***HUGE AFC CHAMPIONSHIP PLAY ON THE PATRIOTS VS RAVENS GAME***
Harbaugh said before last weeks Texans game, I think we can win up in New England next week knowing he was not gonna play his team hard last week & knowing he would win the game.............Flacco & the Ravens defense are gonna go to work on the Patriots like its 2009...............
the ravens didnt play hard last week because they were anticipating the pats?
and they were coming off a well-rested by?
how in earth are you comapring the 2009 pats with the 2011 pats?
no welker, no hernandez, no gronk.
thats almost 80 percent of their offense.
WTF?
Harbaugh said before last weeks Texans game, I think we can win up in New England next week knowing he was not gonna play his team hard last week & knowing he would win the game.............Flacco & the Ravens defense are gonna go to work on the Patriots like its 2009...............
the ravens didnt play hard last week because they were anticipating the pats?
and they were coming off a well-rested by?
how in earth are you comapring the 2009 pats with the 2011 pats?
no welker, no hernandez, no gronk.
thats almost 80 percent of their offense.
WTF?
AFC CHAMPIONSHIP RESULTS 2010 PITTSBURGH (-3½) 24 - N.Y. Jets 19..............FAV 2009 INDIANAPOLIS (-8) 30 - N.Y. Jets 17...............FAV 2008 PITTSBURGH (-6) 23 - Baltimore 14.................FAV 2007 NEW ENGLAND (-13½) 21 - San Diego 12........UND 2006 INDIANAPOLIS (-3) 38 - New England 34..........FAV 2005 Pittsburgh (+3) 34 - DENVER 17.......................UND(out) 2004 New England (+3) 41 - PITTSBURGH 27...........UND(out) 2003 NEW ENGLAND (-3) 24 - Indianapolis 14...........FAV 2002 OAKLAND (-8) 41 - Tennessee 24.....................FAV 2001 New England (+10) 24 - PITTSBURGH 17..........UND(out) 2000 Baltimore (+6) 16 - OAKLAND 3........................UND(out) 1999 Tennessee (+7) 33 - JACKSONVILLE 14...........UND(out) 1998 DENVER (-9) 23 - N.Y. Jets 10.........................FAV 1997 Denver (-2½) 24 - PITTSBURGH 21..................FAV 1996 NEW ENGLAND (-7) 20 - Jacksonville 6............FAV 1995 PITTSBURGH (-11½) 20 - Indianapolis 16.........UND 1994 San Diego (+9) 17 - PITTSBURGH 13...............UND(out) 1993 BUFFALO (-3) 30 - Kansas City 13....................FAV 1992 Buffalo (-2½) 29 - MIAMI 10..............................FAV 1991 BUFFALO (-11½) 10 - Denver 7.........................UND since 1990-91 when nfl went to 12 team playoff format |
AFC CHAMPIONSHIP RESULTS 2010 PITTSBURGH (-3½) 24 - N.Y. Jets 19..............FAV 2009 INDIANAPOLIS (-8) 30 - N.Y. Jets 17...............FAV 2008 PITTSBURGH (-6) 23 - Baltimore 14.................FAV 2007 NEW ENGLAND (-13½) 21 - San Diego 12........UND 2006 INDIANAPOLIS (-3) 38 - New England 34..........FAV 2005 Pittsburgh (+3) 34 - DENVER 17.......................UND(out) 2004 New England (+3) 41 - PITTSBURGH 27...........UND(out) 2003 NEW ENGLAND (-3) 24 - Indianapolis 14...........FAV 2002 OAKLAND (-8) 41 - Tennessee 24.....................FAV 2001 New England (+10) 24 - PITTSBURGH 17..........UND(out) 2000 Baltimore (+6) 16 - OAKLAND 