put foxnews on for someone. so, probably mid 70's?
Club, I am calling you out here... as a non-partisan independent I call out all sides and all posters....
I think the there are two type of foxnews viewers and both higher than mid 70s IQ....
Im thinking 80s-high 90s for the people that believe what is given to them as truth...
because they would start losing people at about 100 and higher... but viewers 100 and higher know it is BS but need the lower IQ people to believe in it so they agree with it...
Like if you look at canos or some of the other smarter guys like sara, they even make light or the absurdity with humorous stances knowing its foxnews rhetoric... because they know how integral it is to have the lower IQ guys to believe it as truth...
while guys like bowslit.... well...... god bless him
Club, I am calling you out here... as a non-partisan independent I call out all sides and all posters....
I think the there are two type of foxnews viewers and both higher than mid 70s IQ....
Im thinking 80s-high 90s for the people that believe what is given to them as truth...
because they would start losing people at about 100 and higher... but viewers 100 and higher know it is BS but need the lower IQ people to believe in it so they agree with it...
Like if you look at canos or some of the other smarter guys like sara, they even make light or the absurdity with humorous stances knowing its foxnews rhetoric... because they know how integral it is to have the lower IQ guys to believe it as truth...
while guys like bowslit.... well...... god bless him
i respect your position on the matter, even if i disagree with it and think you are too generous with fox news viewers.
i do like the poster cano and don't refer to him with my comments, as misguided as he may be on a lot of issues.
0
Quote Originally Posted by dl36:
Club, I am calling you out here... as a non-partisan independent I call out all sides and all posters....
I think the there are two type of foxnews viewers and both higher than mid 70s IQ....
Im thinking 80s-high 90s for the people that believe what is given to them as truth...
because they would start losing people at about 100 and higher... but viewers 100 and higher know it is BS but need the lower IQ people to believe in it so they agree with it...
Like if you look at canos or some of the other smarter guys like sara, they even make light or the absurdity with humorous stances knowing its foxnews rhetoric... because they know how integral it is to have the lower IQ guys to believe it as truth...
while guys like bowslit.... well...... god bless him
i respect your position on the matter, even if i disagree with it and think you are too generous with fox news viewers.
i do like the poster cano and don't refer to him with my comments, as misguided as he may be on a lot of issues.
Ok see the guy wearing the shirt... hes the under 100 IQ type of guy that follows the "BS"...
now they guy that made the shirt and sold it to him for a profit... thats the 100 + IQ that knows its "BS" but needs the simpleton to mindlessly follow the hateful racist rhetoric being prescribed...
You see both types of guys on this site too
0
Quote Originally Posted by ClubDirt:
i think i found the answer. we just need to get a copy of this guy's IQ test results.
Ok see the guy wearing the shirt... hes the under 100 IQ type of guy that follows the "BS"...
now they guy that made the shirt and sold it to him for a profit... thats the 100 + IQ that knows its "BS" but needs the simpleton to mindlessly follow the hateful racist rhetoric being prescribed...
i heard an interview howard stern had with megan kelly a while back, apparently fox news viewers would send in requests for signed pics of meg and she said she got many sent back to her after said "fans" had deposited their manjuice over the pic of her face.
Ms Kelly doesnt send out signed pics anymore.
0
i heard an interview howard stern had with megan kelly a while back, apparently fox news viewers would send in requests for signed pics of meg and she said she got many sent back to her after said "fans" had deposited their manjuice over the pic of her face.
One thing I give Fox News credit for is exposing the Jonathan Gruber tapes that calls American stupid along with other things. His collaboration with Obama to pull the wool over our eyes on Obamacare was dully noted by Fox so much that FINALLY the MSM had to address it. Thankfully we have one network that is still fair and balanced.
0
One thing I give Fox News credit for is exposing the Jonathan Gruber tapes that calls American stupid along with other things. His collaboration with Obama to pull the wool over our eyes on Obamacare was dully noted by Fox so much that FINALLY the MSM had to address it. Thankfully we have one network that is still fair and balanced.
Exactly. There's no such thing anymore in our country. 
Hot Forum Topics
