• Forums
  • Best Betting Sites
  • Sportsbook Promos
  • Best Sports Betting Apps
  • NFL Betting Forum
  • NBA Betting Forum
  • MLB Betting Forum
  • NHL Betting Forum
  • NCAAF Betting Forum
  • NCAAB Betting Forum
  • Soccer Betting Forum
  • Tennis Betting Forum
  • General Discussion
  • Help Forum
  • Guidelines
  • FAQ
  • Forum Updates
    Covers Logo
    Covers App
    Faster picks. Smarter bets.
    All in the NEW Covers App
    Download on the App Store Download on the Google Play Store
    • Sports
      • NFL
        • Back
        • NFL
        • NFL Home
        • Scores & Matchups
        • Prop Projections
        • NFL Picks
        • Weather
        • Injuries
      • NCAAF
        • Back
        • NCAAF
        • NCAAF Home
        • Scores & Matchups
        • Prop Projections
        • NCAAF Picks
        • Weather
        • Injuries
      • NBA
        • Back
        • NBA
        • NBA Home
        • Scores & Matchups
        • Prop Projections
        • NBA Picks
        • Injuries
      • NCAAB
        • Back
        • NCAAB
        • NCAAB Home
        • Scores & Matchups
        • NCAAB Picks
        • Injuries
      • MLB
        • Back
        • MLB
        • MLB Home
        • Scores & Matchups
        • Prop Projections
        • MLB Picks
        • Weather
        • Injuries
      • NHL
        • Back
        • NHL
        • NHL Home
        • Scores & Matchups
        • Prop Projections
        • NHL Picks
        • Injuries
      • Soccer
      • UFC
      • WNBA
        • Back
        • WNBA
        • WNBA Home
        • Scores & Matchups
        • WNBA Picks
        • Injuries
      • CFL
        • Back
        • CFL
        • CFL Home
        • Scores & Matchups
        • CFL Picks
      • Golf
        • Back
        • Golf
        • Golf Home
        • Golf Odds
        • Masters Odds
        • PGA Championship Odds
        • US Open Odds
        • British Open Odds
        • Ryder Cup Odds
        • Golf Picks
    • Odds
      • All Odds
      • NFL
      • NCAAF
      • NBA
      • NCAAB
      • MLB
      • NHL
      • Golf
      • Soccer Odds
        • Back
        • Soccer Odds
        • MLS Odds
        • Champions League Odds
        • Premier League Odds
      • UFC
      • WNBA
      • CFL
      • Election Odds
      • Futures
        • Back
        • Futures
        • NFL
        • NBA
        • MLB
        • NHL
        • NCAAB
        • NCAAF
      • Sports Odds History
    • Picks
      • All Picks
      • NFL
      • NBA
      • NHL
      • MLB
      • NCAAF
      • NCAAB
      • Golf
      • WNBA
      • CFL
      • User Picks
      • Team User Picks
      • Consensus Picks
        • Back
        • Consensus Picks
        • All Consensus Picks
        • NFL
        • NBA
        • NHL
        • MLB
        • NCAAF
        • NCAAB
        • CFL
        • WNBA
        • Consensus FAQ
        • Public Money
    • Prop Projections
      • NFL
      • NBA
      • MLB
      • NHL
    • Betting
      • US Betting Sites
      • Canada Betting Sites
      • Sportsbook Reviews
      • States
        • Back
        • States
        • US Legal Tracker
        • Revenue Tracker
        • Arizona
        • Arkansas
        • California
        • Colorado
        • Connecticut
        • DC
        • Florida
        • Georgia
        • Illinois
        • Indiana
        • Iowa
        • Kansas
        • Kentucky
        • Louisiana
        • Maine
        • Maryland
        • Massachusetts
        • Michigan
        • Mississippi
        • Missouri
        • Nevada
        • New Hampshire
        • New Jersey
        • New York
        • North Carolina
        • Ohio
        • Oregon
        • Pennsylvania
        • Tennessee
        • Texas
        • Vermont
        • Virginia
        • West Virginia
        • Wyoming
      • Provinces
        • Back
        • Provinces
        • Alberta
        • British Columbia
        • Manitoba
        • New Brunswick
        • Newfoundland and Labrador
        • Northwest Territories
        • Nova Scotia
        • Nunavut
        • Ontario
        • Prince Edward Island
        • Quebec (English)
        • Quebec (francais)
        • Saskatchewan
        • Yukon
      • By Sport
        • Back
        • By Sport
        • Baseball
        • Basketball
        • Boxing
        • College Football
        • F1
        • Football
        • Super Bowl
        • Golf
        • Hockey
        • Horse Racing
        • March Madness
        • Soccer
        • UFC
        • World Cup
      • Betting Apps
        • Back
        • Betting Apps
        • Best Sports Betting Apps USA
        • Ontario Sports Betting Apps
      • Rest of World
        • Back
        • Rest of World
        • UK Betting Offers
          • Back
          • UK Betting Offers
          • UK Betting Sites
          • bet365 Bonus Code UK
          • 888Sport Promo Code UK
          • William Hill Sign up Offer
          • Betway Sign up Offer
          • BetVictor Bonus Code UK
      • Betting Guides
        • Back
        • Betting Guides
        • All Guides
        • Glossary
        • Betting Calculators
          • Back
          • Betting Calculators
          • Odds Converter
          • Parlay Calculator
        • Futures Betting Guide
        • Moneyline Betting Guide
        • Over/Under Betting Guide
        • Parlay Betting Guide
        • Point Spread Betting Guide
        • Prop Betting Guide
        • Sports Betting Guides
          • Back
          • Sports Betting Guides
          • How To Bet On Sports Guide
          • NFL Betting Guide
          • NHL Betting Guide
          • NBA Betting Guide
          • MLB Betting Guide
          • NCAAB Betting Guide
          • NCAAF Betting Guide
          • Golf Betting Guide
          • Tennis Betting Guide
        • Teaser Betting Guide
      • Betting News
        • Back
        • Betting News
        • All News
        • Industry News
        • Podcasts
        • Covers Videos
        • Covers Writers
        • Offers & Boosts
    • Promos
      • Sportsbook Promos
      • Canada Sportsbook Promos
      • Bonuses By Sportsbook
        • Back
        • Bonuses By Sportsbook
        • bet365 Bonus Code
        • BET99 Promo Code
        • BetMGM Bonus Code
        • BetRivers Bonus Code
        • Caesars Sportsbook Promo
        • DraftKings Promo Code
        • Fanatics Sportsbook Promo
        • FanDuel Promo Code
        • Hard Rock Bet Promo Code
        • Sports Interaction Promo
        • Stake Promo Code
        • theScore Bet Promo Code
        • TonyBet Promo Code
      • Bonuses By Region
        • Back
        • Bonuses By Region
        • Arkansas Promos
        • Arizona Promos
        • Colorado Promos
        • Connecticut Promos
        • DC Promos
        • Illinois Promos
        • Indiana Promos
        • Iowa Promos
        • Kansas Promos
        • Kentucky Promos
        • Louisiana Promos
        • Maine Promos
        • Maryland Promos
        • Massachusetts Promos
        • Michigan Promos
        • Missouri Promos
        • New Jersey Promos
        • New York Promos
        • North Carolina Promos
        • Ohio Promos
        • Pennsylvania Promos
        • Tennessee Promos
        • Vermont Promos
        • Virginia Promos
        • West Virginia Promos
        • Wyoming Promos
    • Forum & Contests
      • All Forums
      • NFL Betting Forum
      • MLB Betting Forum
      • NCAAB Betting Forum
      • NCAAF Betting Forum
      • NBA Betting Forum
      • NHL Betting Forum
      • Soccer Betting Forum
      • Contests
        • Back
        • Contests
        • Contests Home
        • Streak Survivor
        • King of Covers
        • My Contests
    • Casino
      • Sweepstakes Casino
        • Back
        • Sweepstakes Casino
        • Sweepstakes Casino
        • Sweepstakes No-Deposit Bonuses
        • Sweepstakes Promos
          • Back
          • Sweepstakes Promos
          • Card Crush
          • Casino.click
          • Chanced Casino
          • Crown Coins Casino
          • FreeSpin Casino
          • LoneStar
          • McLuck
          • Mega Bonanza Casino
          • PlayFame
          • Pulsz
          • Stake.us
      • US Casinos
        • Back
        • US Casinos
        • US Online Casinos
        • US Online Casino Bonuses
        • Casino Promos
          • Back
          • Casino Promos
          • bet365 Casino Promo Code
          • BetRivers Casino Promo
          • Borgata Casino Bonus Code
          • Caesars Casino Bonus Code
          • DraftKings Casino Promo
          • Fanatics Casino Promo
          • FanDuel Casino Promo Code
          • Golden Nugget Casino Promo
          • Hard Rock Bet Casino Promo
          • Hollywood Casino Promo Code
      • Canada Casinos
        • Back
        • Canada Casinos
        • Canada Online Casinos
        • Provinces
          • Back
          • Provinces
          • Alberta Online Casino
          • BC Online Casino
          • Ontario Online Casinos
        • Casino Promos
          • Back
          • Casino Promos
          • BC.GAME Bonus Code
          • Cloudbet Promo Code
          • RainBet Promo Code
          • Roobet Promo Code
          • Shuffle Promo Code
          • Thrill Promo Code
    • Prediction Markets
      • Prediction Markets
      • Prediction Market Apps
      • Prediction Market Promos
      • Kalshi Promo Code
      • Polymarket Promo Code
      • DraftKings Predictions Promo Code
      • Novig Promo Code
      • ProphetX Promo Code
      • Underdog Promo Code
      • OG Promo Code
      • Fanatics Markets Promo Code
      • Plus500 Promo Code
    • NFL Week 2
      NFL Week 2
      • NFL Odds
      • NFL Picks
      • NFL Prediction Markets
      • NFL Betting Sites
    Covers Account
    Log in Create account
    Join free Log in
    All Forums | NFL Betting Forum

