Posted:
#1
ceo steve wynn of wynn hotels might be on his way out due to sexual misconduct.
https://finance.yahoo.com/news/wynn-stock-drops-7-percent-171358031.html
wynn hotel ceo might go under
...
Views: 836
Posts: 13
Posted:
#4
stayed there many times; it's 2nd to none, you can just tell by walking into other casinos. Steve's blind as a bat, and health is declining. This news doesn't move my needle, would stay again w/o hesitation. His judgement from the almighty is pending death, and if he's a beliver, it's all forgiven.
Posted:
#5
Quote Originally Posted by MIZUNO22:
stayed there many times; it's 2nd to none, you can just tell by walking into other casinos. Steve's blind as a bat, and health is declining. This news doesn't move my needle, would stay again w/o hesitation. His judgement from the almighty is pending death, and if he's a beliver, it's all forgiven.
We should stop eating bananas.
Posted:
#8
Quote Originally Posted by faceoff:
Steve was about to build 2 new Casino's and a huge 40 acre park in the ''central strip''... He would have locked it up and cost the other scum owners tons of money....So what happens..?.. All these person come forward now...These women all sold themselves to Wynn and every customer with a 100 thousand or higher in credit limit... Most were just pigs, and made over a hundred thousand a year in the 70's and 80's and beyond.... They still do it....So before you go crucifying Wynn, take a good look at yourselves..HYPOCRITES..............................
Steve was about to build 2 new Casino's and a huge 40 acre park in the ''central strip''... He would have locked it up and cost the other scum owners tons of money....So what happens..?.. All these person come forward now...These women all sold themselves to Wynn and every customer with a 100 thousand or higher in credit limit... Most were just pigs, and made over a hundred thousand a year in the 70's and 80's and beyond.... They still do it....So before you go crucifying Wynn, take a good look at yourselves..HYPOCRITES..............................
Reading crap like this is for sure a massive generalization and does not rationalize Wynn and his sexist ego. All of what you say above is not the issue, his problems are not about allowing this to happen and getting PAID for allowing it. Think about it...high rollers who want to abuse women, women who want to take advantage of high rollers....who is making money off this transaction? WYNN is making money off this...it brings whales to his resorts, those whales spend tons of dough at his resort and Steve knows it and is ok with it.
Dont be stupid, he is dirty in this exchange as much or more than the women you try to smear.
Posted:
#9
Quote Originally Posted by faceoff:
QUOTE Originally Posted by wallstreetcappers: QUOTE Originally Posted by faceoff: Steve was about to build 2 new Casino's and a huge 40 acre park in the ''central strip''... He would have locked it up and cost the other scum owners tons of money....So what happens..?.. All these person come forward now...These women all sold themselves to Wynn and every customer with a 100 thousand or higher in credit limit... Most were just pigs, and made over a hundred thousand a year in the 70's and 80's and beyond.... They still do it....So before you go crucifying Wynn, take a good look at yourselves..HYPOCRITES.............................. Reading crap like this is for sure a massive generalization and does not rationalize Wynn and his sexist ego. All of what you say above is not the issue, his problems are not about allowing this to happen and getting PAID for allowing it. Think about it...high rollers who want to abuse women, women who want to take advantage of high rollers....who is making money off this transaction? WYNN is making money off this...it brings whales to his resorts, those whales spend tons of dough at his resort and Steve knows it and is ok with it. Dont be stupid, he is dirty in this exchange as much or more than the women you try to smear. I did think about it... What is wrong with making money..?.. Just because you don't have any does not mean those that have it 'honestly and working hard for it' are bad people.... Don't go criticizing me hyocrite... Steve Wynn had women who wanted him because he had money.... These women are ''bimbo's'' as so referred to..... Wynn created more jobs, tax revenue and workers security than anyone in the world... GROW UP.. Don't hate... Just go worship your hero's the Obama's and Clinton's and live in you closed world... YOU HAVE NO IDEA...
QUOTE Originally Posted by wallstreetcappers: QUOTE Originally Posted by faceoff: Steve was about to build 2 new Casino's and a huge 40 acre park in the ''central strip''... He would have locked it up and cost the other scum owners tons of money....So what happens..?.. All these person come forward now...These women all sold themselves to Wynn and every customer with a 100 thousand or higher in credit limit... Most were just pigs, and made over a hundred thousand a year in the 70's and 80's and beyond.... They still do it....So before you go crucifying Wynn, take a good look at yourselves..HYPOCRITES.............................. Reading crap like this is for sure a massive generalization and does not rationalize Wynn and his sexist ego. All of what you say above is not the issue, his problems are not about allowing this to happen and getting PAID for allowing it. Think about it...high rollers who want to abuse women, women who want to take advantage of high rollers....who is making money off this transaction? WYNN is making money off this...it brings whales to his resorts, those whales spend tons of dough at his resort and Steve knows it and is ok with it. Dont be stupid, he is dirty in this exchange as much or more than the women you try to smear. I did think about it... What is wrong with making money..?.. Just because you don't have any does not mean those that have it 'honestly and working hard for it' are bad people.... Don't go criticizing me hyocrite... Steve Wynn had women who wanted him because he had money.... These women are ''bimbo's'' as so referred to..... Wynn created more jobs, tax revenue and workers security than anyone in the world... GROW UP.. Don't hate... Just go worship your hero's the Obama's and Clinton's and live in you closed world... YOU HAVE NO IDEA...
