ML: 4-12, -8.88 units RL: 4-5-1, -1.98 units TT: 10-9, +0.18 units OU: 13-3-1, +9.64 units FH SIDE: 0-0, +0.00 units FH OU: 0-0, +0.00 units FH TT: 0-0, +0.00 units MIX: 0-0, +0.00 units PROP: 0-0, +0.00 units RFI: 0-0, +0.00 units FI SIDE: 0-0, +0.00 units TOTAL: 31-29-1, -1.04 units
Royals -129
As always, GL to all.
0
To remove first post, remove entire topic.
3-3-1, -0.12 yesterday.
All plays are 1 unit unless otherwise noted.
ML: 4-12, -8.88 units RL: 4-5-1, -1.98 units TT: 10-9, +0.18 units OU: 13-3-1, +9.64 units FH SIDE: 0-0, +0.00 units FH OU: 0-0, +0.00 units FH TT: 0-0, +0.00 units MIX: 0-0, +0.00 units PROP: 0-0, +0.00 units RFI: 0-0, +0.00 units FI SIDE: 0-0, +0.00 units TOTAL: 31-29-1, -1.04 units
3-3-1, -0.12 yesterday. All plays are 1 unit unless otherwise noted. ML: 4-12, -8.88 unitsRL: 4-5-1, -1.98 unitsTT: 10-9, +0.18 unitsOU: 13-3-1, +9.64 unitsFH SIDE: 0-0, +0.00 unitsFH OU: 0-0, +0.00 unitsFH TT: 0-0, +0.00 unitsMIX: 0-0, +0.00 unitsPROP: 0-0, +0.00 unitsRFI: 0-0, +0.00 unitsFI SIDE: 0-0, +0.00 unitsTOTAL: 31-29-1, -1.04 units Royals -129 As always, GL to all.
Weeble, am gonna say this now to you, instead of at end of season. Remember last season when your totals record was awesome and other plays you picked took away from those winnings? It looks like your on fire again with the totals. I have done this stuff for more years then i want to remember and i know all of us gamblers want to try pick winners on all kinds of different bets, but sometimes we have to shake those thoughts and just focus on capping plays that were good at and totals seems to be your thing and i would hate to be having this talk at the end of the season again, like we did last year. I just wanted to remind you of our talk last year, cause sometimes us gamblers cant see whats right in front of us. Your too good of a guy, for me not to have said something. In the end its your choice what you decide to do, but way your totals hit, thats what i would put all my focus on, or at least make your total plays worth more then other plays.
Either way best of luck again this season My Friend
cd
2
Quote Originally Posted by weeble5672:
3-3-1, -0.12 yesterday. All plays are 1 unit unless otherwise noted. ML: 4-12, -8.88 unitsRL: 4-5-1, -1.98 unitsTT: 10-9, +0.18 unitsOU: 13-3-1, +9.64 unitsFH SIDE: 0-0, +0.00 unitsFH OU: 0-0, +0.00 unitsFH TT: 0-0, +0.00 unitsMIX: 0-0, +0.00 unitsPROP: 0-0, +0.00 unitsRFI: 0-0, +0.00 unitsFI SIDE: 0-0, +0.00 unitsTOTAL: 31-29-1, -1.04 units Royals -129 As always, GL to all.
Weeble, am gonna say this now to you, instead of at end of season. Remember last season when your totals record was awesome and other plays you picked took away from those winnings? It looks like your on fire again with the totals. I have done this stuff for more years then i want to remember and i know all of us gamblers want to try pick winners on all kinds of different bets, but sometimes we have to shake those thoughts and just focus on capping plays that were good at and totals seems to be your thing and i would hate to be having this talk at the end of the season again, like we did last year. I just wanted to remind you of our talk last year, cause sometimes us gamblers cant see whats right in front of us. Your too good of a guy, for me not to have said something. In the end its your choice what you decide to do, but way your totals hit, thats what i would put all my focus on, or at least make your total plays worth more then other plays.
Either way best of luck again this season My Friend
I'm not going to speak for Weeble, who I don't believe would ever say anything, but messages like this I view as being extremely patronizing, although I don't believe that to be the intention at all. The reason why you/we know his record in totals and everything else is because he tracks them and posts them. For someone to act like they know better than the person making his own decisions isn't right, imho. He's certainly very aware of results in each facet of the game, and is making the choice he believes is best or just that he wants to choose. We should all respect that. The fact that you "had this talk" at the end of the season (no idea if it was requested or forced upon, like in this instance) and he has made his choice is all the more reason to respect it.
