Every year I look at NHL totals, although I know far less about hockey than most. Who are a few over teams that are so obvious everyone should know?
I’ll go first, Panthers are an obvious one. They’ve been a high scoring team for a while. What say you?
Name 1-3 obvious “over” teams
Every year I look at NHL totals, although I know far less about hockey than most. Who are a few over teams that are so obvious everyone should know?
I’ll go first, Panthers are an obvious one. They’ve been a high scoring team for a while. What say you?
Too hard to point out an obvious yet imo. Gotta get a couple weeks into the reg season. Roster changed, coaching changes etc will influence past from present
Oilers will be tough cuz we'll be seeing 6.5s all season
I do think Chicago overs will be up over 2022
Too hard to point out an obvious yet imo. Gotta get a couple weeks into the reg season. Roster changed, coaching changes etc will influence past from present
Oilers will be tough cuz we'll be seeing 6.5s all season
I do think Chicago overs will be up over 2022
Sharks and canucks 2 big over teams last year as well
Oilers/panthers/Sabres/blues as others mentioned
Overs hit at a decent rate 1st week or 2 of season
Sharks and canucks 2 big over teams last year as well
Oilers/panthers/Sabres/blues as others mentioned
Overs hit at a decent rate 1st week or 2 of season
Devils huge. They have a ton of speed and scoring but the goaltending is still a bit questionable with Vanecek and Schmid and their high risk play results in a lot chances both ways. These are not the Jacques Lemaire neutral zone trapping Devils.
Devils huge. They have a ton of speed and scoring but the goaltending is still a bit questionable with Vanecek and Schmid and their high risk play results in a lot chances both ways. These are not the Jacques Lemaire neutral zone trapping Devils.
Wondering if we will see an uptick in posted totals from the books this year. I think we were creeping into some 7.5/8 territory last year with teams like Oil and Cats.
Wondering if we will see an uptick in posted totals from the books this year. I think we were creeping into some 7.5/8 territory last year with teams like Oil and Cats.
@Gainsford
Will be interesting. 5.5 seems to be a thing of the past. Standard 6.0 a lot and the standard 6.5 with higher scoring teams and 7.0 with 2 high scoring teams
Sometimes adjusted by the books for injuries/hot goalies
@Gainsford
Will be interesting. 5.5 seems to be a thing of the past. Standard 6.0 a lot and the standard 6.5 with higher scoring teams and 7.0 with 2 high scoring teams
Sometimes adjusted by the books for injuries/hot goalies
@Gainsford Will be interesting. 5.5 seems to be a thing of the past. Standard 6.0 a lot and the standard 6.5 with higher scoring teams and 7.0 with 2 high scoring teams Sometimes adjusted by the books for injuries/hot goalies
Remember the days of the 4.5s... like every nyr vs NJ or vs isles was that... and the unders hit like crazy
@Gainsford Will be interesting. 5.5 seems to be a thing of the past. Standard 6.0 a lot and the standard 6.5 with higher scoring teams and 7.0 with 2 high scoring teams Sometimes adjusted by the books for injuries/hot goalies
Remember the days of the 4.5s... like every nyr vs NJ or vs isles was that... and the unders hit like crazy
Last year I made some coin betting Sharks and Oilers overs. The days of the 5.0 are long gone. When I first started spreadsheeting overs in 2017, they were still prevalent. By 2019 they were pretty rare. With teams like the Sharks and Oilers, it’s hard to avoid O/Us of 7 now. Although last year, totals of 7 started off 0-6 to the under if I remember correctly.
Teams I was wary of for overs because of fears the bad teams might not score, or the good teams would shut down their opponents:
NJ
Colorado
Detroit
Chicago
Las Vegas
Kings
Last year I made some coin betting Sharks and Oilers overs. The days of the 5.0 are long gone. When I first started spreadsheeting overs in 2017, they were still prevalent. By 2019 they were pretty rare. With teams like the Sharks and Oilers, it’s hard to avoid O/Us of 7 now. Although last year, totals of 7 started off 0-6 to the under if I remember correctly.
