• Forums
  • Best Betting Sites
  • Sportsbook Promos
  • Best Sports Betting Apps
  • NFL Betting Forum
  • NBA Betting Forum
  • MLB Betting Forum
  • NHL Betting Forum
  • NCAAF Betting Forum
  • NCAAB Betting Forum
  • Soccer Betting Forum
  • Tennis Betting Forum
  • General Discussion
  • Help Forum
  • Guidelines
  • FAQ
  • Forum Updates
    Covers Logo
    Covers App
    Faster picks. Smarter bets.
    All in the NEW Covers App
    Download on the App Store Download on the Google Play Store
    • Sports
      • NFL
        • Back
        • NFL
        • NFL Home
        • Scores & Matchups
        • Prop Projections
        • NFL Picks
        • Weather
        • Injuries
      • NCAAF
        • Back
        • NCAAF
        • NCAAF Home
        • Scores & Matchups
        • Prop Projections
        • NCAAF Picks
        • Weather
        • Injuries
      • NBA
        • Back
        • NBA
        • NBA Home
        • Scores & Matchups
        • Prop Projections
        • NBA Picks
        • Injuries
      • NCAAB
        • Back
        • NCAAB
        • NCAAB Home
        • Scores & Matchups
        • NCAAB Picks
        • Injuries
      • MLB
        • Back
        • MLB
        • MLB Home
        • Scores & Matchups
        • Prop Projections
        • MLB Picks
        • Weather
        • Injuries
      • NHL
        • Back
        • NHL
        • NHL Home
        • Scores & Matchups
        • Prop Projections
        • NHL Picks
        • Injuries
      • Soccer
      • UFC
      • WNBA
        • Back
        • WNBA
        • WNBA Home
        • Scores & Matchups
        • WNBA Picks
        • Injuries
      • CFL
        • Back
        • CFL
        • CFL Home
        • Scores & Matchups
        • CFL Picks
      • Golf
        • Back
        • Golf
        • Golf Home
        • Golf Odds
        • Masters Odds
        • PGA Championship Odds
        • US Open Odds
        • British Open Odds
        • Ryder Cup Odds
        • Golf Picks
    • Odds
      • All Odds
      • NFL
      • NCAAF
      • NBA
      • NCAAB
      • MLB
      • NHL
      • Golf
      • Soccer Odds
        • Back
        • Soccer Odds
        • MLS Odds
        • Champions League Odds
        • Premier League Odds
      • UFC
      • WNBA
      • CFL
      • Election Odds
      • Futures
        • Back
        • Futures
        • NFL
        • NBA
        • MLB
        • NHL
        • NCAAB
        • NCAAF
      • Sports Odds History
    • Picks
      • All Picks
      • NFL
      • NBA
      • NHL
      • MLB
      • NCAAF
      • NCAAB
      • Golf
      • WNBA
      • CFL
      • User Picks
      • Team User Picks
      • Consensus Picks
        • Back
        • Consensus Picks
        • All Consensus Picks
        • NFL
        • NBA
        • NHL
        • MLB
        • NCAAF
        • NCAAB
        • CFL
        • WNBA
        • Consensus FAQ
        • Public Money
    • Prop Projections
      • NFL
      • NBA
      • MLB
      • NHL
    • Betting
      • US Betting Sites
      • Canada Betting Sites
      • Sportsbook Reviews
      • States
        • Back
        • States
        • US Legal Tracker
        • Revenue Tracker
        • Arizona
        • Arkansas
        • California
        • Colorado
        • Connecticut
        • DC
        • Florida
        • Georgia
        • Illinois
        • Indiana
        • Iowa
        • Kansas
        • Kentucky
        • Louisiana
        • Maine
        • Maryland
        • Massachusetts
        • Michigan
        • Mississippi
        • Missouri
        • Nevada
        • New Hampshire
        • New Jersey
        • New York
        • North Carolina
        • Ohio
        • Oregon
        • Pennsylvania
        • Tennessee
        • Texas
        • Vermont
        • Virginia
        • West Virginia
        • Wyoming
      • Provinces
        • Back
        • Provinces
        • Alberta
        • British Columbia
        • Manitoba
        • New Brunswick
        • Newfoundland and Labrador
        • Northwest Territories
        • Nova Scotia
        • Nunavut
        • Ontario
        • Prince Edward Island
        • Quebec (English)
        • Quebec (francais)
        • Saskatchewan
        • Yukon
      • By Sport
        • Back
        • By Sport
        • Baseball
        • Basketball
        • Boxing
        • College Football
        • F1
        • Football
        • Super Bowl
        • Golf
        • Hockey
        • Horse Racing
        • March Madness
        • Soccer
        • UFC
        • World Cup
      • Betting Apps
        • Back
        • Betting Apps
        • Best Sports Betting Apps USA
        • Ontario Sports Betting Apps
      • Rest of World
        • Back
        • Rest of World
        • UK Betting Offers
          • Back
          • UK Betting Offers
          • UK Betting Sites
          • bet365 Bonus Code UK
          • 888Sport Promo Code UK
          • William Hill Sign up Offer
          • Betway Sign up Offer
