All Forums | NFL Betting Forum

Giants +9 is a trap

...
Participants:
Search model icon
Views: 10274
Posts: 112
 
All-Star
Participation Meter
Joined: Feb, 2009
Posts: 12262
Posted: #51
shoot the club up good analysis and if u believe that will happen u are a total numbskull!
 
Veteran
Participation Meter
Joined: Mar, 2010
Posts: 3640
Posted: #52
Quote Originally Posted by guyhi:

Quote Originally Posted by Werker:

When the Giants played them in New Jersey six weeks ago, they were seven point dogs. Now they are getting less than a fg more in Wisconsin, and suddenly it's way too many points? You guys make no sense.  [/Quote/]

The only one with no sense is that avatar your rollin with... WTF featherboy


It amazes me that you don't even understand that I'm making fun of Kobe.
 
Veteran
Participation Meter
Joined: Jan, 2010
Posts: 4140
Posted: #53
I already placed a $500 bet on giant ml+320 to win $1600
Also giants to will it all @+1600
 
Prospect
Participation Meter
Joined: Sep, 2011
Posts: 5
Posted: #54
field will be cleared..but with snow around the stadium look 4 more running then u think..a fresh starks will put him back on the map..85 to 100 yards enough game ticking 4 the under...big players make big plays charels woodsons late game int moves gb to a 10point win....bet on it
 
Prospect
Participation Meter
Joined: Sep, 2007
Posts: 23
Posted: #55
If the pack steamrolls the giants the game will go over because the giants will also score. for me the best bet in this game is the over. good luck all
 
Veteran
Participation Meter
Joined: Jul, 2008
Posts: 1147
Posted: #56
Quote Originally Posted by Werker:

When the Giants played them in New Jersey six weeks ago, they were seven point dogs. Now they are getting less than a fg more in Wisconsin, and suddenly it's way too many points? You guys make no sense. 


So you are one of those people that does not think that things change over a 6 week period? We should just add the 3 points for homefield compared to their first meeting and make the packers -10 and not even think about it?  Who covered in their first meeting?  It's ridiculous to just use a line from 6 weeks ago, especially when the team you are trying to make an arguement for didn't even cover in that case.
 
Veteran
Participation Meter
Joined: Mar, 2010
Posts: 3640
Posted: #57
Quote Originally Posted by Gee_Gee:



So you are one of those people that does not think that things change over a 6 week period? We should just add the 3 points for homefield compared to their first meeting and make the packers -10 and not even think about it?  Who covered in their first meeting?  It's ridiculous to just use a line from 6 weeks ago, especially when the team you are trying to make an arguement for didn't even cover in that case.

Unless there's a MAJOR change in personnel, there is no chance in hell that a line should move much more than five points in six weeks, which is what this line has done. To then call that line a trap because it's way too many points is absurd. You think the difference between the Giants and Packers has moved, what, ten points in six weeks? Stop being ridiculous. I think the line is right on where it is, which is huge movement in favor of the Giants. 
 
Prospect
Participation Meter
Joined: Oct, 2009
Posts: 133
Posted: #58
Greenbay 34  G-men 26.
 
Veteran
Participation Meter
Joined: Oct, 2010
Posts: 4314
Posted: #59
If the Giants at home only lost by 3 to the Pack afew weeks ago.

The main question is what is the difference between the status of the two teams between then and now? (I'm talking mainly injuries here)

Also I'm pretty sure the Giants are a better road team than they are at home from what we learned in the reg season so the fact they are playing on the road shouldn't be as much of factor for them right?
 
Veteran
Participation Meter
Joined: Oct, 2010
Posts: 4314
Posted: #60
I believe actually the giants front 7 is healthier than its been all year and that is a major factor. Those guys up front paying at full strength is a major difference and I think we saw that in the ATL game when the falcons couldn't muster up 1 single offensive score.
 