Teams I was wary of for overs because of fears the bad teams might not score, or the good teams would shut down their opponents:
NJ
Colorado
Detroit
Chicago
Las Vegas
Kings
Quote Originally Posted by dubz4dummyz: @Gainsford Will be interesting. 5.5 seems to be a thing of the past. Standard 6.0 a lot and the standard 6.5 with higher scoring teams and 7.0 with 2 high scoring teams Sometimes adjusted by the books for injuries/hot goalies Remember the days of the 4.5s... like every nyr vs NJ or vs isles was that... and the unders hit like crazy
Reminds of a pre-game interview with Colin Campbell when he coached the Rangers in the late-90s. NYR playing Buffalo and reporter asked him what to expect. Colin replied "probably another soccer game." Yep, times have changed. Another reason I don't bet unders often is the number of empty net goals. Teams sometimes pull their goalies down 3-0 or 4-0 with 7 or 8 minutes to play. What looked like a sure under suddenly not so much. So it's not just the rule changes leading to more goals, it's the philosophy of some of these coaches.
Quote Originally Posted by dubz4dummyz: @Gainsford Will be interesting. 5.5 seems to be a thing of the past. Standard 6.0 a lot and the standard 6.5 with higher scoring teams and 7.0 with 2 high scoring teams Sometimes adjusted by the books for injuries/hot goalies Remember the days of the 4.5s... like every nyr vs NJ or vs isles was that... and the unders hit like crazy
Reminds of a pre-game interview with Colin Campbell when he coached the Rangers in the late-90s. NYR playing Buffalo and reporter asked him what to expect. Colin replied "probably another soccer game." Yep, times have changed. Another reason I don't bet unders often is the number of empty net goals. Teams sometimes pull their goalies down 3-0 or 4-0 with 7 or 8 minutes to play. What looked like a sure under suddenly not so much. So it's not just the rule changes leading to more goals, it's the philosophy of some of these coaches.
Quote Originally Posted by nuggins: Quote Originally Posted by dubz4dummyz: @Gainsford Will be interesting. 5.5 seems to be a thing of the past. Standard 6.0 a lot and the standard 6.5 with higher scoring teams and 7.0 with 2 high scoring teams Sometimes adjusted by the books for injuries/hot goalies Remember the days of the 4.5s... like every nyr vs NJ or vs isles was that... and the unders hit like crazy Reminds of a pre-game interview with Colin Campbell when he coached the Rangers in the late-90s. NYR playing Buffalo and reporter asked him what to expect. Colin replied "probably another soccer game." Yep, times have changed. Another reason I don't bet unders often is the number of empty net goals. Teams sometimes pull their goalies down 3-0 or 4-0 with 7 or 8 minutes to play. What looked like a sure under suddenly not so much. So it's not just the rule changes leading to more goals, it's the philosophy of some of these coaches.
I never bet unders in any sport..it's either over or no play. Been like this for like last 10 years... I swear that I lost every 9 outta 10 unders
And I hate rooting for no goals/ hits/ TDs becuase I like watching high scoring back n forth games. Then someone scores then stressing it doesn't happen more. Stressing penalties etc. Not fun for me
Quote Originally Posted by nuggins: Quote Originally Posted by dubz4dummyz: @Gainsford Will be interesting. 5.5 seems to be a thing of the past. Standard 6.0 a lot and the standard 6.5 with higher scoring teams and 7.0 with 2 high scoring teams Sometimes adjusted by the books for injuries/hot goalies Remember the days of the 4.5s... like every nyr vs NJ or vs isles was that... and the unders hit like crazy Reminds of a pre-game interview with Colin Campbell when he coached the Rangers in the late-90s. NYR playing Buffalo and reporter asked him what to expect. Colin replied "probably another soccer game." Yep, times have changed. Another reason I don't bet unders often is the number of empty net goals. Teams sometimes pull their goalies down 3-0 or 4-0 with 7 or 8 minutes to play. What looked like a sure under suddenly not so much. So it's not just the rule changes leading to more goals, it's the philosophy of some of these coaches.