          • BetVictor Bonus Code UK
      • Betting Guides
        • Back
        • Betting Guides
        • All Guides
        • Glossary
        • Betting Calculators
          • Back
          • Betting Calculators
          • Odds Converter
          • Parlay Calculator
        • Futures Betting Guide
        • Moneyline Betting Guide
        • Over/Under Betting Guide
        • Parlay Betting Guide
        • Point Spread Betting Guide
        • Prop Betting Guide
        • Sports Betting Guides
          • Back
          • Sports Betting Guides
          • How To Bet On Sports Guide
          • NFL Betting Guide
          • NHL Betting Guide
          • NBA Betting Guide
          • MLB Betting Guide
          • NCAAB Betting Guide
          • NCAAF Betting Guide
          • Golf Betting Guide
          • Tennis Betting Guide
        • Teaser Betting Guide
      • Betting News
        • Back
        • Betting News
        • All News
        • Industry News
        • Podcasts
        • Covers Videos
        • Covers Writers
        • Offers & Boosts
    • Promos
      • Sportsbook Promos
      • Canada Sportsbook Promos
      • Bonuses By Sportsbook
        • Back
        • Bonuses By Sportsbook
        • bet365 Bonus Code
        • BET99 Promo Code
        • BetMGM Bonus Code
        • BetRivers Bonus Code
        • Caesars Sportsbook Promo
        • DraftKings Promo Code
        • Fanatics Sportsbook Promo
        • FanDuel Promo Code
        • Hard Rock Bet Promo Code
        • Sports Interaction Promo
        • Stake Promo Code
        • theScore Bet Promo Code
        • TonyBet Promo Code
      • Bonuses By Region
        • Back
        • Bonuses By Region
        • Arkansas Promos
        • Arizona Promos
        • Colorado Promos
        • Connecticut Promos
        • DC Promos
        • Illinois Promos
        • Indiana Promos
        • Iowa Promos
        • Kansas Promos
        • Kentucky Promos
        • Louisiana Promos
        • Maine Promos
        • Maryland Promos
        • Massachusetts Promos
        • Michigan Promos
        • Missouri Promos
        • New Jersey Promos
        • New York Promos
        • North Carolina Promos
        • Ohio Promos
        • Pennsylvania Promos
        • Tennessee Promos
        • Vermont Promos
        • Virginia Promos
        • West Virginia Promos
        • Wyoming Promos
    • Forum & Contests
      • All Forums
      • NFL Betting Forum
      • MLB Betting Forum
      • NCAAB Betting Forum
      • NCAAF Betting Forum
      • NBA Betting Forum
      • NHL Betting Forum
      • Soccer Betting Forum
      • Contests
        • Back
        • Contests
        • Contests Home
        • Streak Survivor
        • King of Covers
        • My Contests
    • Casino
      • Sweepstakes Casino
        • Back
        • Sweepstakes Casino
        • Sweepstakes Casino
        • Sweepstakes No-Deposit Bonuses
        • Sweepstakes Promos
          • Back
          • Sweepstakes Promos
          • Card Crush
          • Casino.click
          • Chanced Casino
          • Crown Coins Casino
          • FreeSpin Casino
          • LoneStar
          • McLuck
          • Mega Bonanza Casino
          • PlayFame
          • Pulsz
          • Stake.us
      • US Casinos
        • Back
        • US Casinos
        • US Online Casinos
        • US Online Casino Bonuses
        • Casino Promos
          • Back
          • Casino Promos
          • bet365 Casino Promo Code
          • BetRivers Casino Promo
          • Borgata Casino Bonus Code
          • Caesars Casino Bonus Code
          • DraftKings Casino Promo
          • Fanatics Casino Promo
          • FanDuel Casino Promo Code
          • Golden Nugget Casino Promo
          • Hard Rock Bet Casino Promo
          • Hollywood Casino Promo Code
      • Canada Casinos
        • Back
        • Canada Casinos
        • Canada Online Casinos
        • Provinces
          • Back
          • Provinces
          • Alberta Online Casino
          • BC Online Casino
          • Ontario Online Casinos
        • Casino Promos
          • Back
          • Casino Promos
          • BC.GAME Bonus Code
          • Cloudbet Promo Code
          • RainBet Promo Code
          • Roobet Promo Code
          • Shuffle Promo Code
          • Thrill Promo Code
    • Prediction Markets
      • Prediction Markets
      • Prediction Market Apps
      • Prediction Market Promos
      • Kalshi Promo Code
      • Polymarket Promo Code
      • DraftKings Predictions Promo Code
      • Novig Promo Code
      • ProphetX Promo Code
      • Underdog Promo Code
      • OG Promo Code
      • Fanatics Markets Promo Code
      • Plus500 Promo Code
    • NFL Week 2
      NFL Week 2
      • NFL Odds
      • NFL Picks
      • Lions-Bills Early Leans
      • Early Survivor Picks
      • NFL Prediction Markets
      • NFL Betting Sites
    Covers Account
    Log in Create account
    Join free Log in
    All Forums | NFL Betting Forum

