• Forums
  • Best Betting Sites
  • Sportsbook Promos
  • Best Sports Betting Apps
  • NFL Betting Forum
  • NBA Betting Forum
  • MLB Betting Forum
  • NHL Betting Forum
  • NCAAF Betting Forum
  • NCAAB Betting Forum
  • Soccer Betting Forum
  • Tennis Betting Forum
  • General Discussion
  • Help Forum
  • Guidelines
  • FAQ
  • Forum Updates
    Covers Logo
    Covers App
    Faster picks. Smarter bets.
    All in the NEW Covers App
    Download on the App Store Download on the Google Play Store
    • Sports
      • NFL
        • Back
        • NFL
        • NFL Home
        • Scores & Matchups
        • Prop Projections
        • NFL Picks
        • Weather
        • Injuries
      • NCAAF
        • Back
        • NCAAF
        • NCAAF Home
        • Scores & Matchups
        • Prop Projections
        • NCAAF Picks
        • Weather
        • Injuries
      • NBA
        • Back
        • NBA
        • NBA Home
        • Scores & Matchups
        • Prop Projections
        • NBA Picks
        • Injuries
      • NCAAB
        • Back
        • NCAAB
        • NCAAB Home
        • Scores & Matchups
        • NCAAB Picks
        • Injuries
      • MLB
        • Back
        • MLB
        • MLB Home
        • Scores & Matchups
        • Prop Projections
        • MLB Picks
        • Weather
        • Injuries
      • NHL
        • Back
        • NHL
        • NHL Home
        • Scores & Matchups
        • Prop Projections
        • NHL Picks
        • Injuries
      • Soccer
      • UFC
      • WNBA
        • Back
        • WNBA
        • WNBA Home
        • Scores & Matchups
        • WNBA Picks
        • Injuries
      • CFL
        • Back
        • CFL
        • CFL Home
        • Scores & Matchups
        • CFL Picks
      • Golf
        • Back
        • Golf
        • Golf Home
        • Golf Odds
        • Masters Odds
        • PGA Championship Odds
        • US Open Odds
        • British Open Odds
        • Ryder Cup Odds
        • Golf Picks
    • Odds
      • All Odds
      • NFL
      • NCAAF
      • NBA
      • NCAAB
      • MLB
      • NHL
      • Golf
      • Soccer Odds
        • Back
        • Soccer Odds
        • MLS Odds
        • Champions League Odds
        • Premier League Odds
      • UFC
      • WNBA
      • CFL
      • Election Odds
      • Futures
        • Back
        • Futures
        • NFL
        • NBA
        • MLB
        • NHL
        • NCAAB
        • NCAAF
      • Sports Odds History
    • Picks
      • All Picks
      • NFL
      • NBA
      • NHL
      • MLB
      • NCAAF
      • NCAAB
      • Golf
      • WNBA
      • CFL
      • User Picks
      • Team User Picks
      • Consensus Picks
        • Back
        • Consensus Picks
        • All Consensus Picks
        • NFL
        • NBA
        • NHL
        • MLB
        • NCAAF
        • NCAAB
        • CFL
        • WNBA
        • Consensus FAQ
        • Public Money
    • Prop Projections
      • NFL
      • NBA
      • MLB
      • NHL
    • Betting
      • US Betting Sites
      • Canada Betting Sites
      • Sportsbook Reviews
      • States
        • Back
        • States
        • US Legal Tracker
        • Revenue Tracker
        • Arizona
        • Arkansas
        • California
        • Colorado
        • Connecticut
        • DC
        • Florida
        • Georgia
        • Illinois
        • Indiana
        • Iowa
        • Kansas
        • Kentucky
        • Louisiana
        • Maine
        • Maryland
        • Massachusetts
        • Michigan
        • Mississippi
        • Missouri
        • Nevada
        • New Hampshire
        • New Jersey
        • New York
        • North Carolina
        • Ohio
        • Oregon
        • Pennsylvania
        • Tennessee
        • Texas
        • Vermont
        • Virginia
        • West Virginia
        • Wyoming
      • Provinces
        • Back
        • Provinces
        • Alberta
        • British Columbia
        • Manitoba
        • New Brunswick
        • Newfoundland and Labrador
        • Northwest Territories
        • Nova Scotia
        • Nunavut
        • Ontario
        • Prince Edward Island
        • Quebec (English)
        • Quebec (francais)
        • Saskatchewan
        • Yukon
      • By Sport
        • Back
        • By Sport
        • Baseball
        • Basketball
        • Boxing
        • College Football
        • F1
        • Football
        • Super Bowl
        • Golf
        • Hockey
        • Horse Racing
        • March Madness
        • Soccer
        • UFC
        • World Cup
      • Betting Apps
        • Back
        • Betting Apps
        • Best Sports Betting Apps USA
        • Ontario Sports Betting Apps
      • Rest of World
        • Back
        • Rest of World
        • UK Betting Offers
          • Back
          • UK Betting Offers
          • UK Betting Sites
          • bet365 Bonus Code UK
          • 888Sport Promo Code UK
          • William Hill Sign up Offer
          • Betway Sign up Offer
          • BetVictor Bonus Code UK
      • Betting Guides
        • Back
        • Betting Guides
        • All Guides
        • Glossary
        • Betting Calculators
          • Back
          • Betting Calculators
          • Odds Converter
          • Parlay Calculator
        • Futures Betting Guide
        • Moneyline Betting Guide
        • Over/Under Betting Guide
        • Parlay Betting Guide
        • Point Spread Betting Guide
        • Prop Betting Guide
        • Sports Betting Guides
          • Back
          • Sports Betting Guides
          • How To Bet On Sports Guide
          • NFL Betting Guide
          • NHL Betting Guide
          • NBA Betting Guide
          • MLB Betting Guide
          • NCAAB Betting Guide
          • NCAAF Betting Guide
          • Golf Betting Guide
          • Tennis Betting Guide
        • Teaser Betting Guide
      • Betting News
        • Back
        • Betting News
        • All News
        • Industry News
        • Podcasts
        • Covers Videos
        • Covers Writers
        • Offers & Boosts
    • Promos
      • Sportsbook Promos
      • Canada Sportsbook Promos
      • Bonuses By Sportsbook
        • Back
        • Bonuses By Sportsbook
        • bet365 Bonus Code
        • BET99 Promo Code
        • BetMGM Bonus Code
        • BetRivers Bonus Code
        • Caesars Sportsbook Promo
        • DraftKings Promo Code
        • Fanatics Sportsbook Promo
        • FanDuel Promo Code
        • Hard Rock Bet Promo Code
        • Sports Interaction Promo
        • Stake Promo Code
        • theScore Bet Promo Code
        • TonyBet Promo Code
      • Bonuses By Region
        • Back
        • Bonuses By Region
        • Arkansas Promos
        • Arizona Promos
        • Colorado Promos
        • Connecticut Promos
        • DC Promos
        • Illinois Promos
        • Indiana Promos
        • Iowa Promos
        • Kansas Promos
        • Kentucky Promos
        • Louisiana Promos
        • Maine Promos
        • Maryland Promos
        • Massachusetts Promos
        • Michigan Promos
        • Missouri Promos
        • New Jersey Promos
        • New York Promos
        • North Carolina Promos
        • Ohio Promos
        • Pennsylvania Promos
        • Tennessee Promos
        • Vermont Promos
        • Virginia Promos
        • West Virginia Promos
        • Wyoming Promos
    • Forum & Contests
      • All Forums
      • NFL Betting Forum
      • MLB Betting Forum
      • NCAAB Betting Forum
      • NCAAF Betting Forum
      • NBA Betting Forum
      • NHL Betting Forum
      • Soccer Betting Forum
      • Contests
        • Back
        • Contests
        • Contests Home
        • Streak Survivor
        • King of Covers
        • My Contests
    • Casino
      • Sweepstakes Casino
        • Back
        • Sweepstakes Casino
        • Sweepstakes Casino
        • Sweepstakes No-Deposit Bonuses
        • Sweepstakes Promos
          • Back
          • Sweepstakes Promos
          • Card Crush
          • Casino.click
          • Chanced Casino
          • Crown Coins Casino
          • FreeSpin Casino
          • LoneStar
          • McLuck
          • Mega Bonanza Casino
          • PlayFame
          • Pulsz
          • Stake.us
      • US Casinos
        • Back
        • US Casinos
        • US Online Casinos
        • US Online Casino Bonuses
        • Casino Promos
          • Back
          • Casino Promos
          • bet365 Casino Promo Code
          • BetRivers Casino Promo
          • Borgata Casino Bonus Code
          • Caesars Casino Bonus Code
          • DraftKings Casino Promo
          • Fanatics Casino Promo
          • FanDuel Casino Promo Code
          • Golden Nugget Casino Promo
          • Hard Rock Bet Casino Promo
          • Hollywood Casino Promo Code
      • Canada Casinos
        • Back
        • Canada Casinos
        • Canada Online Casinos
        • Provinces
          • Back
          • Provinces
          • Alberta Online Casino
          • BC Online Casino
          • Ontario Online Casinos
        • Casino Promos
          • Back
          • Casino Promos
          • BC.GAME Bonus Code
          • Cloudbet Promo Code
          • RainBet Promo Code
          • Roobet Promo Code
          • Shuffle Promo Code
          • Thrill Promo Code
    • Prediction Markets
      • Prediction Markets
      • Prediction Market Apps
      • Prediction Market Promos
      • Kalshi Promo Code
      • Kalshi Referral Code
      • Polymarket Promo Code
      • Polymarket Referral Code
      • DraftKings Predictions Promo Code
      • Novig Promo Code
      • ProphetX Promo Code
      • Underdog Promo Code
      • Betr Promo Code
      • OG Promo Code
      • Fanatics Markets Promo Code
      • Plus500 Promo Code
      • Gemini Predictions Promo Code
    • NFL Week 4
      NFL Week 4
      • NFL Odds
      • NFL Picks
      • Steelers-Browns Picks
      • Week 4 Survivor Picks
      • NFL Prediction Markets
      • NFL Betting Sites
    Covers Account
    Log in Create account
    Join free Log in
    All Forums | Mixed Martial Arts

