Seriously, it's reached the point of lunacy...

You are telling me not one cop of 4 couldn't come up behind, or at a minimum, ambush a man in a wheelchair and restrain him?

He can't stand!

It has to be a faceoff of 4 on one, all with drawn weapons.

Where is the rational for that? You are not going to be 'trained' to have a face off with a  man in a wheel chair so this doesn't come down to training per se. It comes down to spontaneous decision making. And when I say spontaneous, I do not mean 'seconds' as many try to make it out to be. This was more than seconds. How about the initial call of ('man in a wheelchair'). Come in with a different plan!!

In an attempt to handle the situation differently, how do you not come at this man from a different angle??? He can't get up from a chair! Surround him. Surprise him. Rush him. YES there is always a chance for injury or loss of life (however large or small) of a cop in EVERY potentially violent confrontation.

And there is also a 99.999% chance of a life if 4 armed cops face off against a man in a wheelchair, armed or not.

Why handle it that way?

  

So you are for the guy getting shot in the head by the U of Cincy police officer for having unmarked plates and then trying to pull away?

According to you, it's comply or GAME OVER.

Please come on back and tell us about that one and how the Game over applies there. Or will you walk back your statement in a mere two posts.

Some sick people in this world. No wonder these things have gotten brushed under the rug for decades and are only coming to light with video.