An Estimated $64 Million Swing in Favor of Bookies Las Vegas (November
16, 2008) - The Pittsburgh Steelers were 5 point favorites over the San
Diego Chargers on Sunday. As time expired, the Steelers scored a
touchdown to put them up by 7, with the extra point pending. Then came
a video review. The official initially announced the ruling on the
field was upheld and the touchdown counted. But the officiating crew
huddled again and changed the call - taking the points off the board
without explanation. The game was ended with Pittsburgh the 11 to 10
winner. Pittsburgh bettors lost. After the game, the official admitted
that a mistake was made, and the touchdown should have counted.
An estimated 100 million dollars was wagered worldwide on the
Pittsburgh/San Diego game, according to RJ Bell of Pregame.com.
Approximately 66% of that money was on the Steelers; with only 34% on
the Chargers.
"If the touchdown was properly upheld, Steelers bettors would have won
about 32 million dollars instead of losing big. This admittedly
incorrect call resulted in a 64 million dollar swing in favor of the
bookies," said RJ Bell of Pregame.com.
0
To remove first post, remove entire topic.
An Estimated $64 Million Swing in Favor of Bookies Las Vegas (November
16, 2008) - The Pittsburgh Steelers were 5 point favorites over the San
Diego Chargers on Sunday. As time expired, the Steelers scored a
touchdown to put them up by 7, with the extra point pending. Then came
a video review. The official initially announced the ruling on the
field was upheld and the touchdown counted. But the officiating crew
huddled again and changed the call - taking the points off the board
without explanation. The game was ended with Pittsburgh the 11 to 10
winner. Pittsburgh bettors lost. After the game, the official admitted
that a mistake was made, and the touchdown should have counted.
An estimated 100 million dollars was wagered worldwide on the
Pittsburgh/San Diego game, according to RJ Bell of Pregame.com.
Approximately 66% of that money was on the Steelers; with only 34% on
the Chargers.
"If the touchdown was properly upheld, Steelers bettors would have won
about 32 million dollars instead of losing big. This admittedly
incorrect call resulted in a 64 million dollar swing in favor of the
bookies," said RJ Bell of Pregame.com.
interesting article, heard about the 32 mil won by the book but I guess 32 mil won and 32 mil lost would be around 64
Also, possibly Big Ben had some friends on SD because his look after Troy ran that TD in and it was like WTF . Ben is rich enough but I'm pretty sure there are a lot of his "followers" who would like to get the inside tip.
0
interesting article, heard about the 32 mil won by the book but I guess 32 mil won and 32 mil lost would be around 64
Also, possibly Big Ben had some friends on SD because his look after Troy ran that TD in and it was like WTF . Ben is rich enough but I'm pretty sure there are a lot of his "followers" who would like to get the inside tip.
not really...we have percentages of who is liked at first glance.....we all know its a different story walking to the window or clicking the mouse....the numbers i am talking about are counted after the money is in....
0
not really...we have percentages of who is liked at first glance.....we all know its a different story walking to the window or clicking the mouse....the numbers i am talking about are counted after the money is in....
An Estimated $64 Million Swing in Favor of Bookies Las Vegas (November 16, 2008) - The Pittsburgh Steelers were 5 point favorites over the San Diego Chargers on Sunday. As time expired, the Steelers scored a touchdown to put them up by 7, with the extra point pending. Then came a video review. The official initially announced the ruling on the field was upheld and the touchdown counted. But the officiating crew huddled again and changed the call - taking the points off the board without explanation. The game was ended with Pittsburgh the 11 to 10 winner. Pittsburgh bettors lost. After the game, the official admitted that a mistake was made, and the touchdown should have counted.
An estimated 100 million dollars was wagered worldwide on the Pittsburgh/San Diego game, according to RJ Bell of Pregame.com. Approximately 66% of that money was on the Steelers; with only 34% on the Chargers.
"If the touchdown was properly upheld, Steelers bettors would have won about 32 million dollars instead of losing big. This admittedly incorrect call resulted in a 64 million dollar swing in favor of the bookies," said RJ Bell of Pregame.com.
I have a hard time believing $100,000,000 was wagered on that 1 game alone.
0
Quote Originally Posted by kingpincarbs:
An Estimated $64 Million Swing in Favor of Bookies Las Vegas (November 16, 2008) - The Pittsburgh Steelers were 5 point favorites over the San Diego Chargers on Sunday. As time expired, the Steelers scored a touchdown to put them up by 7, with the extra point pending. Then came a video review. The official initially announced the ruling on the field was upheld and the touchdown counted. But the officiating crew huddled again and changed the call - taking the points off the board without explanation. The game was ended with Pittsburgh the 11 to 10 winner. Pittsburgh bettors lost. After the game, the official admitted that a mistake was made, and the touchdown should have counted.
An estimated 100 million dollars was wagered worldwide on the Pittsburgh/San Diego game, according to RJ Bell of Pregame.com. Approximately 66% of that money was on the Steelers; with only 34% on the Chargers.
"If the touchdown was properly upheld, Steelers bettors would have won about 32 million dollars instead of losing big. This admittedly incorrect call resulted in a 64 million dollar swing in favor of the bookies," said RJ Bell of Pregame.com.
I have a hard time believing $100,000,000 was wagered on that 1 game alone.
If you choose to make use of any information on this website including online sports betting services from any websites that may be featured on
this website, we strongly recommend that you carefully check your local laws before doing so.It is your sole responsibility to understand your local laws and observe them strictly.Covers does not provide
any advice or guidance as to the legality of online sports betting or other online gambling activities within your jurisdiction and you are responsible for complying with laws that are applicable to you in
your relevant locality.Covers disclaims all liability associated with your use of this website and use of any information contained on it.As a condition of using this website, you agree to hold the owner
of this website harmless from any claims arising from your use of any services on any third party website that may be featured by Covers.