    UFC 189 Write-Up / Predictions

    whitebelt
    Lawrence401
    sawman
    wiiooiiw
    sharpstick
    ...
    Participants:
    Search
    Views: 1921
    Posts: 22
     
    whitebelt
    whitebelt
    Prospect
    Participation Meter
    Joined: May, 2015
    Posts: 472
    Posted: Jul. 11, 2015 - 1:42 AM ET #1

    Cody Pfister v. Yosdenis Cedeno


    Cody Pfister did not look good in his debut against James  Moontasri and the only positive thing you could say is Pfister showed one hell of a chin. He ate an absurd amount of strikes including several knees that landed perfectly on his face. The fight really should have been stopped in round 1 as Pfister didn’t offer much defense; he was so stunned after one flurry that when he threw a (missed) counterpunch he fell to the ground. He came out swinging in round 2 and fell to the ground off a missed takedown attempt, and Moontasri basically walked onto his back and choked him out.


    Yosdenis is 1-2 in the UFC. In his only UFC win against Jerrod Sanders, he laid an early haymaker on Sanders after catching a body kick and proceeded to land some power shots on the ground, but Sanders was able to end up on top of him. Yosdenis ended up in a stacked guard and landed some fierce shots. After another scramble Cedeno ended up in half guard and landed more nasty elbows, punches, and knees to the body. Sanders injured his knee and could not continue to the 2nd round. He looked pretty well dominated in his decision loss to Chad Laprise in his last fight. Laprise had Cedeno backing up on the feet and Laprise took him down fairly easily throughout the fight. In round one, Laprise easily mounted Cedeno and then took the back with a nice body lock. A guy with better submission skills could have finished that fight, but Laprise cruised to a clear decision.


    I’m not high on either of these guys personally. Cedeno is a brawler with dangerous hands, but has plenty of holes in his grappling & wrestling. Pfister didn’t show anything at all in his first UFC fight but a lot of heart. He seems to try and wrestle his opponents, but didn’t show any kind of wrestling chops in his debut and has no wrestling credentials that I could find.


    Pick: Yosdenis Cedeno (KO)


    Neil Seery v. Louis Smolka


    The 35 year old Irishman, Neil Seery, is on a 2 win streak with decisions over Phil Harris and Chris Beal. He’s 2-1 in the UFC, losing to Brad Pickett in his debut, and is 15-10 as a pro. Despite having a BJJ purple belt and training in Judo as well, Seery is a boxer first and foremost. He’s mostly kept his fights standing, and against Phil Harris refused to engage in a dominant position on several occasions, forcing Harris to stand up. He showed something different against Beal, keeping it a boxing match in round 1 and showing his grappling skills in round 2, even locking up a standing guillotine and jumping guard at one point. He’s a boxer first, but really seems to be growing into a true mixed martial artist.


    Louis Smolka is a young Hawaiian prospect with brown belts in both Judo and Karate. He’s 2-1 in the UFC and is coming off a KO win over Richie Vaculik, which he finished in the final seconds of the fight. He showed toughness, weathering an early storm from Vaculik in round 1. Vaculik outstruck him most of the fight and also landed a few takedowns along the way. Smolka also nearly got finished by rear naked choke after giving up his back in round 2. I believe Smolka was losing the fight on points, but managed to pull off a KO before the final bell.


    Smolka will have the height and reach advantage here, and is the more explosive fighter. But I don’t think he’s fought against someone with the same toughness as Seery. Smolka is a higher volume striker, but he also eats as many as he lands. Seery is much more judicious with his boxing and isn’t as willing to take one to give one. I think Seery point fights and counter punches his way to a close decision victory here.


    Pick: Neil Seery (decision)

    Reply
    To remove first post, remove entire topic.