Veteran
Participation Meter
Joined: Apr, 2009
Posts: 2587
Posted: #61
Packers are still the hunters, not the hunted mcCarthy says, either way, alot of ppl on Giants wagon, and just forget the record breaking stats Pack had this year,,,The best team will win, and grabbed Pack at -9, IMO public gonna be on Giants, McCarthy also wanted home field through playoffs for reason........undefeated at home, wont be surprised Pack put on a show....just sayin, and team healthy and everyone playing, even O line......ppls first mistake underestimating the packers, BOL to all PAckers are my pick ......and for more momentum, win it for Philbin!! Packers well prepared team!
 
All-Star
Participation Meter
Joined: Feb, 2011
Posts: 12243
Posted: #62

Quote Originally Posted by billsneedhelp:

If the Giants at home only lost by 3 to the Pack afew weeks ago.

The main question is what is the difference between the status of the two teams between then and now? (I'm talking mainly injuries here)

Also I'm pretty sure the Giants are a better road team than they are at home from what we learned in the reg season so the fact they are playing on the road shouldn't be as much of factor for them right?

 

Yes, they lost by only 3....but If the Pack make a 4th down stop on the last drive its a 8 point win and a cover on the road...

It was a 3 point final, but the Packers did whatever they wanted in that game, without a running back...

People keep saying the giants are finally healthy, well, this is also the first week the Packers OLine and defense will also be healthy...

 
Veteran
Participation Meter
Joined: Jul, 2011
Posts: 1759
Posted: #63

Giants BEAT the Patriots remember?? I do

Giants ALMOST BEAT the Packers in NY remember?? I do

This is the playoffs, this Aaron Rogers, this IS THE FUCKING NY "WE LOST 4 GAMES IN A ROW" GIANTS....dont refer to past games and say "oh well the Giants played em close last time, that means theyll do it again" No dumbass, it doesnt.

This is a different week, different game. PLEASE keep putting money on the overrated Giants, itll make my win that much better.

 
Prospect
Participation Meter
Joined: Oct, 2006
Posts: 152
Posted: #64

It comes down to this

Rodgers- 502 pass attempts   sacked 36 times

Manning-  589 pass attempts sacked 28 times

Giants D- 48 sacks

Packers D-  29 sacks

Packers pass rush has been god awful despite playing with the lead the entire season.  Thats not gonna cut it agaisnt Eli.  The Giants D finally has Tuck and Osi healthy.  Chad Clifton in his 2nd game back off a major back injury is not gonna be able to deal with JPP and Osi.  Giants win straight up.

 
All-Star
Participation Meter
Joined: Feb, 2011
Posts: 12243
Posted: #65
Quote Originally Posted by MR MACMAN:

It comes down to this

Rodgers- 502 pass attempts   sacked 36 times

Manning-  589 pass attempts sacked 28 times

Giants D- 48 sacks

Packers D-  29 sacks

Packers pass rush has been god awful despite playing with the lead the entire season.  Thats not gonna cut it agaisnt Eli.  The Giants D finally has Tuck and Osi healthy.  Chad Clifton in his 2nd game back off a major back injury is not gonna be able to deal with JPP and Osi.  Giants win straight up.

 

Which defense leads the league in INTS and TDS

 
Veteran
Participation Meter
Joined: Nov, 2010
Posts: 3348
Posted: #66
Quote Originally Posted by aaustinova67:

Giants BEAT the Patriots remember?? I do

Giants ALMOST BEAT the Packers in NY remember?? I do

This is the playoffs, this Aaron Rogers, this IS THE FUCKING NY "WE LOST 4 GAMES IN A ROW" GIANTS....dont refer to past games and say "oh well the Giants played em close last time, that means theyll do it again" No dumbass, it doesnt.

This is a different week, different game. PLEASE keep putting money on the overrated Giants, itll make my win that much better.




If I'm not mistaken, the Giants played the Pats well in the last regular season game back in 2007 and then beat them in the superbowl, what's the difference here?
 