3........................UND(out) 1999 Tennessee (+7) 33 - JACKSONVILLE 14...........UND(out) 1998 DENVER (-9) 23 - N.Y. Jets 10.........................FAV 1997 Denver (-2½) 24 - PITTSBURGH 21..................FAV 1996 NEW ENGLAND (-7) 20 - Jacksonville 6............FAV 1995 PITTSBURGH (-11½) 20 - Indianapolis 16.........UND 1994 San Diego (+9) 17 - PITTSBURGH 13...............UND(out) 1993 BUFFALO (-3) 30 - Kansas City 13....................FAV 1992 Buffalo (-2½) 29 - MIAMI 10..............................FAV 1991 BUFFALO (-11½) 10 - Denver 7.........................UND since 1990-91 when nfl went to 12 team playoff format |
| NFC CHAMPIONSHIP RESULTS 2010 Green Bay (-3½) 21 - CHICAGO 14....................FAV 2009 NEW ORLEANS (-3½) 31 - Minnesota 28 (OT)....UND 2008 ARIZONA (+3½) 30 - Philadelphia 25.................UND(out) 2007 N. Y. Giants (+7½) 23 - GREEN BAY 20 (OT).....UND(out) 2006 CHICAGO (-2½) 39 - New Orleans 14.................FAV 2005 SEATTLE (-3½) 34 - Carolina 14........................FAV 2004 PHILADELPHIA (-5½) 27 - Atlanta 10.................FAV 2003 Carolina (+4) 14 - PHILADELPHIA 3...................UND(out) 2002 Tampa Bay (+4) 27 - PHILADELPHIA 10............UND(out) 2001 ST. LOUIS (-10½) 29 - Philadelphia 24...............UND 2000 N.Y. GIANTS (+2½) 41 - Minnesota 0................UND(out) 1999 ST. LOUIS (-14) 11 - Tampa Bay 6....................UND 1998 Atlanta (+11) 30 - MINNESOTA 27 (OT).............UND(out) 1997 Green Bay (-2½) 23 - SAN FRANCISCO 10........FAV 1996 GREEN BAY (-12½) 30 - Carolina 13.................FAV 1995 DALLAS (-8½) 38 - Green Bay 27......................FAV 1994 SAN FRANCISCO (-7½) 38 - Dallas 28..............FAV 1993 DALLAS (-3½) 38 - San Francisco 21................FAV 1992 Dallas (+4) 30 - SAN FRANCISCO 20...............UND(out) 1991 WASHINGTON (-13½) 41 - Detroit 10................FAV |
| NFC CHAMPIONSHIP RESULTS 2010 Green Bay (-3½) 21 - CHICAGO 14....................FAV 2009 NEW ORLEANS (-3½) 31 - Minnesota 28 (OT)....UND 2008 ARIZONA (+3½) 30 - Philadelphia 25.................UND(out) 2007 N. Y. Giants (+7½) 23 - GREEN BAY 20 (OT).....UND(out) 2006 CHICAGO (-2½) 39 - New Orleans 14.................FAV 2005 SEATTLE (-3½) 34 - Carolina 14........................FAV 2004 PHILADELPHIA (-5½) 27 - Atlanta 10.................FAV 2003 Carolina (+4) 14 - PHILADELPHIA 3...................UND(out) 2002 Tampa Bay (+4) 27 - PHILADELPHIA 10............UND(out) 2001 ST. LOUIS (-10½) 29 - Philadelphia 24...............UND 2000 N.Y. GIANTS (+2½) 41 - Minnesota 0................UND(out) 1999 ST. LOUIS (-14) 11 - Tampa Bay 6....................UND 1998 Atlanta (+11) 30 - MINNESOTA 27 (OT).............UND(out) 1997 Green Bay (-2½) 23 - SAN FRANCISCO 10........FAV 1996 GREEN BAY (-12½) 30 - Carolina 13.................FAV 1995 DALLAS (-8½) 38 - Green Bay 27......................FAV 1994 SAN FRANCISCO (-7½) 38 - Dallas 28..............FAV 1993 DALLAS (-3½) 38 - San Francisco 21................FAV 1992 Dallas (+4) 30 - SAN FRANCISCO 20...............UND(out) 1991 WASHINGTON (-13½) 41 - Detroit 10................FAV |