    Cody Pfister v. Yosdenis Cedeno


    Cody Pfister did not look good in his debut against James  Moontasri and the only positive thing you could say is Pfister showed one hell of a chin. He ate an absurd amount of strikes including several knees that landed perfectly on his face. The fight really should have been stopped in round 1 as Pfister didn’t offer much defense; he was so stunned after one flurry that when he threw a (missed) counterpunch he fell to the ground. He came out swinging in round 2 and fell to the ground off a missed takedown attempt, and Moontasri basically walked onto his back and choked him out.


    Yosdenis is 1-2 in the UFC. In his only UFC win against Jerrod Sanders, he laid an early haymaker on Sanders after catching a body kick and proceeded to land some power shots on the ground, but Sanders was able to end up on top of him. Yosdenis ended up in a stacked guard and landed some fierce shots. After another scramble Cedeno ended up in half guard and landed more nasty elbows, punches, and knees to the body. Sanders injured his knee and could not continue to the 2nd round. He looked pretty well dominated in his decision loss to Chad Laprise in his last fight. Laprise had Cedeno backing up on the feet and Laprise took him down fairly easily throughout the fight. In round one, Laprise easily mounted Cedeno and then took the back with a nice body lock. A guy with better submission skills could have finished that fight, but Laprise cruised to a clear decision.


    I’m not high on either of these guys personally. Cedeno is a brawler with dangerous hands, but has plenty of holes in his grappling & wrestling. Pfister didn’t show anything at all in his first UFC fight but a lot of heart. He seems to try and wrestle his opponents, but didn’t show any kind of wrestling chops in his debut and has no wrestling credentials that I could find.


    Pick: Yosdenis Cedeno (KO)


    Neil Seery v. Louis Smolka


    The 35 year old Irishman, Neil Seery, is on a 2 win streak with decisions over Phil Harris and Chris Beal. He’s 2-1 in the UFC, losing to Brad Pickett in his debut, and is 15-10 as a pro. Despite having a BJJ purple belt and training in Judo as well, Seery is a boxer first and foremost. He’s mostly kept his fights standing, and against Phil Harris refused to engage in a dominant position on several occasions, forcing Harris to stand up. He showed something different against Beal, keeping it a boxing match in round 1 and showing his grappling skills in round 2, even locking up a standing guillotine and jumping guard at one point. He’s a boxer first, but really seems to be growing into a true mixed martial artist.


    Louis Smolka is a young Hawaiian prospect with brown belts in both Judo and Karate. He’s 2-1 in the UFC and is coming off a KO win over Richie Vaculik, which he finished in the final seconds of the fight. He showed toughness, weathering an early storm from Vaculik in round 1. Vaculik outstruck him most of the fight and also landed a few takedowns along the way. Smolka also nearly got finished by rear naked choke after giving up his back in round 2. I believe Smolka was losing the fight on points, but managed to pull off a KO before the final bell.


    Smolka will have the height and reach advantage here, and is the more explosive fighter. But I don’t think he’s fought against someone with the same toughness as Seery. Smolka is a higher volume striker, but he also eats as many as he lands. Seery is much more judicious with his boxing and isn’t as willing to take one to give one. I think Seery point fights and counter punches his way to a close decision victory here.


    Pick: Neil Seery (decision)

     
    whitebelt
    whitebelt
    Prospect
    Participation Meter
    Joined: May, 2015
    Posts: 472
    Posted: Jul. 11, 2015 - 1:43 AM ET #2

    Cody Garbrandt v. Henry Briones


    Garbrandt is an explosive young talent with a penchant for knockouts, while having some personal / legal issues outside of the cage. He’s only 6-0 professionally and 1-0 UFC with a 100% TKO/KO rate. He looked great in his debut showing nearly textbook striking and fast, strong combinations. It was a bit of a take one to give one affair, with Brimage keeping somewhat close in strikes, with Cody landing the better strikes. Brimage was saved by the bell at the end of the first, but Cody got the finish in with less than 30 seconds left in round 3. Cody is an Alpha Male product and has the benefit of training with guys like Uriah Faber, TJ Dillashaw and Chad Mendes.


    Henry Briones is way better and more dangerous than the underdog price would indicate, ranging from +425 at bovada and +540 at 5dimes. He took an absolute beating in the first round of his debut against fellow TUF competitor Guido Cannetti. Henry was more than happy to stay in a phone booth and answer back with big powerful strikes. Not many people what have survived that onslaught, and I give his chin an A+. He picked up where he left off trading strikes in round 2, and landed a nasty uppercut to knock Guido down. He poured on the ground and pound and when Guido exposed his back, Briones instantly mounted his back and sunk a rear naked choke.


    I like both of these prospects and love this matchup, and I expect to see a good finish from either side. I would take Cody in this fight down to -200, but he’s overvalued beyond that and currently has a horrendous line at -650 or worse. Briones showed his iron chin against an excellent striker in Guido Cannetti, whose very similar in striking ability as Cody Garbrandt. I’ll take the Tijuana native to grind out another TKO. If you’re not sold on him as a value bet, the smart play is fight does not go the distance.


    Pick: Henry Briones (inside the distance)


    Alex Garcia v. Mike Swick


    Garcia is 12-2 pro with 2-1 in the UFC and is coming off a loss to Neil Magny (Decision). He got destroyed in his loss to Magny both on the feet and on the ground. However he was able to take Magny down a few times, and he took Spencer down 8 times in his previous fight. Garcia is a BJJ medalist and I think he’s can impose it on Swick.


    Mike Swick is the only fighter you need to look at in this fight. He has lost 3 of his last 4 fights. After losing to Dan Hardy and Paulo Thiago, he took a 2.5 year layoff and came back to KO DeMarques Johnson. He then proceeded in his last outing tl lose by KO to Matt Brown, which was in December 2012. Perhaps 2.5 year layoffs are his key to victory, but I’m not giving the 36 year old any chance to win this fight. I bet against him regardless of his opponent.


    Pick: Alex Garcia (inside the distance)


    Cathal Pendred v. John Howard


    Pendred is one of the more boring fighters I’ve watched in recent history, but he’s now gone 4-0 in the UFC although 2 of those were robberies (in my opinion). With all that said, I’ve learned better than to bet against him after losing money doing so in his last 3 outings.


    John Howard certainly isn’t convincing me to do so, anyway. Having lost his last 3 fights consecutively, and has only won 4 in his last 11. He has looked wholly unimpressive in each loss, getting worked on the ground by Ebersole and LaFlare, then getting finished with an early KO by Lorenz Larkin.


    Look for Pendred to use his dominant clinch control to cruise to another decision.


    Pick: Cathal Pendred (Decision)


    Reply

    Cody Garbrandt v. Henry Briones


    Garbrandt is an explosive young talent with a penchant for knockouts, while having some personal / legal issues outside of the cage. He’s only 6-0 professionally and 1-0 UFC with a 100% TKO/KO rate. He looked great in his debut showing nearly textbook striking and fast, strong combinations. It was a bit of a take one to give one affair, with Brimage keeping somewhat close in strikes, with Cody landing the better strikes. Brimage was saved by the bell at the end of the first, but Cody got the finish in with less than 30 seconds left in round 3. Cody is an Alpha Male product and has the benefit of training with guys like Uriah Faber, TJ Dillashaw and Chad Mendes.