    Tuck rule, Pete Carrol throwing on the 1 yard line, Shanahan not running ball

    12 Next Last»
    ActionMagnet
    royboymiami
    ari
    Europa
    begginerboy
    ...
    Participants:
    Search model icon
    Views: 5461
    Posts: 27
    12 Next Last»
     
    ActionMagnet
    ActionMagnet
    Captain
    Participation Meter
    Joined: Oct, 2010
    Posts: 9708
    Posted: Feb. 6, 2017 - 11:11 PM ET #1

    In all seriousness I'm not hating on Brady/Pats but my god how lucky can a team possibly get? Those 3 plays:

    1) The criminal "tuck rule" that robbed Oakland and should've ended the Pats season (won the SB)..


    2) SB vs Seattle. 2nd and Goal from the 1 yard line and Carroll decides to throw a pass and not run the most unstoppable running back in the modern era to win the SB?

    3) last night was the worst of them all. 1st and 10 on the Pats 20 with an 8 point lead and 4 mins left.. That game was absolutely over if ATL runs the ball 3 times and kicks a FG (Atlanta kicker was 99% from 40 and in).. would've went up 11 and made NE use their last 2 timeouts.
    93-0 was the record for teams up by at least 19 points in the 4th. 93-1 after last night.

    It's mind boggling how this team continues to benefit from miraculous luck..  Brady can just as easily be 2-5 in the SB..  

