Will update my record after these games are over tonight. We will be way in the plus come SB. This line opened with CHI favs of - 1 to - 1.5 for about a day then it flipped. CHI has been taking over 56% of bet tickets throughout the week but , the line flipped to GB. All time %’s in the postseason, when you see the RLM in this type of situation, the public are only @ a 44% cover rate. On the season, GB has allowed 360 total pts , CHI has allowed 415 pts. The simple rating system is a system I live by, GB’s is + 1.0 , CHI’s is + 0.5 , that half pt difference may seem small ( no big deal) but it is, believe me folks. GB allows on average rushing yards 117. 1, CHI allows 134.53. In today’s game, the team that can stop the run , will win the game. It’s a division game. When each team does decide to throw the ball today , GB’s EPA per pass is + 0.21 , whereas CHI’s is only + 0.06. SOS , GB is right around 21st , CHI’s right around 26th, GB stronger there. Offensive completion rate, GB 67.08 % , CHI 58.19%. Williams is a work in progress, he will have a solid career but, he can be insanely inaccurate. Also GB’s 3rd down conversion rate is higher , 48.78 % vs 42.73 % for CHI. CW finished top 3 in inaccurate throws of 20 yards or more league wide, only better than JJ M with Minny, and Penix with ATL. QB with P/O experience vs QB without are 20-40 SU & 20- 39 ATS , give me GB the better team for 2,600/2,000 ML wager - 130. GL to all on the Packers tonight..
4
To remove first post, remove entire topic.
Will update my record after these games are over tonight. We will be way in the plus come SB. This line opened with CHI favs of - 1 to - 1.5 for about a day then it flipped. CHI has been taking over 56% of bet tickets throughout the week but , the line flipped to GB. All time %’s in the postseason, when you see the RLM in this type of situation, the public are only @ a 44% cover rate. On the season, GB has allowed 360 total pts , CHI has allowed 415 pts. The simple rating system is a system I live by, GB’s is + 1.0 , CHI’s is + 0.5 , that half pt difference may seem small ( no big deal) but it is, believe me folks. GB allows on average rushing yards 117. 1, CHI allows 134.53. In today’s game, the team that can stop the run , will win the game. It’s a division game. When each team does decide to throw the ball today , GB’s EPA per pass is + 0.21 , whereas CHI’s is only + 0.06. SOS , GB is right around 21st , CHI’s right around 26th, GB stronger there. Offensive completion rate, GB 67.08 % , CHI 58.19%. Williams is a work in progress, he will have a solid career but, he can be insanely inaccurate. Also GB’s 3rd down conversion rate is higher , 48.78 % vs 42.73 % for CHI. CW finished top 3 in inaccurate throws of 20 yards or more league wide, only better than JJ M with Minny, and Penix with ATL. QB with P/O experience vs QB without are 20-40 SU & 20- 39 ATS , give me GB the better team for 2,600/2,000 ML wager - 130. GL to all on the Packers tonight..
Will update my record after these games are over tonight. We will be way in the plus come SB. This line opened with CHI favs of - 1 to - 1.5 for about a day then it flipped. CHI has been taking over 56% of bet tickets throughout the week but , the line flipped to GB. All time %’s in the postseason, when you see the RLM in this type of situation, the public are only @ a 44% cover rate. On the season, GB has allowed 360 total pts , CHI has allowed 415 pts. The simple rating system is a system I live by, GB’s is + 1.0 , CHI’s is + 0.5 , that half pt difference may seem small ( no big deal) but it is, believe me folks. GB allows on average rushing yards 117. 1, CHI allows 134.53. In today’s game, the team that can stop the run , will win the game. It’s a division game. When each team does decide to throw the ball today , GB’s EPA per pass is + 0.21 , whereas CHI’s is only + 0.06. SOS , GB is right around 21st , CHI’s right around 26th, GB stronger there. Offensive completion rate, GB 67.08 % , CHI 58.19%. Williams is a work in progress, he will have a solid career but, he can be insanely inaccurate. Also GB’s 3rd down conversion rate is higher , 48.78 % vs 42.73 % for CHI. CW finished top 3 in inaccurate throws of 20 yards or more league wide, only better than JJ M with Minny, and Penix with ATL. QB with P/O experience vs QB without are 20-40 SU & 20- 39 ATS , give me GB the better team for 2,600/2,000 ML wager - 130. GL to all on the Packers tonight..
Based on that last stat the Rams should cover this game
0
Quote Originally Posted by Rolexsports:
Will update my record after these games are over tonight. We will be way in the plus come SB. This line opened with CHI favs of - 1 to - 1.5 for about a day then it flipped. CHI has been taking over 56% of bet tickets throughout the week but , the line flipped to GB. All time %’s in the postseason, when you see the RLM in this type of situation, the public are only @ a 44% cover rate. On the season, GB has allowed 360 total pts , CHI has allowed 415 pts. The simple rating system is a system I live by, GB’s is + 1.0 , CHI’s is + 0.5 , that half pt difference may seem small ( no big deal) but it is, believe me folks. GB allows on average rushing yards 117. 1, CHI allows 134.53. In today’s game, the team that can stop the run , will win the game. It’s a division game. When each team does decide to throw the ball today , GB’s EPA per pass is + 0.21 , whereas CHI’s is only + 0.06. SOS , GB is right around 21st , CHI’s right around 26th, GB stronger there. Offensive completion rate, GB 67.08 % , CHI 58.19%. Williams is a work in progress, he will have a solid career but, he can be insanely inaccurate. Also GB’s 3rd down conversion rate is higher , 48.78 % vs 42.73 % for CHI. CW finished top 3 in inaccurate throws of 20 yards or more league wide, only better than JJ M with Minny, and Penix with ATL. QB with P/O experience vs QB without are 20-40 SU & 20- 39 ATS , give me GB the better team for 2,600/2,000 ML wager - 130. GL to all on the Packers tonight..
Based on that last stat the Rams should cover this game
If you have a perspective longer than 3.5 hours, then you'll know that Rolex wins alot and has been along with providing great write-ups for years here on Covers
1
@Juventusfan
Have you any perspective.
Rolex ( like you, me everyone) loses.
What a shock.
If you have a perspective longer than 3.5 hours, then you'll know that Rolex wins alot and has been along with providing great write-ups for years here on Covers
@Juventusfan Have you any perspective. Rolex ( like you, me everyone) loses. What a shock. If you have a perspective longer than 3.5 hours, then you'll know that Rolex wins alot and has been along with providing great write-ups for years here on Covers
This
0
Quote Originally Posted by umgmu:
@Juventusfan Have you any perspective. Rolex ( like you, me everyone) loses. What a shock. If you have a perspective longer than 3.5 hours, then you'll know that Rolex wins alot and has been along with providing great write-ups for years here on Covers
If you choose to make use of any information on this website including online sports betting services from any websites that may be featured on
this website, we strongly recommend that you carefully check your local laws before doing so.It is your sole responsibility to understand your local laws and observe them strictly.Covers does not provide
any advice or guidance as to the legality of online sports betting or other online gambling activities within your jurisdiction and you are responsible for complying with laws that are applicable to you in
your relevant locality.Covers disclaims all liability associated with your use of this website and use of any information contained on it.As a condition of using this website, you agree to hold the owner
of this website harmless from any claims arising from your use of any services on any third party website that may be featured by Covers.