0
@cd329
I'm not going to speak for Weeble, who I don't believe would ever say anything, but messages like this I view as being extremely patronizing, although I don't believe that to be the intention at all. The reason why you/we know his record in totals and everything else is because he tracks them and posts them. For someone to act like they know better than the person making his own decisions isn't right, imho. He's certainly very aware of results in each facet of the game, and is making the choice he believes is best or just that he wants to choose. We should all respect that. The fact that you "had this talk" at the end of the season (no idea if it was requested or forced upon, like in this instance) and he has made his choice is all the more reason to respect it.
What cd says, makes sense when solely looking at the trending numbers. That said, had I done that in pucks this year, I wouldn't have picked up 40+ units in the past couple of months. A lot of that turnaround had to do with my totals bets that sucked for the first half of the season. I kept plugging away and tinkering with my formula and I found something that eventually worked.
If I were to continue on without making changes then...yes, I probably would be wasting my time and money. But for now...
0
@EFroPoker @cd329
What cd says, makes sense when solely looking at the trending numbers. That said, had I done that in pucks this year, I wouldn't have picked up 40+ units in the past couple of months. A lot of that turnaround had to do with my totals bets that sucked for the first half of the season. I kept plugging away and tinkering with my formula and I found something that eventually worked.
If I were to continue on without making changes then...yes, I probably would be wasting my time and money. But for now...
Of course, 100% agree. The point wasn't that the 'advice' wasn't necessarily wrong, it's that when it's unsolicited advice to tell someone that their record is good in one area and bad in another, it's very different. The idea that you post your record and unit in all aspects daily and then would be completely unaware of what has been and hasn't been working is my personal issue, as it comes off patronizing. All good though, and continued well wishes and success!
0
@weeble5672
Of course, 100% agree. The point wasn't that the 'advice' wasn't necessarily wrong, it's that when it's unsolicited advice to tell someone that their record is good in one area and bad in another, it's very different. The idea that you post your record and unit in all aspects daily and then would be completely unaware of what has been and hasn't been working is my personal issue, as it comes off patronizing. All good though, and continued well wishes and success!
@weeble5672 Of course, 100% agree. The point wasn't that the 'advice' wasn't necessarily wrong, it's that when it's unsolicited advice to tell someone that their record is good in one area and bad in another, it's very different. The idea that you post your record and unit in all aspects daily and then would be completely unaware of what has been and hasn't been working is my personal issue, as it comes off patronizing. All good though, and continued well wishes and success!
What you say is true. That said, cd is a good guy so I don't think he meant any ill will by it. Thanks for the support.
0
Quote Originally Posted by EFroPoker:
@weeble5672 Of course, 100% agree. The point wasn't that the 'advice' wasn't necessarily wrong, it's that when it's unsolicited advice to tell someone that their record is good in one area and bad in another, it's very different. The idea that you post your record and unit in all aspects daily and then would be completely unaware of what has been and hasn't been working is my personal issue, as it comes off patronizing. All good though, and continued well wishes and success!
What you say is true. That said, cd is a good guy so I don't think he meant any ill will by it. Thanks for the support.
Yup! 100% agree which is why I said in the original that I didn't think that was the intent :) But if someone is going to offer unsolicited advice where the receiver is clearly extremely aware, a little unsolicited advice felt very needed
0
@weeble5672
Yup! 100% agree which is why I said in the original that I didn't think that was the intent :) But if someone is going to offer unsolicited advice where the receiver is clearly extremely aware, a little unsolicited advice felt very needed
@cd329 I'm not going to speak for Weeble, who I don't believe would ever say anything, but messages like this I view as being extremely patronizing, although I don't believe that to be the intention at all. The reason why you/we know his record in totals and everything else is because he tracks them and posts them. For someone to act like they know better than the person making his own decisions isn't right, imho. He's certainly very aware of results in each facet of the game, and is making the choice he believes is best or just that he wants to choose. We should all respect that. The fact that you "had this talk" at the end of the season (no idea if it was requested or forced upon, like in this instance) and he has made his choice is all the more reason to respect it.
What a jerkoff you are. You have no clue about my friendship with weebe. Me and discussed this at the end of last baseball season and my post was just a reminder of that talk and nothing more. And yes genius, I don't keep notebooks of other rappers stats. Weeble keeps and excellent record tracking, probably the best on this whole website. It's so funny how guys always want to make comments they know nothing about. To even think my post was patronizing shows how clueless you are. Maybe you should have sat back and waited to see what Weeble had to say first. Try doing that next time
3
Quote Originally Posted by EFroPoker:
@cd329 I'm not going to speak for Weeble, who I don't believe would ever say anything, but messages like this I view as being extremely patronizing, although I don't believe that to be the intention at all. The reason why you/we know his record in totals and everything else is because he tracks them and posts them. For someone to act like they know better than the person making his own decisions isn't right, imho. He's certainly very aware of results in each facet of the game, and is making the choice he believes is best or just that he wants to choose. We should all respect that. The fact that you "had this talk" at the end of the season (no idea if it was requested or forced upon, like in this instance) and he has made his choice is all the more reason to respect it.