    Henry Briones is way better and more dangerous than the underdog price would indicate, ranging from +425 at bovada and +540 at 5dimes. He took an absolute beating in the first round of his debut against fellow TUF competitor Guido Cannetti. Henry was more than happy to stay in a phone booth and answer back with big powerful strikes. Not many people what have survived that onslaught, and I give his chin an A+. He picked up where he left off trading strikes in round 2, and landed a nasty uppercut to knock Guido down. He poured on the ground and pound and when Guido exposed his back, Briones instantly mounted his back and sunk a rear naked choke.


    I like both of these prospects and love this matchup, and I expect to see a good finish from either side. I would take Cody in this fight down to -200, but he’s overvalued beyond that and currently has a horrendous line at -650 or worse. Briones showed his iron chin against an excellent striker in Guido Cannetti, whose very similar in striking ability as Cody Garbrandt. I’ll take the Tijuana native to grind out another TKO. If you’re not sold on him as a value bet, the smart play is fight does not go the distance.


    Pick: Henry Briones (inside the distance)


    Alex Garcia v. Mike Swick


    Garcia is 12-2 pro with 2-1 in the UFC and is coming off a loss to Neil Magny (Decision). He got destroyed in his loss to Magny both on the feet and on the ground. However he was able to take Magny down a few times, and he took Spencer down 8 times in his previous fight. Garcia is a BJJ medalist and I think he’s can impose it on Swick.


    Mike Swick is the only fighter you need to look at in this fight. He has lost 3 of his last 4 fights. After losing to Dan Hardy and Paulo Thiago, he took a 2.5 year layoff and came back to KO DeMarques Johnson. He then proceeded in his last outing tl lose by KO to Matt Brown, which was in December 2012. Perhaps 2.5 year layoffs are his key to victory, but I’m not giving the 36 year old any chance to win this fight. I bet against him regardless of his opponent.


    Pick: Alex Garcia (inside the distance)


    Cathal Pendred v. John Howard


    Pendred is one of the more boring fighters I’ve watched in recent history, but he’s now gone 4-0 in the UFC although 2 of those were robberies (in my opinion). With all that said, I’ve learned better than to bet against him after losing money doing so in his last 3 outings.


    John Howard certainly isn’t convincing me to do so, anyway. Having lost his last 3 fights consecutively, and has only won 4 in his last 11. He has looked wholly unimpressive in each loss, getting worked on the ground by Ebersole and LaFlare, then getting finished with an early KO by Lorenz Larkin.


    Look for Pendred to use his dominant clinch control to cruise to another decision.


    Pick: Cathal Pendred (Decision)


     
    whitebelt
    whitebelt
    Prospect
    Participation Meter
    Joined: May, 2015
    Posts: 472
    Posted: Jul. 11, 2015 - 1:43 AM ET #3

    Matt Brown v. Tim Means


    This could be the fight of the night. These guys are both absolute brawlers and if the chins hold up, are going to put on an absolute war. These guys mirror each other in so many ways, from their brawling knockout styles down to their history of serious drug abuse before finding MMA. Matt Brown went on a 7 fight tear including 6 KO finishes before dropping his last 2 straight with decision losses to Robbie Lawler and Johny Hendricks. Tim Means has won 6 of his last 7 and is riding a 4 win streak, with his last 2 coming by finish.


    This fight is impossible to handicap and really should be a pickem. But since it’s not a pick em, I’m going with Tim Means as a +170 dog. At even money, I wouldn’t even be betting a winner, only that it doesn’t go the distance.


    Pick: Tim Means (TKO)


    Brad Pickett v. Thomas Almeida


    Pickett is 36 now and has lost 3 of his last 4. The lone win in that span was against Neil Seery, where he dominated Seery on the mat. He looked awful in each fight, getting beat down in every aspect of every fight.


    Thomas Almeida is 18-0 as a young pro and is now 2-0 in the UFC. The Brazilian started in Chute Boxe and also holds a brown belt in BJJ. He’s got 17 finishes in his 18 wins, including 14 by KO and 3 by submission.


    He’s one of the UFC’s hottest young fighters and really isn’t overvalued at a -1000 favorite. If you’re betting on Almeida, at least find some value in a prop bet with Almeida winning inside the distance.


    Pick: Thomas Almeida (TKO)


    Gunnar Nelson v. Brandon Thatch


    This is a great stylistic matchup of an elite grappler against a monster-sized explosive striker. Brandon Thatch looked great in his first 2 UFC fights, which he won both via first round knockout. At 6’2” he’s huge for the division, and his training home of Denver has blessed him with elevated cardio for this division. His last opponent changed from Stephen Thompson to Benson Henderson on 2 weeks notice, and the veteran really exposed Thatch’s lack of ground game. The first 2 rounds were closely matched striking exchanges, but the 3rd and 4th rounds were Henderson grappling his way to a submission victory.


    Gunnar Nelson is an elite grappler with a black belt in BJJ and a brown belt in Karate to back it up. Gunnar is coming off a horrible outing against Rick Story, which he lost by 5 round decision. Before that aweful show, Gunnar won his first 4 UFC fights with 3 coming by submission. Of his 13-1 pro record, he has 9 submission victories total.


    The whole public seems to be on Thatch, which I assume is because he’s got the deadly combination of big size and explosive technique. And those things are true. But Gunnar has been training with Conor McGregor for this fight, so he should be ready for some of the unorthodoxed strikes that Thatch is going to bring. I think Nelson will follow Henderson’s lead, and ultimately find a way to make this a grappling match. I can see Gunnar using Thatch’s aggressiveness against him- hell, I could even see him pulling a submission off his back if he gets put on his butt from strikes. Gunnar’s grappling advantage is greater than Thatch’s striking advantage.


    Pick: Gunnar Nelson (Submission)


    Reply

    Matt Brown v. Tim Means


    This could be the fight of the night. These guys are both absolute brawlers and if the chins hold up, are going to put on an absolute war. These guys mirror each other in so many ways, from their brawling knockout styles down to their history of serious drug abuse before finding MMA. Matt Brown went on a 7 fight tear including 6 KO finishes before dropping his last 2 straight with decision losses to Robbie Lawler and Johny Hendricks. Tim Means has won 6 of his last 7 and is riding a 4 win streak, with his last 2 coming by finish.


    This fight is impossible to handicap and really should be a pickem. But since it’s not a pick em, I’m going with Tim Means as a +170 dog. At even money, I wouldn’t even be betting a winner, only that it doesn’t go the distance.


    Pick: Tim Means (TKO)


    Brad Pickett v. Thomas Almeida


    Pickett is 36 now and has lost 3 of his last 4. The lone win in that span was against Neil Seery, where he dominated Seery on the mat. He looked awful in each fight, getting beat down in every aspect of every fight.