    suuma's wildcard round 2015

    1234 Next Last»
    suuma
    Mcmanus
    No_FUN_League
    LeagueCapper
    LETGOPACK1234
    ...
    Participants:
    Search model icon
    Views: 17193
    Posts: 89
    1234 Next Last»
     
    suuma
    suuma
    Veteran
    Participation Meter
    Joined: Feb, 2010
    Posts: 4455
    Posted: Jan. 6, 2016 - 1:02 PM ET #1

    61-51 ytd

    Seattle Seahawks -5 +102 BIG PLAY

    Even though having a rough start at 2-4, my power ranking has the Seahawks as the number one team after 16 games. They are ranked #3 on offense and #2 on defense. This alone tells you how hot this team is since week 7. Vikings are the worst playoff team according to my numbers. What have they done during the season to justify a +5 cover vs. the best team in the league right now? Everytime they faced a real good defense, they had almost no offensive output vs. SEA, DEN, KC, at SF (stout home defense). Only vs the Cardinals they had a solid game offensively but I have the Cards' defense ranked #9 while playing the #21 schedule. To end the season they seemed to be red-hot. They beat the Bears (must-win), dropped 49 points on the 2nd worst defense while holding their offense to 24 without their best player and won at Lambeau with a good matchup X' and Os wise while throwing for just 99 yards, for 4.1 NYPPA and getting outgained. The reason is, the Packers have a better defense than people think. This offense is trash and they won't roll on the hottest team getting their best defensive player back in Kam Chancellor. On the other side, the Seahawks offense is ON FIRE. They get Lynch (probably), Luke Willson, Russel Okung & J.R. Sweezy back. The only solid thing about Minny was their defense but did they face great offenses? Yeah at home, the Seahawks and they couldn't stop them. They even couldn't stop the Broncos early in the season. They got the Lions twice during their weak first season half, they got the Chiefs before they started their streak, they got the Giants w/o OBJ, and so on. Mix their schedule and they likely finish 8-8. I had the Vikings as a big improvement and a wildcard team this year but I expected much more from their offense which is garbage. They were averaging 5.9 NYPPA over the season, this is an improvement of just 0.2 to 2014. They are in the same category as the Browns passing-wise. The Seahawks are on a mission (remember Malcom Butler?) and they will get past the Vikes very easily. Considering the Vikes TT under as well.

    More coming.
    Reply
    Quote Post
    0
    Report User
    To remove first post, remove entire topic.
    61-51 ytd

    Seattle Seahawks -5 +102 BIG PLAY

    Even though having a rough start at 2-4, my power ranking has the Seahawks as the number one team after 16 games. They are ranked #3 on offense and #2 on defense. This alone tells you how hot this team is since week 7. Vikings are the worst playoff team according to my numbers. What have they done during the season to justify a +5 cover vs. the best team in the league right now? Everytime they faced a real good defense, they had almost no offensive output vs. SEA, DEN, KC, at SF (stout home defense). Only vs the Cardinals they had a solid game offensively but I have the Cards' defense ranked #9 while playing the #21 schedule. To end the season they seemed to be red-hot. They beat the Bears (must-win), dropped 49 points on the 2nd worst defense while holding their offense to 24 without their best player and won at Lambeau with a good matchup X' and Os wise while throwing for just 99 yards, for 4.1 NYPPA and getting outgained. The reason is, the Packers have a better defense than people think. This offense is trash and they won't roll on the hottest team getting their best defensive player back in Kam Chancellor. On the other side, the Seahawks offense is ON FIRE. They get Lynch (probably), Luke Willson, Russel Okung & J.R. Sweezy back. The only solid thing about Minny was their defense but did they face great offenses? Yeah at home, the Seahawks and they couldn't stop them. They even couldn't stop the Broncos early in the season. They got the Lions twice during their weak first season half, they got the Chiefs before they started their streak, they got the Giants w/o OBJ, and so on. Mix their schedule and they likely finish 8-8. I had the Vikings as a big improvement and a wildcard team this year but I expected much more from their offense which is garbage. They were averaging 5.9 NYPPA over the season, this is an improvement of just 0.2 to 2014. They are in the same category as the Browns passing-wise. The Seahawks are on a mission (remember Malcom Butler?) and they will get past the Vikes very easily. Considering the Vikes TT under as well.

    More coming.
     
    Mcmanus
    Mcmanus
    Captain
    Participation Meter
    Joined: Aug, 2005
    Posts: 7282
    Posted: Jan. 6, 2016 - 1:12 PM ET #2

    The Vikings Offensive line did poorly last time vs Seattle and I do not see that changing this time around as well..Good Bet i think and Good Luck 
    Reply
    Quote Post
    0
    Report User
    The Vikings Offensive line did poorly last time vs Seattle and I do not see that changing this time around as well..Good Bet i think and Good Luck 
     
    suuma
    suuma
    Veteran
    Participation Meter
    Joined: Feb, 2010
    Posts: 4455
    Posted: Jan. 6, 2016 - 1:24 PM ET #3

    Yeah Vikes have an adj. sack rate of 8.8%, good for 29th in the league. Seahawks are not a blitzing team that's why they don't generate the most sacks but their front-four will pressure the heck out of Teddy. Can see him throwing 2 picks.
    Reply
    Quote Post
    0
    Report User
    Yeah Vikes have an adj. sack rate of 8.8%, good for 29th in the league. Seahawks are not a blitzing team that's why they don't generate the most sacks but their front-four will pressure the heck out of Teddy. Can see him throwing 2 picks.
     
    No_FUN_League
    No_FUN_League
    Prospect
    Participation Meter
    Joined: Nov, 2008
    Posts: 216
    Posted: Jan. 6, 2016 - 1:34 PM ET #4

    Quote Originally Posted by suuma:

    61-51 ytd

    Seattle Seahawks -5 +102 BIG PLAY

    Even though having a rough start at 2-4, my power ranking has the Seahawks as the number one team after 16 games. They are ranked #3 on offense and #2 on defense. This alone tells you how hot this team is since week 7. Vikings are the worst playoff team according to my numbers. What have they done during the season to justify a +5 cover vs. the best team in the league right now? Everytime they faced a real good defense, they had almost no offensive output vs. SEA, DEN, KC, at SF (stout home defense). Only vs the Cardinals they had a solid game offensively but I have the Cards' defense ranked #9 while playing the #21 schedule. To end the season they seemed to be red-hot. They beat the Bears (must-win), dropped 49 points on the 2nd worst defense while holding their offense to 24 without their best player and won at Lambeau with a good matchup X' and Os wise while throwing for just 99 yards, for 4.1 NYPPA and getting outgained. The reason is, the Packers have a better defense than people think. This offense is trash and they won't roll on the hottest team getting their best defensive player back in Kam Chancellor. On the other side, the Seahawks offense is ON FIRE. They get Lynch (probably), Luke Willson, Russel Okung & J.R. Sweezy back. The only solid thing about Minny was their defense but did they face great offenses? Yeah at home, the Seahawks and they couldn't stop them. They even couldn't stop the Broncos early in the season. They got the Lions twice during their weak first season half, they got the Chiefs before they started their streak, they got the Giants w/o OBJ, and so on. Mix their schedule and they likely finish 8-8. I had the Vikings as a big improvement and a wildcard team this year but I expected much more from their offense which is garbage. They were averaging 5.9 NYPPA over the season, this is an improvement of just 0.2 to 2014. They are in the same category as the Browns passing-wise. The Seahawks are on a mission (remember Malcom Butler?) and they will get past the Vikes very easily. Considering the Vikes TT under as well.