What a jerkoff you are. You have no clue about my friendship with weebe. Me and discussed this at the end of last baseball season and my post was just a reminder of that talk and nothing more. And yes genius, I don't keep notebooks of other rappers stats. Weeble keeps and excellent record tracking, probably the best on this whole website. It's so funny how guys always want to make comments they know nothing about. To even think my post was patronizing shows how clueless you are. Maybe you should have sat back and waited to see what Weeble had to say first. Try doing that next time
@EFroPoker @cd329 What cd says, makes sense when solely looking at the trending numbers. That said, had I done that in pucks this year, I wouldn't have picked up 40+ units in the past couple of months. A lot of that turnaround had to do with my totals bets that sucked for the first half of the season. I kept plugging away and tinkering with my formula and I found something that eventually worked.If I were to continue on without making changes then...yes, I probably would be wasting my time and money. But for now...
Totally agree with your thoughts. I just remember us laughing about this at the end of the baseball season and whatever you were doing with the totals was dead on. I am 100 percent you know, my post was no disrespect ir me trying to tell you how to bet. It was just a friendly reminder of how good you with the totals. It's like the mechanic who is an expert at fixing motor cycle engines, he doesn't need to try fixing airplane engines loll.
Good luck Friend
2
Quote Originally Posted by weeble5672:
@EFroPoker @cd329 What cd says, makes sense when solely looking at the trending numbers. That said, had I done that in pucks this year, I wouldn't have picked up 40+ units in the past couple of months. A lot of that turnaround had to do with my totals bets that sucked for the first half of the season. I kept plugging away and tinkering with my formula and I found something that eventually worked.If I were to continue on without making changes then...yes, I probably would be wasting my time and money. But for now...
Totally agree with your thoughts. I just remember us laughing about this at the end of the baseball season and whatever you were doing with the totals was dead on. I am 100 percent you know, my post was no disrespect ir me trying to tell you how to bet. It was just a friendly reminder of how good you with the totals. It's like the mechanic who is an expert at fixing motor cycle engines, he doesn't need to try fixing airplane engines loll.
I appreciate the need to followup your patronizing comment with one being an absolute jerk about it. It's not surprising, but it's unfortunate. My response was accurate and well thought out, and Weeble did respond to it. I'm going to give the benefit of the doubt and assume you're just really bad at representing yourself on the online medium, which is pretty common, and this isn't who you are as a person. Wishing you all the best!
0
@cd329
I appreciate the need to followup your patronizing comment with one being an absolute jerk about it. It's not surprising, but it's unfortunate. My response was accurate and well thought out, and Weeble did respond to it. I'm going to give the benefit of the doubt and assume you're just really bad at representing yourself on the online medium, which is pretty common, and this isn't who you are as a person. Wishing you all the best!
@cd329 I appreciate the need to followup your patronizing comment with one being an absolute jerk about it. It's not surprising, but it's unfortunate. My response was accurate and well thought out, and Weeble did respond to it. I'm going to give the benefit of the doubt and assume you're just really bad at representing yourself on the online medium, which is pretty common, and this isn't who you are as a person. Wishing you all the best!
Well heres a another follow up. I know exactly how to convey myself and maybe you should sit back and see if a person that has been here since 2004 and the other person since 2007 talk to each other. But i guess you being here since 2025, you wanted to jump in like some tough guy thinking my post was some type of bash. It was about trying to help a fellow gambler make more money. Am sure you havent learned this yet in your young gambling life, but the best gamblers focus on the gambling bets that they are very good at year in and year out. Thats one of the reason, they make money each year.
Oh and heres last seasons(patronizing lolllll) post to Weeble from me. Hes been winning good with the totals every year and my post was just reminding him of this, since all of us old gamblers get a little forgetful at times. I guess theres always gonna be people out there, trying to twist a persons good intent into it being something bad
@cd329 I appreciate the need to followup your patronizing comment with one being an absolute jerk about it. It's not surprising, but it's unfortunate. My response was accurate and well thought out, and Weeble did respond to it. I'm going to give the benefit of the doubt and assume you're just really bad at representing yourself on the online medium, which is pretty common, and this isn't who you are as a person. Wishing you all the best!