I never bet unders in any sport..it's either over or no play. Been like this for like last 10 years... I swear that I lost every 9 outta 10 unders
And I hate rooting for no goals/ hits/ TDs becuase I like watching high scoring back n forth games. Then someone scores then stressing it doesn't happen more. Stressing penalties etc. Not fun for me
Quote Originally Posted by rangersmets: Quote Originally Posted by nuggins: Quote Originally Posted by dubz4dummyz: @Gainsford Will be interesting. 5.5 seems to be a thing of the past. Standard 6.0 a lot and the standard 6.5 with higher scoring teams and 7.0 with 2 high scoring teams Sometimes adjusted by the books for injuries/hot goalies Remember the days of the 4.5s... like every nyr vs NJ or vs isles was that... and the unders hit like crazy Reminds of a pre-game interview with Colin Campbell when he coached the Rangers in the late-90s. NYR playing Buffalo and reporter asked him what to expect. Colin replied "probably another soccer game." Yep, times have changed. Another reason I don't bet unders often is the number of empty net goals. Teams sometimes pull their goalies down 3-0 or 4-0 with 7 or 8 minutes to play. What looked like a sure under suddenly not so much. So it's not just the rule changes leading to more goals, it's the philosophy of some of these coaches. I never bet unders in any sport..it's either over or no play. Been like this for like last 10 years... I swear that I lost every 9 outta 10 unders And I hate rooting for no goals/ hits/ TDs becuase I like watching high scoring back n forth games. Then someone scores then stressing it doesn't happen more. Stressing penalties etc. Not fun for me
Honestly, I'm not watching most of the games I bet. It's more of a numbers game for me. Sure, the Sharks/Oilers games where you anticipate record goals, I'll watch. And I would also watch the Bruins just shut teams down last year on the extreme unders. But tbh I'd rather have a winning bet than watch the game.
I guess I've had enough NBA late buckets ruin bets, to where I can have total apathy to NHL results anymore. All that being said, the late overs are clearly a newer trend and definitely should be taken into consideration when placing bets. A lot has changed since 2016.
Quote Originally Posted by rangersmets: Quote Originally Posted by nuggins: Quote Originally Posted by dubz4dummyz: @Gainsford Will be interesting. 5.5 seems to be a thing of the past. Standard 6.0 a lot and the standard 6.5 with higher scoring teams and 7.0 with 2 high scoring teams Sometimes adjusted by the books for injuries/hot goalies Remember the days of the 4.5s... like every nyr vs NJ or vs isles was that... and the unders hit like crazy Reminds of a pre-game interview with Colin Campbell when he coached the Rangers in the late-90s. NYR playing Buffalo and reporter asked him what to expect. Colin replied "probably another soccer game." Yep, times have changed. Another reason I don't bet unders often is the number of empty net goals. Teams sometimes pull their goalies down 3-0 or 4-0 with 7 or 8 minutes to play. What looked like a sure under suddenly not so much. So it's not just the rule changes leading to more goals, it's the philosophy of some of these coaches. I never bet unders in any sport..it's either over or no play. Been like this for like last 10 years... I swear that I lost every 9 outta 10 unders And I hate rooting for no goals/ hits/ TDs becuase I like watching high scoring back n forth games. Then someone scores then stressing it doesn't happen more. Stressing penalties etc. Not fun for me
Honestly, I'm not watching most of the games I bet. It's more of a numbers game for me. Sure, the Sharks/Oilers games where you anticipate record goals, I'll watch. And I would also watch the Bruins just shut teams down last year on the extreme unders. But tbh I'd rather have a winning bet than watch the game.
I guess I've had enough NBA late buckets ruin bets, to where I can have total apathy to NHL results anymore. All that being said, the late overs are clearly a newer trend and definitely should be taken into consideration when placing bets. A lot has changed since 2016.
If I'm not mistaken the sharks had an insane over record at home last season...
Karlsson to the pens might make sj a bit tighter...he doesnt play much D..
If I'm not mistaken the sharks had an insane over record at home last season...
Karlsson to the pens might make sj a bit tighter...he doesnt play much D..
Hot Forum Topics
- Monday 10/19/2026 603
- Serious Streak Survivor Strategies 1,918,487
- 🏈🏈🏈 Fubah2's risky CFB bets 278,578
- Commanders vs Niners in-game live MNF 2,715
- NFL LOCKED IN! 109,047
- NFL THREAD * 151 * 26,026
- PART DEUX 140
- the whole problem is knowingly spreading false info to vulnerable people 22,982
- Monday Night Covers Bloodbath Brewing 2,419
- 10/18 3,554
Warning - External Link
Report User
This post is spam
Delete Post
Remove Thread
Scan Results
Login/Register
Accounts are free and easy to create.
Search
