I've already decided I'm done with regular season college and probably 75% of the non CFP bowls from now on. I just for whatever reasons almost every season i suck at college and always pick the team with the kids making bonehead mistakes, the kinds you don't see often in pros. I used to always make up for it during bowl season as I had some tried and true angles but now with the transfer opt outs and surprise sit outs in addition to coaching carousels most of the bowls are a crap shoot. The only angle i have found which works and is actually even better now since the new sit out BS is to wait and see any drastic line moves close to kickoff and follow them - they usually indicate some vital information has become known and especially favorites where the line drops a lot are good fades. And still the best thing is to just take any dogs you like SU instead of moneyline as it's usually the same winner and you can get crazy good odds.
BUT, in the NFL while there are still lots of shenanigans especially late in halves, I still have had success and profit so want to keep that going but the number one thing that makes me wanna quit it is this absolutely asinine trend of 'analytics say go for it' and coaches refusing to kick FGs or punt on 4th down.
They've been saying this for like 5 years and I actually think it's a con. Like ESPN (who encourages this with their stupid graphics) is using data from when coaches first started to do it and it was a novel idea so teams were less prepared.
I watch a ton of games and I see way more teams getting stuffed than not, especially in big spots. And it's not just me noticing when it goes against me, i see teams i fade get stuffed all the time too. It's total nonsense IMO and the two biggest 'pioneers' of this trend, John Harbaugh and Mike McDaniel, both got canned this season. The Dolphins got stuffed ALL the time. One time a few years ago McDaniel could have kicked a chop shot FG up 8 to go up 11, it was 4th and like 6 not 4th and 1 and he still thought a guaranteed 2 score game wasn't enough to make him look like a genius he had to try and go for it. And he ran it!
Spread was 10.5 too. I am so glad he got fired he is a clown.
It used to be you didn't go for it unless you were a) losing (by more than 3) and b) it was late in the 2nd half. Now teams will try it when it's still the first half and they're winning! That should never happen. Ever. First half you're not losing kick the FG and keep the scoreboard ticking over. Sean Payton lost the AFC championship game doing this even tho there were two huge factors supporting him even more to take the FG, namely he was on a backup QB and it was gonna snow.
Watching these games lately I'm actually really underwhelmed by how these supposedly clever multimillionaire coaches fk up basic game strategy. I wish they would go back to playing the game the right way but with gambling ingrained into TV broadcasts now, higher variance is what 'they' actually want, so it probably won't happen. It just puts me off betting on it though because Im old enough to remember when it wasn't like this.
Maybe next season instead of constantly creaming it for coaches going for it every time, the announcers can put more of an effort into pointing out what happened this year to the team who went for it the LEAST amount of times on 4th down...
0
To remove first post, remove entire topic.
I've already decided I'm done with regular season college and probably 75% of the non CFP bowls from now on. I just for whatever reasons almost every season i suck at college and always pick the team with the kids making bonehead mistakes, the kinds you don't see often in pros. I used to always make up for it during bowl season as I had some tried and true angles but now with the transfer opt outs and surprise sit outs in addition to coaching carousels most of the bowls are a crap shoot. The only angle i have found which works and is actually even better now since the new sit out BS is to wait and see any drastic line moves close to kickoff and follow them - they usually indicate some vital information has become known and especially favorites where the line drops a lot are good fades. And still the best thing is to just take any dogs you like SU instead of moneyline as it's usually the same winner and you can get crazy good odds.
BUT, in the NFL while there are still lots of shenanigans especially late in halves, I still have had success and profit so want to keep that going but the number one thing that makes me wanna quit it is this absolutely asinine trend of 'analytics say go for it' and coaches refusing to kick FGs or punt on 4th down.
They've been saying this for like 5 years and I actually think it's a con. Like ESPN (who encourages this with their stupid graphics) is using data from when coaches first started to do it and it was a novel idea so teams were less prepared.
I watch a ton of games and I see way more teams getting stuffed than not, especially in big spots. And it's not just me noticing when it goes against me, i see teams i fade get stuffed all the time too. It's total nonsense IMO and the two biggest 'pioneers' of this trend, John Harbaugh and Mike McDaniel, both got canned this season. The Dolphins got stuffed ALL the time. One time a few years ago McDaniel could have kicked a chop shot FG up 8 to go up 11, it was 4th and like 6 not 4th and 1 and he still thought a guaranteed 2 score game wasn't enough to make him look like a genius he had to try and go for it. And he ran it!
Spread was 10.5 too. I am so glad he got fired he is a clown.
It used to be you didn't go for it unless you were a) losing (by more than 3) and b) it was late in the 2nd half. Now teams will try it when it's still the first half and they're winning! That should never happen. Ever. First half you're not losing kick the FG and keep the scoreboard ticking over. Sean Payton lost the AFC championship game doing this even tho there were two huge factors supporting him even more to take the FG, namely he was on a backup QB and it was gonna snow.
Watching these games lately I'm actually really underwhelmed by how these supposedly clever multimillionaire coaches fk up basic game strategy. I wish they would go back to playing the game the right way but with gambling ingrained into TV broadcasts now, higher variance is what 'they' actually want, so it probably won't happen. It just puts me off betting on it though because Im old enough to remember when it wasn't like this.
Maybe next season instead of constantly creaming it for coaches going for it every time, the announcers can put more of an effort into pointing out what happened this year to the team who went for it the LEAST amount of times on 4th down...