    It's one think to make a play that is lucky (Eli to Tyree) because your luck wasn't reliant on the other team but to have a game stolen from you "tuck rule" and then 2 (top 1 and 2) alltime worst coaching blunders to hand you a SuperBowl? Seriously?  It's beyond words.
    Reply
    Quote Post
    0
    Report User
    To remove first post, remove entire topic.
    In all seriousness I'm not hating on Brady/Pats but my god how lucky can a team possibly get? Those 3 plays:

    1) The criminal "tuck rule" that robbed Oakland and should've ended the Pats season (won the SB)..


    2) SB vs Seattle. 2nd and Goal from the 1 yard line and Carroll decides to throw a pass and not run the most unstoppable running back in the modern era to win the SB?

    3) last night was the worst of them all. 1st and 10 on the Pats 20 with an 8 point lead and 4 mins left.. That game was absolutely over if ATL runs the ball 3 times and kicks a FG (Atlanta kicker was 99% from 40 and in).. would've went up 11 and made NE use their last 2 timeouts.
    93-0 was the record for teams up by at least 19 points in the 4th. 93-1 after last night.

    It's mind boggling how this team continues to benefit from miraculous luck..  Brady can just as easily be 2-5 in the SB..  

    It's one think to make a play that is lucky (Eli to Tyree) because your luck wasn't reliant on the other team but to have a game stolen from you "tuck rule" and then 2 (top 1 and 2) alltime worst coaching blunders to hand you a SuperBowl? Seriously?  It's beyond words.
     
    royboymiami
    royboymiami
    Captain
    Participation Meter
    Joined: Nov, 2011
    Posts: 5321
    Posted: Feb. 6, 2017 - 11:18 PM ET #2

    beyond words.... yet you wrote your thesis on the continued excellence of Tom Brady and the Pats...

    Did you not see Tom throwing to Bennet at the goal line to rub it in your face??? he was dying for bennet to catch it in order to prove that you can throw from the 2 or 3 yrd line
    Reply
    Quote Post
    0
    Report User
    beyond words.... yet you wrote your thesis on the continued excellence of Tom Brady and the Pats...

    Did you not see Tom throwing to Bennet at the goal line to rub it in your face??? he was dying for bennet to catch it in order to prove that you can throw from the 2 or 3 yrd line
     
    ActionMagnet
    ActionMagnet
    Captain
    Participation Meter
    Joined: Oct, 2010
    Posts: 9708
    Posted: Feb. 6, 2017 - 11:22 PM ET #3

    Yes I also saw that pass come that close to being intercepted.. Luck was on his side yet again. Next comment
    Reply
    Quote Post
    0
    Report User
    Yes I also saw that pass come that close to being intercepted.. Luck was on his side yet again. Next comment
     
    royboymiami
    royboymiami
    Captain
    Participation Meter
    Joined: Nov, 2011
    Posts: 5321
    Posted: Feb. 6, 2017 - 11:26 PM ET #4

    EXACTLY SOOOOOO how is it luck???? 

    Was NE lucky to not have tom brady the first 4 games?
    Lucky to have NO TRUE #1 Receiver
    Lucky their workhorse fumbled

    comeon man ... if you came home to your wife getting banged by a 21 inch cockk and yours was 3 inches how would you feel??

    Would you fold or come back with 31 inches to his 28

    Sucker
    Reply
    Quote Post
    0
    Report User
    EXACTLY SOOOOOO how is it luck???? 

    Was NE lucky to not have tom brady the first 4 games?
    Lucky to have NO TRUE #1 Receiver
    Lucky their workhorse fumbled

    comeon man ... if you came home to your wife getting banged by a 21 inch cockk and yours was 3 inches how would you feel??

    Would you fold or come back with 31 inches to his 28

    Sucker
     
    ActionMagnet
    ActionMagnet
    Captain
    Participation Meter
    Joined: Oct, 2010
    Posts: 9708
    Posted: Feb. 6, 2017 - 11:33 PM ET #5

    Quote Originally Posted by royboymiami:

    EXACTLY SOOOOOO how is it luck???? 

    Was NE lucky to not have tom brady the first 4 games?
    Lucky to have NO TRUE #1 Receiver
    Lucky their workhorse fumbled

    comeon man ... if you came home to your wife getting banged by a 21 inch cockk and yours was 3 inches how would you feel??

    Would you fold or come back with 31 inches to his 28

    Sucker

    Listen don't waste your time or mines by responding anymore, I didn't read your second post because your first post told me all I need to know about your football acumen and level of incompetence. So have your self a nice night.
    Reply
    Quote Post
    0
    Report User
    Quote Originally Posted by royboymiami:

    EXACTLY SOOOOOO how is it luck???? 

    Was NE lucky to not have tom brady the first 4 games?
    Lucky to have NO TRUE #1 Receiver
    Lucky their workhorse fumbled

    comeon man ... if you came home to your wife getting banged by a 21 inch cockk and yours was 3 inches how would you feel??

    Would you fold or come back with 31 inches to his 28

    Sucker

    Listen don't waste your time or mines by responding anymore, I didn't read your second post because your first post told me all I need to know about your football acumen and level of incompetence. So have your self a nice night.
     
    ari
    ari
    Rookie
    Participation Meter
    Joined: Sep, 2006
    Posts: 756
    Posted: Feb. 6, 2017 - 11:41 PM ET #6

    Quote Originally Posted by ActionMagnet:

    In all seriousness I'm not hating on Brady/Pats but my god how lucky can a team possibly get? Those 3 plays:

    1) The criminal "tuck rule" that robbed Oakland and should've ended the Pats season (won the SB)..


