Deadspin posted this article today, which points out that most "experts" are actually heavily in the red. The link is below. Please tell us your thoughts. For example, are the experts as bad as this article makes them out to be?
Deadspin posted this article today, which points out that most "experts" are actually heavily in the red. The link is below. Please tell us your thoughts. For example, are the experts as bad as this article makes them out to be?
I dont know that the article "makes" anyone out to be anything (unless you think they are exaggerating numbers.) I think the short answer is yes, they are as bad as they appear to be; and no, it isn't the article it isnt the article making them that way. they are simply reporting on the fact that most "experts" out there are really experts, since by nature of being a real sharp part of that requires they hold onto their methods/picks are tightly as possible at times.
to me the article is more about a person that has found a way to win in the market, whether picks are good or the picks are bad in terms of his marketability and way to make his money in the sports betting.
I dont know that the article "makes" anyone out to be anything (unless you think they are exaggerating numbers.) I think the short answer is yes, they are as bad as they appear to be; and no, it isn't the article it isnt the article making them that way. they are simply reporting on the fact that most "experts" out there are really experts, since by nature of being a real sharp part of that requires they hold onto their methods/picks are tightly as possible at times.
to me the article is more about a person that has found a way to win in the market, whether picks are good or the picks are bad in terms of his marketability and way to make his money in the sports betting.
Well, the article points out that Pregame regularly causes their clients to lose large sums of money, despite their claims otherwise. My question is, do you think that all "experts/touts" are this bad? Are they all in the Pregame camp?
Well, the article points out that Pregame regularly causes their clients to lose large sums of money, despite their claims otherwise. My question is, do you think that all "experts/touts" are this bad? Are they all in the Pregame camp?
Well, the article points out that Pregame regularly causes their clients to lose large sums of money, despite their claims otherwise. My question is, do you think that all "experts/touts" are this bad? Are they all in the Pregame camp?
If you have to ask if "touts" are bad, then you should find a different hobby.
On the bright side, at least you didn't post in all caps.
Never Make A Winner A Loser. Never.
Quote Originally Posted by Sidehatch:
Well, the article points out that Pregame regularly causes their clients to lose large sums of money, despite their claims otherwise. My question is, do you think that all "experts/touts" are this bad? Are they all in the Pregame camp?
If you have to ask if "touts" are bad, then you should find a different hobby.
On the bright side, at least you didn't post in all caps.