I feel your pain. You go through the process of handicapping the game, getting the best line you can get, getting good CLV…all to see the entire game flip on a ridiculous coaching decision. And it’s so hard to predict because almost every team and coach does it. How many games do you think to yourself “this game should never have played out this way…”. Teams that decide not to punt or take a fg in the first half and now they’re playing catch up in the second half and the entire game is fcked because of it. It’s the biggest coin flip of betting football. Is the coach going to do what he’s supposed to do or is he going to roll the dice and gamble for no reason. Man do I miss the days when you 100% kicked a field goal when you were in range. 4th and 1 or 2 used to not even be a choice. It was automatic field goal or punt.
0
@NutinButtLove
I feel your pain. You go through the process of handicapping the game, getting the best line you can get, getting good CLV…all to see the entire game flip on a ridiculous coaching decision. And it’s so hard to predict because almost every team and coach does it. How many games do you think to yourself “this game should never have played out this way…”. Teams that decide not to punt or take a fg in the first half and now they’re playing catch up in the second half and the entire game is fcked because of it. It’s the biggest coin flip of betting football. Is the coach going to do what he’s supposed to do or is he going to roll the dice and gamble for no reason. Man do I miss the days when you 100% kicked a field goal when you were in range. 4th and 1 or 2 used to not even be a choice. It was automatic field goal or punt.
I agree. I have written a lot about this and see both sides. But it is so frustrating the way coaches make their in-game decisions now.
I have been piecing together things about this for my Substack.
There are a lot of intricacies with this new stuff.
The bottom line to me is that it works far better in baseball because of the longer seasons and more opportunities.
I have been saying this for a while on here also.
It is basically playing the probabilities. No one gets 'scared' of that word -- I think it was Dan Patrick that said it that way. But they get 'scared' of analytics.
But in baseball you might have the exact situation come up many, many times throughout a year. It will be closer to evening out in your favor.
In the NFL, you only have 17 games for those situations to work out.
When they work out, you look 'smart'; when they do not work out, you are apt to get fired.
Plus there are things like the flow of the game, momentum, weather, individual matchups and injuries that analytics simply do not take into account.
So, it can cause a coach to over-rely on them instead of 'gut feel'.
But there are some great things that it has done as well.
Analytics can sometimes equal coaching malpractice.
0
@NutinButtLove
@brn2loslive2win
I agree. I have written a lot about this and see both sides. But it is so frustrating the way coaches make their in-game decisions now.
I have been piecing together things about this for my Substack.
There are a lot of intricacies with this new stuff.
The bottom line to me is that it works far better in baseball because of the longer seasons and more opportunities.
I have been saying this for a while on here also.
It is basically playing the probabilities. No one gets 'scared' of that word -- I think it was Dan Patrick that said it that way. But they get 'scared' of analytics.
But in baseball you might have the exact situation come up many, many times throughout a year. It will be closer to evening out in your favor.
In the NFL, you only have 17 games for those situations to work out.
When they work out, you look 'smart'; when they do not work out, you are apt to get fired.
Plus there are things like the flow of the game, momentum, weather, individual matchups and injuries that analytics simply do not take into account.
So, it can cause a coach to over-rely on them instead of 'gut feel'.
But there are some great things that it has done as well.
Analytics can sometimes equal coaching malpractice.
I wish there was data on every time a team was in good position to take points with a field goal and instead went for 4th down. Maybe it’s a biased opinion because we seem to remember when it doesn’t work far easier than when it does.
One thing I’ve gained from it from a gambling perspective is that when two good offenses face each other, especially with aggressive coaches, it can very easily turn into a low scoring game. And it’s always the average Joe screaming fix! Fix! But I have backed out of quite a few over bets because I know that the coaches won’t kick fgs and that they will likely fail on multiple 4th downs. These are the games where you get an entire scoreless quarter with long drives resulting in no points. I guess we just have to pay close attention and learn more about the coaching tendencies. You know better than anyone, if you do your homework there’s an edge to be found.
0
@Raiders22
I wish there was data on every time a team was in good position to take points with a field goal and instead went for 4th down. Maybe it’s a biased opinion because we seem to remember when it doesn’t work far easier than when it does.
One thing I’ve gained from it from a gambling perspective is that when two good offenses face each other, especially with aggressive coaches, it can very easily turn into a low scoring game. And it’s always the average Joe screaming fix! Fix! But I have backed out of quite a few over bets because I know that the coaches won’t kick fgs and that they will likely fail on multiple 4th downs. These are the games where you get an entire scoreless quarter with long drives resulting in no points. I guess we just have to pay close attention and learn more about the coaching tendencies. You know better than anyone, if you do your homework there’s an edge to be found.
If you choose to make use of any information on this website including online sports betting services from any websites that may be featured on
this website, we strongly recommend that you carefully check your local laws before doing so.It is your sole responsibility to understand your local laws and observe them strictly.Covers does not provide
any advice or guidance as to the legality of online sports betting or other online gambling activities within your jurisdiction and you are responsible for complying with laws that are applicable to you in
your relevant locality.Covers disclaims all liability associated with your use of this website and use of any information contained on it.As a condition of using this website, you agree to hold the owner
of this website harmless from any claims arising from your use of any services on any third party website that may be featured by Covers.