Posted:
#51
LC YOUR STILL ONE OF THE BEST ON HERE
0
*** NBA Bounce-Back Monday ***
Posted:
#59
LeagueCapper. I respect your plays bro but I think if you just stopped betting on bad teams all together you'd be killing it. I know bad teams cover too, but why even try your luck with them? It's just not worth it IMO in the long run. Bad teams do what bad teams do. Nets was a bad beat tho make no mistake about it. But I would put certain bad teams on my do not bet list. I've never wagered on the 6ers not once even tho they covered tonight. Maybe I dont have the balls you do
0
Posted:
#60
Quote Originally Posted by TFTM2014:
You've been cold. ICE cold. Glad to see you're on Nets and Wolves. Don't know why you are but they'll both lose. Sorry.
That Nets was brutal for you i understand, but I did call this. Sorry bud. I suggest to stop trying to be a wise guy and just cap the games.You've been cold. ICE cold. Glad to see you're on Nets and Wolves. Don't know why you are but they'll both lose. Sorry.
0
Posted:
#61
Quote Originally Posted by ajjjjj:
My favorite part of your threads is the meticulous record you were posting when you were winning. Updated daily, breaking down ATS, units, big play records.. everything.
Since then, all of a sudden records have disappeared. Of course, when they do reappear, units will be calculated incorrectly (in your favor or course) and a loss here and there will be forgotten.
Classic Covers
I post it every night but nice try
2014 NBA Season: -9.13 units
0
Posted:
#69
That is why I like this guy. I flame him and run him under a bus when he gets wiped by Vegas. Many others do the same. Yet he is able to make a joke out of it. Respect for that. Others go defensive and either go in a hole and hide or come out with rage and make excuses for their loss.
Better luck next time LC
Better luck next time LC
0
Posted:
#73
Quote Originally Posted by Dr_Baseball:
LC, I show road favs off a road win where they won each quarter are 52-61 ATS since 1996 through tonight. 54%. Doesn't seem very strong of an angle given the small sample size. What am I missing?
LC, I show road favs off a road win where they won each quarter are 52-61 ATS since 1996 through tonight. 54%. Doesn't seem very strong of an angle given the small sample size. What am I missing?
| ATS: | 14-25-0 (-5.41, 35.9%) |
|---|
Team must be a road favorite and a road favorite in the last game with 0 or 1 days rest.
Take the Spurs out of the equation and you have:
| ATS: | 12-24-0 (-5.78, 33.3%) |
|---|
0
Posted:
#74
Quote Originally Posted by fadeORdie:
That is why I like this guy. I flame him and run him under a bus when he gets wiped by Vegas. Many others do the same. Yet he is able to make a joke out of it. Respect for that. Others go defensive and either go in a hole and hide or come out with rage and make excuses for their loss.
Better luck next time LC
That is why I like this guy. I flame him and run him under a bus when he gets wiped by Vegas. Many others do the same. Yet he is able to make a joke out of it. Respect for that. Others go defensive and either go in a hole and hide or come out with rage and make excuses for their loss.
Better luck next time LC
you just described Scaljabroni 
0
Posted:
#75
Quote Originally Posted by LeagueCapper:
| ATS: | 14-25-0 (-5.41, 35.9%) |
|---|
Team must be a road favorite and a road favorite in the last game with 0 or 1 days rest.
Take the Spurs out of the equation and you have:
| ATS: | 12-24-0 (-5.78, 33.3%) |
|---|
The last 4 covers by the way have been by 1 point, 2 points, 3 points, and 2 points.
System could easily by 8-28 ATS
0
Hot Forum Topics
