considering thatthe defense oforlhas been worse thanthat ofcharin recentgames, the -14toorlis dangerousfor punters... must take intoaccount thatcharandI beatorlonce andin recentgamesmight makemorecharcleandorlpointsmade??but the lasttime they played. the effectiveness ofcharis very badbut in recentgamesthe defenseof both teamsare almostequal,untilwe can say thatthecharis better indefensive reboundscharis higher thanorl whichwill giveworktoovercomethe-14orltoearn itbythe difference... I think thebest alternativeisunder....Under 186.5
takinginto accountthe -14orlandoinjurybecomes more difficult... holderthatis banking
considering thatthe defense oforlhas been worse thanthat ofcharin recentgames, the -14toorlis dangerousfor punters... must take intoaccount thatcharandI beatorlonce andin recentgamesmight makemorecharcleandorlpointsmade??but the lasttime they played. the effectiveness ofcharis very badbut in recentgamesthe defenseof both teamsare almostequal,untilwe can say thatthecharis better indefensive reboundscharis higher thanorl whichwill giveworktoovercomethe-14orltoearn itbythe difference... I think thebest alternativeisunder....Under 186.5
takinginto accountthe -14orlandoinjurybecomes more difficult... holderthatis banking
you know something?you're right...with theoddsnow upto+7.5tophilthis indicatesthatgivethe197more thanunderthemainbankingphilandMILwill beeither..
but ifthedefensewill bephilit's much betterthanMilwaukee, Thatwould make astrongundernot having toface thebestofmilwaukee.. and defense ofmilwaukeeis weakenedmorestronglytoan ERA ofphil... what I meanis that theodds+7.5philis nowmoreassuredandis evidentunder197 points
0
you know something?you're right...with theoddsnow upto+7.5tophilthis indicatesthatgivethe197more thanunderthemainbankingphilandMILwill beeither..
but ifthedefensewill bephilit's much betterthanMilwaukee, Thatwould make astrongundernot having toface thebestofmilwaukee.. and defense ofmilwaukeeis weakenedmorestronglytoan ERA ofphil... what I meanis that theodds+7.5philis nowmoreassuredandis evidentunder197 points
bestpicksnow your english is subpar and I can't understand half of what you are saying. That being said it seems you did no research on your picks not knowing that half of Philly was playing and I would eiter fade all of these picks or stay away completely. Come on man.
0
bestpicksnow your english is subpar and I can't understand half of what you are saying. That being said it seems you did no research on your picks not knowing that half of Philly was playing and I would eiter fade all of these picks or stay away completely. Come on man.
okfriend...txtechpika I justexplainthat bothphillyandMilwaukeeplaylowinthe lineup.... certainly true thatphillyplaylesson offensebut not in thedefense thatis stronger thanMilw... Milwlessoffensiveplayas well andthat makes amore attractiveunder
notmuchresearch is neededto analyzethis ... phillynow withoddsof+8isalsomore attractive...
gl...man
0
okfriend...txtechpika I justexplainthat bothphillyandMilwaukeeplaylowinthe lineup.... certainly true thatphillyplaylesson offensebut not in thedefense thatis stronger thanMilw... Milwlessoffensiveplayas well andthat makes amore attractiveunder
notmuchresearch is neededto analyzethis ... phillynow withoddsof+8isalsomore attractive...
bestpicksnow your english is subpar and I can't understand half of what you are saying. That being said it seems you did no research on your picks not knowing that half of Philly was playing and I would eiter fade all of these picks or stay away completely. Come on man.
I disagee with you, txtech. The man definitely know his sports. I've been tailing him for a couple weeks. Fade if you want to...no loss to us. As Best's English goes, I've been studying Spanish for over a decade and it's still pretty mixed up with verb tenses. You got his PHILLY UNDER bet, yes?? to all!!!
0
Quote Originally Posted by txtechpika:
bestpicksnow your english is subpar and I can't understand half of what you are saying. That being said it seems you did no research on your picks not knowing that half of Philly was playing and I would eiter fade all of these picks or stay away completely. Come on man.
I disagee with you, txtech. The man definitely know his sports. I've been tailing him for a couple weeks. Fade if you want to...no loss to us. As Best's English goes, I've been studying Spanish for over a decade and it's still pretty mixed up with verb tenses. You got his PHILLY UNDER bet, yes?? to all!!!
motorcitymamathanks.... ifyou wantI can help youpractice Spanish.. with mylittle Englishtry to givea betterexplanationfor allbettorswho knowand do not knowofproyecconesand probabilitiesof events.. I haveyears of playingonlinepoker worldwith largeprojectionsand thathelped meto explore opportunitiesin the probabilityof betting andasfitto win apokerhead upinthiscase is againstthebookmakersmakingbluffin the oddsforgamblerslose... all the time isnotso... straight bettherewithout muchanalysisevery day but bankersorsports bettingshould try todropless moneyevery day sothey trya bluffbetween therunlineandmoneylineforall of ussomeunsafebetwhenin reality they arethe easiest...
