Since 2021, teams that scored no more than 18 points in a road playoff game last game are: 10-26 10-26 ATS
Spurs - 5
Over the last 22 years, the under has gone 52-20-2 (72.22%, +30u, 36.86% ROI) when home playoff teams with spreads between -4.5 and +5.0 in tied series after the first round have played after being an underdog in their last game. And all game 3 playoff games since 2016 have gone 26-8 to the Under
Spurs-T-wolves Under 216.5 &
76ers-Knicks Under 214.5
I'm also taking a small shot with the 76ers tonight. I can't see them getting swept in this rivalry series. I believe they win at least 1 of the next 2 games.
76ers + 3.5
Bet labs have a double play on the 76ers as well
BOL!
1
To remove first post, remove entire topic.
Since 2021, teams that scored no more than 18 points in a road playoff game last game are: 10-26 10-26 ATS
Spurs - 5
Over the last 22 years, the under has gone 52-20-2 (72.22%, +30u, 36.86% ROI) when home playoff teams with spreads between -4.5 and +5.0 in tied series after the first round have played after being an underdog in their last game. And all game 3 playoff games since 2016 have gone 26-8 to the Under
Spurs-T-wolves Under 216.5 &
76ers-Knicks Under 214.5
I'm also taking a small shot with the 76ers tonight. I can't see them getting swept in this rivalry series. I believe they win at least 1 of the next 2 games.
Obviously Embiid is playing. I got them at plus money, but I still think at - 3.5 they have a good chance of covering. Knicks are a far different team on the road then they are at home.
0
Obviously Embiid is playing. I got them at plus money, but I still think at - 3.5 they have a good chance of covering. Knicks are a far different team on the road then they are at home.
Over the last 22 years, the under has gone 52-20-2 (72.22%, +30u, 36.86% ROI) when home playoff teams with spreads between -4.5 and +5.0 in TIED SERIES after the first round have played after being an underdog in their last game ...
Spurs-T-wolves Under 216.5 &
76ERS - KNICKS under 214.5
1
@Redlad
Over the last 22 years, the under has gone 52-20-2 (72.22%, +30u, 36.86% ROI) when home playoff teams with spreads between -4.5 and +5.0 in TIED SERIES after the first round have played after being an underdog in their last game ...
And what is the ATS record for the first trend when you filter it for teams that are now at home?
OK. The 76ers-Knicks fell under the game 3 playoff trend. Not the 52-20-2 one. And you have to learn to do your own research. I'm not a sports service. I don't get paid for providing information.
1
Quote Originally Posted by Stew Baker:
And what is the ATS record for the first trend when you filter it for teams that are now at home?
OK. The 76ers-Knicks fell under the game 3 playoff trend. Not the 52-20-2 one. And you have to learn to do your own research. I'm not a sports service. I don't get paid for providing information.
Quote Originally Posted by Stew Baker: And what is the ATS record for the first trend when you filter it for teams that are now at home? OK. The 76ers-Knicks fell under the game 3 playoff trend. Not the 52-20-2 one. And you have to learn to do your own research. I'm not a sports service. I don't get paid for providing information.
Why bother to share snippets, when they don't tell the whole story and could be misleading? Do you even know what the ATS record is since 2021 for HOME teams that scored no more than 18 (or whatever the correct number is) points in a road playoff game last game?
0
Quote Originally Posted by Redlad:
Quote Originally Posted by Stew Baker: And what is the ATS record for the first trend when you filter it for teams that are now at home? OK. The 76ers-Knicks fell under the game 3 playoff trend. Not the 52-20-2 one. And you have to learn to do your own research. I'm not a sports service. I don't get paid for providing information.
Why bother to share snippets, when they don't tell the whole story and could be misleading? Do you even know what the ATS record is since 2021 for HOME teams that scored no more than 18 (or whatever the correct number is) points in a road playoff game last game?
Why bother to share snippets, when they don't tell the whole story and could be misleading? Do you even know what the ATS record is since 2021 for HOME teams that scored no more than 18 (or whatever the correct number is) points in a road playoff game last game?