    2) SB vs Seattle. 2nd and Goal from the 1 yard line and Carroll decides to throw a pass and not run the most unstoppable running back in the modern era to win the SB?

    3) last night was the worst of them all. 1st and 10 on the Pats 20 with an 8 point lead and 4 mins left.. That game was absolutely over if ATL runs the ball 3 times and kicks a FG (Atlanta kicker was 99% from 40 and in).. would've went up 11 and made NE use their last 2 timeouts.
    93-0 was the record for teams up by at least 19 points in the 4th. 93-1 after last night.

    It's mind boggling how this team continues to benefit from miraculous luck..  Brady can just as easily be 2-5 in the SB..  

    It's one think to make a play that is lucky (Eli to Tyree) because your luck wasn't reliant on the other team but to have a game stolen from you "tuck rule" and then 2 (top 1 and 2) alltime worst coaching blunders to hand you a SuperBowl? Seriously?  It's beyond words.

    You sound silly, you ever hear the saying 1 play doesn't determine the outcome of a game ?  There's luck involved in every game  and any team that actually makes it to the Super Bowl had some sort of lucky break(s) along the way.  I hate Patriots (Jets fan) but as a football fan you can't deny the dynasty of Brady and Bellicheat and call it luck.




    Reply
    Quote Post
    0
    Report User
    Quote Originally Posted by ActionMagnet:

    In all seriousness I'm not hating on Brady/Pats but my god how lucky can a team possibly get? Those 3 plays:

    1) The criminal "tuck rule" that robbed Oakland and should've ended the Pats season (won the SB)..


    2) SB vs Seattle. 2nd and Goal from the 1 yard line and Carroll decides to throw a pass and not run the most unstoppable running back in the modern era to win the SB?

    3) last night was the worst of them all. 1st and 10 on the Pats 20 with an 8 point lead and 4 mins left.. That game was absolutely over if ATL runs the ball 3 times and kicks a FG (Atlanta kicker was 99% from 40 and in).. would've went up 11 and made NE use their last 2 timeouts.
    93-0 was the record for teams up by at least 19 points in the 4th. 93-1 after last night.

    It's mind boggling how this team continues to benefit from miraculous luck..  Brady can just as easily be 2-5 in the SB..  

    It's one think to make a play that is lucky (Eli to Tyree) because your luck wasn't reliant on the other team but to have a game stolen from you "tuck rule" and then 2 (top 1 and 2) alltime worst coaching blunders to hand you a SuperBowl? Seriously?  It's beyond words.

    You sound silly, you ever hear the saying 1 play doesn't determine the outcome of a game ?  There's luck involved in every game  and any team that actually makes it to the Super Bowl had some sort of lucky break(s) along the way.  I hate Patriots (Jets fan) but as a football fan you can't deny the dynasty of Brady and Bellicheat and call it luck.




     
    royboymiami
    royboymiami
    Captain
    Participation Meter
    Joined: Nov, 2011
    Posts: 5321
    Posted: Feb. 6, 2017 - 11:49 PM ET #7

    yea  i too skimmed past all your bs
    Reply
    Quote Post
    0
    Report User
    yea  i too skimmed past all your bs
     
    ActionMagnet
    ActionMagnet
    Captain
    Participation Meter
    Joined: Oct, 2010
    Posts: 9708
    Posted: Feb. 6, 2017 - 11:51 PM ET #8

    Yes 1 play does determine the outcome of a game. You must be new to sports.
    Reply
    Quote Post
    0
    Report User
    Yes 1 play does determine the outcome of a game. You must be new to sports.
     
    Europa
    Europa
    Legend
    Participation Meter
    Joined: Dec, 2003
    Posts: 42670
    Posted: Feb. 7, 2017 - 12:34 AM ET #9

    Quote Originally Posted by ActionMagnet:

    In all seriousness I'm not hating on Brady/Pats but my god how lucky can a team possibly get? Those 3 plays:

    1) The criminal "tuck rule" that robbed Oakland and should've ended the Pats season (won the SB)..

    2) SB vs Seattle. 2nd and Goal from the 1 yard line and Carroll decides to throw a pass and not run the most unstoppable running back in the modern era to win the SB?

    3) last night was the worst of them all. 1st and 10 on the Pats 20 with an 8 point lead and 4 mins left.. That game was absolutely over if ATL runs the ball 3 times and kicks a FG (Atlanta kicker was 99% from 40 and in).. would've went up 11 and made NE use their last 2 timeouts.
    93-0 was the record for teams up by at least 19 points in the 4th. 93-1 after last night.

    It's mind boggling how this team continues to benefit from miraculous luck..  Brady can just as easily be 2-5 in the SB..  

    It's one think to make a play that is lucky (Eli to Tyree) because your luck wasn't reliant on the other team but to have a game stolen from you "tuck rule" and then 2 (top 1 and 2) alltime worst coaching blunders to hand you a SuperBowl? Seriously?  It's beyond words.

    Not to nit picking here, just want to be clear it was Seattle OC Darrell Bevell not Pete Carroll made that dammn slant call.  
    Reply
    Quote Post
    0
    Report User
    Quote Originally Posted by ActionMagnet:

    In all seriousness I'm not hating on Brady/Pats but my god how lucky can a team possibly get? Those 3 plays:

    1) The criminal "tuck rule" that robbed Oakland and should've ended the Pats season (won the SB)..

    2) SB vs Seattle. 2nd and Goal from the 1 yard line and Carroll decides to throw a pass and not run the most unstoppable running back in the modern era to win the SB?

    3) last night was the worst of them all. 1st and 10 on the Pats 20 with an 8 point lead and 4 mins left.. That game was absolutely over if ATL runs the ball 3 times and kicks a FG (Atlanta kicker was 99% from 40 and in).. would've went up 11 and made NE use their last 2 timeouts.
    93-0 was the record for teams up by at least 19 points in the 4th. 93-1 after last night.

