Posted:
#51
Quote Originally Posted by Mick960:
GL mate. Have the same pick. Great thread!
0
How to Create Steady Monthly Income from Betting on Sports
Posted:
#55
Quote Originally Posted by powerade:
Call out the tout and watch the aliases come to hi addresses in droves.
Call out the tout and watch the aliases come to hi addresses in droves. I tried to reason with you powerade. Unfortunately I can't make up for years of humiliation you must have been subjected in your life to be the bitter person you are. I truly regret I can't help you. But I strongly recommend to seek any mental help you can get. And as soon as possible for your benefit and the benefit of those who have to live with you on a daily bases. GL buddy
0
Posted:
#56
Quote Originally Posted by MRMigfromCali:
why dont u buy 1/2 OR a 1 point in case score is 27-24??? it would suck to lose $220 by 1/2 point.. my line is 51 im gona buy 1pt in case its 28-24 BOL 
I wouldn't bet if I thought the score would be that close to my pick. You may be right from your perspective but I hope the game would end in 48 points at most and you won't need that point you bought. GL
0
Posted:
#57
Continuing to examine the money delivered on on ATS in MNF played tonight. The most interesting observation we made throughout the day is the one that showed how big were the bets on Atlanta -3.5. Because right now the size of average bets on Atlanta is down to 857$ although the volume continues in the same direction. In a simple translation to English - One or Few very large bets (by my calculation over 400,000$) was/were placed on Atlanta. And that's in case all the other bets rather than large were at least 900$ (large are considered over 1000$ and at the time there were only 8 and now are 11). So, 900 times 1845 are 1,660.500$ leaving us with 408,245$ for the large bets). So, if that much money was thrown on Atlanta driving the line from -3 to -3.5 - it either is a "straight" money or a wise guy money only to be reversed before the game. That is the reason I'm waiting on to see where the money goes.
0
Posted:
#58
Quote Originally Posted by SportsMavin:
Strong leans on Washington +4 and Under 44 in College Football game. It will stay as a lean to examine our lean theory
Strong leans on Washington +4 and Under 44 in College Football game. It will stay as a lean to examine our lean theory
Ok, so continuing to examine the lean theory. The lean on a side came through Washington covering "unbelievably" but the Totals lean has failed. Well, the leans are so far 2-1 illustrating the reason they are only leans. But both leans that won (under yesterday on UCF game and Washington plus points) were a result of strong opposition between the public bets and the line movement. The same tandem was part of the lean that did not come through (under on Washington game) but not in the same intensity as the ones which won. The conclusion so far can only be drawn regarding the level of intensity of opposed directions of the line movement and the public support - on popularity level of almost 50,000 bets placed. That is a conditional conclusion in my notebook yet to be examined few times before becoming a "play" criteria for upcoming college Bowl games
0
Posted:
#59
Quote Originally Posted by SportsMavin:
And what that's supposed to mean powerade? That the person was planted here as a sleeper agent 5 years ago so he could come one day and complement me on a thread??? I also bought ESPN and Covers so one day they could be used at my threads. You got me man!!! I knew I couldn't get by you... Damn....
Haha yup, you tout services make fake profiles all the time just for this.
Hope your having fun logging in and out of your SAF's and doing this.
Facking loser.
0
Posted:
#62
Quote Originally Posted by powerade:
Haha yup, you tout services make fake profiles all the time just for this.
Hope your having fun logging in and out of your SAF's and doing this.
Facking loser.
Since I have no such intentions and did no ask for anything from you or anybody else - that statement speaks most probably your wishes and you're accusing me of what's in your own mind. I really mean it - you need help. Sooner you'll get it - better it will be for you and people around you.
As far as calling names and foul words go - I understand that you are being called those names all the time and that is the reason you use them towards total strangers you never met or never did any harm to you. That's another reason to seek mental help ASAP.
Good luck finding your own butt with your own hands buddy. Merry Christmas! (I can imagine you're pretty lonely small person who has no one to share your holidays with, therefore my wishes are sincere as I really feel sorry for you)
0
Posted:
#68
Quote Originally Posted by dilaudid8:
power I no where your coming from but my brother let the guy post
power I no where your coming from but my brother let the guy post
Thanks for stepping in buddy, but I really don't mind if powerade chooses to come into my thread and make a butt out of himself. Deep inside he has a good intentions of protecting the community from imaginary enemies. I also don't mind his accusations as they have no base or any hold on reality - he only reveals what he would do if it's about an imaginary touts or creating false/fake identities as most probably he does all the time. I am a true believer in a good nature of a human being and hope he will find peace within himself first and then within the society.
0
Posted:
#70
Quote Originally Posted by rr207:
all i had to read was the first two posts to determine that you don't know jack squat
all i had to read was the first two posts to determine that you don't know jack squat
Oh my, now I'm really worried. Oh rr227, how am I going to sleep now knowing that you did not like my two first posts. Please don't do this to me. I started the thread with sole intention of impressing your highness... You're so cruel... oh my, oh my...
0
Posted:
#73
Few hours before the game in Detroit, 8 pay touts backed Detroit and only 3 Atlanta. As the game hour approached, the number of pay touts supporting the Lions grew and with a kick off the numbers were 16 - 7 Detroit (this info too is from the same source where the money info was brought). As you already noticed, despite leaning Atlanta -3.5, I didn't take the full game ATS pick as I'd like to see how the game develops and might jump on at the halftime. I did take totals bet. It will be intersting if my theory that the pay touts are at the service of the books trying to balance the bets for them - will prove true. That will be the case if Atlanta covers tonight.
0
Posted:
#74
BALTIMORE Ravens - NY Giants (-2.5)
Let's start with the fact that the books have engaged in a tactics too well known. They moved the line to -3 but the odds have changed to +115 and -2.5 you can still get at the traditional -110.
This is the one of the most one sided games betting wise I've ever seen. 97$ (!!!) of the money is on the Giants (262,868$ vs 7, 463$). The pay touts are on the Giants as well as Cowherd and many prominent cappers. 10 bets over 1000$ are on the Giants vs 0 on the Ravens.
This is a spot play as well as the Giants who alternate between being embarrassed and embarrassing the opposition are due to embarrass the Ravens who are embarrassed one game after another and still clinched the playoff despite losing 3 games on a row.
The big question is - will the Giants cover or will just win with a FG being down 2 or 1 point towards the end of the game?
Well, this is an occasion I'm willing to to pay the juice for the ML which I do very seldom.
Final:
NY Giants ML (-135) 305$
0
Hot Forum Topics
