Toronto OVER 76.5 is on my play on card,,leaning on Twins OVER as well as they have been good to me on the futures board the last few years,,,probably will play on the UNDER on Nats again as that has cashed last 2 seasons as well and are in a tough spot divison wise--GL this year
Toronto OVER 76.5 is on my play on card,,leaning on Twins OVER as well as they have been good to me on the futures board the last few years,,,probably will play on the UNDER on Nats again as that has cashed last 2 seasons as well and are in a tough spot divison wise--GL this year
I disagree with a lot of your plays, although I'm on board with your Astros under. I am getting under 72.5 -115 on my syndicate. I like the Yankees over and Diamondbacks over. The key I think for both teams is the bullpen. The Yanks have one of the league's best bullpens (that got even better) and the Diamondbacks bolstered what was the league's worst bullpen. Both teams were a bit unlucky last year based on run differentials. I did a bit of a write up on my site at smartbetting.blogspot.com
I disagree with a lot of your plays, although I'm on board with your Astros under. I am getting under 72.5 -115 on my syndicate. I like the Yankees over and Diamondbacks over. The key I think for both teams is the bullpen. The Yanks have one of the league's best bullpens (that got even better) and the Diamondbacks bolstered what was the league's worst bullpen. Both teams were a bit unlucky last year based on run differentials. I did a bit of a write up on my site at smartbetting.blogspot.com
Think they take a slight step back. Offense still one of the best, but the pitching is lacking after top two. Placing a lot of hope in having a healthy Brandon Webb....
Think they take a slight step back. Offense still one of the best, but the pitching is lacking after top two. Placing a lot of hope in having a healthy Brandon Webb....
I disagree with a lot of your plays, although I'm on board with your Astros under. I am getting under 72.5 -115 on my syndicate. I like the Yankees over and Diamondbacks over. The key I think for both teams is the bullpen. The Yanks have one of the league's best bullpens (that got even better) and the Diamondbacks bolstered what was the league's worst bullpen. Both teams were a bit unlucky last year based on run differentials. I did a bit of a write up on my site at smartbetting.blogspot.com
your cheap plug for your site (which isn't allowed on here by the way) doesn't work. Easy killer.
I disagree with a lot of your plays, although I'm on board with your Astros under. I am getting under 72.5 -115 on my syndicate. I like the Yankees over and Diamondbacks over. The key I think for both teams is the bullpen. The Yanks have one of the league's best bullpens (that got even better) and the Diamondbacks bolstered what was the league's worst bullpen. Both teams were a bit unlucky last year based on run differentials. I did a bit of a write up on my site at smartbetting.blogspot.com
your cheap plug for your site (which isn't allowed on here by the way) doesn't work. Easy killer.
i don't like any of those because I think it's really hard to bet an OVER in the AL East considering how good each team in that division is and you have to play them 19 times, also it's hard to win under bets on the bad teams cuz they need to be really terrible not to backdoor you at the end of the year like the Astros did to a ton of people last year
i don't like any of those because I think it's really hard to bet an OVER in the AL East considering how good each team in that division is and you have to play them 19 times, also it's hard to win under bets on the bad teams cuz they need to be really terrible not to backdoor you at the end of the year like the Astros did to a ton of people last year
Arizona had one of the worst (if not the worst pens) in MLB this year and they should get much better with Putz . . . and playing in the NL West, improvement in the bullpen could swing some wins. I don't like the under.
I AGREE on Houston
The AL East picks are hard to handicap. Boston is definitely the best, in my opinion, but 96 wins requires Papelbon and Beckett to return to form. The Yankees bats look good this year and the bullpen should be very strong this year.
Arizona had one of the worst (if not the worst pens) in MLB this year and they should get much better with Putz . . . and playing in the NL West, improvement in the bullpen could swing some wins. I don't like the under.
I AGREE on Houston
The AL East picks are hard to handicap. Boston is definitely the best, in my opinion, but 96 wins requires Papelbon and Beckett to return to form. The Yankees bats look good this year and the bullpen should be very strong this year.
MINNESOTA OVER 85 Twins won 94 games last year because they dominated the AL Central 47-25 (76%). They get Morneau and Nathan back and I haven't seen much improvement from other Central teams, with the exception of Detroit who signed V-Mart.
MILWAUKEE BREWERS OVER 86 Marcum and Greinke round out a strong three with Gallardo - should make a huge difference in the NL Central. Prince Fielder is playing for big money.
PHILLIES UNDER 97 "Best rotation in history" aside, the Phillies have some big health question marks at closer (Lidge) and 2B (Utley). There is the loss of Werth to the division-rival Nationals and who knows if Howard will decline in output. Elsewhere in the NL East, teams have gotten better. Braves have a strong rotation and added Uggla to bolster the lineup. The Nationals will be a better team this year. The Mets could be better if the big money busts (Beltan, Bay) get healthy.
SF GIANTS UNDER 88 Giants won 92 games last year but was only 38-34 against NL West opponents, and I think that Colorado and Arizona will be better this year. Granted SD, will take a step back with the loss of Adrian Gonzalez. I still don't see much run production coming from this team, which will make it hard to win this many games, let alone the division.
MINNESOTA OVER 85 Twins won 94 games last year because they dominated the AL Central 47-25 (76%). They get Morneau and Nathan back and I haven't seen much improvement from other Central teams, with the exception of Detroit who signed V-Mart.
MILWAUKEE BREWERS OVER 86 Marcum and Greinke round out a strong three with Gallardo - should make a huge difference in the NL Central. Prince Fielder is playing for big money.
PHILLIES UNDER 97 "Best rotation in history" aside, the Phillies have some big health question marks at closer (Lidge) and 2B (Utley). There is the loss of Werth to the division-rival Nationals and who knows if Howard will decline in output. Elsewhere in the NL East, teams have gotten better. Braves have a strong rotation and added Uggla to bolster the lineup. The Nationals will be a better team this year. The Mets could be better if the big money busts (Beltan, Bay) get healthy.
SF GIANTS UNDER 88 Giants won 92 games last year but was only 38-34 against NL West opponents, and I think that Colorado and Arizona will be better this year. Granted SD, will take a step back with the loss of Adrian Gonzalez. I still don't see much run production coming from this team, which will make it hard to win this many games, let alone the division.
If you choose to make use of any information on this website including online sports betting services from any websites that may be featured on this website, we strongly recommend that you carefully check your local laws before doing so. It is your sole responsibility to understand your local laws and observe them strictly. Covers does not provide any advice or guidance as to the legality of online sports betting or other online gambling activities within your jurisdiction and you are responsible for complying with laws that are applicable to you in your relevant locality. Covers disclaims all liability associated with your use of this website and use of any information contained on it. As a condition of using this website, you agree to hold the owner of this website harmless from any claims arising from your use of any services on any third party website that may be featured by Covers.