The seahawks have 3 loses, 1 of them are against brock purdy. But this dude...... duhhhh i wana see how he does against contenders lol
Good question. Personally I think its a down year for QB's in the league overall. Elite QB's in the league?
Mahomes
Stafford
Outside of that I wouldn't have anyone else in the category.
Good question. Personally I think its a down year for QB's in the league overall. Elite QB's in the league?
Mahomes
Stafford
Outside of that I wouldn't have anyone else in the category.
Stafford just hung 37 on Seattle in Seattle with no turnovers. Whats your point?
Stafford just hung 37 on Seattle in Seattle with no turnovers. Whats your point?
No they are not.
No they are not.
Your hilarious " he was great on the last drive of the game". Yup. lets forget the mediocre play the other 95% of the game. Oh and that was when San Fran was completely healthy on defense and held Seattle in check on offense
And then he beat a bunch of 3 win teams. He is amazing!
Oh he played poor against Jacksonville. Lets use all the injury excuses possible. Don't call a spade a spade that he had 5 turnovers in the first 2 games of the season for Purdy.
You can scream like a child as much as you want, he has not earned the title elite in this league. Now take off the 49ers jersey and enjoy the rest of your monday.
Your hilarious " he was great on the last drive of the game". Yup. lets forget the mediocre play the other 95% of the game. Oh and that was when San Fran was completely healthy on defense and held Seattle in check on offense
And then he beat a bunch of 3 win teams. He is amazing!
Oh he played poor against Jacksonville. Lets use all the injury excuses possible. Don't call a spade a spade that he had 5 turnovers in the first 2 games of the season for Purdy.
You can scream like a child as much as you want, he has not earned the title elite in this league. Now take off the 49ers jersey and enjoy the rest of your monday.
And yet they lost lol. Stafford is also a top mvp candidate and hall of famer, no1 is saying he isnt great ha. So that makes brock beating them less impressive??
And yet they lost lol. Stafford is also a top mvp candidate and hall of famer, no1 is saying he isnt great ha. So that makes brock beating them less impressive??
@AJ86
Purdy faced four teams that might be considered 'contenders' -- as in potential playoff teams.
The JAX game has been discussed already about his toe, etc. But even included it shows a disparity.
SEA - Purdy a 84 QBR vs Darnold 51
JAX Purdy 56 vs Lawrence 66
IND Purdy 89 vs Rivers 51
CH Purdy 85 vs Williams 71
So, Purdy avg in those games 78.5 vs 59.75
Essentially he outplayed them by ~24%
I am not sure that is the correct way to do it either.
Just comparing how he did vs 'contenders' does not consider game situation or team's defenses.
For example, a team may not be a contender but have a very good defense or just an elite pass defense.
![]()
@AJ86
Purdy faced four teams that might be considered 'contenders' -- as in potential playoff teams.
The JAX game has been discussed already about his toe, etc. But even included it shows a disparity.
SEA - Purdy a 84 QBR vs Darnold 51
JAX Purdy 56 vs Lawrence 66
IND Purdy 89 vs Rivers 51
CH Purdy 85 vs Williams 71
So, Purdy avg in those games 78.5 vs 59.75
Essentially he outplayed them by ~24%
I am not sure that is the correct way to do it either.
Just comparing how he did vs 'contenders' does not consider game situation or team's defenses.
For example, a team may not be a contender but have a very good defense or just an elite pass defense.
![]()
I think you have to include Burrow and Allen. Jackson still is when not injured.
So, the question is what QBs do you think are between Purdy and that group?
![]()
I think you have to include Burrow and Allen. Jackson still is when not injured.
So, the question is what QBs do you think are between Purdy and that group?
![]()
@AJ86
Wait so being perfect 7 for 7 on a game winning drive in a clutch situation doesn't matter because he didnt light up the statsheet??? This dude is a fn clown lol. But sure, keep bringing up the Jacksonville game and acting like your making a point
@AJ86
Wait so being perfect 7 for 7 on a game winning drive in a clutch situation doesn't matter because he didnt light up the statsheet??? This dude is a fn clown lol. But sure, keep bringing up the Jacksonville game and acting like your making a point
Okay so clearly your anger is still getting the best of you.