    Thomas Almeida is 18-0 as a young pro and is now 2-0 in the UFC. The Brazilian started in Chute Boxe and also holds a brown belt in BJJ. He’s got 17 finishes in his 18 wins, including 14 by KO and 3 by submission.


    He’s one of the UFC’s hottest young fighters and really isn’t overvalued at a -1000 favorite. If you’re betting on Almeida, at least find some value in a prop bet with Almeida winning inside the distance.


    Pick: Thomas Almeida (TKO)


    Gunnar Nelson v. Brandon Thatch


    This is a great stylistic matchup of an elite grappler against a monster-sized explosive striker. Brandon Thatch looked great in his first 2 UFC fights, which he won both via first round knockout. At 6’2” he’s huge for the division, and his training home of Denver has blessed him with elevated cardio for this division. His last opponent changed from Stephen Thompson to Benson Henderson on 2 weeks notice, and the veteran really exposed Thatch’s lack of ground game. The first 2 rounds were closely matched striking exchanges, but the 3rd and 4th rounds were Henderson grappling his way to a submission victory.


    Gunnar Nelson is an elite grappler with a black belt in BJJ and a brown belt in Karate to back it up. Gunnar is coming off a horrible outing against Rick Story, which he lost by 5 round decision. Before that aweful show, Gunnar won his first 4 UFC fights with 3 coming by submission. Of his 13-1 pro record, he has 9 submission victories total.


    The whole public seems to be on Thatch, which I assume is because he’s got the deadly combination of big size and explosive technique. And those things are true. But Gunnar has been training with Conor McGregor for this fight, so he should be ready for some of the unorthodoxed strikes that Thatch is going to bring. I think Nelson will follow Henderson’s lead, and ultimately find a way to make this a grappling match. I can see Gunnar using Thatch’s aggressiveness against him- hell, I could even see him pulling a submission off his back if he gets put on his butt from strikes. Gunnar’s grappling advantage is greater than Thatch’s striking advantage.


    Pick: Gunnar Nelson (Submission)


     
    whitebelt
    whitebelt
    Prospect
    Participation Meter
    Joined: May, 2015
    Posts: 472
    Posted: Jul. 11, 2015 - 1:43 AM ET #4

    Dennis Bermudez v. Jeremy Stephens


    Bermudez is coming off a first round submission loss to Ricardo Lamas, which broke an impressive 7 fight win streak that included notable wins over Clay Guida, Steven Siler, and Max Holloway. As impressive as he has been in his wins, he deserves to be under scrutiny after a pathetic loss in his last fight. Bermudez didn’t look bad through the first few minutes against Lamas, until he basically got knocked out by a modest jab. Lamas rocked him off the jab, and immediately landed a perfect guillotine which forced Bermudez to tap.


    Lil Heathen is riding a 2 loss streak, dropping decisions to Cub Swanson and Charles Oliveira, after compiling a 3 fight win streak. He seems to struggle against ranked fighters, with his last 5 losses coming against the above mentioned fighters in addition to Anthony Pettis, Donald Cerrone, Yves Edwards.


    On paper, it’s easy to understand why The Menace is a favorite having won 7 of his last 8, while Lil Heathen has only won 3 of his last 8. Stephens hasn’t looked horrible in his losses, but just can’t find a way to win. I’m taking Bermudez in a couple of parlays, but really can’t bet him straight because his chin looked as weak as possible in his last outing.


    Pick: Bermudez (decision)


    Robbie Lawler v. Rory MacDonald


    The defending champion and fight of the year winner Robbie Lawler is the underdog in his first title defense? Seriously!? Ruthless has completely reinvented himself since coming to the UFC in 2013. After trading wins and losses for years in Strikeforce, he’s gone 6-1 in the UFC, with his lone loss in that span being a R5 decision loss to Hendricks in the FOTY. Which as you probably know, he avenged in his last outing to win the championship title.


    Rory MacDonald has been impressive himself going 9-2 in the UFC, and currently riding a 3 win streak. His last loss came to none other than Robbie Lawler, which was a split decision that really should have been unanimous. Rory is a great kickboxer, but also has very good black belt jiu jitsu. He has been very technical with his striking, and has a reputation for outstriking his opponents by a very wide margin. Statistically, he lands 3.94 strikes/minute and absorbs 2.42 strikes/minute.


    I love both of these guys, but I really don’t see why Rory is the favorite. The only dangerous striker he’s matched up against recently is Lawler, and Lawler won the fight. Rory resorted to takedowns, and while he will take opponents down he generally keeps his fights striking. Lawler holds 2 big advantages: power and aggression. He has beaten better wrestlers (Hendricks, Ellenberger) and has also beaten great strikers (Hendricks, Matt Brown). I see this fight going much like the last one, except this is Rory’s first 5 round fight and a decision is less likely.


    Pick: Lawler (TKO)


    Conor McGregor v. Chad Mendes


    These guys need no introduction, so I’m going to keep this short. Conor McGregor hasn’t been tested in the way that Chad Mendes is going to test him. All of his wins have been spectacular to watch, but his only notable win was a great TKO of Dustin Porier. With only 5 wins in the UFC (4 by TKO), he’s a legitimate top 10 contender. But there’s a reason the UFC hasn’t matched him against a wrestler. The reason is that wrestling and grappling are major question marks in his game, and a matchup against Mendes or Ellenberger posed a huge threat to McGregor’s unblemished record, and a loss would derail the hype-train that the UFC is riding to millions of dollars. That’s why he was matched up against Jose Aldo while leapfrogging every notable threat in the 145 division.


    Chad Mendes is a nightmare matchup for McGregor. Mendes has a matching 17-2 record, but sets himself apart with an 8-2 UFC record to Conor’s 5-0. The Alpha Male product trains with some of the best in Uriah Hall and TJ Dillashaw. And let’s not forget: Mendes has never lost to anybody not-named Jose Aldo. Mendes is a 2xNCAA D1 All American and 2x PAC10 Champion.


    Chad Mendes is going to derail this train, and the hardcore fans are going to profit handsomly with +160 odds on the #1 fighter at 145, second best only to the #1 pound for pound fighter in the world. Only casual fans are on McGregor, and Las Vegas is going to empty the bank accounts of the thousands of Irish tourists who are attending the fight in person.


    Pick: Chad Mendes (inside the distance)


    Reply

    Dennis Bermudez v. Jeremy Stephens


    Bermudez is coming off a first round submission loss to Ricardo Lamas, which broke an impressive 7 fight win streak that included notable wins over Clay Guida, Steven Siler, and Max Holloway. As impressive as he has been in his wins, he deserves to be under scrutiny after a pathetic loss in his last fight. Bermudez didn’t look bad through the first few minutes against Lamas, until he basically got knocked out by a modest jab. Lamas rocked him off the jab, and immediately landed a perfect guillotine which forced Bermudez to tap.


    Lil Heathen is riding a 2 loss streak, dropping decisions to Cub Swanson and Charles Oliveira, after compiling a 3 fight win streak. He seems to struggle against ranked fighters, with his last 5 losses coming against the above mentioned fighters in addition to Anthony Pettis, Donald Cerrone, Yves Edwards.