    More coming.

    I'm glad you stopped fading the Hawks finally.    I have a slight worry that the last meeting the Vikes had 2 defensive players of worth out.  BOL to all Hawks backers!
    Reply
    Quote Post
    0
    Report User
    Quote Originally Posted by suuma:

    61-51 ytd

    Seattle Seahawks -5 +102 BIG PLAY

    Even though having a rough start at 2-4, my power ranking has the Seahawks as the number one team after 16 games. They are ranked #3 on offense and #2 on defense. This alone tells you how hot this team is since week 7. Vikings are the worst playoff team according to my numbers. What have they done during the season to justify a +5 cover vs. the best team in the league right now? Everytime they faced a real good defense, they had almost no offensive output vs. SEA, DEN, KC, at SF (stout home defense). Only vs the Cardinals they had a solid game offensively but I have the Cards' defense ranked #9 while playing the #21 schedule. To end the season they seemed to be red-hot. They beat the Bears (must-win), dropped 49 points on the 2nd worst defense while holding their offense to 24 without their best player and won at Lambeau with a good matchup X' and Os wise while throwing for just 99 yards, for 4.1 NYPPA and getting outgained. The reason is, the Packers have a better defense than people think. This offense is trash and they won't roll on the hottest team getting their best defensive player back in Kam Chancellor. On the other side, the Seahawks offense is ON FIRE. They get Lynch (probably), Luke Willson, Russel Okung & J.R. Sweezy back. The only solid thing about Minny was their defense but did they face great offenses? Yeah at home, the Seahawks and they couldn't stop them. They even couldn't stop the Broncos early in the season. They got the Lions twice during their weak first season half, they got the Chiefs before they started their streak, they got the Giants w/o OBJ, and so on. Mix their schedule and they likely finish 8-8. I had the Vikings as a big improvement and a wildcard team this year but I expected much more from their offense which is garbage. They were averaging 5.9 NYPPA over the season, this is an improvement of just 0.2 to 2014. They are in the same category as the Browns passing-wise. The Seahawks are on a mission (remember Malcom Butler?) and they will get past the Vikes very easily. Considering the Vikes TT under as well.

    More coming.

    I'm glad you stopped fading the Hawks finally.    I have a slight worry that the last meeting the Vikes had 2 defensive players of worth out.  BOL to all Hawks backers!
     
    LeagueCapper
    LeagueCapper
    Captain
    Participation Meter
    Joined: Mar, 2011
    Posts: 9317
    Posted: Jan. 6, 2016 - 1:39 PM ET #5

    Good thoughts Suuma, best of luck 
    Reply
    Quote Post
    0
    Report User
    Good thoughts Suuma, best of luck 
     
    LETGOPACK1234
    LETGOPACK1234
    All-Star
    Participation Meter
    Joined: Feb, 2011
    Posts: 12243
    Posted: Jan. 6, 2016 - 1:51 PM ET #6

    So far so good 
    Reply
    Quote Post
    0
    Report User
    So far so good 
     
    TheDrill
    TheDrill
    Prospect
    Participation Meter
    Joined: Jan, 2014
    Posts: 346
    Posted: Jan. 6, 2016 - 2:14 PM ET #7

    Sweet...on it as well.  Don't care if it's -55 degrees, think Seattle rolls in this game.  

    I also have a future on them at +700...surely not the best odds on them throughout the season, but I felt like there was still value with them being behind Arizona, NE, Carolina and Denver.  Probably hedge that at Carolina next week if they can win in Minny this weekend.
    Reply
    Quote Post
    0
    Report User
    Sweet...on it as well.  Don't care if it's -55 degrees, think Seattle rolls in this game.  

    I also have a future on them at +700...surely not the best odds on them throughout the season, but I felt like there was still value with them being behind Arizona, NE, Carolina and Denver.  Probably hedge that at Carolina next week if they can win in Minny this weekend.
     
    twozerosix
    twozerosix
    Prospect
    Participation Meter
    Joined: Aug, 2014
    Posts: 98
    Posted: Jan. 6, 2016 - 2:20 PM ET #8

    With you here got it early at -4.  My only worry is the weather.  10am start for Seattle plus forecast of 1 degree at gametime.  I think I like MIN TT Under better but a D/ST score and you probably lose that.  All that said I see SEA winning by 7+.      
    Reply
    Quote Post
    0
    Report User
    With you here got it early at -4.  My only worry is the weather.  10am start for Seattle plus forecast of 1 degree at gametime.  I think I like MIN TT Under better but a D/ST score and you probably lose that.  All that said I see SEA winning by 7+.      
     
    vankiep_0007
    vankiep_0007
    Hall of Fame
    Participation Meter
    Joined: Oct, 2008
    Posts: 24629
    Posted: Jan. 6, 2016 - 2:27 PM ET #9

    Gl this week Suuma
    Reply
    Quote Post
    0
    Report User
    Gl this week Suuma
     
    JBone_Texas
    JBone_Texas
    Veteran
    Participation Meter
    Joined: Oct, 2010
    Posts: 1016
    Posted: Jan. 6, 2016 - 2:28 PM ET #10

    Nice writeup.

    I'm not settled on this game yet so I'm not disagreeing just adding a few thoughts for caution.

    Seattle on 3rd straight post-season with 2 past SB runs.  That is a lot of games and no precedent for a team making 3 straight SB's.  Lynch in particular if he plays is of concern their, aging, coming off injury, and tons of workload over the past 2 seasons.