So just so I understand your point. We can accept his last drive against Seattle but we can disregard the other 95% of the game and completely ignore his performance against Jacksonville. Thanks for clarifying. I appreciate it.
Okay so clearly your anger is still getting the best of you.
So just so I understand your point. We can accept his last drive against Seattle but we can disregard the other 95% of the game and completely ignore his performance against Jacksonville. Thanks for clarifying. I appreciate it.
Ummmmm....
Drake Maye has entered the conversation fellas.
I'm no football guru, and I don't have my own utube channel dissecting QB play.
But you can't tell me that there isn't a more difficult QB to defend than Drake Maye. I've watched plenty of his games this year, and the eye test translates to the #'s.
#4 in true passer rating
#1 in qbr
#1 in epa
#1 in explosive plays
#1 in true completion percentage
#3 in pressured completion percentage
#6 in blitzed completion percentage
#2 completion % vs man coverage
#2 completion % vs zone coverage
The last 4 in bold are quite impressive. From a defensive perspective, how the hell do you defend him?
On top of all that, his wr's have only gotten 1.91 yards of target separation this year. That's terrible. He is throwing guys open, and threading the needle on a regular basis.
He is "it", 100% in my eyes.
Ummmmm....
Drake Maye has entered the conversation fellas.
I'm no football guru, and I don't have my own utube channel dissecting QB play.
But you can't tell me that there isn't a more difficult QB to defend than Drake Maye. I've watched plenty of his games this year, and the eye test translates to the #'s.
#4 in true passer rating
#1 in qbr
#1 in epa
#1 in explosive plays
#1 in true completion percentage
#3 in pressured completion percentage
#6 in blitzed completion percentage
#2 completion % vs man coverage
#2 completion % vs zone coverage
The last 4 in bold are quite impressive. From a defensive perspective, how the hell do you defend him?
On top of all that, his wr's have only gotten 1.91 yards of target separation this year. That's terrible. He is throwing guys open, and threading the needle on a regular basis.
He is "it", 100% in my eyes.
@jdmoney14
He's good I'll give you that. But not sure about being a stud. Would he be this good w/o number 23 lining up behind him? Now that's the stud on this team.
@jdmoney14
He's good I'll give you that. But not sure about being a stud. Would he be this good w/o number 23 lining up behind him? Now that's the stud on this team.
Personally I think the word "elite" is thrown around wayyyyy to much these days. Like you think during the Brady era, it was Brady, Manning and Rodgers. No one else was ever part of that category. Nowadays we need to place 5-10 players in it. Elite to me means year over year success both on the stat sheet and in the win column. Purdy has what? 1 Pro Bowl? 0 All Pro's? And we are going to place him in that category?
I can't really rank them this year. QB play has been so inconsistent really. Lamar, Allen, Burrow have all been average. Trevor Lawrence has had a solid season. Is it a flash in the pan? Drake Maye - where will he be next year with his progression? Same goes with Caleb Williams. I don't believe the hype with Dak. He loves to feast on garbage teams but when he plays good squads he is non-existent. Justin Herbert is hard to gauge because he never has an offensive line but still plays well. Just look at last year. Jayden Daniels looked great. This year he was average.
So ya you can put purdy in that group of QB's I guess. Just not elite.
Personally I think the word "elite" is thrown around wayyyyy to much these days. Like you think during the Brady era, it was Brady, Manning and Rodgers. No one else was ever part of that category. Nowadays we need to place 5-10 players in it. Elite to me means year over year success both on the stat sheet and in the win column. Purdy has what? 1 Pro Bowl? 0 All Pro's? And we are going to place him in that category?
I can't really rank them this year. QB play has been so inconsistent really. Lamar, Allen, Burrow have all been average. Trevor Lawrence has had a solid season. Is it a flash in the pan? Drake Maye - where will he be next year with his progression? Same goes with Caleb Williams. I don't believe the hype with Dak. He loves to feast on garbage teams but when he plays good squads he is non-existent. Justin Herbert is hard to gauge because he never has an offensive line but still plays well. Just look at last year. Jayden Daniels looked great. This year he was average.