    It's mind boggling how this team continues to benefit from miraculous luck..  Brady can just as easily be 2-5 in the SB..  

    It's one think to make a play that is lucky (Eli to Tyree) because your luck wasn't reliant on the other team but to have a game stolen from you "tuck rule" and then 2 (top 1 and 2) alltime worst coaching blunders to hand you a SuperBowl? Seriously?  It's beyond words.

    Not to nit picking here, just want to be clear it was Seattle OC Darrell Bevell not Pete Carroll made that dammn slant call.  
     
    ActionMagnet
    ActionMagnet
    Captain
    Participation Meter
    Joined: Oct, 2010
    Posts: 9708
    Posted: Feb. 7, 2017 - 12:36 AM ET #10

    Quote Originally Posted by Europa:


    Not to nit picking here, just want to be clear it was Seattle OC Darrell Bevell not Pete Carroll made that dammn slant call.  

    Agree but I'm sure the call went past Carroll who as the head coach has veto power.
    Reply
    Quote Post
    0
    Report User
    Quote Originally Posted by Europa:


    Not to nit picking here, just want to be clear it was Seattle OC Darrell Bevell not Pete Carroll made that dammn slant call.  

    Agree but I'm sure the call went past Carroll who as the head coach has veto power.
     
    Europa
    Europa
    Legend
    Participation Meter
    Joined: Dec, 2003
    Posts: 42670
    Posted: Feb. 7, 2017 - 12:45 AM ET #11

    Quote Originally Posted by ActionMagnet:


    Agree but I'm sure the call went past Carroll who as the head coach has veto power.

    Blame the ill fated slant call solely on Bevell not Carroll, Bevell made that call. And guess what? Bevell blamed it to WR Richardo Lockette for not stronger to the ball!! Bevell, dude lacks a strong spine.

    story here,

    https://www.sbnation.com/nfl/2015/2/2/7961801/darrell-bevell-ricardo-lockette-super-bowl-russell-wilson-interception-playcall
    Reply
    Quote Post
    0
    Report User
    Quote Originally Posted by ActionMagnet:


    Agree but I'm sure the call went past Carroll who as the head coach has veto power.

    Blame the ill fated slant call solely on Bevell not Carroll, Bevell made that call. And guess what? Bevell blamed it to WR Richardo Lockette for not stronger to the ball!! Bevell, dude lacks a strong spine.

    story here,

    https://www.sbnation.com/nfl/2015/2/2/7961801/darrell-bevell-ricardo-lockette-super-bowl-russell-wilson-interception-playcall
     
    begginerboy
    begginerboy
    MVP
    Participation Meter
    Joined: Jul, 2013
    Posts: 15267
    Posted: Feb. 7, 2017 - 1:00 AM ET #12

    Quote Originally Posted by Europa:


    Blame the ill fated slant call solely on Bevell not Carroll, Bevell made that call. And guess what? Bevell blamed it to WR Richardo Lockette for not stronger to the ball!! Bevell, dude lacks a strong spine.

    story here,

    https://www.sbnation.com/nfl/2015/2/2/7961801/darrell-bevell-ricardo-lockette-super-bowl-russell-wilson-interception-playcall
    And Shanahan blames Freeman for the Matty Ice hit/fumble. The Pats owed me one after that Seattle loss in the SB. It was brutal. 10 point lead, then lose the lead, then get to the goal line and throw a pick. I will go to my grave believing that they did not go to Lynch because in the back of their minds (on an unconscious level) they did not want him getting the MVP. He had been a distraction all year and they were not about to reward him. And Shanahan can say whatever he wants to say, but unconsciously he wanted to prove his genius and it backfired big time. 

    That is why capping human psychology (in sports) is so important and also so very difficult, because you never know how these knuckleheads will react under duress. Look at the Warriors last year. 3-1 lead, against a team they owned. Then one play, Draymond swinging up at LBJ's balls changed everything. It totally changed the series, like the Matt Ryan fumble in the SB.  
    Reply
    Quote Post
    0
    Report User
    Quote Originally Posted by Europa:


    Blame the ill fated slant call solely on Bevell not Carroll, Bevell made that call. And guess what? Bevell blamed it to WR Richardo Lockette for not stronger to the ball!! Bevell, dude lacks a strong spine.

    story here,

    https://www.sbnation.com/nfl/2015/2/2/7961801/darrell-bevell-ricardo-lockette-super-bowl-russell-wilson-interception-playcall
    And Shanahan blames Freeman for the Matty Ice hit/fumble. The Pats owed me one after that Seattle loss in the SB. It was brutal. 10 point lead, then lose the lead, then get to the goal line and throw a pick. I will go to my grave believing that they did not go to Lynch because in the back of their minds (on an unconscious level) they did not want him getting the MVP. He had been a distraction all year and they were not about to reward him. And Shanahan can say whatever he wants to say, but unconsciously he wanted to prove his genius and it backfired big time. 

    That is why capping human psychology (in sports) is so important and also so very difficult, because you never know how these knuckleheads will react under duress. Look at the Warriors last year. 3-1 lead, against a team they owned. Then one play, Draymond swinging up at LBJ's balls changed everything. It totally changed the series, like the Matt Ryan fumble in the SB.  
     
