This card is very very interesting to me because for once I see what I feel are ALOT of live dogs. I can easily see Wiman, Rampage, Jordan, and Hioki winning their fights.
So what I elected to do is the following.. if it confuses u i don't blame u cuz it confused me a little bit at first.
I have a lot of small parlays of these 4 guys.
I have every combo of 3 team parlays with these guys at .05 u a piece. I also have a parlay of Jordan/wiman/jackson at .11u to win 2.11 just getting this up now before the jordan fight so sharp doesn't say I am making shit up.
0
To remove first post, remove entire topic.
+9.61u since the comeback
This card is very very interesting to me because for once I see what I feel are ALOT of live dogs. I can easily see Wiman, Rampage, Jordan, and Hioki winning their fights.
So what I elected to do is the following.. if it confuses u i don't blame u cuz it confused me a little bit at first.
I have a lot of small parlays of these 4 guys.
I have every combo of 3 team parlays with these guys at .05 u a piece. I also have a parlay of Jordan/wiman/jackson at .11u to win 2.11 just getting this up now before the jordan fight so sharp doesn't say I am making shit up.
Making garbage up.... You posted parlays 2 legs after the fact.... There's no debate about that. I mean you can't honestly deny it.... The threads are time stamped.
0
Making garbage up.... You posted parlays 2 legs after the fact.... There's no debate about that. I mean you can't honestly deny it.... The threads are time stamped.
Debating on making Jackson a real play. He came in at 204 he looked good and due to the fact that he was actually talking garbage to Glover makes me feel like its a pretty good time to get Page at +$.
Wait Sharp two legs of one of the parlays I put up are through?
0
Debating on making Jackson a real play. He came in at 204 he looked good and due to the fact that he was actually talking garbage to Glover makes me feel like its a pretty good time to get Page at +$.
Wait Sharp two legs of one of the parlays I put up are through?
no there buddy i said u were accusing me of making garbage up... go to the orig post at the top of the thread and reread it then... and like i said b4 if i was gonna lie about it... i would have made it for more than .7u to win 1.5... sorry I forgot bellator was on thurs now... we will try not to make that mistake again... like i said... if u don't like it... don't read it.
0
1. Shawn Jordan
+125
Shawn Jordan vs Mike Russow: (Shawn Jordan vs. Mike Russow)
2. Hatsu Hioki
+190
Hatsu Hioki vs Clay Guida: (Hatsu Hioki vs. Clay Guida)
3. Matt Wiman
+170
Matt Wiman vs TJ Grant: (Matt Wiman vs. TJ Grant)
4. Quinton Jackson
+230
Quinton Jackson vs Glover Teixeira: (Quinton Jackson vs. Glover Teixeira)
no there buddy i said u were accusing me of making garbage up... go to the orig post at the top of the thread and reread it then... and like i said b4 if i was gonna lie about it... i would have made it for more than .7u to win 1.5... sorry I forgot bellator was on thurs now... we will try not to make that mistake again... like i said... if u don't like it... don't read it.
i didn't realize i cud post the wagers on here from odds becuz it didn't show up in the message box but i guess i can... so am i still making garbage up sharp?
Wager ID 25787060
Event 1:
San Fran. 49ers at Atlanta Falcons
Play Time:
2013-01-20 15:05
Selection:
San Fran. to win
Odds:
-200
Final Score:
Atlanta 24 San Fran. 28
Event 2:
Michael Bisping vs Vitor Belfort: (Michael Bisping vs. Vitor Belfort)
Play Time:
2013-01-19 22:34
Selection:
Vitor Belfort to win
Odds:
Match Up -110
Final Score:
Vitor Belfort Wins
Event 3:
Wisconsin Badgers at Indiana Hoosiers (2nd Half)
Play Time:
2013-01-15 22:30
Selection:
Under to win
Odds:
Under (70.0) -110
Final Score:
Indiana (2H) 27 Wisconsin (2H) 33
Bet Type:
Parlay
Bet Odds:
+447
Bet Amount:
$100.00
Paid Amount:
$546.69
Won Amount:
$446.69
Time Placed:
2013-01-15 22:03:07
0
i didn't realize i cud post the wagers on here from odds becuz it didn't show up in the message box but i guess i can... so am i still making garbage up sharp?
Wager ID 25787060
Event 1:
San Fran. 49ers at Atlanta Falcons
Play Time:
2013-01-20 15:05
Selection:
San Fran. to win
Odds:
-200
Final Score:
Atlanta 24 San Fran. 28
Event 2:
Michael Bisping vs Vitor Belfort: (Michael Bisping vs. Vitor Belfort)
aight... i am done i think the tickets provide the proof... i mean either get on board or don't i don't care either way... i just post my garbage on here so ppl can make money with me... u mad then be mad... just don't come out here and say i am lying or this and that because I got better garbage to do than lie about a few hundred dollars here or there to a bunch of guys I will never ever meet.