So ya you can put purdy in that group of QB's I guess. Just not elite.
@AJ86
Again with the Jacksonville game haha! So lets poo poo his 7 wins- he didnt beat Seattle good enough, Colts stink, bears stink(even tho they were 11-4), cards stink, titans stink, browns defense stinks(even tho they're #2 in the nfl with the future all time sack leader which purdy masterfully avoided all day), panthers stink. But lets keep harping on that 1 game in September where he couldn't plant his foot. Got it!
@AJ86
Again with the Jacksonville game haha! So lets poo poo his 7 wins- he didnt beat Seattle good enough, Colts stink, bears stink(even tho they were 11-4), cards stink, titans stink, browns defense stinks(even tho they're #2 in the nfl with the future all time sack leader which purdy masterfully avoided all day), panthers stink. But lets keep harping on that 1 game in September where he couldn't plant his foot. Got it!
Yea hes the only qb in the history with a stud rb lol. Is Burrow only good because if his top tier weapons? Is Stafford only good because of his? Or do we only use this excuse with purdy?
Yea hes the only qb in the history with a stud rb lol. Is Burrow only good because if his top tier weapons? Is Stafford only good because of his? Or do we only use this excuse with purdy?
Sweetheart, did you not post this?
Wait so being perfect 7 for 7 on a game winning drive in a clutch situation doesn't matter because he didnt light up the statsheet???
You keep bringing up 1 drive. I am talking about the other 19 (which you disregard).
And no. I am not looking at the teams that are a combined 37-59 on the year.
You sound like Cowboy's fans justifying Dak being elite.
Sweetheart, did you not post this?
Wait so being perfect 7 for 7 on a game winning drive in a clutch situation doesn't matter because he didnt light up the statsheet???
You keep bringing up 1 drive. I am talking about the other 19 (which you disregard).
And no. I am not looking at the teams that are a combined 37-59 on the year.
You sound like Cowboy's fans justifying Dak being elite.
If Purdy is this good, why has he never been an MVP candidate?
If Purdy is this good, why has he never been an MVP candidate?
@AJ86
The word 'elite' may be thrown around too much. But 'all-time great' would apply to those others you mentioned.
An 'elite' to me is a legitimate long-time franchise starter that even has a legitimate shot at the HoF. You can include Rivers, Luck, Ryan, Brees, Wilson, Roethlisberger, and even Cousins at times, and even Prescott now.
It is hard to use the word 'elite' to be just the QBs that can be included in an all-time top 10 list.
These QBs, are QBs that you are simply 'not answering the phone' about a trade for them. They are your starter and franchise guy.
So, I think most years you should have 5-6-7 guys in it.
It is not asking if they are an all-time great. Every year will not have a Brady, Rodgers, or Manning playing at the same time.
![]()
@AJ86
The word 'elite' may be thrown around too much. But 'all-time great' would apply to those others you mentioned.
An 'elite' to me is a legitimate long-time franchise starter that even has a legitimate shot at the HoF. You can include Rivers, Luck, Ryan, Brees, Wilson, Roethlisberger, and even Cousins at times, and even Prescott now.
It is hard to use the word 'elite' to be just the QBs that can be included in an all-time top 10 list.
These QBs, are QBs that you are simply 'not answering the phone' about a trade for them. They are your starter and franchise guy.
So, I think most years you should have 5-6-7 guys in it.
It is not asking if they are an all-time great. Every year will not have a Brady, Rodgers, or Manning playing at the same time.
![]()
@AJ86
I look at the body of work over their career to determine this.
This is not to say they cannot have a great year or two.
In other words, Burrow, Jackson and Allen have all been injured but are still elite to me.
@AJ86
I look at the body of work over their career to determine this.
This is not to say they cannot have a great year or two.
In other words, Burrow, Jackson and Allen have all been injured but are still elite to me.