    Seattle o line troubles all year.  Wilson helps negate just how bad they have been by avoiding sacks.  They began to gel a bit run blocking anyways with Rawls (he played in Minn game), but have regressed recently.  There is no history this year that Lynch has been effective or up to previous standards.

    At the current spread 5.5 if the game switched to being played at home in Seattle the line in that case would be Seattle -11, perhaps -11.5.  An interesting concept to look at in terms of value.

    First matchup of these teams in Minn was a bad situation for Minn.  They came in 8-3 leading the division and off a quality win at the time vs. Atlanta.  Seahawks were on a roll starting 2-4 and coming in 6-5 fighting for their playoff life.  Minn was down 4 defensive starters, 2 safeties, LB A. Barr (injured early in game), and DT Linval Joseph.  Seattle took advantage of the injuries and lack of Minn focus to get up 21-0 early.  Minn is not built to come from behind against anyone, once they were out of their gameplan and given the scenario they didn't put up much fight.

    Seattle is a VERY popular team amongst bettors, especially in the playoffs due to past success.  That is already partially reflected in the line, and will likely grow more so up until kickoff.

    Like the Vikings blowout win over a disinterested and terrible defensive NYG team, I wouldn't put to much into last weeks results of Seattle blowing out Arizona on the road.  Arizona knew they were playing for nothing and didn't put up much fight after getting down early.

    I'm not too keen on Bridgewater or the entire Vikings team so not sure I can back them but if the line grows high enough (+7 minimum) I'd have to strongly consider.  Minn isn't great but they also didn't get blown out in most games, including games against quality opponents/playoff teams Denver, Arizona, and KC (won).  

    At +7 or more your asking for a repeat of a blowout.  It could go that way but Seattle doesn't have the offensive firepower to support that result on any consistent basis.

    Reply
    Quote Post
    0
    Report User
    Nice writeup.

    I'm not settled on this game yet so I'm not disagreeing just adding a few thoughts for caution.

    Seattle on 3rd straight post-season with 2 past SB runs.  That is a lot of games and no precedent for a team making 3 straight SB's.  Lynch in particular if he plays is of concern their, aging, coming off injury, and tons of workload over the past 2 seasons.

    Seattle o line troubles all year.  Wilson helps negate just how bad they have been by avoiding sacks.  They began to gel a bit run blocking anyways with Rawls (he played in Minn game), but have regressed recently.  There is no history this year that Lynch has been effective or up to previous standards.

    At the current spread 5.5 if the game switched to being played at home in Seattle the line in that case would be Seattle -11, perhaps -11.5.  An interesting concept to look at in terms of value.

    First matchup of these teams in Minn was a bad situation for Minn.  They came in 8-3 leading the division and off a quality win at the time vs. Atlanta.  Seahawks were on a roll starting 2-4 and coming in 6-5 fighting for their playoff life.  Minn was down 4 defensive starters, 2 safeties, LB A. Barr (injured early in game), and DT Linval Joseph.  Seattle took advantage of the injuries and lack of Minn focus to get up 21-0 early.  Minn is not built to come from behind against anyone, once they were out of their gameplan and given the scenario they didn't put up much fight.

    Seattle is a VERY popular team amongst bettors, especially in the playoffs due to past success.  That is already partially reflected in the line, and will likely grow more so up until kickoff.

    Like the Vikings blowout win over a disinterested and terrible defensive NYG team, I wouldn't put to much into last weeks results of Seattle blowing out Arizona on the road.  Arizona knew they were playing for nothing and didn't put up much fight after getting down early.

    I'm not too keen on Bridgewater or the entire Vikings team so not sure I can back them but if the line grows high enough (+7 minimum) I'd have to strongly consider.  Minn isn't great but they also didn't get blown out in most games, including games against quality opponents/playoff teams Denver, Arizona, and KC (won).  

    At +7 or more your asking for a repeat of a blowout.  It could go that way but Seattle doesn't have the offensive firepower to support that result on any consistent basis.

     
    zamigo6
    zamigo6
    All-Star
    Participation Meter
    Joined: Dec, 2010
    Posts: 13130
    Posted: Jan. 6, 2016 - 2:30 PM ET #11

    GL Suuma
    Reply
    Quote Post
    0
    Report User
    GL Suuma
     
    BigBadBruin
    BigBadBruin
    Veteran
    Participation Meter
    Joined: Apr, 2010
    Posts: 1755
    Posted: Jan. 6, 2016 - 2:46 PM ET #12

    GL - I am on seahawks too


    Reply
    Quote Post
    0
    Report User
    GL - I am on seahawks too


     
    Teamastro
    Teamastro
    Veteran
    Participation Meter
    Joined: Jul, 2012
    Posts: 1209
    Posted: Jan. 6, 2016 - 3:08 PM ET #13

    Seattle seems to pick the right time to come alive.  6-1 in the last 7... average of 31 pts per gm....Russell Wilson is playing the best football and getting great support from the O line.  He brings it again this Sunday.  I don't believe there will be a blowout but Hawks win this.  BTW, Vikings are 4-3 in the last 7 and average 24 pts.  Even if Lynch does not play at least the Vikings have to plan for it.... B.O.L Suuma
    Reply
    Quote Post
    0
    Report User
    Seattle seems to pick the right time to come alive.  6-1 in the last 7... average of 31 pts per gm....Russell Wilson is playing the best football and getting great support from the O line.  He brings it again this Sunday.  I don't believe there will be a blowout but Hawks win this.  BTW, Vikings are 4-3 in the last 7 and average 24 pts.  Even if Lynch does not play at least the Vikings have to plan for it.... B.O.L Suuma
     
    DogbiteWilliams
    DogbiteWilliams
    Captain
    Participation Meter
    Joined: Sep, 2015
    Posts: 6443
    Posted: Jan. 6, 2016 - 3:51 PM ET #14

    I know about a system that selects SEA and KC this week.  I am loathe to bet road favorites so I will pass.  Good luck to suuma and all of his fans.