AFC CHAMPIONSHIP RESULTS 2010 PITTSBURGH (-3½) 24 - N.Y. Jets 19..............FAV 2009 INDIANAPOLIS (-8) 30 - N.Y. Jets 17...............FAV 2008 PITTSBURGH (-6) 23 - Baltimore 14.................FAV 2007 NEW ENGLAND (-13½) 21 - San Diego 12........UND 2006 INDIANAPOLIS (-3) 38 - New England 34..........FAV 2005 Pittsburgh (+3) 34 - DENVER 17.......................UND(out) 2004 New England (+3) 41 - PITTSBURGH 27...........UND(out) 2003 NEW ENGLAND (-3) 24 - Indianapolis 14...........FAV 2002 OAKLAND (-8) 41 - Tennessee 24.....................FAV 2001 New England (+10) 24 - PITTSBURGH 17..........UND(out) 2000 Baltimore (+6) 16 - OAKLAND 3........................UND(out) 1999 Tennessee (+7) 33 - JACKSONVILLE 14...........UND(out) 1998 DENVER (-9) 23 - N.Y. Jets 10.........................FAV 1997 Denver (-2½) 24 - PITTSBURGH 21..................FAV 1996 NEW ENGLAND (-7) 20 - Jacksonville 6............FAV 1995 PITTSBURGH (-11½) 20 - Indianapolis 16.........UND 1994 San Diego (+9) 17 - PITTSBURGH 13...............UND(out) 1993 BUFFALO (-3) 30 - Kansas City 13....................FAV 1992 Buffalo (-2½) 29 - MIAMI 10..............................FAV 1991 BUFFALO (-11½) 10 - Denver 7.........................UND since 1990-91 when nfl went to 12 team playoff format |
AFC CHAMPIONSHIP RESULTS 2010 PITTSBURGH (-3½) 24 - N.Y. Jets 19..............FAV 2009 INDIANAPOLIS (-8) 30 - N.Y. Jets 17...............FAV 2008 PITTSBURGH (-6) 23 - Baltimore 14.................FAV 2007 NEW ENGLAND (-13½) 21 - San Diego 12........UND 2006 INDIANAPOLIS (-3) 38 - New England 34..........FAV 2005 Pittsburgh (+3) 34 - DENVER 17.......................UND(out) 2004 New England (+3) 41 - PITTSBURGH 27...........UND(out) 2003 NEW ENGLAND (-3) 24 - Indianapolis 14...........FAV 2002 OAKLAND (-8) 41 - Tennessee 24.....................FAV 2001 New England (+10) 24 - PITTSBURGH 17..........UND(out) 2000 Baltimore (+6) 16 - OAKLAND 3........................UND(out) 1999 Tennessee (+7) 33 - JACKSONVILLE 14...........UND(out) 1998 DENVER (-9) 23 - N.Y. Jets 10.........................FAV 1997 Denver (-2½) 24 - PITTSBURGH 21..................FAV 1996 NEW ENGLAND (-7) 20 - Jacksonville 6............FAV 1995 PITTSBURGH (-11½) 20 - Indianapolis 16.........UND 1994 San Diego (+9) 17 - PITTSBURGH 13...............UND(out) 1993 BUFFALO (-3) 30 - Kansas City 13....................FAV 1992 Buffalo (-2½) 29 - MIAMI 10..............................FAV 1991 BUFFALO (-11½) 10 - Denver 7.........................UND since 1990-91 when nfl went to 12 team playoff format |
| NFC CHAMPIONSHIP RESULTS 2010 Green Bay (-3½) 21 - CHICAGO 14....................FAV 2009 NEW ORLEANS (-3½) 31 - Minnesota 28 (OT)....UND 2008 ARIZONA (+3½) 30 - Philadelphia 25.................UND(out) 2007 N. Y. Giants (+7½) 23 - GREEN BAY 20 (OT).....UND(out) 2006 CHICAGO (-2½) 39 - New Orleans 14.................FAV 2005 SEATTLE (-3½) 34 - Carolina 14........................FAV 2004 PHILADELPHIA (-5½) 27 - Atlanta 10.................FAV 2003 Carolina (+4) 14 - PHILADELPHIA 3...................UND(out) 2002 Tampa Bay (+4) 27 - PHILADELPHIA 10............UND(out) 2001 ST. LOUIS (-10½) 29 - Philadelphia 24...............UND 2000 N.Y. GIANTS (+2½) 41 - Minnesota 0................UND(out) 1999 ST. LOUIS (-14) 11 - Tampa Bay 6....................UND 1998 Atlanta (+11) 30 - MINNESOTA 27 (OT).............UND(out) 1997 Green Bay (-2½) 23 - SAN FRANCISCO 10........FAV 1996 GREEN BAY (-12½) 30 - Carolina 13.................FAV 1995 DALLAS (-8½) 38 - Green Bay 27......................FAV 1994 SAN FRANCISCO (-7½) 38 - Dallas 28..............FAV 1993 DALLAS (-3½) 38 - San Francisco 21................FAV 1992 Dallas (+4) 30 - SAN FRANCISCO 20...............UND(out) 1991 WASHINGTON (-13½) 41 - Detroit 10................FAV |
| NFC CHAMPIONSHIP RESULTS 2010 Green Bay (-3½) 21 - CHICAGO 14....................FAV 2009 NEW ORLEANS (-3½) 31 - Minnesota 28 (OT)....UND 2008 ARIZONA (+3½) 30 - Philadelphia 25.................UND(out) 2007 N. Y. Giants (+7½) 23 - GREEN BAY 20 (OT).....UND(out) 2006 CHICAGO (-2½) 39 - New Orleans 14.................FAV 2005 SEATTLE (-3½) 34 - Carolina 14........................FAV 2004 PHILADELPHIA (-5½) 27 - Atlanta 10.................FAV 2003 Carolina (+4) 14 - PHILADELPHIA 3...................UND(out) 2002 Tampa Bay (+4) 27 - PHILADELPHIA 10............UND(out) 2001 ST. LOUIS (-10½) 29 - Philadelphia 24...............UND 2000 N.Y. GIANTS (+2½) 41 - Minnesota 0................UND(out) 1999 ST. LOUIS (-14) 11 - Tampa Bay 6....................UND 1998 Atlanta (+11) 30 - MINNESOTA 27 (OT).............UND(out) 1997 Green Bay (-2½) 23 - SAN FRANCISCO 10........FAV 1996 GREEN BAY (-12½) 30 - Carolina 13.................FAV 1995 DALLAS (-8½) 38 - Green Bay 27......................FAV 1994 SAN FRANCISCO (-7½) 38 - Dallas 28..............FAV 1993 DALLAS (-3½) 38 - San Francisco 21................FAV 1992 Dallas (+4) 30 - SAN FRANCISCO 20...............UND(out) 1991 WASHINGTON (-13½) 41 - Detroit 10................FAV |
This thread is absolutely hilarious...nothing better to read this garbage while taking a shit...keep it comin
This thread is absolutely hilarious...nothing better to read this garbage while taking a shit...keep it comin
take all your stats about past games teams seasons percentages white jersey black jersey rain snow and throw them in the garbage, this is one game with these two teams not any past teams and the better team will win which will be the pats and yes they will cover. you can find a hundred past stats to back every single team every single week, they mean shit. its one matchup between the two teams playing that week and the team that executes better wins plain and simple.
take all your stats about past games teams seasons percentages white jersey black jersey rain snow and throw them in the garbage, this is one game with these two teams not any past teams and the better team will win which will be the pats and yes they will cover. you can find a hundred past stats to back every single team every single week, they mean shit. its one matchup between the two teams playing that week and the team that executes better wins plain and simple.
