rain yesterday!
swept the board and it felt great.
I went old school and really put in some time and effort and it payed off.
Got the bank roll up just a little.........
T-Pups for me tonight.
Like em as home dogs plus 3 got em at matchook minus 103.
gl all
rain yesterday!
swept the board and it felt great.
I went old school and really put in some time and effort and it payed off.
Got the bank roll up just a little.........
T-Pups for me tonight.
Like em as home dogs plus 3 got em at matchook minus 103.
gl all
Posts your bets pal and we'll see who's got room to talk shit.
Nice fucking job yesterday Crash, wish I would've tailed you
Posts your bets pal and we'll see who's got room to talk shit.
Nice fucking job yesterday Crash, wish I would've tailed you
The Bets today
Packers -3.5
Under 43
Steelers -3.5
Over 38 (larger than large which right now is 2 units and has been as high as 20, sorry the recession and bad capping has really affected my bankroll)
I am beside myself that this line opened at Pitt plus 3. Beside myself.
Yeah, the fact Pitt are getting 3 absolutely stuns me. Just like Wisconsin +3 in the Rose Bowl.
Wisconsin +3 was a 12 unit play for me, and while they lost, they covered
Pitt +3 might be a huge play again, to say the least.
The Bets today
Packers -3.5
Under 43
Steelers -3.5
Over 38 (larger than large which right now is 2 units and has been as high as 20, sorry the recession and bad capping has really affected my bankroll)
I am beside myself that this line opened at Pitt plus 3. Beside myself.
Yeah, the fact Pitt are getting 3 absolutely stuns me. Just like Wisconsin +3 in the Rose Bowl.
Wisconsin +3 was a 12 unit play for me, and while they lost, they covered
Pitt +3 might be a huge play again, to say the least.
Bringing back the Wisconsin game is funny. My hard learned lesson is when a line seems crazy good in my favor it usually is not!
I too was crazy to bet the Badgers on that line when it came out. I thought about it and followed my experience and bet TCU against my gut. The wager lost but it was one of those games I felt like I was on the right side and a loser. Many will say that is a contradiction but the ball bounces funny sometimes and the best team does not always win. IN THAT GAME I THOUGHT TCU WAS THE BETTER SQUAD.
I watch way more of the NFL but this line screams to me that the Packers are the better squad. I may shift based on experience.
Also, I love playing against teams that have lost their all pro center, this is a huge angle for me.
thanks for the visit to the wall of shame-
gl tonight
Bringing back the Wisconsin game is funny. My hard learned lesson is when a line seems crazy good in my favor it usually is not!
I too was crazy to bet the Badgers on that line when it came out. I thought about it and followed my experience and bet TCU against my gut. The wager lost but it was one of those games I felt like I was on the right side and a loser. Many will say that is a contradiction but the ball bounces funny sometimes and the best team does not always win. IN THAT GAME I THOUGHT TCU WAS THE BETTER SQUAD.
I watch way more of the NFL but this line screams to me that the Packers are the better squad. I may shift based on experience.
Also, I love playing against teams that have lost their all pro center, this is a huge angle for me.
thanks for the visit to the wall of shame-
gl tonight
Gilberto keep doing what you do ....someone that hits 60 percent over 250 picks is someone i want to listen too .... if people want to fade then fade ... but i would advise not to do that for too long ..
Gilberto keep doing what you do ....someone that hits 60 percent over 250 picks is someone i want to listen too .... if people want to fade then fade ... but i would advise not to do that for too long ..
Post what you want but atleast be accurate:
Wisconsin CBB 1-0
Bears ML and +3.5 (1-2)
Jets 1H, ML, +4 (1-5)
Jets 2H (2-5)
Illinois ST 1H, Game, 2H (5-5)
5-5 is a far cry from 1-5 but enjoy yourself as you post nothing and are the typical Covers bashers that come after good cappers so blow me.
Jets 2H
Post what you want but atleast be accurate:
Wisconsin CBB 1-0
Bears ML and +3.5 (1-2)
Jets 1H, ML, +4 (1-5)
Jets 2H (2-5)
Illinois ST 1H, Game, 2H (5-5)
5-5 is a far cry from 1-5 but enjoy yourself as you post nothing and are the typical Covers bashers that come after good cappers so blow me.
Jets 2H
If you choose to make use of any information on this website including online sports betting services from any websites that may be featured on this website, we strongly recommend that you carefully check your local laws before doing so. It is your sole responsibility to understand your local laws and observe them strictly. Covers does not provide any advice or guidance as to the legality of online sports betting or other online gambling activities within your jurisdiction and you are responsible for complying with laws that are applicable to you in your relevant locality. Covers disclaims all liability associated with your use of this website and use of any information contained on it. As a condition of using this website, you agree to hold the owner of this website harmless from any claims arising from your use of any services on any third party website that may be featured by Covers.