Hello friends ![]()
You already know last night was a huge success ![]()
Take Brooklyn +18.5 & ML +900 while you still can ![]()
Good luck! Hopefully, we won't need it
Hello friends ![]()
You already know last night was a huge success ![]()
Take Brooklyn +18.5 & ML +900 while you still can ![]()
Good luck! Hopefully, we won't need it
Hello friends ![]()
You already know last night was a huge success ![]()
Take Brooklyn +18.5 & ML +900 while you still can ![]()
Good luck! Hopefully, we won't need it
@Way2Good
I'm just posting my best interpretation of the numbers. It's dishonest on your part to compare me to someone who purposely and consistently posts bad info.
@Way2Good
I'm just posting my best interpretation of the numbers. It's dishonest on your part to compare me to someone who purposely and consistently posts bad info.
I hit bucks, and wizards ML and both were +200. In addition to all the dogs I've picked as winners recently. Once we get past the learning curve, most of these plays will become either no plays or wins.
I hit bucks, and wizards ML and both were +200. In addition to all the dogs I've picked as winners recently. Once we get past the learning curve, most of these plays will become either no plays or wins.
@mrdeltona
Dogs in the 6-10 range
SU: 63-182-1 (25.7%)
ATS: 121-121-4 (50%)
Dogs 3-6 range
SU: 102-155-3 (39.7%)
ATS: 138-119-3 (53.7%)
looks like dogs in 3-6 range have a good chance of winning SU if covering
@mrdeltona
Dogs in the 6-10 range
SU: 63-182-1 (25.7%)
ATS: 121-121-4 (50%)
Dogs 3-6 range
SU: 102-155-3 (39.7%)
ATS: 138-119-3 (53.7%)
looks like dogs in 3-6 range have a good chance of winning SU if covering
@MrFreedo
Thanks for posting that. Should be more mindful on the bigger dogs. But, ultimately, my manual adjustment fell short. I realize that now. Had I known OKC was the outright winner I could have told you last night there was no way Brooklyn would cover. I knew something was wrong, we all knew. But, 9/10 times I'm wrong going on instincts alone. The numbers didn't lie. Manual oversight went horribly wrong here.
@MrFreedo
Thanks for posting that. Should be more mindful on the bigger dogs. But, ultimately, my manual adjustment fell short. I realize that now. Had I known OKC was the outright winner I could have told you last night there was no way Brooklyn would cover. I knew something was wrong, we all knew. But, 9/10 times I'm wrong going on instincts alone. The numbers didn't lie. Manual oversight went horribly wrong here.
i love me some garbage teams 1st half of the season but spots get tougher as they either dont care or straight tank when theres nothing to play for. Early on even if they suck or are expected to suck they have the enthusiasm of what if
i love me some garbage teams 1st half of the season but spots get tougher as they either dont care or straight tank when theres nothing to play for. Early on even if they suck or are expected to suck they have the enthusiasm of what if

If you choose to make use of any information on this website including online sports betting services from any websites that may be featured on this website, we strongly recommend that you carefully check your local laws before doing so.It is your sole responsibility to understand your local laws and observe them strictly.Covers does not provide any advice or guidance as to the legality of online sports betting or other online gambling activities within your jurisdiction and you are responsible for complying with laws that are applicable to you in your relevant locality.Covers disclaims all liability associated with your use of this website and use of any information contained on it.As a condition of using this website, you agree to hold the owner of this website harmless from any claims arising from your use of any services on any third party website that may be featured by Covers.