    I will try to post something about that system on Friday from my work computer.  My ancient iPad already shut down once and I lost everything I had typed.
    Reply
    Quote Post
    0
    Report User
    I know about a system that selects SEA and KC this week.  I am loathe to bet road favorites so I will pass.  Good luck to suuma and all of his fans.

    I will try to post something about that system on Friday from my work computer.  My ancient iPad already shut down once and I lost everything I had typed.
     
    DogbiteWilliams
    DogbiteWilliams
    Captain
    Participation Meter
    Joined: Sep, 2015
    Posts: 6443
    Posted: Jan. 6, 2016 - 3:55 PM ET #15

    The way I crunch the numbers at Football Outsiders makes SEA the #1 team despite bieng a sixth seed.  They do seem capable of covering that spread despite the good record of home dogs in the Wild Card round.
    Reply
    Quote Post
    0
    Report User
    The way I crunch the numbers at Football Outsiders makes SEA the #1 team despite bieng a sixth seed.  They do seem capable of covering that spread despite the good record of home dogs in the Wild Card round.
     
    vankiep_0007
    vankiep_0007
    Hall of Fame
    Participation Meter
    Joined: Oct, 2008
    Posts: 24629
    Posted: Jan. 6, 2016 - 4:10 PM ET #16

    My wife's family from Seattle... I'll might be on it with you Suuma
    Reply
    Quote Post
    0
    Report User
    My wife's family from Seattle... I'll might be on it with you Suuma
     
    Metallica2467
    Metallica2467
    Legend
    Participation Meter
    Joined: Jan, 2006
    Posts: 51193
    Posted: Jan. 6, 2016 - 4:42 PM ET #17

    Go Hawks!
    GL this weekend Buddy
    R.I.P. Legend
    Reply
    Quote Post
    0
    Report User
    Go Hawks!
    GL this weekend Buddy
     
    five0
    five0
    Prospect
    Participation Meter
    Joined: Jan, 2009
    Posts: 43
    Posted: Jan. 6, 2016 - 7:26 PM ET #18

    the X factor will be the extreme cold polar air at game time -1 and below tough to handicap   
    Reply
    Quote Post
    0
    Report User
    the X factor will be the extreme cold polar air at game time -1 and below tough to handicap   
     
    sunglow
    sunglow
    Banned
    Participation Meter
    Joined: Nov, 2011
    Posts: 1057
    Posted: Jan. 6, 2016 - 8:02 PM ET #19

    Quote Originally Posted by suuma:

    61-51 ytd

    Seattle Seahawks -5 +102 BIG PLAY

    Even though having a rough start at 2-4, my power ranking has the Seahawks as the number one team after 16 games. They are ranked #3 on offense and #2 on defense. This alone tells you how hot this team is since week 7. Vikings are the worst playoff team according to my numbers. What have they done during the season to justify a +5 cover vs. the best team in the league right now? Everytime they faced a real good defense, they had almost no offensive output vs. SEA, DEN, KC, at SF (stout home defense). Only vs the Cardinals they had a solid game offensively but I have the Cards' defense ranked #9 while playing the #21 schedule. To end the season they seemed to be red-hot. They beat the Bears (must-win), dropped 49 points on the 2nd worst defense while holding their offense to 24 without their best player and won at Lambeau with a good matchup X' and Os wise while throwing for just 99 yards, for 4.1 NYPPA and getting outgained. The reason is, the Packers have a better defense than people think. This offense is trash and they won't roll on the hottest team getting their best defensive player back in Kam Chancellor. On the other side, the Seahawks offense is ON FIRE. They get Lynch (probably), Luke Willson, Russel Okung & J.R. Sweezy back. The only solid thing about Minny was their defense but did they face great offenses? Yeah at home, the Seahawks and they couldn't stop them. They even couldn't stop the Broncos early in the season. They got the Lions twice during their weak first season half, they got the Chiefs before they started their streak, they got the Giants w/o OBJ, and so on. Mix their schedule and they likely finish 8-8. I had the Vikings as a big improvement and a wildcard team this year but I expected much more from their offense which is garbage. They were averaging 5.9 NYPPA over the season, this is an improvement of just 0.2 to 2014. They are in the same category as the Browns passing-wise. The Seahawks are on a mission (remember Malcom Butler?) and they will get past the Vikes very easily. Considering the Vikes TT under as well.

    More coming.

    Nice write up as always
    Reply
    Quote Post
    0
    Report User
    Quote Originally Posted by suuma:

    61-51 ytd

    Seattle Seahawks -5 +102 BIG PLAY

    Even though having a rough start at 2-4, my power ranking has the Seahawks as the number one team after 16 games. They are ranked #3 on offense and #2 on defense. This alone tells you how hot this team is since week 7. Vikings are the worst playoff team according to my numbers. What have they done during the season to justify a +5 cover vs. the best team in the league right now? Everytime they faced a real good defense, they had almost no offensive output vs. SEA, DEN, KC, at SF (stout home defense). Only vs the Cardinals they had a solid game offensively but I have the Cards' defense ranked #9 while playing the #21 schedule. To end the season they seemed to be red-hot. They beat the Bears (must-win), dropped 49 points on the 2nd worst defense while holding their offense to 24 without their best player and won at Lambeau with a good matchup X' and Os wise while throwing for just 99 yards, for 4.1 NYPPA and getting outgained. The reason is, the Packers have a better defense than people think. This offense is trash and they won't roll on the hottest team getting their best defensive player back in Kam Chancellor. On the other side, the Seahawks offense is ON FIRE. They get Lynch (probably), Luke Willson, Russel Okung & J.R. Sweezy back. The only solid thing about Minny was their defense but did they face great offenses? Yeah at home, the Seahawks and they couldn't stop them. They even couldn't stop the Broncos early in the season. They got the Lions twice during their weak first season half, they got the Chiefs before they started their streak, they got the Giants w/o OBJ, and so on. Mix their schedule and they likely finish 8-8. I had the Vikings as a big improvement and a wildcard team this year but I expected much more from their offense which is garbage. They were averaging 5.9 NYPPA over the season, this is an improvement of just 0.2 to 2014. They are in the same category as the Browns passing-wise. The Seahawks are on a mission (remember Malcom Butler?) and they will get past the Vikes very easily. Considering the Vikes TT under as well.