He literally was an mvp candidate in 2023 you bozo! He was 3rd in mvp voting, which is considered an mvp candidate. His 8 game pace would also have put him in mvp discussions if he played a full year, but he wouldn't have topped Stafford or maye
He literally was an mvp candidate in 2023 you bozo! He was 3rd in mvp voting, which is considered an mvp candidate. His 8 game pace would also have put him in mvp discussions if he played a full year, but he wouldn't have topped Stafford or maye
@AJ86
Consider that Purdy leads the league in QBR with 77.6
He is 1st in PE/Play at .262
He is 1st in Positive% plays at 55.4%
He is 1st in Boom% plays at 35.9%
He is 4th in Bust% plays at 16.5%
The only other QB in the top 5 in the last two categories is Stafford.
I think this year Purdy is playing at an 'eite' level and that his career has him on a clear path to being a great franchise QB.
![]()
@AJ86
Consider that Purdy leads the league in QBR with 77.6
He is 1st in PE/Play at .262
He is 1st in Positive% plays at 55.4%
He is 1st in Boom% plays at 35.9%
He is 4th in Bust% plays at 16.5%
The only other QB in the top 5 in the last two categories is Stafford.
I think this year Purdy is playing at an 'eite' level and that his career has him on a clear path to being a great franchise QB.
![]()
Exactly. I've brought up purdy leading the nfl in qbr, but he conveniently ignores it every time and brings up the Jaguars game lol
Exactly. I've brought up purdy leading the nfl in qbr, but he conveniently ignores it every time and brings up the Jaguars game lol
Yes, every QB will have a bad game or two.
That is why I pointed out even Stafford had a 26 QBR and Darnold a 25 QBR against CAR and Purdy had a 51 QBR against them.
I get that some folks do not want to like certain QBs or think they are great. Brady had detractors, Mahomes does, Manning did, Jackson and Allen do, Burrow does.
But overall, most reasonable football folks acknowledge these guys are very good QBs.
But when the eye-test and the numbers reflect it, it becomes hard to deny it.
Purdy will always have a knock for being last-drafted and on the smaller size. But some things are inherently built-in that cannot be coached. Add that to the things that some folks are easily coachable on -- and you have an elite QB to me.
![]()
Yes, every QB will have a bad game or two.
That is why I pointed out even Stafford had a 26 QBR and Darnold a 25 QBR against CAR and Purdy had a 51 QBR against them.
I get that some folks do not want to like certain QBs or think they are great. Brady had detractors, Mahomes does, Manning did, Jackson and Allen do, Burrow does.
But overall, most reasonable football folks acknowledge these guys are very good QBs.
But when the eye-test and the numbers reflect it, it becomes hard to deny it.
Purdy will always have a knock for being last-drafted and on the smaller size. But some things are inherently built-in that cannot be coached. Add that to the things that some folks are easily coachable on -- and you have an elite QB to me.
![]()
Just keep going in circles eh? As usual you cherry pick. I bring up the entire Seattle game and the entire Jags game. You bring up the 1 drive vs Seattle and when they played the 4-12 Browns. Clearly there is a disconnect.
Purdy missed the Rams 2 games, and Houston game. Those would have been better measuring stick games.
Just keep going in circles eh? As usual you cherry pick. I bring up the entire Seattle game and the entire Jags game. You bring up the 1 drive vs Seattle and when they played the 4-12 Browns. Clearly there is a disconnect.
Purdy missed the Rams 2 games, and Houston game. Those would have been better measuring stick games.
Well said, and good posts
. It certainly becomes hard to deny, but some people will still try to find a way to lol. I mean afterall, he only beat the 13-3 seahawks by a few points and didn't fill up the box score!!!
Well said, and good posts
. It certainly becomes hard to deny, but some people will still try to find a way to lol. I mean afterall, he only beat the 13-3 seahawks by a few points and didn't fill up the box score!!!

If you choose to make use of any information on this website including online sports betting services from any websites that may be featured on this website, we strongly recommend that you carefully check your local laws before doing so.It is your sole responsibility to understand your local laws and observe them strictly.Covers does not provide any advice or guidance as to the legality of online sports betting or other online gambling activities within your jurisdiction and you are responsible for complying with laws that are applicable to you in your relevant locality.Covers disclaims all liability associated with your use of this website and use of any information contained on it.As a condition of using this website, you agree to hold the owner of this website harmless from any claims arising from your use of any services on any third party website that may be featured by Covers.