0
aight... i am done i think the tickets provide the proof... i mean either get on board or don't i don't care either way... i just post my garbage on here so ppl can make money with me... u mad then be mad... just don't come out here and say i am lying or this and that because I got better garbage to do than lie about a few hundred dollars here or there to a bunch of guys I will never ever meet.
You posted a parlay that had two legs in already. What's the confusion? Like there's never been faked posted tickets? When I get home and see a winner, ill tell you had I 1,000 units on it, and ill copy and paste a ticket.
Let me know if you believe me or not.
0
You posted a parlay that had two legs in already. What's the confusion? Like there's never been faked posted tickets? When I get home and see a winner, ill tell you had I 1,000 units on it, and ill copy and paste a ticket.
I am trying to do the math now, with the Jordan win and him starting most of the parlays if I shouldn't be doing some small hedging... given none of the plays are really that big nothing wrong with free money... n e one that's really good with hedging feel free to offer suggestings... still debating on making Rampage a single play... but if Wiman wins not sure there will b any need...
It is kinda scary however that Grant has moved up to -200 now... normally when the juice moves like this its a bad bad sign
0
Alright so complete card recap....
We have parlays of the following
.8u to win 1.5u Weedman/Suanders/DJ
.05u to win 2.85u jordan/jackson/wiman/hioki
PARLAYS
.11u to win 2.11u Jordan/Jackson/Wiman
.05u to win .9u jordan/wiman/hioki
.05u to win 1u jordan/jackson/wiman
.05u to win 1.3u jordan jackson hioki
.05 u to win 1.08u jackson/wiman/hioki
I am trying to do the math now, with the Jordan win and him starting most of the parlays if I shouldn't be doing some small hedging... given none of the plays are really that big nothing wrong with free money... n e one that's really good with hedging feel free to offer suggestings... still debating on making Rampage a single play... but if Wiman wins not sure there will b any need...
It is kinda scary however that Grant has moved up to -200 now... normally when the juice moves like this its a bad bad sign
Whelp... if someone had told me Matt was going to go out there and just stand toe to toe and play who has better Muay Thai I would have hammered Grant... thought Matt would apply pressure put him on the cage take him down.. and wear him out maybe do some damage late... but just terrible game plan from a guy that is supposed to be a "good" mma mind. sigh... oh well... Sucks originally was gonna make Jordan/Page parlay a real play... but didn't.
1u @ +240 Rampage to win 2.4u.
Sucks because had i made the parlay with jordan the play I would be looking at getting 6.9 to 1 right now lol... sigh
0
Whelp... if someone had told me Matt was going to go out there and just stand toe to toe and play who has better Muay Thai I would have hammered Grant... thought Matt would apply pressure put him on the cage take him down.. and wear him out maybe do some damage late... but just terrible game plan from a guy that is supposed to be a "good" mma mind. sigh... oh well... Sucks originally was gonna make Jordan/Page parlay a real play... but didn't.
1u @ +240 Rampage to win 2.4u.
Sucks because had i made the parlay with jordan the play I would be looking at getting 6.9 to 1 right now lol... sigh
Up a whopppppping .17u on the night. Once again the garbage I put in early in the week clears w/ease (got a little worried in rd 2) and then I manage to blow a good portion of that profit on picks I made the day of. Not too aggrivated w/myself because a lot of it were very small plays that had high reward. Think I am going to try to have the feb 2 card done by thurs and just stick with what I have.
I usually have a rule in which I fade a guy that hasn't been in the cage in a year which should have made Lamas a play and Jackson a non-play at min but I just didn't follow through with that, but it is making me greatly lower the amt in which I was going to ptu on Aldo.
0
Up a whopppppping .17u on the night. Once again the garbage I put in early in the week clears w/ease (got a little worried in rd 2) and then I manage to blow a good portion of that profit on picks I made the day of. Not too aggrivated w/myself because a lot of it were very small plays that had high reward. Think I am going to try to have the feb 2 card done by thurs and just stick with what I have.
I usually have a rule in which I fade a guy that hasn't been in the cage in a year which should have made Lamas a play and Jackson a non-play at min but I just didn't follow through with that, but it is making me greatly lower the amt in which I was going to ptu on Aldo.
If you choose to make use of any information on this website including online sports betting services from any websites that may be featured on
this website, we strongly recommend that you carefully check your local laws before doing so.It is your sole responsibility to understand your local laws and observe them strictly.Covers does not provide
any advice or guidance as to the legality of online sports betting or other online gambling activities within your jurisdiction and you are responsible for complying with laws that are applicable to you in
your relevant locality.Covers disclaims all liability associated with your use of this website and use of any information contained on it.As a condition of using this website, you agree to hold the owner
of this website harmless from any claims arising from your use of any services on any third party website that may be featured by Covers.
Hot Forum Topics