    On paper, it’s easy to understand why The Menace is a favorite having won 7 of his last 8, while Lil Heathen has only won 3 of his last 8. Stephens hasn’t looked horrible in his losses, but just can’t find a way to win. I’m taking Bermudez in a couple of parlays, but really can’t bet him straight because his chin looked as weak as possible in his last outing.


    Pick: Bermudez (decision)


    Robbie Lawler v. Rory MacDonald


    The defending champion and fight of the year winner Robbie Lawler is the underdog in his first title defense? Seriously!? Ruthless has completely reinvented himself since coming to the UFC in 2013. After trading wins and losses for years in Strikeforce, he’s gone 6-1 in the UFC, with his lone loss in that span being a R5 decision loss to Hendricks in the FOTY. Which as you probably know, he avenged in his last outing to win the championship title.


    Rory MacDonald has been impressive himself going 9-2 in the UFC, and currently riding a 3 win streak. His last loss came to none other than Robbie Lawler, which was a split decision that really should have been unanimous. Rory is a great kickboxer, but also has very good black belt jiu jitsu. He has been very technical with his striking, and has a reputation for outstriking his opponents by a very wide margin. Statistically, he lands 3.94 strikes/minute and absorbs 2.42 strikes/minute.


    I love both of these guys, but I really don’t see why Rory is the favorite. The only dangerous striker he’s matched up against recently is Lawler, and Lawler won the fight. Rory resorted to takedowns, and while he will take opponents down he generally keeps his fights striking. Lawler holds 2 big advantages: power and aggression. He has beaten better wrestlers (Hendricks, Ellenberger) and has also beaten great strikers (Hendricks, Matt Brown). I see this fight going much like the last one, except this is Rory’s first 5 round fight and a decision is less likely.


    Pick: Lawler (TKO)


    Conor McGregor v. Chad Mendes


    These guys need no introduction, so I’m going to keep this short. Conor McGregor hasn’t been tested in the way that Chad Mendes is going to test him. All of his wins have been spectacular to watch, but his only notable win was a great TKO of Dustin Porier. With only 5 wins in the UFC (4 by TKO), he’s a legitimate top 10 contender. But there’s a reason the UFC hasn’t matched him against a wrestler. The reason is that wrestling and grappling are major question marks in his game, and a matchup against Mendes or Ellenberger posed a huge threat to McGregor’s unblemished record, and a loss would derail the hype-train that the UFC is riding to millions of dollars. That’s why he was matched up against Jose Aldo while leapfrogging every notable threat in the 145 division.


    Chad Mendes is a nightmare matchup for McGregor. Mendes has a matching 17-2 record, but sets himself apart with an 8-2 UFC record to Conor’s 5-0. The Alpha Male product trains with some of the best in Uriah Hall and TJ Dillashaw. And let’s not forget: Mendes has never lost to anybody not-named Jose Aldo. Mendes is a 2xNCAA D1 All American and 2x PAC10 Champion.


    Chad Mendes is going to derail this train, and the hardcore fans are going to profit handsomly with +160 odds on the #1 fighter at 145, second best only to the #1 pound for pound fighter in the world. Only casual fans are on McGregor, and Las Vegas is going to empty the bank accounts of the thousands of Irish tourists who are attending the fight in person.


    Pick: Chad Mendes (inside the distance)


     
    Lawrence401
    Lawrence401
    Prospect
    Participation Meter
    Joined: Jul, 2013
    Posts: 102
    Posted: Jul. 11, 2015 - 6:37 AM ET #5

    Thanks for the write ups! Do you think Chad wins by TKO, Submission, decision, or what round are you thinking? Those props for Mendes are lucrative!
    Reply
    Thanks for the write ups! Do you think Chad wins by TKO, Submission, decision, or what round are you thinking? Those props for Mendes are lucrative!
     
    sawman
    sawman
    Captain
    Participation Meter
    Joined: Jul, 2011
    Posts: 5100
    Posted: Jul. 11, 2015 - 10:25 AM ET #6

    Good write ups. 
    I'm on Mendes too, but I would disagree that only the casual fans are on McG. Lots of hardcores are picking him as well
    Reply
    Good write ups. 
    I'm on Mendes too, but I would disagree that only the casual fans are on McG. Lots of hardcores are picking him as well
     
    wiiooiiw
    wiiooiiw
    Prospect
    Participation Meter
    Joined: Aug, 2013
    Posts: 182
    Posted: Jul. 11, 2015 - 11:24 AM ET #7

    I've seen a prop for Mendes +1000 on a submission.  I think that's hard to beat.  I know conors last loss was awhile ago but, yup it was a submission.  
    Reply
    I've seen a prop for Mendes +1000 on a submission.  I think that's hard to beat.  I know conors last loss was awhile ago but, yup it was a submission.  
     
    whitebelt
    whitebelt
    Prospect
    Participation Meter
    Joined: May, 2015
    Posts: 472
    Posted: Jul. 11, 2015 - 11:39 AM ET #8

    Chad doesn't sub many guys, though anything is possible. I think it will be a TKO. But if Chad's mounted him dropping bombs, I could easily see Conor giving up his back and getting choked. I don't think Conor will have any clue what to do off the mat except try and get up, and he could definitely do it the wrong way and pay for it.
    Reply
    Chad doesn't sub many guys, though anything is possible. I think it will be a TKO. But if Chad's mounted him dropping bombs, I could easily see Conor giving up his back and getting choked. I don't think Conor will have any clue what to do off the mat except try and get up, and he could definitely do it the wrong way and pay for it.
     
    sharpstick
    sharpstick
    Captain
    Participation Meter
    Joined: Jan, 2010
    Posts: 8525
    Posted: Jul. 11, 2015 - 11:50 AM ET #9

    Alex Garcia got destroyed on the feet and the ground by Magny?  

    Obviously, you didn't watch the fight.  And we can point to this as the reason you're not hitting the 80% you did before you started posting on covers......  
    Reply
    Alex Garcia got destroyed on the feet and the ground by Magny?  

    Obviously, you didn't watch the fight.  And we can point to this as the reason you're not hitting the 80% you did before you started posting on covers......  
     
    Qncyk1
    Qncyk1
    Veteran
    Participation Meter
    Joined: Aug, 2011
    Posts: 1239
    Posted: Jul. 11, 2015 - 12:12 PM ET #10

    garcia tore his acl and meniscus in the first round against magny

    you should  really need to take that into consideration
    Reply
    garcia tore his acl and meniscus in the first round against magny

    you should  really need to take that into consideration
     
    sharpstick
    sharpstick
    Captain
    Participation Meter
    Joined: Jan, 2010
    Posts: 8525
    Posted: Jul. 11, 2015 - 12:43 PM ET #11

    Quote Originally Posted by Qncyk1:

    garcia tore his acl and meniscus in the first round against magny

    you should  really need to take that into consideration

    Yes.  Yes he did.  And he won rounds 2 and 3 after it, but got robbed by the judges.  