Oh I see.....so if Wynn makes money from the deal since he is giving some of these dollars to the RNC then its all good right? No harm no foul right?
Stop being hypocritical in trying to portray women as the blame for Steve and his disgusting behavior and getting caught and being forced out. Steve is a big boy and he has control over his decisions.
Your analysis of leaving the abuser alone because he donates to the RNC and makes jobs is atrocious, it is disgusting and pathetic. No ammt of jobs or money makes it ok to look the other way when a male chauv is abusive to women, verbally as well as sexually. Taking money from whales so they can hook up with women is a decision he made and shows what a schmuck he is.
Posted:
#10
I’m not going to discount all of his other ventures outside the state of Nevada. There are people out there that don’t want to see his casinos open up in their backyard. Not that they don’t want casinos, they already have their local developments that they want to establish. Having a name like Wynn impedes their progress.
Posted:
#11
Quote Originally Posted by wallstreetcappers:
Oh I see.....so if Wynn makes money from the deal since he is giving some of these dollars to the RNC then its all good right? No harm no foul right?
Stop being hypocritical in trying to portray women as the blame for Steve and his disgusting behavior and getting caught and being forced out. Steve is a big boy and he has control over his decisions.
Your analysis of leaving the abuser alone because he donates to the RNC and makes jobs is atrocious, it is disgusting and pathetic. No ammt of jobs or money makes it ok to look the other way when a male chauv is abusive to women, verbally as well as sexually. Taking money from whales so they can hook up with women is a decision he made and shows what a schmuck he is.
I could be wrong but I don't think he is defending the supposed "abuser" because that person has donated to the RNC. That is a connection you are trying to make to fit your own narrative.
I believe he is simply pointing out and arguing the counterpoint to your later words that "Steve is a big boy and he has control over his decisions." Why aren't these women big girls that have control over their own decisions? So much for empowerment, accountability, and responsibility as equals I suppose, right?
The problem now inevitably is that women want to be "treated as equals" (whatever that means) when it's advantageous to them, but still want special/victim treatment when that part is advantageous to them. True equality can't have it both ways, and at some point the pendulum has to swing back to the side of common sense.
Posted:
#12
Quote Originally Posted by dcp1985:
QUOTE Originally Posted by wallstreetcappers: Oh I see.....so if Wynn makes money from the deal since he is giving some of these dollars to the RNC then its all good right? No harm no foul right? Stop being hypocritical in trying to portray women as the blame for Steve and his disgusting behavior and getting caught and being forced out. Steve is a big boy and he has control over his decisions. Your analysis of leaving the abuser alone because he donates to the RNC and makes jobs is atrocious, it is disgusting and pathetic. No ammt of jobs or money makes it ok to look the other way when a male chauv is abusive to women, verbally as well as sexually. Taking money from whales so they can hook up with women is a decision he made and shows what a schmuck he is. I could be wrong but I don't think he is defending the supposed "abuser" because that person has donated to the RNC. That is a connection you are trying to make to fit your own narrative.I believe he is simply pointing out and arguing the counterpoint to your later words that "Steve is a big boy and he has control over his decisions." Why aren't these women big girls that have control over their own decisions? So much for empowerment, accountability, and responsibility as equals I suppose, right?The problem now inevitably is that women want to be "treated as equals" (whatever that means) when it's advantageous to them, but still want special/victim treatment when that part is advantageous to them. True equality can't have it both ways, and at some point the pendulum has to swing back to the side of common sense.
QUOTE Originally Posted by wallstreetcappers: Oh I see.....so if Wynn makes money from the deal since he is giving some of these dollars to the RNC then its all good right? No harm no foul right? Stop being hypocritical in trying to portray women as the blame for Steve and his disgusting behavior and getting caught and being forced out. Steve is a big boy and he has control over his decisions. Your analysis of leaving the abuser alone because he donates to the RNC and makes jobs is atrocious, it is disgusting and pathetic. No ammt of jobs or money makes it ok to look the other way when a male chauv is abusive to women, verbally as well as sexually. Taking money from whales so they can hook up with women is a decision he made and shows what a schmuck he is. I could be wrong but I don't think he is defending the supposed "abuser" because that person has donated to the RNC. That is a connection you are trying to make to fit your own narrative.I believe he is simply pointing out and arguing the counterpoint to your later words that "Steve is a big boy and he has control over his decisions." Why aren't these women big girls that have control over their own decisions? So much for empowerment, accountability, and responsibility as equals I suppose, right?The problem now inevitably is that women want to be "treated as equals" (whatever that means) when it's advantageous to them, but still want special/victim treatment when that part is advantageous to them. True equality can't have it both ways, and at some point the pendulum has to swing back to the side of common sense.