    More coming.

    Nice write up as always
     
    Hawky
    Hawky
    Veteran
    Participation Meter
    Joined: Apr, 2014
    Posts: 3439
    Posted: Jan. 6, 2016 - 8:11 PM ET #20

    seattle is also very smart with cold weather
    Reply
    Quote Post
    0
    Report User
    seattle is also very smart with cold weather
     
    mrquija27
    mrquija27
    Veteran
    Participation Meter
    Joined: Jan, 2011
    Posts: 3117
    Posted: Jan. 6, 2016 - 8:36 PM ET #21

    Sorry they will save themselves the embarrassment in Carolina and just lose on purpose.  Haven't you read?  
    Reply
    Quote Post
    0
    Report User
    Sorry they will save themselves the embarrassment in Carolina and just lose on purpose.  Haven't you read?  
     
    suuma
    suuma
    Veteran
    Participation Meter
    Joined: Feb, 2010
    Posts: 4455
    Posted: Jan. 7, 2016 - 12:25 PM ET #22

    Cincinnati Bengals +3 or ML

    Here is what I've written about Cincy and AJ McCarron before the season: https://www.covers.com/postingforum/post01/showmessage.aspx?spt=21&sub=102156091

    And after 16 games they have shown they are a very good Football team. Overall they are the better team than the Steelers. Lewis has not won a playoff game with them but they never had the personnel or matchup they have this time. So the only reason to go against them would be AJ McCarron for me, but is he a downgrade over Andy Dalton? The reason the Bengals are +3 at home is because its AJ vs. Ben. With Andy it would probably be Bengals -2.5 or -3. Is AJ 5-6 points worse than Andy? I don't think so. This kid is a proven winner. He is 2-1 and played the best half at Denver I've seen for a long while from any QB. They have adjusted their offense to him, playing conservative, get Hill/Bernard into the game along with some wildcat looks for Sanu and let McCarron make some throws to exploit mismatches this great receiving corps can create. They are playing at home, have an overall great team on both sides of the ball, top-5 OL, 2nd best scoring defense, deep secondary. This is a favorable setup when having a playoff home game.

    The Steelers are just not the same. Can they prove me wrong? Yeah of course but I don't see it by now. Ben has 21TD and 16INT in about 12 games this season. There is a reason he was so "bad". Le'Veon Bell was a HUGE loss for this offense because of his pass-catching ability. He is a whole dimension for this offense. Martavis Bryant had some issues here and there and he struggled down the stretch. Now De'Angelo Williams who stepped in as a very good backup for Bell by averaging 4.5 YPC, is down. Against this defense, the Steelers desperately need to get their run game going to get Bryant & ABrown in man coverage or soft zone spots. I just can't see Tussaint, Todman and Johnson running the show. Look what the Steelers did vs. the Browns without a running game. And the Bengals' front seven is 5 levels superior than the Browns'. The Patriots can win without running the ball a single time but can the Steelers? Brown was targeted 13.2 times over the final 6 weeks. Without stacking the box, the Bengals can show some more nickle looks and contain Brown over the top with a safety. Not to mention the best pass-rushing tandem in Dunlap and Atkins who will have more time because the Steelers will face some more 3rd and longs than they would like to.

    Overall, I have not wasted a single thought in taking the Steelers. Lewis will get his first playoff win with the Bengals and then Dalton comes back from injury and gets his a*s kicked by a Pats team that is on 4 weeks of rest. The Steelers front seven is pretty good/solid but the secondary is still below average and they should get torched here and there. Still undecided whether to make it a big play. Depends on the final line I will get.
    Reply
    Quote Post
    0
    Report User
    Cincinnati Bengals +3 or ML

    Here is what I've written about Cincy and AJ McCarron before the season: https://www.covers.com/postingforum/post01/showmessage.aspx?spt=21&sub=102156091

    And after 16 games they have shown they are a very good Football team. Overall they are the better team than the Steelers. Lewis has not won a playoff game with them but they never had the personnel or matchup they have this time. So the only reason to go against them would be AJ McCarron for me, but is he a downgrade over Andy Dalton? The reason the Bengals are +3 at home is because its AJ vs. Ben. With Andy it would probably be Bengals -2.5 or -3. Is AJ 5-6 points worse than Andy? I don't think so. This kid is a proven winner. He is 2-1 and played the best half at Denver I've seen for a long while from any QB. They have adjusted their offense to him, playing conservative, get Hill/Bernard into the game along with some wildcat looks for Sanu and let McCarron make some throws to exploit mismatches this great receiving corps can create. They are playing at home, have an overall great team on both sides of the ball, top-5 OL, 2nd best scoring defense, deep secondary. This is a favorable setup when having a playoff home game.