Primetime name the corners for the Ravens? Do any of these guys compare to Revis? I hope im not sounding ignorant. Point being is I would consider this Ravens D as good against subpar teams. But against Brady I would tread lightly. Dont bet against a Michigan Man!
Primetime name the corners for the Ravens? Do any of these guys compare to Revis? I hope im not sounding ignorant. Point being is I would consider this Ravens D as good against subpar teams. But against Brady I would tread lightly. Dont bet against a Michigan Man!
no corner is as good as revis...so to compare to revis is just a very ignorant comment!!
I hope you can have brighter thoughts than these. Derelle Revis was made human this year because his TEAM made him that. The guy has amazing ability to lower his waist and react to a receiver and even fly on a deep route. This ability is rare. He get's tested when the opponent knows the whole defensive backfield relies on HIM!...ANY man would say, 'god damn it where's the help'!
The Jets' problems were deeper than this as we all know but lets get to the Ravens. Webb is a fine cover man he would'nt be in Baltimore if he were'nt - Jimmy Smith is appropriate for this game. The ROOKIE from Colorado which was considered by many to be the top corner in the draft is going to be asked to make plays. Hey, Tom Brady will ask him the same thing....
Ed Reed should be in the box as the Ravens' sack total resides in very precarious positions. That being said, why has their sack total declined so rapidly over the last few weeks?...Old men gettin tired?
Both teams probably are scared of eachother.
The fact that Belichick brought Josh McDaniels into this situation says something to Bill O'Briens answer when Belichick asked him if McDaniels could come back and make a difference; Apparantley, the answer is yes.
The Patriots' staff all rode together on the same wagon in 2007, and they have some redemption in their soules.
Pats 37-19
no corner is as good as revis...so to compare to revis is just a very ignorant comment!!
I hope you can have brighter thoughts than these. Derelle Revis was made human this year because his TEAM made him that. The guy has amazing ability to lower his waist and react to a receiver and even fly on a deep route. This ability is rare. He get's tested when the opponent knows the whole defensive backfield relies on HIM!...ANY man would say, 'god damn it where's the help'!
The Jets' problems were deeper than this as we all know but lets get to the Ravens. Webb is a fine cover man he would'nt be in Baltimore if he were'nt - Jimmy Smith is appropriate for this game. The ROOKIE from Colorado which was considered by many to be the top corner in the draft is going to be asked to make plays. Hey, Tom Brady will ask him the same thing....
Ed Reed should be in the box as the Ravens' sack total resides in very precarious positions. That being said, why has their sack total declined so rapidly over the last few weeks?...Old men gettin tired?
Both teams probably are scared of eachother.
The fact that Belichick brought Josh McDaniels into this situation says something to Bill O'Briens answer when Belichick asked him if McDaniels could come back and make a difference; Apparantley, the answer is yes.
The Patriots' staff all rode together on the same wagon in 2007, and they have some redemption in their soules.
Pats 37-19
Pats are on a Mission.
Pats are on a Mission.
Hot Forum Topics
-
🤢🥴💩_ Fubah's risky baseball bets _🥶😲🥵
445,961
-
🏈🏈🏈 “To BEt, or not to BEt, that is the question” ...Fubah2's risky bets
301,612
-
Wednesday 09/09/2026
824
-
PART DEUX
345
-
🏈🏈🏈 Fubah2's risky CFB bets
253,376
-
Patriots vs Seahawks in-game live season kickoff
1,399
-
9/9 🫣🫣🔥🔥🔥
4,502
-
Couple thoughts
4,001
-
PART TROIS
247
-
NFL LOCKED IN!
95,204
Warning - External Link
Report User
This post is spam
Delete Post
Remove Thread
Scan Results
Login/Register
Accounts are free and easy to create.
Search

Covers is the world
leader in sports
betting information.