Read the posts again, he went on a tangent and I addressed his tangent. The original issue isnt that Steve allowed women to hook up with whales and that Steve profited off doing so (which is true) the original issue is his treatment of women, specific women with specific details and instances...not this. Then the other guy went off about how this is all about the RNC and how liberals are so terrible (post 7 and 10). The issue that forced him out wasnt that he called those women bimbos, it was that he had decades of harrasment towards women. There are many articles about it online and it is not tough to find. faceoff got stuck in tangent land and missed the original issue(s).
Posted:
#13
Quote Originally Posted by faceoff:
QUOTE Originally Posted by wallstreetcappers: QUOTE Originally Posted by dcp1985: QUOTE Originally Posted by wallstreetcappers: Oh I see.....so if Wynn makes money from the deal since he is giving some of these dollars to the RNC then its all good right? No harm no foul right? Stop being hypocritical in trying to portray women as the blame for Steve and his disgusting behavior and getting caught and being forced out. Steve is a big boy and he has control over his decisions. Your analysis of leaving the abuser alone because he donates to the RNC and makes jobs is atrocious, it is disgusting and pathetic. No ammt of jobs or money makes it ok to look the other way when a male chauv is abusive to women, verbally as well as sexually. Taking money from whales so they can hook up with women is a decision he made and shows what a schmuck he is. I could be wrong but I don't think he is defending the supposed "abuser" because that person has donated to the RNC. That is a connection you are trying to make to fit your own narrative.I believe he is simply pointing out and arguing the counterpoint to your later words that "Steve is a big boy and he has control over his decisions." Why aren't these women big girls that have control over their own decisions? So much for empowerment, accountability, and responsibility as equals I suppose, right?The problem now inevitably is that women want to be "treated as equals" (whatever that means) when it's advantageous to them, but still want special/victim treatment when that part is advantageous to them. True equality can't have it both ways, and at some point the pendulum has to swing back to the side of common sense. Read the posts again, he went on a tangent and I addressed his tangent. The original issue isnt that Steve allowed women to hook up with whales and that Steve profited off doing so (which is true) the original issue is his treatment of women, specific women with specific details and instances...not this. Then the other guy went off about how this is all about the RNC and how liberals are so terrible (post 7 and 10). The issue that forced him out wasnt that he called those women bimbos, it was that he had decades of harrasment towards women. There are many articles about it online and it is not tough to find. faceoff got stuck in tangent land and missed the original issue(s). I did not go on any tangent what-so-ever... You are the one who is ranting... RNC was not even mentioned by me... That is your leftist rant... Wynn has been sabotaged as the Democrats are trying to do Trump and my great country... You are so stupid you are disgusting..
QUOTE Originally Posted by wallstreetcappers: QUOTE Originally Posted by dcp1985: QUOTE Originally Posted by wallstreetcappers: Oh I see.....so if Wynn makes money from the deal since he is giving some of these dollars to the RNC then its all good right? No harm no foul right? Stop being hypocritical in trying to portray women as the blame for Steve and his disgusting behavior and getting caught and being forced out. Steve is a big boy and he has control over his decisions. Your analysis of leaving the abuser alone because he donates to the RNC and makes jobs is atrocious, it is disgusting and pathetic. No ammt of jobs or money makes it ok to look the other way when a male chauv is abusive to women, verbally as well as sexually. Taking money from whales so they can hook up with women is a decision he made and shows what a schmuck he is. I could be wrong but I don't think he is defending the supposed "abuser" because that person has donated to the RNC. That is a connection you are trying to make to fit your own narrative.I believe he is simply pointing out and arguing the counterpoint to your later words that "Steve is a big boy and he has control over his decisions." Why aren't these women big girls that have control over their own decisions? So much for empowerment, accountability, and responsibility as equals I suppose, right?The problem now inevitably is that women want to be "treated as equals" (whatever that means) when it's advantageous to them, but still want special/victim treatment when that part is advantageous to them. True equality can't have it both ways, and at some point the pendulum has to swing back to the side of common sense. Read the posts again, he went on a tangent and I addressed his tangent. The original issue isnt that Steve allowed women to hook up with whales and that Steve profited off doing so (which is true) the original issue is his treatment of women, specific women with specific details and instances...not this. Then the other guy went off about how this is all about the RNC and how liberals are so terrible (post 7 and 10). The issue that forced him out wasnt that he called those women bimbos, it was that he had decades of harrasment towards women. There are many articles about it online and it is not tough to find. faceoff got stuck in tangent land and missed the original issue(s). I did not go on any tangent what-so-ever... You are the one who is ranting... RNC was not even mentioned by me... That is your leftist rant... Wynn has been sabotaged as the Democrats are trying to do Trump and my great country... You are so stupid you are disgusting..
Your posts are all tangents. Do you know why he got the heat? What it was exactly? It was not because he called those women bimbos, do you really even know what you are talking about? There are decades of incidents where Steve was sexually abusing women, not high rollers wanting his dough...every day average people he came in contact with...he abused them and got away with it. There is no excuse, none at all.
I think you need to do a bit more research and open your eyes.
Hot Forum Topics