    The Steelers are just not the same. Can they prove me wrong? Yeah of course but I don't see it by now. Ben has 21TD and 16INT in about 12 games this season. There is a reason he was so "bad". Le'Veon Bell was a HUGE loss for this offense because of his pass-catching ability. He is a whole dimension for this offense. Martavis Bryant had some issues here and there and he struggled down the stretch. Now De'Angelo Williams who stepped in as a very good backup for Bell by averaging 4.5 YPC, is down. Against this defense, the Steelers desperately need to get their run game going to get Bryant & ABrown in man coverage or soft zone spots. I just can't see Tussaint, Todman and Johnson running the show. Look what the Steelers did vs. the Browns without a running game. And the Bengals' front seven is 5 levels superior than the Browns'. The Patriots can win without running the ball a single time but can the Steelers? Brown was targeted 13.2 times over the final 6 weeks. Without stacking the box, the Bengals can show some more nickle looks and contain Brown over the top with a safety. Not to mention the best pass-rushing tandem in Dunlap and Atkins who will have more time because the Steelers will face some more 3rd and longs than they would like to.

    Overall, I have not wasted a single thought in taking the Steelers. Lewis will get his first playoff win with the Bengals and then Dalton comes back from injury and gets his a*s kicked by a Pats team that is on 4 weeks of rest. The Steelers front seven is pretty good/solid but the secondary is still below average and they should get torched here and there. Still undecided whether to make it a big play. Depends on the final line I will get.
     
    roastedpeanuts
    roastedpeanuts
    Rookie
    Participation Meter
    Joined: Nov, 2013
    Posts: 632
    Posted: Jan. 7, 2016 - 3:05 PM ET #23

    Winning the division was a massive deal for the Vikings.  Green Bay had owned that division.  See a sense of accomplishment no matter what happens.  Hey at least we won the division.  First playoff game for Teddy and company, Zim hasn't won a playoff game as a coach since 1996 with cowboys and been in the league every year since. Seattle veteran tough nosed bunch, def not as good as last year but def good enough to beat Minny.  
    Reply
    Quote Post
    0
    Report User
    Winning the division was a massive deal for the Vikings.  Green Bay had owned that division.  See a sense of accomplishment no matter what happens.  Hey at least we won the division.  First playoff game for Teddy and company, Zim hasn't won a playoff game as a coach since 1996 with cowboys and been in the league every year since. Seattle veteran tough nosed bunch, def not as good as last year but def good enough to beat Minny.  
     
    Moonstormsnow
    Moonstormsnow
    Veteran
    Participation Meter
    Joined: Sep, 2015
    Posts: 2096
    Posted: Jan. 7, 2016 - 5:48 PM ET #24

    On both of those Summa... GL throughout the playoffs sir 
    Reply
    Quote Post
    0
    Report User
    On both of those Summa... GL throughout the playoffs sir 
     
     
    MRxKrazz
    MRxKrazz
    Banned
    Participation Meter
    Joined: Dec, 2006
    Posts: 11486
    Posted: Jan. 7, 2016 - 5:56 PM ET #25

    Lets get them during the playoffs!! 
    Reply
    Quote Post
    0
    Report User
    Lets get them during the playoffs!! 
    All Forums | NFL Betting Forum
    1234 Next Last»

    Hot Forums IconHot Forum Topics

    • 🤢🥴💩_ Fubah's risky baseball bets _🥶😲🥵 447,543 Covers arrow
    • Tuesday 09/15/2026 643 Covers arrow
    • 🏈🏈🏈 Fubah2's risky CFB bets 257,332 Covers arrow
    • PART DEUX 265 Covers arrow
    • Couple Beers 3,785 Covers arrow
    • Tuesday 3,106 Covers arrow
    • Trump lies so much. 20,682 Covers arrow
    • Obviously the true face of the republican party 31,196 Covers arrow
    • Another looney Trump comment today. 11,550 Covers arrow
    • What damage to America does the traitor and his party plan for the rest of the year.? 25,632 Covers arrow

    Warning - External Link

    Report User

    Thank you for reporting
    This content is abusive or harmful
    This post is spam
    An error has occurred
    This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.

    Delete Post

    Are you sure you would like to remove this post?

    Remove Thread

    Are you sure you would like to remove this thread?

    Scan Results

    Login/Register

    Happy to have you join the conversation. To do so, please login or create an account.
    Accounts are free and easy to create.

    Search


    Loading…

    Loading…

    About Us
    Contact Us
    Careers
    Our Team
    Brand
    Testimonials
    Betting Guides
    Sportsbook Reviews
    Betting News
    Podcasts
    Responsible Gambling
    Betting Sites
    US Betting Sites
    Canada Betting Sites
    Canada Casinos
    Best Betting Apps
    Contests
    Streak Survivor
    King of Covers
    Ultimate Race
    Office Pools
    The Covers community has
    810,221
    lifetime members worldwide
    Join our community today
    Covers 30 Years Logo Established in 1995,
    Covers is the world
    leader in sports
    betting information.
    21+
    Gambling problem? Call 1-800-GAMBLER
    Help Privacy Terms of Service Cookies Sitemap Forum
    YouTube logo
    Facebook logo
    Twitter logo
    Instagram logo
    LinkedIn logo
    Google News logo
    Covers is verified safe by:
    Evalon Logo Logo GPWA Logo GDPR logo Logo GeoTrust logo Logo PCI DSS logo Logo
    Copyright © 1995 - 2026 CS Media Ltd. All Rights Reserved.
    If you choose to make use of any information on this website including online sports betting services from any websites that may be featured on this website, we strongly recommend that you carefully check your local laws before doing so.It is your sole responsibility to understand your local laws and observe them strictly.Covers does not provide any advice or guidance as to the legality of online sports betting or other online gambling activities within your jurisdiction and you are responsible for complying with laws that are applicable to you in your relevant locality.Covers disclaims all liability associated with your use of this website and use of any information contained on it.As a condition of using this website, you agree to hold the owner of this website harmless from any claims arising from your use of any services on any third party website that may be featured by Covers.