CIN/BAL

Under 53 (-110)

Good luck JA.  

@JoseAlonso787

 I like it BOL 

First head to head meeting in week 5 (41-38) high scoring Cincinnati Loss at home in Overtime goes over so second meeting goes under? Just curious as to why the under is to your liking Joe?

@justliketoplay

 

Mixture of 2nd game (adjusted schemes) and Thursday night effect. I think the better team will have made the better adjustments. Better team on both sides of the ball is BAL, so I’m thinking they slow CIN down a bit more than they did in the 1st match. 

787 

@JoseAlonso787

 Bol this week JA

@JoseAlonso787

 Without T Higgins you're probably correct. If I go side, I'd lay the pts for the same reason. Stripes are a different team without him, and they aren't going to win with their D.

@Knollywood100

@JoseAlonso787

 Brother, Bol.

So in your way of thinking, second matchups of a season always go the same way? First one went over, so 2nd game must as well? Why do you think the 2nd one will also go over? If you are going to question a pick, it would be nice if u give reasoning why you like it the other way. And because the first game went over isn't a good reason, in most cases

Its a bit risky   Ravens all over except for the game vs Bills where they put up 35..

Bengals o line a mess..

T Higgins might not play....

Bengals wont shut the Ravens down...

@KarmaStateU2024

 I have played that system in the past (first game over second game under) or vise versa and was just asking his reasoning because I have done it in the past with inconsistent results and stopped playing/including this in my current handicapping.

I know some and maybe more may still have this way of deciding a game as crazy as it sounds and was just curious as I said.... his reasoning.

The spread went up five with the over/under since that last game so again just asked the question as to why he wagered on the under.