    But, if you didn't watch that fight, and took Whitebelt at face value, you'd really have no clue.
    Reply
    Quote Originally Posted by Qncyk1:

    garcia tore his acl and meniscus in the first round against magny

    you should  really need to take that into consideration

    Yes.  Yes he did.  And he won rounds 2 and 3 after it, but got robbed by the judges.  

    But, if you didn't watch that fight, and took Whitebelt at face value, you'd really have no clue.
     
    whitebelt
    whitebelt
    Prospect
    Participation Meter
    Joined: May, 2015
    Posts: 472
    Posted: Jul. 11, 2015 - 12:51 PM ET #12

    I guess neutralized on the feet would be a better description than destroyed. But Magny owned the ground from the first round when he was on Garcia's back and side control. Garcia didn't do anything but miss punches in that fight. He didn't land anything at all. He had a couple of big takedowns, and did nothing with them. Magny had way more on the ground, controlling from the top and outstriking him on the ground by a 5:1 margin. 
    Reply
    I guess neutralized on the feet would be a better description than destroyed. But Magny owned the ground from the first round when he was on Garcia's back and side control. Garcia didn't do anything but miss punches in that fight. He didn't land anything at all. He had a couple of big takedowns, and did nothing with them. Magny had way more on the ground, controlling from the top and outstriking him on the ground by a 5:1 margin. 
     
    Qncyk1
    Qncyk1
    Veteran
    Participation Meter
    Joined: Aug, 2011
    Posts: 1239
    Posted: Jul. 11, 2015 - 1:00 PM ET #13

    Quote Originally Posted by whitebelt:

    I guess neutralized on the feet would be a better description than destroyed. But Magny owned the ground from the first round when he was on Garcia's back and side control. Garcia didn't do anything but miss punches in that fight. He didn't land anything at all. He had a couple of big takedowns, and did nothing with them. Magny had way more on the ground, controlling from the top and outstriking him on the ground by a 5:1 margin. 

    im not using any fight metrics in the magny/garcia fight because i believe that the injury happened in the first round as alex claims

    he had the operation so there is no question that he did have a serious debilitating injury just the question of when

    i dont know why anyone would use anything in the fight for capping purposes other than garcia showed heart fighting through the injury and will in all likelihood never quit in a fight


    Reply
    Quote Originally Posted by whitebelt:

    I guess neutralized on the feet would be a better description than destroyed. But Magny owned the ground from the first round when he was on Garcia's back and side control. Garcia didn't do anything but miss punches in that fight. He didn't land anything at all. He had a couple of big takedowns, and did nothing with them. Magny had way more on the ground, controlling from the top and outstriking him on the ground by a 5:1 margin. 

    im not using any fight metrics in the magny/garcia fight because i believe that the injury happened in the first round as alex claims

    he had the operation so there is no question that he did have a serious debilitating injury just the question of when

    i dont know why anyone would use anything in the fight for capping purposes other than garcia showed heart fighting through the injury and will in all likelihood never quit in a fight


     
    whitebelt
    whitebelt
    Prospect
    Participation Meter
    Joined: May, 2015
    Posts: 472
    Posted: Jul. 11, 2015 - 1:02 PM ET #14

    No, he didn't get robbed. Strikes win fights when sensible judges are scoring, and Garcia didn't land squat in that fight. Some people believe time in control should be scored more heavily than landing strikes. You're one of those people and that's fine, but I'm not and most agree that strikes are the relevant factor. If you want to write off his poor striking to injury, that's fine too. But he didn't win that fight.
    Reply
    No, he didn't get robbed. Strikes win fights when sensible judges are scoring, and Garcia didn't land squat in that fight. Some people believe time in control should be scored more heavily than landing strikes. You're one of those people and that's fine, but I'm not and most agree that strikes are the relevant factor. If you want to write off his poor striking to injury, that's fine too. But he didn't win that fight.
     
    Qncyk1
    Qncyk1
    Veteran
    Participation Meter
    Joined: Aug, 2011
    Posts: 1239
    Posted: Jul. 11, 2015 - 1:12 PM ET #15

    Quote Originally Posted by whitebelt:

    No, he didn't get robbed. Strikes win fights when sensible judges are scoring, and Garcia didn't land squat in that fight. Some people believe time in control should be scored more heavily than landing strikes. You're one of those people and that's fine, but I'm not and most agree that strikes are the relevant factor. If you want to write off his poor striking to injury, that's fine too. But he didn't win that fight.

    i never said he won if you were referring to my post

    im saying that i believe garcia suffered a  significant injury in the first round of the fight that required a significant surgery that followed with a significant rehab

    if you are not taking the knee injury into consideration when capping garcias future fights then you probably have less than one percent here that would agree with you.
    Reply
    Quote Originally Posted by whitebelt:

    No, he didn't get robbed. Strikes win fights when sensible judges are scoring, and Garcia didn't land squat in that fight. Some people believe time in control should be scored more heavily than landing strikes. You're one of those people and that's fine, but I'm not and most agree that strikes are the relevant factor. If you want to write off his poor striking to injury, that's fine too. But he didn't win that fight.

    i never said he won if you were referring to my post

    im saying that i believe garcia suffered a  significant injury in the first round of the fight that required a significant surgery that followed with a significant rehab

    if you are not taking the knee injury into consideration when capping garcias future fights then you probably have less than one percent here that would agree with you.
     
    whitebelt
    whitebelt
    Prospect
    Participation Meter
    Joined: May, 2015
    Posts: 472
    Posted: Jul. 11, 2015 - 1:24 PM ET #16

    Quote Originally Posted by Qncyk1:

    i dont know why anyone would use anything in the fight for capping purposes other than garcia showed heart fighting through the injury and will in all likelihood never quit in a fight

    No point in handicapping anyone against Mike Swick unless you're trying to nail down the method for prop betting. There are more interesting fights to break down on this card. I picked Garcia to win by finish, which will probably involve him taking Swick down fairly easily and finishing with strikes on the mat.
    Reply
    Quote Originally Posted by Qncyk1:

    i dont know why anyone would use anything in the fight for capping purposes other than garcia showed heart fighting through the injury and will in all likelihood never quit in a fight

    No point in handicapping anyone against Mike Swick unless you're trying to nail down the method for prop betting. There are more interesting fights to break down on this card. I picked Garcia to win by finish, which will probably involve him taking Swick down fairly easily and finishing with strikes on the mat.
     
    wiiooiiw
    wiiooiiw
    Prospect
    Participation Meter
    Joined: Aug, 2013
    Posts: 182
    Posted: Jul. 11, 2015 - 1:34 PM ET #17

    Quote Originally Posted by whitebelt:

    Chad doesn't sub many guys, though anything is possible. I think it will be a TKO. But if Chad's mounted him dropping bombs, I could easily see Conor giving up his back and getting choked. I don't think Conor will have any clue what to do off the mat except try and get up, and he could definitely do it the wrong way and pay for it.
    exactly the way I saw it.  Not saying it's likely but its well within the realm of possibility
    Reply
    Quote Originally Posted by whitebelt:

