Yes, overall, YTD, the Angels are a poor team, but they are 6-4 last ten and the D-bax are 4-6 after a disappointing road trip. Because the Angels are lightly regarded Urena flies under the radar. He is very good and very consistent. Nelson shows neither quality and when he takes the ball you don’t know what you are going to get, you keep your fingers crossed. The Angels are also 13-24 vs teams over .500, unimpressive until you see the D-bax at 11-26, even worse. Urena and better performance vs righty recently are the key here.
Play At Your Own Risk.
Now and then even a BLIND squirrel can find an acorn
2
To remove first post, remove entire topic.
32-44-6, -1,029.96 - ROR -13.4%
6/015/2026
FG – Angels+114 Urena/Nelson
Yes, overall, YTD, the Angels are a poor team, but they are 6-4 last ten and the D-bax are 4-6 after a disappointing road trip. Because the Angels are lightly regarded Urena flies under the radar. He is very good and very consistent. Nelson shows neither quality and when he takes the ball you don’t know what you are going to get, you keep your fingers crossed. The Angels are also 13-24 vs teams over .500, unimpressive until you see the D-bax at 11-26, even worse. Urena and better performance vs righty recently are the key here.
backdoor_cover, yesterday's thread: Took the Brewers few weeks ago to win the title at +2000. Went down but sticking to my pick. See you all later!!
What a shock! Man, we thought you had disappeared, or gone over to the dark side, or had one too many Margueritas and checked out! Great to see you back.
Now and then even a BLIND squirrel can find an acorn
0
backdoor_cover, yesterday's thread: Took the Brewers few weeks ago to win the title at +2000. Went down but sticking to my pick. See you all later!!
What a shock! Man, we thought you had disappeared, or gone over to the dark side, or had one too many Margueritas and checked out! Great to see you back.
@undermysac: Did you look at the Twins at all, just interested on your take if you have time.
********
Yeah, mostly unimpressed. Both teams can be exciting or disappointing, and we don't have much starter data on Paredes yet. Gore has looked decent lately, but he is no world beater. No play for me.
Now and then even a BLIND squirrel can find an acorn
0
@undermysac: Did you look at the Twins at all, just interested on your take if you have time.
********
Yeah, mostly unimpressed. Both teams can be exciting or disappointing, and we don't have much starter data on Paredes yet. Gore has looked decent lately, but he is no world beater. No play for me.
If you choose to make use of any information on this website including online sports betting services from any websites that may be featured on
this website, we strongly recommend that you carefully check your local laws before doing so.It is your sole responsibility to understand your local laws and observe them strictly.Covers does not provide
any advice or guidance as to the legality of online sports betting or other online gambling activities within your jurisdiction and you are responsible for complying with laws that are applicable to you in
your relevant locality.Covers disclaims all liability associated with your use of this website and use of any information contained on it.As a condition of using this website, you agree to hold the owner
of this website harmless from any claims arising from your use of any services on any third party website that may be featured by Covers.