Well heres a another follow up. I know exactly how to convey myself and maybe you should sit back and see if a person that has been here since 2004 and the other person since 2007 talk to each other. But i guess you being here since 2025, you wanted to jump in like some tough guy thinking my post was some type of bash. It was about trying to help a fellow gambler make more money. Am sure you havent learned this yet in your young gambling life, but the best gamblers focus on the gambling bets that they are very good at year in and year out. Thats one of the reason, they make money each year.
Oh and heres last seasons(patronizing lolllll) post to Weeble from me. Hes been winning good with the totals every year and my post was just reminding him of this, since all of us old gamblers get a little forgetful at times. I guess theres always gonna be people out there, trying to twist a persons good intent into it being something bad
Can the Jays find life with their bats? After their manager got tossed yesterday and gave the ump an earful you'd think it would fire up this team. They need a win like blood.
Good Luck
0
Quote Originally Posted by weeble5672:
Adding...Jays +1.5, -118
Dylan Cease is throwing some serious heat today.
Can the Jays find life with their bats? After their manager got tossed yesterday and gave the ump an earful you'd think it would fire up this team. They need a win like blood.
If this is your way of asking for help, please reach out. I'd be happy to do what I can.
If it's not and this is truly who you are...ok. For what it's worth, while dates are wonderful, I've also been here since 2006. I've had different usernames over the years and come and gone. Very cool that you've been on a forum for longer than me, though. I've been a professional gambler for multiple decades. You can literally google me if you felt so inclined. I played professional poker for many many years and have been in sports for decades.
Saying the post was patronizing wasn't an insult. It was an attempt to let someone reflect and try to be better. It also wasn't a matter of opinion. The post is factually and unequivocally patronizing by definition. Telling another adult how they should handle their business that they're already opting to share publicly is the epitome of being patronzing. He knows his record and results and can make his own decisions as such. Saying something more in line with "your totals are crushing, maybe going bigger there is the move!" would be a potentially improved way of handling things.
Like I've said multiple times, nobody is twisting anything. Nobody said your intent was bad -- I quite literally stated I assumed the opposite MULTIPLE times. But it's a chance to listen and be better. That's a choice, however, and no worries at all if you choose to take it as an attack that it wasn't and not reflect in any way. All good, and appreciate you attempting to help and your presence here on this forum.
Still wishing you the best.
0
@cd329
If this is your way of asking for help, please reach out. I'd be happy to do what I can.
If it's not and this is truly who you are...ok. For what it's worth, while dates are wonderful, I've also been here since 2006. I've had different usernames over the years and come and gone. Very cool that you've been on a forum for longer than me, though. I've been a professional gambler for multiple decades. You can literally google me if you felt so inclined. I played professional poker for many many years and have been in sports for decades.
Saying the post was patronizing wasn't an insult. It was an attempt to let someone reflect and try to be better. It also wasn't a matter of opinion. The post is factually and unequivocally patronizing by definition. Telling another adult how they should handle their business that they're already opting to share publicly is the epitome of being patronzing. He knows his record and results and can make his own decisions as such. Saying something more in line with "your totals are crushing, maybe going bigger there is the move!" would be a potentially improved way of handling things.
Like I've said multiple times, nobody is twisting anything. Nobody said your intent was bad -- I quite literally stated I assumed the opposite MULTIPLE times. But it's a chance to listen and be better. That's a choice, however, and no worries at all if you choose to take it as an attack that it wasn't and not reflect in any way. All good, and appreciate you attempting to help and your presence here on this forum.
I wish I could have made a 10k bet, that your next post was gonna be you saying that you were a pro gambler lollll. Yeah okay, we can all dream. I got 46 years doing this shit on both sides of the aisle, so I don't need any type of help from you Gotta admit thou your posts did give me a good laugh thou. Now let this go and move on,pretty simple
2
Different usernames, grounds for being banned.
So what were these other usernames?
I wish I could have made a 10k bet, that your next post was gonna be you saying that you were a pro gambler lollll. Yeah okay, we can all dream. I got 46 years doing this shit on both sides of the aisle, so I don't need any type of help from you Gotta admit thou your posts did give me a good laugh thou. Now let this go and move on,pretty simple
If you choose to make use of any information on this website including online sports betting services from any websites that may be featured on
this website, we strongly recommend that you carefully check your local laws before doing so.It is your sole responsibility to understand your local laws and observe them strictly.Covers does not provide
any advice or guidance as to the legality of online sports betting or other online gambling activities within your jurisdiction and you are responsible for complying with laws that are applicable to you in
your relevant locality.Covers disclaims all liability associated with your use of this website and use of any information contained on it.As a condition of using this website, you agree to hold the owner
of this website harmless from any claims arising from your use of any services on any third party website that may be featured by Covers.