    Chad doesn't sub many guys, though anything is possible. I think it will be a TKO. But if Chad's mounted him dropping bombs, I could easily see Conor giving up his back and getting choked. I don't think Conor will have any clue what to do off the mat except try and get up, and he could definitely do it the wrong way and pay for it.
    exactly the way I saw it.  Not saying it's likely but its well within the realm of possibility
     
    Qncyk1
    Qncyk1
    Veteran
    Participation Meter
    Joined: Aug, 2011
    Posts: 1239
    Posted: Jul. 11, 2015 - 1:43 PM ET #18

    Quote Originally Posted by whitebelt:


    No point in handicapping anyone against Mike Swick unless you're trying to nail down the method for prop betting. There are more interesting fights to break down on this card. I picked Garcia to win by finish, which will probably involve him taking Swick down fairly easily and finishing with strikes on the mat.



    for all we know swick has spent the last two years banging 
    who--res in thailand

    the only play im hoping to do tonight in mma is live betting mendes at +300 or so sometime in the second round. im on herrera -150 tonight at three units and couldnt find anything better than this tonight

    good luck with your plays
    Reply
    Quote Originally Posted by whitebelt:


    No point in handicapping anyone against Mike Swick unless you're trying to nail down the method for prop betting. There are more interesting fights to break down on this card. I picked Garcia to win by finish, which will probably involve him taking Swick down fairly easily and finishing with strikes on the mat.



    for all we know swick has spent the last two years banging 
    who--res in thailand

    the only play im hoping to do tonight in mma is live betting mendes at +300 or so sometime in the second round. im on herrera -150 tonight at three units and couldnt find anything better than this tonight

    good luck with your plays
     
    Golazo
    Golazo
    Banned
    Participation Meter
    Joined: Feb, 2015
    Posts: 454
    Posted: Jul. 11, 2015 - 2:55 PM ET #19

    Good luck, thanks for the write up.
    Reply
    Good luck, thanks for the write up.
     
    nwcrazy
    nwcrazy
    Veteran
    Participation Meter
    Joined: Dec, 2008
    Posts: 1916
    Posted: Jul. 11, 2015 - 9:37 PM ET #20

    Nice stuff.

    The two fights I'm excited to watch are the co-main events.

    I'm laying off the Lawler/MacDonald fight but I'm picking MacGregor because he's got that crazy style. Will go small because I don't have a lot of confidence. The bet is just to make the fight interesting for me.

    Good luck
    Reply
    Nice stuff.

    The two fights I'm excited to watch are the co-main events.

    I'm laying off the Lawler/MacDonald fight but I'm picking MacGregor because he's got that crazy style. Will go small because I don't have a lot of confidence. The bet is just to make the fight interesting for me.

    Good luck
     
    nwcrazy
    nwcrazy
    Veteran
    Participation Meter
    Joined: Dec, 2008
    Posts: 1916
    Posted: Jul. 12, 2015 - 12:46 AM ET #21

    Like I said, he's got that crazy in him, much like Nick Diaz...except he has more talent.

    It was fun to watch.
    Reply
    Like I said, he's got that crazy in him, much like Nick Diaz...except he has more talent.

    It was fun to watch.
     
     
    whitebelt
    whitebelt
    Prospect
    Participation Meter
    Joined: May, 2015
    Posts: 472
    Posted: Jul. 12, 2015 - 1:14 PM ET #22

    Well after a rough start I won my way back to an even balance of $150 and still had Mendes to finish a 5-leg parlay that was $5 to win $200. But I wasn't happy with only standing to gain $200 on the night So of course I loaded the $150 on Mendes. That would have put me $450 in the win column in the night. And Mendes made a rookie mistake! So disappointed that Mendes let Conor back to his feet on a weak sub attempt. Chad won't see a title shot for at least 2 years now, regardless of who wins Aldo-McGregor.
    Reply
    Well after a rough start I won my way back to an even balance of $150 and still had Mendes to finish a 5-leg parlay that was $5 to win $200. But I wasn't happy with only standing to gain $200 on the night So of course I loaded the $150 on Mendes. That would have put me $450 in the win column in the night. And Mendes made a rookie mistake! So disappointed that Mendes let Conor back to his feet on a weak sub attempt. Chad won't see a title shot for at least 2 years now, regardless of who wins Aldo-McGregor.
    All Forums | Mixed Martial Arts

    Hot Forums IconHot Forum Topics

    • 🤢🥴💩_ Fubah's risky baseball bets _🥶😲🥵 455,270
    • Wednesday 09/30/2026 636
    • 🏈🏈🏈 Fubah2's risky CFB bets 265,443
    • The MLB Playoffs are here. 10,616
    • I'm embarrassed for Trump supporters 60,190
    • PHILLY/ATL live in game comments welcome 614
    • PART DEUX 115
    • Trump's legacy? 32,958
    • NCAA FOOTBALL. 151 29,115
    • Trump lies so much. 22,898

    Warning - External Link

    Report User

    Thank you for reporting
    This content is abusive or harmful
    This post is spam
    An error has occurred
    This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.

    Delete Post

    Are you sure you would like to remove this post?

    Remove Thread

    Are you sure you would like to remove this thread?

    Scan Results

    Login/Register

    Happy to have you join the conversation. To do so, please login or create an account.
    Accounts are free and easy to create.

    Search


    Loading…

    Loading…

    About Us
    Contact Us
    Careers
    Our Team
    Brand
    Testimonials
    Betting Guides
    Sportsbook Reviews
    Betting News
    Podcasts
    Responsible Gambling
    Betting Sites
    US Betting Sites
    Canada Betting Sites
    Canada Casinos
    Best Betting Apps
    Contests
    Streak Survivor
    King of Covers
    Ultimate Race
    Office Pools
    The Covers community has
    810,221
    lifetime members worldwide
    Join our community today
    Covers 30 Years Logo Established in 1995,
    Covers is the world
    leader in sports
    betting information.
    21+
    Gambling problem? Call 1-800-GAMBLER
    Help Privacy Terms of Service Cookies Sitemap Forum
    YouTube logo
    Facebook logo
    Twitter logo
    Instagram logo
    LinkedIn logo
    Google News logo
    Covers is verified safe by:
    Evalon Logo Logo GPWA Logo GDPR logo Logo GeoTrust logo Logo PCI DSS logo Logo
    Copyright © 1995 - 2026 Genius Sports. All Rights Reserved.
    If you choose to make use of any information on this website including online sports betting services from any websites that may be featured on this website, we strongly recommend that you carefully check your local laws before doing so.It is your sole responsibility to understand your local laws and observe them strictly.Covers does not provide any advice or guidance as to the legality of online sports betting or other online gambling activities within your jurisdiction and you are responsible for complying with laws that are applicable to you in your relevant locality.Covers disclaims all liability associated with your use of this website and use of any information contained on it.As a condition of using this website, you agree to hold the owner of this website harmless from any claims arising from your use of any services on any third party website that may be featured by Covers.