0
motorcitymamathanks.... ifyou wantI can help youpractice Spanish.. with mylittle Englishtry to givea betterexplanationfor allbettorswho knowand do not knowofproyecconesand probabilitiesof events.. I haveyears of playingonlinepoker worldwith largeprojectionsand thathelped meto explore opportunitiesin the probabilityof betting andasfitto win apokerhead upinthiscase is againstthebookmakersmakingbluffin the oddsforgamblerslose... all the time isnotso... straight bettherewithout muchanalysisevery day but bankersorsports bettingshould try todropless moneyevery day sothey trya bluffbetween therunlineandmoneylineforall of ussomeunsafebetwhenin reality they arethe easiest...
Greetingsfriend! ejnell_04 I think theinsurance isstronger andWashington196.5+2andunder! why? becauseWAS isa superior teamtoClevelandeven though theirnumbersdo not show it... WAScomes frombeatingfar superiorteamsenrolledin the finalleague... WASeffectivenessasCLEis not good... but the defenseWASsuperiosiswhathas given himthe pasttriumphsWAS.... CLE's defenseis badthis will allow studentstoearnup tothoseWAS+2femalethat givetheodds.... theunderis clearthatifCLEis not effectiveon offenseand defenseis a wallWAS.... with theoddsof 196.5is more thansufficientunder.... luckyfriend....!
Greetingsfriend! ejnell_04 I think theinsurance isstronger andWashington196.5+2andunder! why? becauseWAS isa superior teamtoClevelandeven though theirnumbersdo not show it... WAScomes frombeatingfar superiorteamsenrolledin the finalleague... WASeffectivenessasCLEis not good... but the defenseWASsuperiosiswhathas given himthe pasttriumphsWAS.... CLE's defenseis badthis will allow studentstoearnup tothoseWAS+2femalethat givetheodds.... theunderis clearthatifCLEis not effectiveon offenseand defenseis a wallWAS.... with theoddsof 196.5is more thansufficientunder.... luckyfriend....!
you know something?you're right...with theoddsnow upto+7.5tophilthis indicatesthatgivethe197more thanunderthemainbankingphilandMILwill beeither..
but ifthedefensewill bephilit's much betterthanMilwaukee, Thatwould make astrongundernot having toface thebestofmilwaukee.. and defense ofmilwaukeeis weakenedmorestronglytoan ERA ofphil... what I meanis that theodds+7.5philis nowmoreassuredandis evidentunder197 points
GAME OVER
PHI 90 - MIL 85
endof discussion....he who knowsdoes not needa lot of research...!
0
Quote Originally Posted by BESTPICKSNOW:
you know something?you're right...with theoddsnow upto+7.5tophilthis indicatesthatgivethe197more thanunderthemainbankingphilandMILwill beeither..
but ifthedefensewill bephilit's much betterthanMilwaukee, Thatwould make astrongundernot having toface thebestofmilwaukee.. and defense ofmilwaukeeis weakenedmorestronglytoan ERA ofphil... what I meanis that theodds+7.5philis nowmoreassuredandis evidentunder197 points
GAME OVER
PHI 90 - MIL 85
endof discussion....he who knowsdoes not needa lot of research...!
okfriend...txtechpika I justexplainthat bothphillyandMilwaukeeplaylowinthe lineup.... certainly true thatphillyplaylesson offensebut not in thedefense thatis stronger thanMilw... Milwlessoffensiveplayas well andthat makes amore attractiveunder
notmuchresearch is neededto analyzethis ... phillynow withoddsof+8isalsomore attractive...
gl...man
GAME OVER
PHI 90 - MIL 85
endof discussion....he who knowsdoes not needa lot of research...!
0
Quote Originally Posted by BESTPICKSNOW:
okfriend...txtechpika I justexplainthat bothphillyandMilwaukeeplaylowinthe lineup.... certainly true thatphillyplaylesson offensebut not in thedefense thatis stronger thanMilw... Milwlessoffensiveplayas well andthat makes amore attractiveunder
notmuchresearch is neededto analyzethis ... phillynow withoddsof+8isalsomore attractive...
gl...man
GAME OVER
PHI 90 - MIL 85
endof discussion....he who knowsdoes not needa lot of research...!
If you choose to make use of any information on this website including online sports betting services from any websites that may be featured on
this website, we strongly recommend that you carefully check your local laws before doing so.It is your sole responsibility to understand your local laws and observe them strictly.Covers does not provide
any advice or guidance as to the legality of online sports betting or other online gambling activities within your jurisdiction and you are responsible for complying with laws that are applicable to you in
your relevant locality.Covers disclaims all liability associated with your use of this website and use of any information contained on it.As a condition of using this website, you agree to hold the owner
of this website harmless from any claims arising from your use of any services on any third party website that may be featured by Covers.