Now take the top 10 teams in yards per attempt and compare. If you can do better than 8 out of 10 playoff teams (including both super bowl teams in the top 3) then that stat is a better predictor.
I very much doubt you can though
He is not saying his stat equals wins or superbowl rings....but he gave a stat that was 410- 102, yes 410-102 ATS the spread last season!!!! That is insane.....and it is 38-10 this year ATS!!!
How can you not pay attention to that??? 38-10 ATS the spread already....youhave to give it some props...you have to start factoring it and try to take advantage of it unless the trend quickly stops....but seeing it went 80% ALL of last season and is already over 75% right now, I dont think you can argue it....
Sure turnover usually determine who wins the game, but can you say before the game starts who turns the ball over??? No....but before the game you can know who has more yards per pass attempt....
This stat is crazy, and I am going to try to take advantage of using it...
Now take the top 10 teams in yards per attempt and compare. If you can do better than 8 out of 10 playoff teams (including both super bowl teams in the top 3) then that stat is a better predictor.
I very much doubt you can though
He is not saying his stat equals wins or superbowl rings....but he gave a stat that was 410- 102, yes 410-102 ATS the spread last season!!!! That is insane.....and it is 38-10 this year ATS!!!
How can you not pay attention to that??? 38-10 ATS the spread already....youhave to give it some props...you have to start factoring it and try to take advantage of it unless the trend quickly stops....but seeing it went 80% ALL of last season and is already over 75% right now, I dont think you can argue it....
Sure turnover usually determine who wins the game, but can you say before the game starts who turns the ball over??? No....but before the game you can know who has more yards per pass attempt....
This stat is crazy, and I am going to try to take advantage of using it...
For Example:
Teams with a positive turnover differential have gone 33-3 all-time in the Super Bowl
That's wins and losses. Not covers. Plenty of SB winners didn't cover.
Far greater than the record of teams who had the higher number of yards per pass/reception.
For Example:
Teams with a positive turnover differential have gone 33-3 all-time in the Super Bowl
That's wins and losses. Not covers. Plenty of SB winners didn't cover.
Far greater than the record of teams who had the higher number of yards per pass/reception.
Yes, 8 of the 45 winners to be exact. That means 82% of the time the winner DID cover
Far greater than the record of teams who had the higher number of yards per pass/reception.
So, I am pretty sure you are wrong. You shouldn't assume things, it can make you look foolish
Yes, 8 of the 45 winners to be exact. That means 82% of the time the winner DID cover
Far greater than the record of teams who had the higher number of yards per pass/reception.
So, I am pretty sure you are wrong. You shouldn't assume things, it can make you look foolish
If you choose to make use of any information on this website including online sports betting services from any websites that may be featured on this website, we strongly recommend that you carefully check your local laws before doing so.It is your sole responsibility to understand your local laws and observe them strictly.Covers does not provide any advice or guidance as to the legality of online sports betting or other online gambling activities within your jurisdiction and you are responsible for complying with laws that are applicable to you in your relevant locality.Covers disclaims all liability associated with your use of this website and use of any information contained on it.As a condition of using this website, you agree to hold the owner of this website harmless from any claims arising from your use of any services on any third party website that may be featured by Covers.