Veteran
Participation Meter
Joined: Oct, 2008
Posts: 4418
Posted: #67

I love the G-men in this game.  Defense these days is all about pass rush not coverage.  Look @ teams w/ supposedly great corners this year - NY Jets, Philly, etc.  Neither even sniffed the playoffs.

The best defenses all have a ferocious pass rush - Steelers, Ravens, Niners and ... Giants.

 

 
MVP
Participation Meter
Joined: Apr, 2007
Posts: 16954
Posted: #68
Quote Originally Posted by EazyFBaby:




If I'm not mistaken, the Giants played the Pats well in the last regular season game back in 2007 and then beat them in the superbowl, what's the difference here?


The Packers don't have the pressure of going 19-0.


 
All-Star
Participation Meter
Joined: Feb, 2011
Posts: 12243
Posted: #69

Quote Originally Posted by EazyFBaby:




If I'm not mistaken, the Giants played the Pats well in the last regular season game back in 2007 and then beat them in the superbowl, what's the difference here?

 

It wasnt a home game for NE..GB isnt trying to go 19-0

 
Veteran
Participation Meter
Joined: Nov, 2010
Posts: 3348
Posted: #70
^^^

Wait, so the Giants won because NE had the pressure of going 19-0?
 
Veteran
Participation Meter
Joined: Nov, 2010
Posts: 3348
Posted: #71
All I'm saying is the Giants played the Packers well, it took a late drive by GB to win the game. We played the Pats tough as well a few years back then beat them in the bowl, I just can't comprehend why people will think the Giants are going to get blown out
 
Veteran
Participation Meter
Joined: Jan, 2011
Posts: 1222
Posted: #72
SORRY BUT I'M ON THE GIANTS  
 
Veteran
Participation Meter
Joined: Jan, 2011
Posts: 1222
Posted: #73
THINK THAT THE PASSING OF THE PACKERS OFFENSIVE CORDINATOR'S SON WILL MAKE A DIFFERENCE TOO. 
 
Veteran
Participation Meter
Joined: Apr, 2009
Posts: 2587
Posted: #74
Greg Jennings
I prefer any team that plans on flying into GB and stepping off that plane.... RT
 
 
All-Star
Participation Meter
Joined: Feb, 2011
Posts: 12243
Posted: #75

Quote Originally Posted by EazyFBaby:

All I'm saying is the Giants played the Packers well, it took a late drive by GB to win the game. We played the Pats tough as well a few years back then beat them in the bowl, I just can't comprehend why people will think the Giants are going to get blown out

 

The giants were down 8 with under 1 minute left...

If the Packers stop them they covered that game...

All Forums | NFL Betting Forum
About Us
Contact Us
Careers
Our Team
Brand
Testimonials
Betting Guides
Sportsbook Reviews
Sports Betting News
Podcasts
Responsible Gaming
Betting Sites
Canada Betting Sites
Canada Casinos
Best Betting Apps
Contests
Streak Survivor
King of Covers
Office Pools
The Covers community has
810,221
lifetime members worldwide
Covers 30 Years Logo Established in 1995,
Covers is the world
leader in sports
betting information.
Site Map Help Privacy Terms of Service youtube logo facebook logo twitter logo instagram logo linkedin logo google news logo
Covers is verified safe by: Evalon Logo GPWA Logo GDPR Logo GeoTrust Logo Evalon Logo
Copyright © 1995 - 2026 CS Media Limited All Rights Reserved.

If you choose to make use of any information on this website including online sports betting services from any websites that may be featured on this website, we strongly recommend that you carefully check your local laws before doing so.It is your sole responsibility to understand your local laws and observe them strictly.Covers does not provide any advice or guidance as to the legality of online sports betting or other online gambling activities within your jurisdiction and you are responsible for complying with laws that are applicable to you in your relevant locality.Covers disclaims all liability associated with your use of this website and use of any information contained on it.As a condition of using this website, you agree to hold the owner of this website harmless from any claims arising from your use of any services on any third party website that may be featured by Covers.