You're sort of an A-hole, aren't you. You're just upset because he doesn't like the T-Wolves that you think are such a great bet.
1
Quote Originally Posted by Stew Baker:
Why bother to share snippets, when they don't tell the whole story and could be misleading? Do you even know what the ATS record is since 2021 for HOME teams that scored no more than 18 (or whatever the correct number is) points in a road playoff game last game?
You're sort of an A-hole, aren't you. You're just upset because he doesn't like the T-Wolves that you think are such a great bet.
You're a bit presumptsuos, aren't you? What course in mindreading did you take? I'm not a two year old; I don't care who likes or doesn't like what I like. If you know anything about this business, you would know that for a team that's playing at home, it's pretty significant to know what the record of a trend is for home teams, not just the overall trend for home and away. I would have asked the exact same question if the trend was for the Michigan Wolverines playing the Little Sisters of the Poor, which I don't have a bet on.
If dude has the answer, he should type the 5 character answer in the reply field and submit, and not take an attitude. If he doesn't have the answer, then he's shorting himself by making a bet based on a trend which may not apply quite like he thinks it does.
0
@Jimmy_Cats
You're a bit presumptsuos, aren't you? What course in mindreading did you take? I'm not a two year old; I don't care who likes or doesn't like what I like. If you know anything about this business, you would know that for a team that's playing at home, it's pretty significant to know what the record of a trend is for home teams, not just the overall trend for home and away. I would have asked the exact same question if the trend was for the Michigan Wolverines playing the Little Sisters of the Poor, which I don't have a bet on.
If dude has the answer, he should type the 5 character answer in the reply field and submit, and not take an attitude. If he doesn't have the answer, then he's shorting himself by making a bet based on a trend which may not apply quite like he thinks it does.
No, I'm not being presumptuous. (correct spelling) I read your thread, and I know who you bet on. In reading your thread, my thought was that you lack testicles for not putting your 1.6 units all on T-Wolves moneyline instead of grabbing 4.5 points. I didn't say anything until you started giving Redlad a hard time, just because he made a typo. He's one of the best posters on covers and you choose to nitpick.
0
@Stew Baker
No, I'm not being presumptuous. (correct spelling) I read your thread, and I know who you bet on. In reading your thread, my thought was that you lack testicles for not putting your 1.6 units all on T-Wolves moneyline instead of grabbing 4.5 points. I didn't say anything until you started giving Redlad a hard time, just because he made a typo. He's one of the best posters on covers and you choose to nitpick.
Where do you see that I gave Redlad a hard time over a typo? Something clearly didn't make sense and I pointed it out, wanting him to clarify what he was talking about. Not nitpicking, rather trying to learn something. Where I did give him a hard time is when he gave me a smartass response to a simple, easy to answer question, the answer to which would be clearly helpful, the one about filtering the first trend for home teams only, where that record would be more applicable here, compared to the record which was posted.
If you want to discuss my unit distribution on the Minnesota game, go to that thread where I posted it.
0
@Jimmy_Cats
Where do you see that I gave Redlad a hard time over a typo? Something clearly didn't make sense and I pointed it out, wanting him to clarify what he was talking about. Not nitpicking, rather trying to learn something. Where I did give him a hard time is when he gave me a smartass response to a simple, easy to answer question, the answer to which would be clearly helpful, the one about filtering the first trend for home teams only, where that record would be more applicable here, compared to the record which was posted.
If you want to discuss my unit distribution on the Minnesota game, go to that thread where I posted it.
If you choose to make use of any information on this website including online sports betting services from any websites that may be featured on
this website, we strongly recommend that you carefully check your local laws before doing so.It is your sole responsibility to understand your local laws and observe them strictly.Covers does not provide
any advice or guidance as to the legality of online sports betting or other online gambling activities within your jurisdiction and you are responsible for complying with laws that are applicable to you in
your relevant locality.Covers disclaims all liability associated with your use of this website and use of any information contained on it.As a condition of using this website, you agree to hold the owner
of this website harmless from any claims arising from your use of any services on any third party website that may be featured by Covers.