    Brian7479
    Brian7479
    Veteran
    Participation Meter
    Joined: Nov, 2016
    Posts: 1208
    Posted: Feb. 7, 2017 - 1:05 AM ET #13

    Quote Originally Posted by royboymiami:

    EXACTLY SOOOOOO how is it luck???? Was NE lucky to not have tom brady the first 4 games?Lucky to have NO TRUE #1 ReceiverLucky their workhorse fumbledcomeon man ... if you came home to your wife getting banged by a 21 inch cockk and yours was 3 inches how would you feel??Would you fold or come back with 31 inches to his 28Sucker

    Shouldn't it be 34 inches hahaha
    Reply
    Quote Post
    0
    Report User
    Quote Originally Posted by royboymiami:

    EXACTLY SOOOOOO how is it luck???? Was NE lucky to not have tom brady the first 4 games?Lucky to have NO TRUE #1 ReceiverLucky their workhorse fumbledcomeon man ... if you came home to your wife getting banged by a 21 inch cockk and yours was 3 inches how would you feel??Would you fold or come back with 31 inches to his 28Sucker

    Shouldn't it be 34 inches hahaha
     
    StumpTownStu
    StumpTownStu
    Hall of Fame
    Participation Meter
    Joined: Oct, 2016
    Posts: 22234
    Posted: Feb. 7, 2017 - 1:13 AM ET #14

    It's so easy to tell who loses bets and who wins. Get over it. And everybody says the same b.s. "I actually won a f#ck ton of money and blahbady blah blah but i'm just saying...." The Patriots have had a lot of things go their way over the years but every team does. The Patriots good fortunes are remembered more because they win championships. You don't win 5 chips, go to 7, plus countless other AFC championships they were in and didn't win, because you're just lucky. Or because you're a "system QB". Yes, Atlanta should have won. Yes, they should have ran the ball 3 times and kicked a field goal. The Patriots still had to do their part. The refs didn't just spot them 31 unanswered points. The Falcons "prolific offense" didn't just conk out on it's own either.
    R.I.P. #94 MARSHAWN KNEELAND - DC4L
    Reply
    Quote Post
    0
    Report User
    It's so easy to tell who loses bets and who wins. Get over it. And everybody says the same b.s. "I actually won a f#ck ton of money and blahbady blah blah but i'm just saying...." The Patriots have had a lot of things go their way over the years but every team does. The Patriots good fortunes are remembered more because they win championships. You don't win 5 chips, go to 7, plus countless other AFC championships they were in and didn't win, because you're just lucky. Or because you're a "system QB". Yes, Atlanta should have won. Yes, they should have ran the ball 3 times and kicked a field goal. The Patriots still had to do their part. The refs didn't just spot them 31 unanswered points. The Falcons "prolific offense" didn't just conk out on it's own either.
     
    Europa
    Europa
    Legend
    Participation Meter
    Joined: Dec, 2003
    Posts: 42670
    Posted: Feb. 7, 2017 - 1:17 AM ET #15

    Quote Originally Posted by begginerboy:

    And Shanahan blames Freeman for the Matty Ice hit/fumble. The Pats owed me one after that Seattle loss in the SB. It was brutal. 10 point lead, then lose the lead, then get to the goal line and throw a pick. I will go to my grave believing that they did not go to Lynch because in the back of their minds (on an unconscious level) they did not want him getting the MVP. He had been a distraction all year and they were not about to reward him. And Shanahan can say whatever he wants to say, but unconsciously he wanted to prove his genius and it backfired big time. 

    That is why capping human psychology (in sports) is so important and also so very difficult, because you never know how these knuckleheads will react under duress. Look at the Warriors last year. 3-1 lead, against a team they owned. Then one play, Draymond swinging up at LBJ's balls changed everything. It totally changed the series, like the Matt Ryan fumble in the SB.  

    Ironically, Marshawn Lynch tweeted "I kno y I didn't get the ball now. Yes Lawd!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!" after the end of SB LI.

    https://www.espn.com/nfl/story/_/page/QTP_170205Lynch/seattle-seahawks-running-back-marshawn-lynch-knows-why-team-lost-new-england-patriots-super-bowl-xlix
    Reply
    Quote Post
    0
    Report User
    Quote Originally Posted by begginerboy:

    And Shanahan blames Freeman for the Matty Ice hit/fumble. The Pats owed me one after that Seattle loss in the SB. It was brutal. 10 point lead, then lose the lead, then get to the goal line and throw a pick. I will go to my grave believing that they did not go to Lynch because in the back of their minds (on an unconscious level) they did not want him getting the MVP. He had been a distraction all year and they were not about to reward him. And Shanahan can say whatever he wants to say, but unconsciously he wanted to prove his genius and it backfired big time. 

    That is why capping human psychology (in sports) is so important and also so very difficult, because you never know how these knuckleheads will react under duress. Look at the Warriors last year. 3-1 lead, against a team they owned. Then one play, Draymond swinging up at LBJ's balls changed everything. It totally changed the series, like the Matt Ryan fumble in the SB.  

    Ironically, Marshawn Lynch tweeted "I kno y I didn't get the ball now. Yes Lawd!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!" after the end of SB LI.

    https://www.espn.com/nfl/story/_/page/QTP_170205Lynch/seattle-seahawks-running-back-marshawn-lynch-knows-why-team-lost-new-england-patriots-super-bowl-xlix
     
    ActionMagnet
    ActionMagnet
    Captain
    Participation Meter
    Joined: Oct, 2010
    Posts: 9708
    Posted: Feb. 7, 2017 - 1:17 AM ET #16

    Quote Originally Posted by begginerboy:

    And Shanahan blames Freeman for the Matty Ice hit/fumble. The Pats owed me one after that Seattle loss in the SB. It was brutal. 10 point lead, then lose the lead, then get to the goal line and throw a pick. I will go to my grave believing that they did not go to Lynch because in the back of their minds (on an unconscious level) they did not want him getting the MVP. He had been a distraction all year and they were not about to reward him. And Shanahan can say whatever he wants to say, but unconsciously he wanted to prove his genius and it backfired big time. 

    That is why capping human psychology (in sports) is so important and also so very difficult, because you never know how these knuckleheads will react under duress. Look at the Warriors last year. 3-1 lead, against a team they owned. Then one play, Draymond swinging up at LBJ's balls changed everything. It totally changed the series, like the Matt Ryan fumble in the SB.  

    Agree completely on team not wanting Lynch to be the MVP. There was zero logical reason to throw a damn pass from the 1 yard line with that monster in the backfield. Seattle had a timeout as well. Could've ran him twice with chance to get 1 yard.

    Ironically Brady tried a pass on second down at the goal line in OT.  Beasley should've intercepted it but the football gods weren't having it. Would've been poetic justice.
    Reply
    Quote Post
    0
    Report User
    Quote Originally Posted by begginerboy:

    And Shanahan blames Freeman for the Matty Ice hit/fumble. The Pats owed me one after that Seattle loss in the SB. It was brutal. 10 point lead, then lose the lead, then get to the goal line and throw a pick. I will go to my grave believing that they did not go to Lynch because in the back of their minds (on an unconscious level) they did not want him getting the MVP. He had been a distraction all year and they were not about to reward him. And Shanahan can say whatever he wants to say, but unconsciously he wanted to prove his genius and it backfired big time. 

    That is why capping human psychology (in sports) is so important and also so very difficult, because you never know how these knuckleheads will react under duress. Look at the Warriors last year. 3-1 lead, against a team they owned. Then one play, Draymond swinging up at LBJ's balls changed everything. It totally changed the series, like the Matt Ryan fumble in the SB.  

    Agree completely on team not wanting Lynch to be the MVP. There was zero logical reason to throw a damn pass from the 1 yard line with that monster in the backfield. Seattle had a timeout as well. Could've ran him twice with chance to get 1 yard.

    Ironically Brady tried a pass on second down at the goal line in OT.  Beasley should've intercepted it but the football gods weren't having it. Would've been poetic justice.
     
    StumpTownStu
    StumpTownStu
    Hall of Fame
    Participation Meter
    Joined: Oct, 2016
    Posts: 22234
    Posted: Feb. 7, 2017 - 1:27 AM ET #17

    Marshawn would've got in the endzone. Obviously it's easy to say that now that we'll never know but i've watch that kid break tackles at literally every level.
    R.I.P. #94 MARSHAWN KNEELAND - DC4L
    Reply
    Quote Post
    0
    Report User
    Marshawn would've got in the endzone. Obviously it's easy to say that now that we'll never know but i've watch that kid break tackles at literally every level.
     
    begginerboy
    begginerboy
    MVP
    Participation Meter
    Joined: Jul, 2013
    Posts: 15267
    Posted: Feb. 7, 2017 - 1:30 AM ET #18

    Quote Originally Posted by ActionMagnet:


    Agree completely on team not wanting Lynch to be the MVP. There was zero logical reason to throw a damn pass from the 1 yard line with that monster in the backfield. Seattle had a timeout as well. Could've ran him twice with chance to get 1 yard.

    Ironically Brady tried a pass on second down at the goal line in OT.  Beasley should've intercepted it but the football gods weren't having it. Would've been poetic justice.

    But, and a big but. If you are going to throw in that situation that is the only kind of pass you are allowed to throw: a fade to the corner where it is one-on-one coverage and a very small chance of an int. You don't throw a slant into the most crowded area in the end zone where if a ball is tipped 10 guys are there to intercept it. It was just absurd. The pass play the pats ran for the two point conversion on the final TD in regulation, now that was a thing of beauty. 
    Reply
    Quote Post
    0
    Report User
    Quote Originally Posted by ActionMagnet:


    Agree completely on team not wanting Lynch to be the MVP. There was zero logical reason to throw a damn pass from the 1 yard line with that monster in the backfield. Seattle had a timeout as well. Could've ran him twice with chance to get 1 yard.

    Ironically Brady tried a pass on second down at the goal line in OT.  Beasley should've intercepted it but the football gods weren't having it. Would've been poetic justice.

    But, and a big but. If you are going to throw in that situation that is the only kind of pass you are allowed to throw: a fade to the corner where it is one-on-one coverage and a very small chance of an int. You don't throw a slant into the most crowded area in the end zone where if a ball is tipped 10 guys are there to intercept it. It was just absurd. The pass play the pats ran for the two point conversion on the final TD in regulation, now that was a thing of beauty. 
     
    bpickin
    bpickin
    All-Star
    Participation Meter
    Joined: Feb, 2010
    Posts: 13189
    Posted: Feb. 7, 2017 - 9:18 AM ET #19

    And pats run it on second and goal from the one yard line to win it this year... ironic
    Reply
    Quote Post
    0
    Report User
    And pats run it on second and goal from the one yard line to win it this year... ironic
     
    bpickin
    bpickin
    All-Star
    Participation Meter
    Joined: Feb, 2010
    Posts: 13189
    Posted: Feb. 7, 2017 - 9:19 AM ET #20

    The ole slap in the face to Pete Carroll saying, " this is how it's done ok?"
    Reply
    Quote Post
    0
    Report User
    The ole slap in the face to Pete Carroll saying, " this is how it's done ok?"
     
    ArtSchlichterJr
    ArtSchlichterJr
    Veteran
    Participation Meter
    Joined: Nov, 2009
    Posts: 3459
    Posted: Feb. 7, 2017 - 12:51 PM ET #21

    Quote Originally Posted by ActionMagnet:

    Yes 1 play does determine the outcome of a game. You must be new to sports.
    Well I  must say you must be new to all sports at all levels because it takes a "little luck"  to win it all at any level at ANY sport .  No winner cannot look back along the path to the crown and not say were were lucky that day..  It's putting yourself in the position to be "lucky" ie playing in the big game that separates  the winners from the loser's. ..  Pat's did not get a hall pass to all the SB's.. They earned their spots there so they had a shot to get "lucky".. Class over rain man...
    Be careful with the axe Eugene.
    Reply
    Quote Post
    0
    Report User
    Quote Originally Posted by ActionMagnet:

    Yes 1 play does determine the outcome of a game. You must be new to sports.
    Well I  must say you must be new to all sports at all levels because it takes a "little luck"  to win it all at any level at ANY sport .  No winner cannot look back along the path to the crown and not say were were lucky that day..  It's putting yourself in the position to be "lucky" ie playing in the big game that separates  the winners from the loser's. ..  Pat's did not get a hall pass to all the SB's.. They earned their spots there so they had a shot to get "lucky".. Class over rain man...
     
    swanbomb
    swanbomb
    Banned
    Participation Meter
    Joined: Dec, 2012
    Posts: 1855
    Posted: Feb. 8, 2017 - 10:19 AM ET #22

    He could easily be 0 for 7 too, you forgot to mention that. He could also easily be 7 for 7, or 6 for 7, or 4 for 7, hell even 1 for 7. 
    Reply
    Quote Post
    0
    Report User
    He could easily be 0 for 7 too, you forgot to mention that. He could also easily be 7 for 7, or 6 for 7, or 4 for 7, hell even 1 for 7. 
     
    gamblerluke
    gamblerluke
    Prospect
    Participation Meter
    Joined: Mar, 2011
    Posts: 138
    Posted: Feb. 8, 2017 - 10:39 AM ET #23

    Money controls the outcome of games!
    Reply
    Quote Post
    0
    Report User
    Money controls the outcome of games!
     
    Wizerguy
    Wizerguy
    Legend
    Participation Meter
    Joined: Jan, 2005
    Posts: 38278
    Posted: Feb. 8, 2017 - 11:40 AM ET #24

    Quote Originally Posted by gamblerluke:

    Money controls the outcome of games!



    games ?...maybe a few...not this one
    - The storms will come, the storms will pass -
    Reply
    Quote Post
    0
    Report User
    Quote Originally Posted by gamblerluke:

    Money controls the outcome of games!



    games ?...maybe a few...not this one
     
     
    JackParkman
    JackParkman
    Prospect
    Participation Meter
    Joined: Nov, 2016
    Posts: 29
    Posted: Feb. 8, 2017 - 2:57 PM ET #25

    Tuck rule was a divisional game, still had to beat Steelers and Rams.
    Reply
    Quote Post
    0
    Report User
    Tuck rule was a divisional game, still had to beat Steelers and Rams.
    All Forums | NFL Betting Forum
    12 Next Last»

    Hot Forums IconHot Forum Topics

    • 🤢🥴💩_ Fubah's risky baseball bets _🥶😲🥵 448,709 Covers arrow
    • 🏈🏈🏈 “To BEt, or not to BEt, that is the question” ...Fubah2's risky bets 302,167 Covers arrow
    • Thursday 09/17/2026 734 Covers arrow
    • 🏈🏈🏈 Fubah2's risky CFB bets 257,821 Covers arrow
    • Couple Beers 5,038 Covers arrow
    • I'm embarrassed for Trump supporters 58,315 Covers arrow
    • PART DEUX 180 Covers arrow
    • NFL LOCKED IN! 97,758 Covers arrow
    • DET@BUFF Under 55 Small Write up 3,185 Covers arrow
    • ***Macwesties * Thur. Sept. 17, 2026 * NFL * TNF * Football Plays*** 3,961 Covers arrow

    Warning - External Link

    Report User

    Thank you for reporting
    This content is abusive or harmful
    This post is spam
    An error has occurred
    This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.

    Delete Post

    Are you sure you would like to remove this post?

    Remove Thread

    Are you sure you would like to remove this thread?

    Scan Results

    Login/Register

    Happy to have you join the conversation. To do so, please login or create an account.
    Accounts are free and easy to create.

    Search


    Loading…

    Loading…

    About Us
    Contact Us
    Careers
    Our Team
    Brand
    Testimonials
    Betting Guides
    Sportsbook Reviews
    Betting News
    Podcasts
    Responsible Gambling
    Betting Sites
    US Betting Sites
    Canada Betting Sites
    Canada Casinos
    Best Betting Apps
    Contests
    Streak Survivor
    King of Covers
    Ultimate Race
    Office Pools
    The Covers community has
    810,221
    lifetime members worldwide
    Join our community today
    Covers 30 Years Logo Established in 1995,
    Covers is the world
    leader in sports
    betting information.
    21+
    Gambling problem? Call 1-800-GAMBLER
    Help Privacy Terms of Service Cookies Sitemap Forum
    YouTube logo
    Facebook logo
    Twitter logo
    Instagram logo
    LinkedIn logo
    Google News logo
    Covers is verified safe by:
    Evalon Logo Logo GPWA Logo GDPR logo Logo GeoTrust logo Logo PCI DSS logo Logo
    Copyright © 1995 - 2026 CS Media Ltd. All Rights Reserved.
    If you choose to make use of any information on this website including online sports betting services from any websites that may be featured on this website, we strongly recommend that you carefully check your local laws before doing so.It is your sole responsibility to understand your local laws and observe them strictly.Covers does not provide any advice or guidance as to the legality of online sports betting or other online gambling activities within your jurisdiction and you are responsible for complying with laws that are applicable to you in your relevant locality.Covers disclaims all liability associated with your use of this website and use of any information contained on it.As a condition of using this website, you agree to hold the owner of this website harmless from any claims arising from your use of any services on any third party website that may be featured by Covers.